Technical Papers
Jul 11, 2014

Statistical Analysis of the Number of Household Vehicles Used for Hurricane Ivan Evacuation

Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 140, Issue 12

Abstract

The objectives of this paper are to identify the contributing factors to households’ choice of the number of vehicles used for evacuation and to develop predictive models of this choice that explicitly consider the constraint imposed by the number of vehicles owned by the household. This constraint is not accommodated by regular ordered response logit models. Data comes from a poststorm survey for Hurricane Ivan. Two models that are variants of the regular Poisson regression model are developed: a Poisson model with exposure and right-censored Poisson regression. The right-censored Poisson model is preferred due to its inherent capabilities, better fit to the data, and superior predictive power. The model and individual variable analyses indicate that households traveling longer distances or evacuating later are more likely to use fewer vehicles. Households with prior hurricane experience and pet owners are more likely to use a greater number of vehicles. Income and distance from the coast are insignificant in the multivariable models, although the individual effect of distance from the coast has a statistically significant bivariate relationship with vehicle usage choice based on the Pearson correlation measure. A method for using the right-censored Poisson model to produce the desired share of vehicle usage is also discussed for generating individual predictions for hurricane evacuation demand simulation.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by National Science Foundation Award SES-0826873 for which the authors are grateful. The Hurricane Ivan survey was supported by the USACE (http://chps.sam.usace.army.mil/USHESdata/Assessments/2004Storms/Ivan/Ivan_Frame.htm [go to Behavioral Data]) and directed by Betty Morrow and Hugh Gladwin. The authors also thank Dr. William Greene and Dr. Kris Wernstedt for their advice on the Poisson regression models. However, the authors are solely responsible for the findings in this document.

References

Baker, E. J. (1991). “Hurricane evacuation behavior.” Int. J. Mass Emergencies Disasters, 9(2), 287–310.
Baker, E. J. (2000). “Hurricane evacuation in the United States.” Storms, R. Pielke, ed., Vol. 1, Routledge, New York, 306–319.
Bhat, C., and Pulugurta, V. (1998). “A comparison of two alternative behavioral choice mechanisms for household auto ownership decisions.” Transp. Res. Part B: Methodol., 32(1), 61–75.
Bhat, C., Srinivasan, S., and Guo, J. (2002). Activity-based travel demand modeling for metropolitan areas in Texas: Data sources, sample formation, and estimation results, Univ. of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX.
Carnegie, J., and Deka, D. (2010). “Using hypothetical disaster scenarios to predict evacuation behavioral response.” The 89th Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
Cova, T., and Johnson, J. (2002). “Microsimulation of neighborhood evacuations in the urban-wildland interface.” Environ. Plann. A, 34(12), 2211–2229.
Dash, N., and Morrow, B. (2000). “Return delays and evacuation order compliance: The case of Hurricane Georges and the Florida Keys.” Global Environ. Change Part B: Environ. Hazard., 2(3), 119–128.
Dow, K., and Cutter, S. (2002). “Emerging hurricane evacuation issues: Hurricane Floyd and South Carolina.” Nat. Hazard. Rev., 12–18.
Gladwin, C., Gladwin, H., and Peacock, W. (2001). “Modeling hurricane evacuation decisions with ethnographic methods.” Int. J. Mass Emergencies Disasters, 19(2), 117–143.
Greene, W. (2012). Econometric Analysis, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
Hasan, S., Mesa-Arango, R., and Ukkusuri, S. (2013). “A random parameter hazard based model to understand the temporal dynamics of household evacuation timing behavior.” Transp. Res. Part C, 27, 108–116.
Heath, S. E., Beck, A. M., Kass, P. H., and Glickman, L. T. (2001a). “Risk factors for pet evacuation failure after a slow-onset disaster.” J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc., 218(12), 1905–1910.
Heath, S. E., Kass, P. H., Beck, A. M., and Glickman, L. T. (2001c). “Human and pet-related risk factors for household evacuation failure during a natural disaster.” Am. J. Epidemiol., 153(7), 659–665.
Heath, S. E., Voeks, S. K., and Glickman, L. T. (2001b). “Epidemiological features of pet evacuation failure in a rapid onset disaster.” J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc., 218(12), 1898–1904.
Hobeika, A., Kim, S., and Beckwith, R. (1994). “A decision support system for developing evacuation plans around nuclear power stations.” Interfaces, 24(5), 22–35.
Lindell, M. (2008). “EMBLEM2: An empirically based large scale evacuation time estimate model.” Transp. Res. Part A: Policy Pract., 42(1), 140–154.
Lindell, M., Kang, J., and Prater, C. (2011). “The logistics of household hurricane evacuation.” Nat. Hazard., 58(3), 1093–1109.
Lindell, M., Lu, J.-C., and Prater, C. (2005). “Household decision making and evacuation in response to Hurricane Lili.” Nat. Hazard. Rev., 171–179.
Lindell, M., and Prater, C. (2007). “Critical behavioral assumptions in evacuation time estimate analysis for private vehicles: Examples from hurricane research and planning.” J. Urban Plann. Dev., 18–29.
Lindell, M., Prater, C., and Wu, J. (2002). Hurricane evacuation time estimates for the Texas Gulf Coast, Texas A&M Univ., College Station, TX.
Long, S., and Freese, J. (2006). Regression models for categorical dependent variables using Stata, Stata Press, College Station, TX.
Murray-Tuite, P., and Wolshon, B. (2013). “Evacuation transportation modeling: An overview of research, development, and practice.” Transp. Res.: Part C, 27, 25–45.
Murray-Tuite, P., Yin, W., Ukkusuri, S., and Gladwin, H. (2012). “Changes in evacuation decisions between Hurricanes Ivan and Katrina.” 91st Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
Post, Buckley, Schuh, and Jernigan (PBSJ). (1999). Hurricane Georges assessment: Review of hurricane evacuation studies utilization and information dissemination, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Tallahassee, FL.
Prater, C., Wenger, D., and Grady, K. (2000). Hurricane Bret post-storm assessment: A review of the utilization of hurricane evacuation studies and information dissemination, Texas A&M Univ. Hazard Reduction and Recovery Center, College Station, TX.
Radwan, A., Hobeika, A., and Sivasailam, D. (1985). “Computer simulation model for rural network evaluation under natural disasters.” ITE J., 55(9), 25–30.
Ruch, C., and Schumann, G. (1997). Corpus Christi study area hurricane contingency planning guide, Texas A&M Univ., Hazard Reduction and Recovery Center, College Station, TX.
Ruch, C., and Schumann, G. (1998). Houston/Galveston study area hurricane contingency planning guide, Texas A&M Univ., Hazard Reduction and Recovery Center, College Station, TX.
Siebeneck, L., and Cova, T. (2008). “An assessment of the return-entry process for Hurricane Rita 2005.” Int. J. Mass Emergencies Disasters, 26, 91–111.
Sorensen, J. (2000). “Hazard warning systems: Review of 20 years of progress.” Nat. Hazard. Rev., 119–125.
Train, K. (2002). Discrete choice methods with simulation, Cambridge University Press, New York.
Urbina, E., and Wolshon, B. (2003). “National review of hurricane evacuation plans and policies: A comparison and contrast of state practices.” Transp. Res. Part A: Policy Pract., 37(3), 257–275.
Wu, H.-C., Lindell, M., and Prater, C. (2012). “Logistics of hurricane evacuation in Hurricanes Katrina and Rita.” Transp. Res. Part F: Traffic Psychol. Behav., 15(4), 445–461.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Transportation Engineering
Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 140Issue 12December 2014

History

Received: Dec 18, 2013
Accepted: May 2, 2014
Published online: Jul 11, 2014
Published in print: Dec 1, 2014
Discussion open until: Dec 11, 2014

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Weihao Yin, Ph.D. [email protected]
Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Virginia Tech, 7054 Haycock Rd., Falls Church, VA 22043. E-mail: [email protected]
Pamela Murray-Tuite, A.M.ASCE [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Virginia Tech, 7054 Haycock Rd., Falls Church, VA 22043 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Hugh Gladwin [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Sociology and Anthropology, Florida International Univ., 3000 NE 151st St., North Miami, FL 33181. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share