Technical Papers
Aug 22, 2012

Microsimulation Approach for Predicting Crashes at Unsignalized Intersections Using Traffic Conflicts

Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 138, Issue 12

Abstract

A microsimulation approach is presented for assessing safety at unsignalized intersections using critical traffic conflicts computed in simulation models as a surrogate safety measure. The proposed approach was applied to a crash data set, collated over a 5-year monitoring period, corresponding to urban unsignalized intersections of the city of Salerno, Italy. Given that over 45% of accidents recorded at these intersections occurred more especially in six 1-h time periods during the day and that these hourly periods corresponded to the peak traffic volumes, it was considered worthwhile to investigate each of these 1-h concentrated time intervals. Traffic flows were computed by using video cameras placed at each intersection and expressed as peak-hour volumes in the analysis. A process of microsimulation model calibration and validation was carried out, and a good level of conformity between the traffic simulated in the peak hours and the corresponding one measured in the field was obtained. Subsequently, a form of software, which is compatible with the applied microsimulation software, was used for identifying the number of critical conflicts at the intersections investigated. For this aim, a collision was assumed to be very probable when conflicts are characterized by a time to collision (TTC) and post-encroachment time (PET) below the threshold values of 1.5 and 5 s, respectively. The relationship between critical conflicts computed in microsimulation models and actual crashes was found to be statistically significant. A crash-prediction regression model was then developed for the investigated intersections, which allows predicting crashes in the field on the basis of the critical conflicts computed in simulation. The proposed model was found to fit the accident data slightly better than the traffic volume-based regression model.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the two anonymous referees whose comments proved to be invaluable.

References

AIMSUN [Computer software]. (2010). Version 6.1.2. TSS-Transport Simulation System, Barcelona.
Amundsen, F., and Hyden, C. (1977). Proc., 1st Workshop on Traffic Conflicts, Institute of Transport Economics, Oslo, Norway.
Archer, J. (2000). “Developing the potential of micro-simulation modelling for traffic safety assessment.” ICTCT, Corfu, Greece.
Archer, J., and Young, W. (2010). “Signal treatments to reduce the likelihood of heavy vehicle crashes at intersections: Microsimulation modelling approach.” J. Transp. Eng., 136(7), 632–639.
Autodesk Inc. Autocad. [Computer software]. (2000) Autodesk, United States.
Bachmann, C., Roorda, M. J., and Abdulhai, B. (2011). “Simulating traffic conflicts on truck-only infrastructure using an improved time-to-collision definition.” 90th Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting (CD-ROM), Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
Barcelo, J., Dumont, A. G., Montero, L., Perarnau, J., and Torday, A. (2003). “Safety indicators for micro-simulation based assessments.” 82nd Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting (CD-ROM), Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
Caliendo, C., Guida, M., and Parisi, A. (2007). “A crash-prediction model for multilane roads.” Accid. Anal. Prev., 39, 657–670.
Cooper, D., and Ferguson, N. (1976). “A conflict simulation model.” Traffic Eng. Control, 17, 306–309.
Cunto, F., and Saccomanno, F. F. (2008). “Calibration and validation of simulated vehicle performance at signalized intersections.” Accid. Anal. Prev., 40, 1171–1179.
Darzentas, J., McDowell, M. R. C., and Cooper, D. (1980). “Minimum acceptance gaps and conflict involvement in a single crossing maneuver.” Traffic Eng. Control, 21, 58–62.
Dijkstra, A., Marchesini, P., Bijleveld, F., Kars, V., Drolenga, H., and van Maarseveen, M. (2010). “Do calculated conflicts in microsimulation model predict number of crashes?” Transportation Research Record, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 105–112.
Elvik, R., and Vaa, T. (2004). The handbook of road safety measures, Elsevier.
Evans, L. (1991). Traffic safety and the drive, Van Nostrand Reinhold, Amsterdam.
FHWA. (1976)., US Dept. of Transportation Federal Highway Administration Office of Development Implementation Division, Washington, DC.
Gettman, D., and Head, L. (2003). “Surrogate safety measures from traffic simulation models.”, US Dept. of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.
Gettman, D., Pu, L., Sayed, T., and Shelby, S. (2008). “Surrogate safety assessment model and validation: Final report.”, US Dept. of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.
Guido, G., Saccomano, F., Vitale, A., Astarita, V., and Festa, D. (2011). “Comparing safety performance measures obtained from video capture data.” J. Transp. Eng., 137(7), 481–491.
Hallen, B. L., Shin, B. T., and Cooper, P. J. (1978). “Analysis of traffic conflict collisions.” Transportation Research Record, Washington, DC, 67–74.
Hayward, J. C. (1971). “Near misses as a measure of safety at urban intersections.” Doctoral thesis, The Pennsylvania State Univ., Dept. of Civil Engineering, Penn State.
IMSLMATH/LIBRARY. (1989). Fortran subroutines for mathematical applications, IMSL, United States.
Kiefer, R. J., Le Blanc, D. J., and Flannagan, C. A. (2005). “Developing an inverse time-to-collision crash alert timing approach based on drives’ last-second braking and steering judgments.” Accid. Anal. Prev., 37, 295–303.
Laureshyn, A., Svensson, A., and Hyden, C. (2010). “Evaluation of traffic safety, based on micro-level behaviour data: Theoretical framework and first implementation.” Accid. Anal. Prev., 42, 1637–1646.
Layfield, R. L., Summersgill, I., Hall, R. D., and Chatterjee, K. (1996). “Accidents at urban priority crossroads and staggered junctions.”, Transportation Research Laboratory, ISSN 0968-4107, Crowthorne, England.
Miaou, S. P. (1996). “Measuring the goodness-of-fit of accident prediction models.”, US Dept. of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.
Minderhould, M. M., and Bovy, P. H. L. (2001). “Extended time-to-collision measures for road traffic safety assessment.” Accid. Anal. Prev., 33, 89–97.
Paddock, R. (1974). The traffic conflict technique: An accident prediction method, Dept. of Transportation, Division of Highway Bureau of Traffic Control, Ohio.
Pirdavani, A., Brijs, T., Bellemans, T., and Wets, G. (2010). “Evaluation of traffic safety at un-signalized intersections using microsimulation: A utilization of proximal safety indicators.” Adv. Transp. Studies, 22, 43–50.
Sayed, T., Brown, G., and Navin, F. (1994). “Simulation of traffic conflicts at unsignalized intersections with TSC-Sim.” Acc. Anal. Prev., 26, 593–607.
Vogel, K. (2003). “A comparison of headway and time to collision as safety indicators.” Acc. Anal. Prev., 35, 427–473.
Yang, H., Ozbay, K., and Bartin, B. (2010). “Application of simulation based traffic conflict analysis for highway safety evaluation.” Proc., 1098 12th WCTR, Jul. 11-15, Lisbon.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Transportation Engineering
Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 138Issue 12December 2012
Pages: 1453 - 1467

History

Received: Jan 24, 2012
Accepted: Jun 13, 2012
Published online: Aug 22, 2012
Published in print: Dec 1, 2012

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Ciro Caliendo [email protected]
Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Salerno, 84084 Fisciano (SA), Italy (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Maurizio Guida
Dept. of Electronic and Computer Engineering, Univ. of Salerno, 84084 Fisciano (SA), Italy.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share