Technical Papers
Mar 18, 2016

Assessing Freeway Breakdown and Recovery: A Stochastic Model

Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 142, Issue 7

Abstract

Conditions at a freeway bottleneck are predicted with a two-dimensional stochastic differential equation (SDE) model of flow and speed. Stochastic behavior is assumed to be standard Brownian motion. To fully describe conditions observed in the field, it is necessary to couple the SDE model with a stochastic capacity model, thus forming a stochastic capacity-differential equation (SCDE) model. The model contains mechanisms to (1) trigger a breakdown event when the traffic flow reaches or exceeds the freeway capacity, and (2) identify when recovery takes place. Measures of freeway performance are derived from SCDE model predictions. They include breakdown probability, expressed as a function of traffic flow and time-of-day, and recovery time, i.e., the length of time the freeway remains in a congested state before returning to a free-flow state. To achieve dependable model forecasts, it is necessary to impose constraints when fitting the stochastic capacity model. The constraint condition consists of matching the breakdown and prebreakdown flow distributions derived from field data and stochastic capacity model forecasts. Sensitivity analyses are performed to test validity of the model-fitting procedure and to test the dependability of the SCDE model forecasts. An empirical study of recurrent workday freeway congestion on I-93 in Salem, NH is used to demonstrate the approach. The approach demonstrates the need to treat breakdown as a random process.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Agresti, A. (1990). Categorical data analysis, 1st Ed., Wiley, New York.
Brilon, W., Geistefeldt, J., and Regler, M. (2005). “Reliability of freeway traffic flow: A stochastic concept of capacity.” Proc., 16th Int. Symp. on Transportation and Traffic Theory, College Park, MD, 125–144.
Brilon, W., Geistefeldt, J., and Zurlinden, H. (2007). “Implementing the concept of reliability for highway capacity analysis.” Transp. Res. Rec., 2027, 1–8.
Brouste, A., et al. (2014). “The yuima project: A computational framework for simulation and inference of stochastic differential equations.” J. Stat. Software, 57(4), 1–51.
Eisele, B., Schrank, D., and Lomax, T. (2011). “TTT’s 2011 congested corridors report, powered by INRIX traffic data.” 〈http://d2dtl5nnlpfr0r.cloudfront.net/tti.tamu.edu/documents/corridors-report-2011.pdf〉 (Nov. 2011).
GAO (Government Accountability Office). (2015). “Surface transpiration, DOT is progressing toward a performance-based approach. But states and grantees report potential implementation challenges.” 〈http://www.gao.gov/assets/670/667939.pdf〉 (Jan. 2015).
Geistefeldt, J. (2009). “Estimation of passenger car equivalents based on capacity variability.” Transp. Res. Rec., 2130, 1–6.
Geistefeldt, J. (2010). “Consistency of stochastic capacity estimations.” Transp. Res. Rec., 2173, 89–95.
Glickman, T. S., and Gough, M. (1991). “Readings in risk.” Environ. Int., 17(4), 391.
Haldar, A., and Mahadevan, S. (2000). Probability, reliability and statistical methods in engineering design, Wiley, New York.
Hosmer, D., and Lemeshow, S. (1989). Applied logistic regression, Wiley, New York.
Iacus, S. (2008). Simulation and inference for stochastic differential equations: With R examples, Springer, Berlin.
Ishak, S., Mamidala, C., and Qi, Y. (2010). “Stochastic characteristics of freeway traffic speed during breakdown and recovery periods.” Transp. Res. Rec., 2178, 79–89.
Kittelson, W. K., and Roess, R. P. (2001). “Highway capacity analysis after Highway Capacity Manual 2000.” Transp. Res. Rec., 1776, 10–16.
Kuhne, R., Mahnke, R., Lubashevsky, I., and Kaupuzs, J. (2002). “Probabilistic description of traffic breakdowns.” Phys. Rev. E (Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics), 65(6), 066125.
Lorenz, M. R., and Elefteriadou, L. (2001). “Defining freeway capacity as function of breakdown probability.” Transp. Res. Rec., 1776, 43–51.
Mahnke, R., Kaupuzs, J., and Lubashevsky, I. (2005). “Probabilistic description of traffic flow.” Phys. Rep., 408(1–2), 1–130.
Qiu, T. Z., Lu, X.-Y., Chow, A. H., and Shladover, S. E. (2010). “Estimation of freeway traffic density with loop detector and probe vehicle data.” Transp. Res. Rec., 2178, 21–29.
R Core Team. (2014). “R: A language and environment for statistical computing.” R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
Tebaldi, C., West, M., and Karr, A. F. (2002). “Statistical analyses of freeway traffic flows.” J. Forecasting, 21(1), 39–68.
TRB (Transportation Research Board). (2000). Highway capacity manual, Washington, DC.
U.S. DOT. (2012). “Moving ahead for progress in the 21st century act (P.L. 112-141) (MAP-21).” 〈http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/map21/〉.
Yeon, J., Hernandez, S., and Elefteriadou, L. (2009). “Differences in freeway capacity by day of the week, time of day, and segment type.” J. Transp. Eng., 416–426.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Transportation Engineering
Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 142Issue 7July 2016

History

Received: May 21, 2015
Accepted: Jan 7, 2016
Published online: Mar 18, 2016
Published in print: Jul 1, 2016
Discussion open until: Aug 18, 2016

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Paul J. Ossenbruggen [email protected]
Professor Emeritus, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of New Hampshire, Durham, NH 03824. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share