Technical Papers
Dec 14, 2012

Effect of Road Narrowing on Junction Capacity Using Microsimulation

Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 139, Issue 6

Abstract

Traffic-calming measures have been widely used in urban areas, aiming sometimes to reduce vehicle flow rates but primarily to reduce speed and, hence, the number and severity of traffic accidents. The one-way priority working road narrowing (throttle) is a widely used traffic-calming technique. However, installation of such a measure close to a junction can severely affect the operation and level of service, especially for the major road movements. There is a lack of research, guidance, and design standards to inform the effective deployment of such a measure. This paper starts by providing a summary of the terms and standards used in practice for traffic-calming measures, primarily focusing on the use of throttles. The paper aims to investigate the relationship between throttle spacing (X) from a priority junction and the “major-to-major movement” driver’s delay for different flow levels using the S-Paramics microsimulation model. The model was calibrated and validated with field data collected from a selected site within Greater Manchester for two separate days by using camcorders. Cooperative behavior between drivers (i.e., those with priority who gave way to others) was noticed and analyzed accordingly. Different scenarios were used to test the effects on delays and queues for various parameters including throttle spacing (X), major-arms flow level, and reversing the direction of priority. The findings show that there is a direct relationship between throttle spacing (X) and the level of delay for traffic on the major arms of the junction. It is also shown that for a minor arm with two-way flow level of up to 500 vehicles per hour (veh/h), the throttle spacing should be at least 30 m. Once the flow level reaches 700veh/h, the spacing should be at least 50 m, whereas for flow levels of 800veh/h, the spacing should be at least 100 meters. Alternatively, consideration should be given to reversing the priority given to traffic by using MJTP (major-arm traffic has priority) operation rather than MNTP (minor-arm traffic has priority) when less throttle spacing (X) is required, to minimize delays to traffic on the major arms.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Aberdeenshire Council. (2011). “Traffic calming.” 〈http://www.aberdeenshire.gov.uk/roads/traffic/calming.asp〉 (Nov. 16, 2012).
Al-Obaedi, J., and Yousif, S. (2012). “Microsimulation model for motorway merges with ramp-metering controls.” IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst., 13(1), 296–306.
Barbosa, H. M., Tight, M. R., and May, A. D. (2000). “A model of speed profiles for traffic calmed roads.” Transp. Res. Part A: Policy Pract., 34(2), 103–123.
Barceló, J., and Casas, J. (2005). “Dynamic network simulation with AIMSUN.” Simulation approaches in transportation analysis, R. Kitamura and M. Kuwahara, eds., Vol. 31, 1–24.
Buchanan, C. (1963). “Traffic in Towns—A study of the long term problem of traffic in urban areas.” Rep. of the Steering Group and Working Group appointed by the Minister of Transport, HMSO, London.
County Surveyors Society, and Dept. for Transport. (1994). Traffic calming in practice, Landor, London.
Dept. for Transport. (1994). “Horizontal deflections.”, London.
Dept. for Transport. (1996). “Part 1: Traffic appraisal in urban areas.” Section 2, Design manual for roads and bridges, Vol. 12, HMSO, London 〈www.dft.gov.uk/ha/standards/dmrb〉 (Jan. 12, 2012).
Dept. for Transport. (1997). “Traffic calming on major roads: A49, Craven arms, Shropshire.”, London.
Dept. for Transport. (1999). “Historic core zone: Bury St. Edmunds.”, London.
Dept. for Transport. (2000). “Traffic calming in villages on major roads.”, London.
Dept. for Transport. (2001). “Home zones—Planning and design.”, London.
Dept. for Transport. (2004). “Rural traffic calming: Bird Lane, Essex.”, London.
Dept. for Transport. (2006). A road safety good practice guide for highway authorities, Dept. for Transport, Local Government and the Regions, London.
Dept. for Transport. (2007). “Traffic calming.”, TSO, London.
Ewing, R., McClintock, E., and Hall, R. A. (1997). U.S. experience with traffic calming, Institute of Transportation Engineers, Washington, DC.
Ewing, R. H. (1999). Traffic calming: State of the practice, Institute of Transportation Engineers, Washington, DC.
Ewing, R. H., and Brown, S. J. (2009). U.S. traffic calming manual, American Planning Association and ASCE, Chicago and Reston, VA.
Garcia, A., Torres, A. J., Romero, M. A., and Moreno, A. T. (2011). “Traffic microsimulation study to evaluate the effect of type and spacing of traffic calming devices on capacity.” Procedia—Soc. Behav. Sci., 16(1), 270–281.
Goodwin, P. (1999). “Transformation of transport policy in Great Britain.” Transp. Res. Part A: Policy Pract., 33(7–8), 655–669.
Hass-Klau, C., and Nold, I. (1994). Horizontal traffic calming measures: Alternatives to road humps? Environmental and Transport Planning, Brighton, England.
Hass-Klau, C., Nold, I., Boker, G., and Crampton, G. (1992). Civilised streets: A guide to traffic calming, Environmental and Transport Planning, Brighton, England.
Institute of Transportation Engineers. (2011). “Traffic calming—Selected reports.” 〈www.ite.org〉 (Oct. 26, 2011).
Kaysi, I. A., and Abbany, A. S. (2007). “Modeling aggressive driver behavior at unsignalized intersections.” Accid. Anal. Prev., 39(4), 671–678.
Kjemtrup, K., and Herrstedt, L. (1992). “Speed management and traffic calming in urban areas in Europe—A historical view.” Accid. Anal. Prev., 24(1), 57–65.
Lajunen, T., Parker, D., and Summala, H. (1999). “Does traffic congestion increase driver aggression?” Transp. Res. Part F: Traffic Psychol. Behav., 2(4), 225–236.
Lines, C. J., and Castelijn, H. A. (1991). “Translation of Dutch 30 kph zone design manual.”, TRRL, Berkshire, UK.
Liu, R., and Wang, J. (2007). “A general framework for the calibration and validation of car-following models along an uninterrupted open highway.” Mathematics in Transport: Selected Proc. of the 4th IMA Int. Conf. on Mathematics in Transport, Elsevier, Oxford, UK, 111–123.
Pennsylvania Bureau of Highway Safety Traffic Engineering. (2001). Pennsylvania’s traffic calming handbook, Pennsylvania Dept. of Transportation, Harrisburg, PA.
Pharaoh, T. (1991). Traffic calming guidelines. Devon County Council, Engineering and Planning Dept., Exeter, England.
Pucher, J., Buehler, R., and Seinen, M. (2011). “Bicycling renaissance in North America? An update and re-appraisal of cycling trends and policies.” Transp. Res. Part A: Policy Pract., 45(6), 451–475.
Samoail, N. A., and Yousif, S. (1998). “A study into urban roadworks with shuttle-lane operation.” Proc., IMA 3rd Int. Conf. on Mathematics in Transport Planning and Control, Pergamon, Oxford, UK, 79–88.
Sayer, I. A., and Parry, D. I. (1994). “Speed control using chicanes: A trial at TRL.”. TRL, Berkshire, UK.
Sayer, I. A., Parry, D. I., and Barker, J. K. (1998). “Traffic calming: An assessment of selected on-road chicane schemes.”, TRL, Berkshire, UK.
Schermers, G., and Theyse, M. (1998). National guidelines for traffic calming, South Africa Dept. of Transport, Pretoria, South Africa.
S-Paramics 2010.1 [Computer software]. SIAS, Edinburgh, UK.
Summersgill, I. (1981). “The control of shuttle working on narrow bridges.”, TRRL, Berkshire, UK.
Surrey County Council. (1999). Traffic calming good practice guidance, 〈http://www.surreycc.gov.uk〉 (Dec. 12, 2011).
Transportation Association of Canada, and Canadian Institution of Transportation Engineers. (1998). Canadian guide to neighborhood traffic calming, Transportation Association of Canada, Ottawa, Canada.
Tripp, H. A. (1942). Town planning and road traffic, Edward Arnold, London.
Virginia Traffic Engineering Div. (1997). Residential traffic calming guide: Pilot program, January 1998–December 1999, Virginia Dept. of Transportation, Richmond, VA.
Wang, J. (2006). “A merging model for motorway.” Ph.D. thesis, Univ. of Leeds, Leeds, UK.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Transportation Engineering
Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 139Issue 6June 2013
Pages: 574 - 584

History

Received: Jul 31, 2012
Accepted: Dec 12, 2012
Published online: Dec 14, 2012
Published in print: Jun 1, 2013

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Saad Yousif [email protected]
Senior Lecturer in Transport Studies, Univ. of Salford, Manchester M5 4WT, UK (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Mohammed Alterawi
Ph.D. Student, Univ. of Salford, Manchester M5 4WT, UK.
Ralph R. Henson
Senior Lecturer in Transport Studies, Univ. of Salford, Manchester M5 4WT, UK.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share