Technical Papers
Oct 17, 2014

Trade-Off Analysis Approach for Multiobjective Transportation Investment Decision Making

Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 141, Issue 3

Abstract

Transportation planning is multidimensional, complex, and dynamic in nature. The decision-making process often involves multiple stakeholders with conflicting preferences. Effective decision outcomes can only be reached by explicitly addressing such conflicts. Over the last several decades, optimization techniques have been used for project-selection decisions to achieve maximized overall returns on investments. The existing methods for project selection capable of conducting trade-off analyses mainly focus on assessing trade-offs between project construction time, duration, and cost, as well as swapping between transportation agency costs and user costs. However, they have largely not addressed impacts on the overall economic returns by changing a few important decision factors such as differentiating relative importance of various transportation performance goals and measures, and different types of highway facilities, and further relaxing the budget constraints by management programs dealing with physical facilities and system operations while keeping the total budget unchanged. This paper introduces a trade-off analysis approach that uses a multicommodity minimum-cost network (MMCN) model to establish traffic details for the transportation network needed for estimating the benefits of implementing a single project or multiple projects jointly, and a surrogate worth trade-off (SWT) method for multiobjective project selection based on the estimated project benefits. A computational study has revealed that the proposed trade-off approach can generate noninferior solutions and increase the total benefits by 18–20%.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the ITA, CMAP, and Chicago DOT for data support of this research. The researchers are grateful to Argonne National Laboratory for providing supercomputing facilities to conduct the computational analysis.

References

Abbasnia, R., Afshar, A., and Eshtehardian, E. (2008). “Time-cost trade-off problem in construction project management, based on fuzzy logic.” J. Appl. Sci., 8(22), 4159–4165.
Ahuja, R. K., Magnanti, T. L., and Orlin, L. B. (1993). Network flows: Theory, algorithms, and applications, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
Bai, Q., Labi, S., and Sinha, K. C. (2011). “Trade-off analysis for multiobjective optimization in transportation asset management by generating pareto frontiers using extreme points nondominated sorting genetic algorithm II.” J. Transp. Eng., 798–808.
Cambridge Systematics. (2004). Development of a multimodal tradeoffs methodology for use in statewide transportation planning, Oakland, CA.
Cohon, J. L., and Mark, D. H. (1975). “A review and evaluation of multiobjective programming techniques.” Water Resour. Res., 11(2), 208–220.
El-kholy, A. M. (2013). “Time-cost tradeoff analysis considering funding variability and time uncertainty.” Alexandria Eng. J., 52(1), 113–121.
Feng, C. W., Liu, L., and Burns, S. A. (2000). “Stochastic construction time-cost trade-off analysis.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng., 117–126.
Haimes, Y. Y. (1998). Risk modeling, assessment, and management, Wiley, New York.
Haimes, Y. Y., and Hall, W. A. (1974). “Multiobjective in water resource systems analysis: The surrogate worth tradeoff method.” Water Resour. Res., 10(4), 615–624.
Houmb, S. H., Georg, G., France, R., Bieman, J., and Jurjens, J. (2005). “Cost-benefit trade-off analysis using BBN for aspect-oriented risk-driven development.” Proc., 10th IEEE Int. Conf. Engineering of Complex Computer Systems, 195–204.
Korte, B., and Vygen, J. (2002). Combinatorial optimization: Theory and algorithms, Springer, New York.
Lee, E. B., Kim, C., Ghafari, N., and Brink, G. (2011a). “Value analysis using performance attributes matrix for highway rehabilitation projects.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 34–43.
Lee, E. B., Kim, C., and Harvey, J. T. (2011b). “Selection of pavement for highway rehabilitation based on life-cycle cost analysis.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 23–32.
Li, Z. (2009). “Stochastic model and O(N2) algorithm for highway investment decision-making under budget uncertainty.” J. Transp. Eng., 371–379.
Li, Z., Kaul, H., Kapoor, S., Veliou, E., and Zhou, B. (2012a). “A new model for transportation investment decisions considering project interdependencies.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 36–46.
Li, Z., and Madanu, S. (2009). “Highway project-level life-cycle benefit/cost analysis under certainty, risk, and uncertainty: A methodology with case study.” ASCE J. Transp. Eng., 516–526.
Li, Z., Madanu, S., Wang, Y., Abbas, M., and Zhou, B. (2010). “A heuristic approach for selecting highway investment alternatives.” Wiley J. Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastruct. Eng., 25(6), 427–439.
Li, Z., Roshandeh, A. M., Zhou, B., and Lee, S. H. (2013). “Optimal decision-making of interdependent tollway capital investments incorporating risk and uncertainty.” J. Transp. Eng., 686–696.
Li, Z., Zavattero, D., Wies, K., Son, Y.-J., and Levinson, H. S. (2012b). “Development and application of the TRANSIMS toolbox for transportation operations management in and around Chicago central area.” Phase I Final Rep., Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Dept. of Transportation, Washington, DC.
Moussourakis, J., and Haksever, C. (2004). “Flexible model for time/cost tradeoff problem.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 307–314.
Nemhauser, G. L., and Wolsey, L. A. (1999). Integer and combinatorial optimization, Wiley, New York.
Orabi, W., and El-Rayes, K. (2011). “Optimizing the rehabilitation efforts of aging transportation networks.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 529–539.
Senouci, A. B., and Eldin, N. N. (2004). “Use of genetic algorithm in resource scheduling of construction projects.” ASCE J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 869–877.
Vahidi, R. (2013). “Do tradeoff models have what it takes to make a real tradeoff?” Procedia Social Behav. Sci., 74, 71–80.
Yang, I.-T. (2005). “Chance-constrained time-cost tradeoff analysis considering funding variability.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 1002–1012.
Zheng, D. X. M., Ng, T. S. T., and Kumaraswamy, M. M. (2004). “Applying a genetic algorithm-based multiobjective approach for time-cost optimization.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 168–176.
Zhou, B., Li, Z., Patel, H., Roshandeh, A. M., and Wang, Y. (2014). “Risk-based two-step optimization model for highway transportation investment decision-making.” J. Transp. Eng., 04014007.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Transportation Engineering
Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 141Issue 3March 2015

History

Received: Aug 5, 2013
Accepted: Sep 10, 2014
Published online: Oct 17, 2014
Published in print: Mar 1, 2015
Discussion open until: Mar 17, 2015

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Arash M. Roshandeh
Postdoctoral Researcher, School of Civil Engineering, Purdue Univ., West Lafayette, IN 47907.
Zongzhi Li, M.ASCE [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil, Architectural and Environmental Engineering, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, IL 60616 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Mohammad Neishapouri
Graduate Research Assistant, Dept. of Civil, Architectural and Environmental Engineering, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, IL 60616.
Harshingar Patel
Graduate Research Assistant, Dept. of Civil, Architectural and Environmental Engineering, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, IL 60616.
Yi Liu
Graduate Research Assistant, Dept. of Civil, Architectural and Environmental Engineering, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, IL 60616.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share