TECHNICAL PAPERS
Jun 25, 2010

Evaluating the Environmental Impacts of Water Distribution Systems by Using EIO-LCA-Based Multiobjective Optimization

Publication: Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 137, Issue 2

Abstract

Climate change has made environmental impact a factor of growing importance in decision making for municipalities. Increasingly, the environmental impacts of expanding and operating a water distribution system (WDS) are considered alongside the cost and hydraulic design. This paper presents a nondominated sorting genetic algorithm (NSGA-II) that minimizes capital costs, annual pumping energy use, and environmental impacts in WDS design that adheres to hydraulic constraints. A previously developed environmental impact (EI) index is included in the environmental objective function of the optimization program. The EI index normalizes and aggregates multiple environmental measures evaluated with an economic input-output life-cycle assessment (EIO-LCA) model. The EIO-LCA-based NSGA-II was applied to the Anytown network. Annual pumping energy use was found to dominate the EI index while capital cost and the EI index were inversely related, and the annual pumping energy use and the EI index followed a near linear relationship. The location and shape of the Pareto fronts were sensitive to demand and roughness coefficient (C-factor) adjustments with greater sensitivity observed for changes in demand than changes in the C-factor.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Association of Municipalities of Ontario (AMO). (2001). “Financing of municipal waterworks: Analysis and case studies.” Municipal Engineers Association; Ontario Good Roads Association, Ontario, Canada.
Bank of Canada. (2009). “Monthly and average of exchange rates.” 〈http://www.bankofcanada.ca〉 (Jul. 1, 2009).
Carnegie Mellon Univ. Green Design Institute (Carnegie). (2009). “Economic input-output life cycle assessment (EIO-LCA) model.” 〈http://www.eiolca.net/〉 (Jun. 25, 2009).
Cheung, P. B., Reis, L. F. R., Formiga, T. M., Chaudhry, F. H., and Ticona, W. G. C. (2003). “Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms applied to the rehabilitation of a water distribution system: A comparative study.” Lect. Notes Comput. Sci., 2632(67), 662–676.
Dandy, G., Roberts, A, Hewitson, C., and Chrystie, P. (2006). “Sustainability objectives for the optimization of water distribution networks.” Proc., 8th Annual Water Distribution Systems Analysis Symp., ASCE, Reston, VA.
Dandy, G. C., Bogdanowicz, A., Craven, A., Maywald, A., and Liu, P. (2008). “Optimizing the sustainability of water distribution systems.” Proc., 10th Annual Water Distribution Systems Analysis Conf. WDSA2008, ASCE, Reston, VA, 267–277.
Deb, K., Pratap, A., Agarwal, S., and Meyarivan, T. (2002). “A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II.” IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 6(2), 182–197.
Dennison, F. J., Azapagic, A., Clift, R., and Colbourne, J. S. (1999). “Life cycle assessment: Comparing strategic options for the mains infrastructure—Part I.” Water Sci. Technol., 39(10-11), 315–319.
Engineering News Report (ENR). (2009). “Construction cost index history.” 〈http://enr.construction.com/〉 (Jun. 7, 2009).
EPA. (2008). “National air quality: Status and trends through 2007.” Rep. No. EPA-454/R-08-006, Air Quality Assessment Div. of the Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Research Triangle Park, NC.
EPA. (2009). “USEPA Toxic release inventory reporting year 2007; Public data release: Summary of key findings.” 〈http://www.epa.gov/tri〉 (Jun. 12, 2009).
EPANET 2 [Computer software]. EPA. Cincinnati.
Esty, D. C., Levy, M., Srebotnjak, T., and de Sherbinin, A. (2005). 2005 Environmental sustainability index: Benchmarking national environmental stewardship, Yale Center for Environmental Law and Policy, New Haven, CT.
Farmani, R., Savic, D. A., and Walters, G. A. (2005a). “Evolutionary multi-objective optimization in water distribution network design.” Eng. Optim., 37(2), 167–183.
Farmani, R., Walters, G., and Savic, D. (2005b). “Trade-off between total cost and reliability for Anytown water distribution network.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 131(3), 161–171.
Filion, Y. R., MacLean, H. L., and Karney, B. W. (2004). “Life-cycle energy analysis of a water distribution system.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 10(3), 120–130.
Formiga, K. T. M., Chaudhry, F. H., Cheung, P. B., and Reis, L. F. R. (2003). “Optimal design of water distribution system by multiobjective evolutionary methods.” Lect. Notes Comput. Sci., 2632(66), 677–691.
Goedkoop, M., and Spriensma, R. (2001). The eco-indicator 99: A damage oriented method for life cycle impact assessment, PRé Consultants, Amersfoot, Netherlands.
Halhal, D., Walters, G. A., Ouazar, D., and Savic, D. A. (1997). “Water network rehabilitation with structured messy genetic algorithms.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 123(3), 137–146.
Herstein, L. M., Filion, Y. R., and Hall, K. R. (2008). “Water distribution system design and environmental impact: Balancing local interests with broader regional concerns.” Proc., 10th Annual Water Distribution Systems Analysis Conf. WDSA2008, ASCE, Reston, VA, 254–265.
Herstein, L. M., Filion, Y. R., and Hall, K. R. (2009). “Evaluating environmental impact in water distribution system design.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 15(3), 241–250.
Jeppsson, U., and Hellström, D. (2002). “Systems analysis for environmental assessment of urban water and wastewater systems.” Water Sci. Technol., 46(6-7), 121–129.
Kapelan, Z., Savic, D. A., Walters, G. A., and Babayan, A. V. (2006). “Risk- and robustness-based solutions to a multi-objective water distribution system rehabilitation problem under uncertainty.” Water Sci. Technol., 53(1), 61–75.
Lundie, S., Peters, G. M., and Beavis, P. C. (2004). “Life cycle assessment for sustainable metropolitan water systems planning.” Environ. Sci. Technol., 38(13), 3465–3473.
Lundie, S., Peters, G. M., and Beavis, P. C. (2005). “Quantitative systems analysis as a strategic planning approach for metropolitan water service providers.” Water Sci. Technol., 52(9), 11–20.
Nicolini, M. (2005). “A two-level evolutionary approach to multi-criterion optimization of water supply systems.” Lect. Notes Comput. Sci., 3410, 736–751.
Sanks, R. L. (2008). “Data flow in pipes, fitting, and valves.” Pumping station design, 3rd Ed., G. M. Jones, R. L. Sanks, G. Tchobanoglous, and B. E. Bosserman, eds., Elsevier, Boston.
Sastry, K. (2007). “Single and multiobjective genetic algorithm toolbox for Matlab in C++.” Rep. No. 2007017, Illinois Genetic Algorithm Laboratory, Urbana, IL.
Simpson, A. R. (2008). “Selecting a discount rate for evaluating water distribution projects—The sustainability controversy.” Proc., 10th Annual Water Distribution Systems Analysis Conf. WDSA2008, ASCE, Reston, VA, 117–128.
Srinivas, N., and Deb, K. (1994). “Multiobjective optimization using nondominated sorting in genetic algorithms.” Evol. Comput., 2(3), 221–248.
United States Bureau of Labor Statistics (USBLS). (2009). “Producer price index online database.” 〈http://www.bls.gov/data/〉 (Jun. 1, 2009).
United States Energy Information Administration (USEIA). (2009). “Annual energy outlook 2009 with projections to 2030.” Rep. No. DOE/EIA-0383(2009), USEIA, Washington, DC.
Walski, T. M. (1986). “Predicting costs of pipe cleaning and lining projects.” J. Transp. Eng., 112(3), 317–327.
Walski, T. M., et al. (1987). “Battle of the network models: Epilogue.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 113(2), 191–203.
Walski, T. M., Chase, D. V., and Savic, D. A. (2001). “Using models for water distribution design.” Water Distribution Modeling, 1st Ed., Haestad Methods, Waterbury, CT, 233–309.
Walters, G. A., Halhal, D., Savic, D., and Ouazar, D. (1999). “Improved design of ‘Anytown’ distribution network using structured messy genetic algorithms.” Urban Water, 1(1), 23–28.
Wu, W., Simpson, A. R., and Maier, H. R. (2008). “Water distribution system optimization accounting for a range of future possible carbon prices.” Proc., 10th Annual Water Distribution Systems Analysis Conf. WDSA2008, ASCE, Reston, VA, 278–289.
Wu, W., Simpson, A. R., and Maier, H. R. (2010). “Accounting for greenhouse gas emissions in multi-objective genetic algorithm optimization of water distribution systems.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 136(2), 146–155.
Wu, Z. Y., and Walski, T. (2005). “Self-adaptive penalty approach compared with other constraint-handling techniques for pipeline optimization.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 131(3), 181–192.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 137Issue 2March 2011
Pages: 162 - 172

History

Received: Jul 20, 2009
Accepted: May 5, 2010
Published online: Jun 25, 2010
Published in print: Mar 1, 2011

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

L. M. Herstein [email protected]
Graduate Student, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Toronto, Toronto, ON M56 1A4, Canada; formerly, Graduate Student, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Queen’s Univ., Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada. E-mail: [email protected]
Y. R. Filion [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Queen’s Univ., Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada. E-mail: [email protected]
Vice President of Research, Univ. of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share