Technical Papers
May 15, 2013

Availability Approach to Optimizing Railway Track Renewal Operations

Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 139, Issue 9

Abstract

This paper proposes a multiobjective optimization approach for planning railway ballast, rail, and sleeper renewal operations. The objective is to support an informed decision that considers not only the railway track life-cycle cost (LCC) but also the track occupation times required to perform interventions. Two objective functions were minimized, as follows: (1) railway track unavailability caused by railway track maintenance and renewal operations, and (2) railway track components’ LCC. Furthermore, to rationalize the renewal strategy, the model considers a multicomponent formulation that assesses, in time and space, the opportunistic combination of railway track renewal activities. A numerical application of the model on a real case study (Lisbon-Oporto line) is developed and discussed. The results show the interest of using this simple multiobjective optimization approach to obtain a decision-making process to support the scheduling of major railway track renewal works with an informed LCC-unavailability trade-off.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The writers thank the Portuguese Railway Infrastructure Manager, REFER, E.P.E., for its support and cooperation. The support of the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT), FCT project reference PTDC/SENTRA/112975/2009 and FCT Ph.D. grant reference SFRH/BD/51327/2010 are also gratefully acknowledged. The writers also thank the reviewers for their comments, which enabled the presentation of this paper to be improved.

References

Andrade, A., and Teixeira, P. (2011a). “Biobjective optimization model for maintenance and renewal decisions related to rail track geometry.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 163–170.
Andrade, A., and Teixeira, P. (2011b). “Uncertainty in rail-track geometry degradation: Lisbon-Oporto line case study.” J. Transp. Eng., 137(3), 193–200.
Andrade, A., and Teixeira, P. (2013). “Unplanned maintenance needs related to rail track geometry.” Proc. of the ICE – Transport, 166, 1–11.
Automated, and Cost-Effective Railway Infrastructure Maintenance (ACEM-Rail). (2011). D1.1 report on the state of practice of railway infrastructure maintenance, Málaga, Spain.
Bai, Q., Labi, S., and Sinha, K. (2012). “Trade-off analysis for multiobjective optimization in transportation asset management by generating Pareto frontiers using extreme points nondominated sorting genetic algorithm II.” J. Transp. Eng., 138(6), 798–808.
Budai, G., Huisman, D., and Dekker, R. (2005). “Scheduling preventive railway maintenance activities.” J. Oper. Res. Soc., 57(9), 1035–1044.
Coello, C. A. C., Lamont, G., and Van Veldhuizen, D. (2007). Evolutionary algorithms for solving multi-objective problems, Springer, New York and London.
Deb, K. (1999). “Multi-objective genetic algorithms: Problem difficulties and construction of test problems.” Evol. Comput., 7(3), 205–230.
Deb, K. (2001). Multi-objective optimization using evolutionary algorithms, Wiley, New York.
Deb, K., Pratap, D., Agarwal, S., and Meyarivan, T. (2002). “A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II.” IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput., 6(2), 182–197.
Esveld, C. (2001). Modern railway track, MRT Productions, Zaltbommel, Netherlands.
Gorman, M., and Kanet, J. (2010). “Formulation and solution approaches to the rail maintenance production gang scheduling problem.” J. Transp. Eng., 136(8), 701–708.
Haque, S., Kabir, A., and Sarker, R. (2003). “Optimization model for opportunistic replacement policy using GA with fuzzy logic controller.” Proc., IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, Canberra, Australia, 2837–2843.
Kalos, M., and Whitlock, P. (2008). Monte Carlo methods, Wiley, Weinheim, Germany.
Konak, A., Coit, D., and Smith, A. (2006). “Multi-objective optimization using genetic algorithms: A tutorial.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Safety, 91(9), 992–1007.
Laggoune, R., Chateauneuf, A., and Aissani, D. (2010). “Impact of few failure data on the opportunistic replacement policy for multi-component systems.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Safety, 95(2), 108–119.
Lyngby, N., Hokstad, P., and Vatn, J. (2008). “RAMS management of railway tracks.” Handbook of performability engineering, K. B. Misra, ed., Springer, London, 1123–1145.
MATLAB version R2010a [Computer software]. MathWorks, Natick, MA.
Meneses, S., and Ferreira, A. (2013). “Pavement maintenance programming considering two objectives: Maintenance costs and user costs.” Int. J. Pavement Eng., 14(2), 206–221.
Nilsson, R., and Olofsson, U. (2002). “Surface cracks and wear of rail: A full-scale test on a commuter train track.” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part F, J. Rail Rapid Transit, 216(4), 249–264.
Podofillini, L., Zio, E., and Zille, V. (2006). “Risk-informed optimisation of railway tracks inspection and maintenance procedures.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Safety, 91(1), 20–35.
Rede Ferroviária Nacional (REFER). (2009). “Tolerâncias dos parâmetros geométricos da via.”, Lisbon, Portugal (in Portuguese).
Shyr, F., and Ben-Akiva, M. (1996). “Modeling rail fatigue behavior with multiple hazards.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 2(2), 73–82.
Stirling, A., Roberts, C., Chan, A., and Zhao, J. (2006). “Assessing the economic life of rail using a stochastic analysis of failures.” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part F, J. Rail Rapid Transit, 220(2), 103–111.
Wu, Z., Flintsch, G., Ferreira, A., and Picado-Santos, L. (2012). “Framework for multiobjective optimization of physical highway assets investments.” J. Transp. Eng., 138(12), 1411–1421.
Yun, W., and Ferreira, L. (2003). “Prediction of the demand of the railway sleepers: A simulation model for replacement strategies.” Int. J. Prod. Econ., 81–82(1), 589–595.
Zhang, T., Andrews, J., and Wang, R. (2013). “Optimal scheduling of track maintenance on a railway network.” Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int., 29(2), 285–297.
Zhao, J., Chan, A., and Burrow, M. (2007). “Reliability analysis and maintenance decision for railway sleepers using track condition information.” J. Oper. Res. Soc., 58(8), 1047–1055.
Zhao, J., Chan, A., Stirling, A., and Madelin, K. (2006). “Optimizing policies of railway ballast maintenance and renewal.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 50–56.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Transportation Engineering
Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 139Issue 9September 2013
Pages: 941 - 948

History

Received: Feb 19, 2013
Accepted: May 13, 2013
Published online: May 15, 2013
Published in print: Sep 1, 2013
Discussion open until: Oct 15, 2013

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Luis Filipe Caetano [email protected]
Ph.D. Student, CESUR, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Instituto Superior Técnico (IST), Technical Univ. of Lisbon, Ave. Rovisco Pais, 1049-001 Lisbon, Portugal (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Paulo Fonseca Teixeira [email protected]
Assistant Professor, CESUR, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Instituto Superior Técnico (IST), Technical Univ. of Lisbon, Ave. Rovisco Pais, 1049-001 Lisbon, Portugal. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share