TECHNICAL PAPERS
Apr 15, 2011

Development of an Improved Approach for Selecting Storm-Water Best Management Practices

Publication: Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 137, Issue 3

Abstract

This paper discusses the development of a software-aided approach to best management practice (BMP) selection. Supported with input from a geographic information system (GIS), this software provides an algorithmic, mathematically based alternative to the inherently subjective approaches currently used to choose BMPs for management of storm-water runoff. The BMP selection software was applied to a study site located in the town of Blacksburg, Virginia. The software was utilized to identify BMP alternatives for a distributed storm-water management approach on the site. When compared with a base model with no runoff management, the traditional, detention-based management approach yielded 13.0% greater runoff rate reduction than did the distributed model. By contrast, the distributed storm-water management approach greatly outperformed the detention-based approach in removing pollutants from surface runoff. Although both runoff management strategies removed a significant portion of suspended sediment from the demonstration site’s runoff, the distributed model achieved a nearly 40% greater removal efficiency. Similarly, although both runoff management approaches remove a significant portion of total phosphorus from the demonstration site’s runoff, the distributed model achieved a 38% greater removal efficiency.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The research project described in this paper was supported by the U.S. EPA Grant No. USEPA83340501-0. Readers who are interested in obtaining a copy of the BMP Selector software are encouraged to contact Kevin D. Young, P.E., at [email protected].

References

Artita, K. S., Kaini, P., and Nicklow, J. W. (2007). “Generating alternative watershed-scale BMP designs with evolutionary algorithms.” Proc., 2007 World Environmental and Water Resources Congress, ASCE, Reston, VA.
Carter, S., Zhen, X.-Y., Parker, A., and Cutter, C. (2008). “An innovative stormwater BMP decision support system for quantifying and optimizing load reductions and costs in Los Angeles.” Proc., 2008 World Environmental and Water Resources Congress, ASCE, Reston, VA.
Center for Watershed Protection. (2000). National pollutant removal performance database for stormwater treatment practices, 2nd Ed., CWP, Ellicott City, MD.
Hipp, J. A., Ogunseitan, O., Lejano, R., and Smith, C. S. (2006). “Optimization of stormwater filtration at the urban/watershed interface.” Environ. Sci. Technol., 40(15), 4794–4801.
Kaini, P., Artita, K. S., and Nicklow, J. W. (2007). “Designing BMPs at a watershed scale using SWAT and a genetic algorithm.” Proc., 2007 World Environmental and Water Resources Congress, ASCE, Reston, VA.
Lai, F., Shoemaker, L., and Cheng, M.-S. (2005). “Decision support framework for placement of BMPs in urban watersheds.” U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Science Forum, Washington, DC.
Massachusetts Stormwater Treatment Evaluation Program (MASTEP). (2006). “Stormwater Technologies Clearinghouse.” 〈http://www.mastep.net〉 (Aug. 2008).
Otero, J., Labadie, J., Haunert, D., and Daron, M. (1995). “Optimization of managed runoff to the St. Lucie estuary.” Proc., 1st Int. Conf. on Water Resources Engineering, ASCE, Reston, VA, 1506–1510.
Saaty, T. L. (1980). The analytic hierarchy process, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Schmoldt, D. L., Kangas, J., Mendoza, G., and Pesonen, M. (2001). The analytic hierarchy process in natural resource and environmental decision making, Kluwer, Dordrecht, Netherlands.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) and American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE). (2005). “International stormwater best management practices (BMP) database.” 〈http://www.bmpdatabase.org〉 (Aug. 2008).
Veith, T. L., Wolfe, M. L., and Heatwole, C. D. (2004). “Cost-effective BMP placement: Optimization versus targeting.” Trans. ASAE, 47(5), 1585–1594.
Yeh, C.-H., and Labadie, J. W. (1997). “Multi-objective watershed-level planning of stormwater detention systems.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 123(6), 336–343.
Young, K. D., Kibler, D. F., Benham, B. L., and Loganathan, G. V. (2009). “Application of the analytical hierarchical process for improved selection of stormwater BMPs.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 135(4), 264–275.
Zhen, X.-Y., Yu, S. L., and Jen-Yang, L. (2004). “Optimal location and sizing of stormwater basins at watershed scale.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 130(4), 339–348.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 137Issue 3May 2011
Pages: 268 - 275

History

Received: Sep 30, 2009
Accepted: Jun 25, 2010
Published online: Apr 15, 2011
Published in print: May 1, 2011

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Kevin D. Young [email protected]
Research Associate, Via Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Virginia Tech, 200 Patton Hall, Blacksburg, VA (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Randel L. Dymond, M.ASCE [email protected]
Associate Professor, Via Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Virginia Tech, 200 Patton Hall, Blacksburg, VA. E-mail: [email protected]
David F. Kibler, M.ASCE [email protected]
Professor Emeritus, Via Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Virginia Tech, 200 Patton Hall, Blacksburg, VA. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share