Calibrating Road Design Guides Using Risk-Based Reliability Analysis
Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 140, Issue 9
Abstract
Existing geometric design guides provide deterministic design criteria for highway elements that ignore the uncertainty associated with many design parameters. Reliability analysis has been advocated as an approach to account for this uncertainty and to evaluate the risk associated with a particular design feature. This paper discusses one important application of reliability analysis: the calibration of geometric design models to yield consistent safety (risk) levels. The paper provides calibrated design charts for the middle ordinate , defined as the lateral distance between edge of median barriers and centerline of the adjacent traffic lane, at different probability of noncompliance levels. The results show that the calibrated values of are generally lower than those derived from the AASHTO design guide. The calibrated design charts can offer designers dealing with highways with constricted right-of-way an option to use lower middle ordinate values and enable them to estimate the safety consequences of their decisions. Overall, the calibrated charts can aid the decision maker in determining the safety implications of deviating from geometric design standards and quantifying the safety level built in design values that are deemed acceptable.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
AASHTO. (2011). A policy on geometric design of highways and streets, 6th Ed., Washington, DC.
Easa, S. M. (2000). “Reliability approach to intersection sight distance design.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 42–52.
El Khoury, J., and Hobeika, A. (2007). “Incorporating uncertainty into the estimation of the passing sight distance requirements.” Comput. Aid. Civ. Infrastruct. Eng., 22(5), 347–357.
Faghri, A., and Demetsky, M. J. (1988). “Reliability and risk assessment in the prediction of hazards at rail-highway grade crossings.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 45–51.
Fambro, D., Fitzpatrick, K., and Koppa, R. (1997). “Determination of stopping sight distance.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
Fitzpatrick, K., and Wooldridge, M. (2001). “Recent geometric design research for improved safety and operation.” NCHRP Synthesis 299, Transportation Research Board, Washington DC.
Haukaas, T. (2011). Civil 518: Reliability and structure safety, Univ. of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC.
Ibrahim, S., and Sayed, T. (2011). “Developing safety performance functions incorporating reliability based risk measures.” Accid. Anal. Prev., 43(6), 2153–2159.
Ibrahim, S., Sayed, T., and Ismail, K. (2012). “Methodology for safety optimization of highway cross-sections for horizontal curves with restricted sight distance.” Accid. Anal. Prev., 49, 476–485.
Ismail, K., and Sayed, T. (2009). “Risk-based framework for accommodating uncertainty in highway geometric design.” Can. J. Civ. Eng., 36(5), 743–753.
Ismail, K., and Sayed, T. (2010). “Risk-based highway design: Case studies from British Columbia, Canada.”, Transportation Research Board, 3–13.
Ismail, K., and Sayed, T. (2012). “Risk-optimal highway design: Methodology and case studies.” Saf. Sci., 50(7), 1513–1521.
Lerner, N. (1995). “Age and driver perception-reaction time for sight distance design requirements.” ITE Compendium of Technical Papers, Institute of Transportation Engineers, Washington, DC, 624–628.
Mahsuli, M., and Haukaas, T. (2013). “Computer program for multimodel reliability and optimization analysis.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng., 27(1), 87–98.
Navin, F. P. D. (1990). “Safety factors for road design: Can they be estimated.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 181–189.
Navin, F. P. D. (1991). “Safe road design as limit state.” Proc. Conf. Strategic Highway Research Program and Traffic Safety on Two Continents, Swedish National Road and Transport Research Institute (VTI) Rapport 372A, Part 2.
Richl, L., and Sayed, T. (2005). “Effect of speed prediction models and perceived radius on design consistency.” Can. J. Civ. Eng., 32(2), 388–399.
Richl, L., and Sayed, T. (2006). “Evaluating the safety risk of narrow medians using reliability analysis.” J. Transp. Eng., 366–375.
Rt (2012). [Computer software]. University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada. 〈http://www.inrisk.ubc.ca/software/rt/〉 (June 1, 2012).
Sarhan, M., and Hassan, Y. (2008). “Three-dimensional, probabilistic highway design: Sight distance application.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 10–18.
Transportation Association of Canada (TAC). (1999). “Geometric design guide for Canadian roads.” Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Transportation Research Board. (1998). “Managing speed: Review of current practice for setting and enforcing speed limits.”, Washington, DC.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 140 • Issue 9 • September 2014
Copyright
© 2014 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Aug 12, 2013
Accepted: Mar 24, 2014
Published online: May 15, 2014
Published in print: Sep 1, 2014
Discussion open until: Oct 15, 2014
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.