Technical Papers
Sep 14, 2012

Full Closure or Partial Closure? Evaluation of Construction Plans for the I-5 Closure in Downtown Sacramento

Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 139, Issue 3

Abstract

Three alternative construction plans with full highway closures and limited capacity closures (partial closures) are evaluated for a large-scale freeway reconstruction project in the Sacramento metropolitan area. By using a dynamic network analysis tool, the potential impact resulting from different construction plans is estimated and analyzed measured by changes in total demand, travel delays, vehicle miles/hours traveled (VMT/VHT), fuel consumptions, and emissions. The results show that, for this Interstate 5 closure, if only user delay costs are considered, the actual full closure plan is the best. It produces considerably less total system travel delay than the two partial closure plans although it closed more lanes. This plan, however, may induce more VMT than the other two. In fact, the other two partial closure plans produce slightly fewer emissions and consume slightly less fuel. The outcome of which plan comes out on top crucially depends on two other factors, besides the chosen objective: the amount of demand reduction a plan induces and the availability of alternative routes to divert traffic away from the work zone area. Developing efficient demand management measures will be the key to improving the network performance and to reduce the emissions. Moreover, when data are available, construction costs and emissions produced by construction activities should also be included in the evaluations, in addition to the user costs considered in this study.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This research is funded by the Division of Research and Innovation (DRI) of Caltrans. We wish to thank Hassan Aboukhadijeh from the Division of Research and Innovation (DRI) of Caltrans for his project management support; Laurie Jurgens and Daniel Bui from Caltrans Division of Traffic Operations, and Joe Horton and John Holzhauser from Caltans District 3 for their assistance during various stages of this research. We assume full responsibility of the methods and results presented herein.

References

Beacher, A. G., Fontaine, M. D., and Garber, N. J. (2005). “Guidelines for using late merge traffic control in work zones: Results of a simulation-based study.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 42–50.
Brzezinski, D., Constance, H., and Phil, E. (2001). “Final facility-specific speed correction factors.”, US Environmental protection Agency, Washington, DC.
Chatterjee, I., Edara, P., Menneni, S., and Sun, C. (2009). “Replication of work zone capacity values in a simulation model.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 138–148.
Collura, J., Heaslip, K. P., Moriarty, K., Wu, F., Khanta, R., and Berthaume, A. (2010). “Simulation models for assessment of the impacts of strategies for highway work zones: Eight case studies along interstate highways and state routes in New England.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 62–69.
Daganzo, C. F. (1994). “The cell transmission model: A dynamic representation of highway traffic consistent with the hydrodynamic theory.” Transp. Res. Part B, 28, 269–287.
Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). (2003). “Full road closure for work zone operations: A cross-cutting study.”, Washington, DC.
Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). (2009). “Traffic analysis toolbox, volume IX: Work zone modeling and simulation—A guide for analysts.”, Washington, DC.
Fudala, N. J., and Fontaine, M. D. (2010). “Interaction between system design and operations of variable speed limit systems in work zones.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 1–10.
Gou, J., Zhang, L., Altman, J. C., and Davis, W. (2009). “Quickzone improvement for rural freeway and model validation.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 34–45.
Heaslip, K., Kondyli, A., Arguea, D., Elefteriadou, L., and Sullivan, F. (2009). “Estimation of freeway work zone capacity through simulation and field data.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 16–24.
Lighthill, M., and Whitham, G. (1955a). “On kinematic waves. II. A theory of traffic flow on long crowded roads.” Proc. R. Soc. London, 229(1178), 317–345.
Lighthill, M. J., and Whitham, G. B. (1955b). “On kinematic waves. I. Flood movement in long rivers.” Proc. R. Soc. A, 229(1178), 281–316.
Qian, S., and Zhang, M. (2012). “A hybrid route choice model for dynamic traffic assignment.” Network Spatial Econ..
Richards, P. (1956). “Shock waves on the highway.” Oper. Res., 4(1), 42–51.
Schroeder, B. J., and Rouphail, N. M. (2010). “Estimating operational impacts of freeway work zones on extended facilities.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 70–80.
Schwarzenegger, A. (2008). “Governor’s executive order s-04-08.” 〈http://gov.ca.gov/executive-order/9629〉 (May 23, 2008).
Stacy, C. D., Susan, W. D., and Robert, G. B. (2009). “Transportation energy data book.” 28th Ed.,.
Zhang, M., Chen, Y., Lim, R., and Qian, S. (2012). “What happens when a major freeway is closed for repair? The case of fix-i5 in downtown sacramento.” Transportation Research Record, Vol. 2278, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 134–144.
Zhang, M., Nie, Y., and Shen, W. (2008). “Development of a path flow estimator for inferring steady-state and time-dependent origin-destination trip matrices.”, Univ. of California, Davis, CA.
Zhang, M., Qian, Z., and Shen, W. (2011). “Continuation of to 5300: Integrated work zone traffic management.”, Univ. of California, Davis, CA.
Zhang, H. M., Shen, W., Nie, Y., and Ma, J. (2007). “Integrated construction zone traffic management.”, Univ. of California, Davis, CA.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Transportation Engineering
Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 139Issue 3March 2013
Pages: 273 - 286

History

Received: Feb 21, 2012
Accepted: Sep 11, 2012
Published online: Sep 14, 2012
Published in print: Mar 1, 2013

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Zhen (Sean) Qian [email protected]
Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford Univ., Stanford, CA (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
H. Michael Zhang [email protected]
Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of California, Davis, CA. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share