Technical Papers
Feb 13, 2012

Optimal Multiasset Maintenance Budget Allocation in Highway Asset Management

Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 138, Issue 10

Abstract

In a highway asset maintenance management system involving more than one highway asset type, identifying an equitable optimal allocation of available budget to individual asset systems is a major challenge. This is because the following outcomes are desirable: (1) the maintenance needs of all assets are adequately addressed, (2) the objectives of individual asset systems are optimally satisfied in an equitable manner, and (3) the objectives of the overall highway asset system are achieved optimally. To achieve these desirable outcomes, this paper proposes a two-stage approach in solving the dual-level multiasset, multiobjective pavement network maintenance optimal budget allocation problem. Stage I of the approach analyzes the individual multiobjective asset systems independently to establish for each a family of optimal Pareto solutions. Minimization of maintenance cost is selected as a common objective for the individual asset systems. This serves as the link for interaction with the Stage II analysis. Stage II adopts an optimal algorithm to allocate budget to individual assets by performing a cross-asset trade-off to achieve the optimal budget solution for the given overall system-level objectives. By defining a minimum performance threshold level for each asset type, the Stage II optimization analysis aims to achieve an equitable allocation of budget by maintaining equivalent amounts of performance improvements for the individual asset systems above their respective minimum threshold levels. The conceptual framework of the proposed approach is presented in this paper with a numerical example to illustrate the detailed working of the procedure.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

AASHTO. (1997). AASHTO guide for commonly recognized (CoRe) structural elements.” Subcommittee on Bridges and Structures, Standing Committee on Highways, Washington, DC.
Amekudzi, A. A., Crichton, R., Robert, W., and Comeau, C. (2001). “Application of shortfall analysis and Markowitz’ theory in investment trade-off analysis for competing infrastructure: Using HERS and NBIAS for integrated asset management.” Proc., 5th Int. Conf. on Managing Pavements, Univ. of Washington, Seattle, WA.
ASTM. (2007). “Standard practice for roads and parking lots pavement condition index surveys.”, Philadelphia.
Barber, C., and Bland, D. (2008). “Highway asset management plan.” Communities and neighborhoods overview and scrutiny, Item 9, Manchester City Council, Manchester.
Behrens, M. W. (2006). “Allocation of state transportation resources.” Testimony before the Senate Finance Committee and Senate Finance Committee, 79th session interim (March 01), The Texas Senate, Austin, Texas.
Bellman, R. E. (1957). Dynamic programming, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
Chan, W. T., Fwa, T. F., and Tan, C. Y. (1994). “Road-maintenance planning using genetic algorithms. I: Formulation.” J. Transp. Eng., 120(5), 693–709.
Chan, W. T., Fwa, T. F., and Tan, J. Y. (2003). “Optimal fund-allocation analysis for multidistrict highway agencies.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 9(4), 167–175.
Cowe Falls, L., Haas, R., McNeil, S., and Tighe, S. (2006). “Asset service index as an integration mechanism for civil infrastructure.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 1–7.
Ekern, D. S. (2006). “VDOT asset management methodology.” Rep. to the General Assembly of Virginia, Asset Management Division, Virginia Dept. of Transportation, Richmond, VA, 〈http://www.virginiadot.org〉 (Feb. 5, 2010).
Ferreira, A., Antunes, A., and Picado-Santos, L. (2002). “Probabilistic segment-linked pavement management optimization model.” J. Transp. Eng., 128(6), 568–577.
Flintsch, G. W., and Bryant, J. W., Jr. (2006). “Asset management data collection for supporting decision processes.” Office of Asset Management, Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), Washington, DC, 〈http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/asset/dataintegration/if08018/index.cfm〉.
Fwa, T. F., Tan, C. Y., and Chan, W. T. (1994). “Road-maintenance planning using genetic algorithms. II: Analysis.” J. Transp. Eng., 120(5), 710–722.
Gharaibeh, N. G., Chiu, Y., and Gurian, P. L. (2006). “Decision methodology for allocating funds across transportation infrastructure assets.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 12(1), 1–9.
Gharaibeh, N. G., Darter, M. I., and Uzarski, D. R. (1999). “Development of prototype highway asset management system.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 5(2), 61–68.
Jani, S. (2007). “Road asset valuation and management-case study Finland.” Proc., Int. Seminar on Sustainable Road Financing and Investment, Roads Fund Board, Dar-Es-Salaam, Tanzania.
Jha, M. K., and Abdullah, J. (2006). “A Markovian approach for optimizing highway life-cycle with genetic algorithms by considering maintenance of roadside appurtenances.” J. Franklin Inst., 343, 404–419.
Jiang, Y., and Sinha, K. C. (1989). “Dynamic optimization model for bridge management systems.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 92–100.
Kuhn, K. D. (2010). “Network-level infrastructure management using approximate dynamic programming.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 16(2), 103–111.
Li, Z., and Sinha, K. C. (2004). “Methodology for the development of a highway asset management system for Indiana.”, Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), Washington, DC.
Loveless, R., and Peng, T. (2006). “Urban and highway lighting energy management.” Proc., 8th Transit New Zealand and New Zealand Institute of Highway Technology (NZIHT) Annual Conf., New Zealand Institute of Highway Technology, New Plymouth, New Zealand.
Minnesota Dept. of Transportation (MnDOT). (2006). “State target formula.” 〈http://www.dot.state.mn.us/planning/program/targetformula.html〉 (Feb. 5, 2010).
Mrawira, D., and Amador, L. (2009). “Cross-assets trade-off analysis: Why are we still talking about it?” Proc., 88th TRB Annual Meeting Compendium of Papers, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP). (2007). “Multi-objective optimization for bridge management systems.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP). (2009). “An asset-management framework for the interstate highway system.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2001). “Asset management for the roads sector.” Paris, 52.
Sadek, A. W., Kvasnak, A., and Segale, J. (2003). “Integrated infrastructure management systems: Small urban area’s experience.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 9(3), 98–106.
Shepard, R. W., and Johnson, M. B. (2001). California bridge health index: A diagnostic tool to maximize bridge longevity, investment, Transport Research News, 215, 6–11.
Sirirangsi, P., Amekudzi, A., and Herabat, P. (2003). “Capturing effects of maintenance practices in highway asset valuation: Replacement-cost approach versus book-value method.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 57–65.
Small, E. P., and Swisher, M. (2000). “Integration of bridge and pavement management systems: A proposed strategy for asset management.” Transportation Research Circular 498: 8th Int. Bridge Management Conf., Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, DC, J-1/1–16.
Sun, X., Zhang, Z., Wang, R., and Wang, X. (2004). “Analysis of past national bridge inventory ratings for predicting bridge system preservation needs.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 36–43.
Tack, J. N., and Chou, E. Y. J. (2002). “Multiyear pavement repair scheduling optimization by preconstrained genetic algorithm.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 3–9.
Zhang, Z., Aki, F., and Hudson, W. R. (2002). “Developing an integrated management system for the urban transportation infrastructure.”, Southwest Region Univ. Transportation Center, Texas A&M Univ. System, College Station, TX.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Transportation Engineering
Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 138Issue 10October 2012
Pages: 1179 - 1187

History

Received: May 18, 2010
Accepted: Feb 9, 2012
Published online: Feb 13, 2012
Published in print: Oct 1, 2012

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

M.ASCE
Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, National Univ. of Singapore, 10 Kent Ridge Crescent, Singapore 119260, Republic of Singapore (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
J. Farhan
Research Scholar, Dept. of Civil Engineering, National Univ. of Singapore, 10 Kent Ridge Crescent, Singapore 119260, Republic of Singapore.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share