Technical Papers
Jun 15, 2012

Development of Analytical Capacity Models for Conventional Railways with Advanced Signaling Systems

Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 138, Issue 7

Abstract

Railways around the world are experiencing growth in traffic demand and the need to expand their network and line capacity. To accommodate the substantial demand, the conventional railway operator in Taiwan, the Taiwan Railways Administration (TRA), is interested in understanding the potential benefit of adopting various advanced signaling systems, such as hybrid or moving-block systems. In this study, the authors developed a set of analytical capacity models for conventional rail operations with advanced signaling systems, which were implemented in the busiest corridor in the TRA system. The empirical results show that advanced signaling systems generally have positive capacity effects. However, the benefit may not be substantial due to constraints from the station track layouts. Therefore, possible capacity improvement alternatives, such as improving track layouts and upgrading signaling systems, should be considered together to determine the optimal capacity improvement plan. The use of these proposed capacity models can help railway agencies with similar operational environments in their capacity management and resource planning projects.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Dr. Jyh-Cherng Jong, Ms. Tzu-Ya Lin, and Mr. Kuo-Chu Liu for their assistance on this project. This project was funded by the National Science Council (NSC) of the Republic of China under grant NSC 98-2221-E002-114-MY3.

References

AASHTO. (2007). Transportation—Invest in our future: America’s freight challenge, Washington, DC.
American Railway Engineering Association (AREA). (1947). “Track capacity and train performance.” Proc. of the 1947 Convention of the American Railway Engineering Association, Chicago, 125–144.
American Railway Engineering and Maintenance-of-Way Association (AREMA). (2001). “Train performance.” Manual for railway engineering, Chapter 16, Part 2, Landover, MD.
Conant, M. (1964). Route capacity, excess capacity, and overinvestment, railroad mergers and abandoments, Univ. of CA Press, Los Angeles.
Detmold, P. J. (1985). “New concepts in the control of train movement.” Transportation Research Record 1029, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 43–47.
Dingler, M. H., Lai, Y. C., and Barkan, C. P. L. (2010). “Effects of communications-based train control and electronically controlled pneumatic brakes on railroad capacity.” Transportation Research Record 2159, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 77–84.
Drapa, J., Ede Moore, W. J., Polivka, A., and Polivka, E. (2007). “PTC starts to roll out across the USA.” Railw. Gaz. Int., 163(5), 285–289.RWGIAN
Emery, D. (2008). “Enhanced ETCS_L3 train control system.” Proc., 11th Int. Conf. on Computer System Design and Operation in Railway (Computer in Railways XI 223), Wessex Institute of Technology, Southampton, UK.
European Rail Industry (UNIFE). (2010). “ERTMS application levels.” 〈http://www.ertms.com/media/2428/fact-3.pdf〉 (Mar. 18, 2010).
Federal Railroad Administration (FRA). (2008). Communication timeout and latency effect on positive train control system for the IDOT corridor, U.S. Dept. of Transportation, Washington, DC.
Federal Railroad Administration (FRA). (2009). “North American Joint Positive Train Control (NAJPTC) project.” Docket NO. DOT/FRA/ORD-09/04, U.S. Dept. of Transportation, Washington, DC.
Hartong, M. (2009). “Secure communications based train control (CBTC) operations.” Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Computer Science, George Mason Univ., Fairfax, VA.
Hill, R. J., and Bond, L. J. (1995). “Modeling moving-block railway signaling systems using discrete-event simulation.” Proc., Joint Rail Conference, ASME/IEEE, Baltimore, MD, 105–111.
IEEE. (1999). “IEEE standard for Communications-Based Train Control (CBTC) performance and functional requirements.” 1474.1-1999, New York.
Institute of Transportation (IOT). (2008). Railway capacity manual of Taiwan Railway Administration, Taipei, Taiwan.
International Union of Railways (UIC). (1996). UIC leaflet 405 OR, Paris.
International Union of Railways (UIC). (2004). UIC Code 406 capacity, Paris.
International Union of Railways (UIC). (2008). Influence of ETCS on line capacity: Generic study, Paris.
International Union of Railways (UIC). (2009). ERTMS implementations benchmark—Final report, Paris.
International Union of Railways (UIC). (2010). Influence of the European Train Control System (ERTCS) on the capacity of nodes, Paris.
Invensys Rail Group (IRG). (2007). Transportation capacity research paper—A comparison of the costs of different methods of increasing capacity in road & rail environments, London.
Jong, J. C., et al. (2005). “Rail capacity research—Rail capacity model for TRA system (1).” Institute of Transportation (IOT), Ministry of Transportation and Communications, Publication No. IOT-94-8-1217, Taiwan.
Jong, J. C., et al. (2006). “Rail capacity research—Rail capacity model for TRA system (2).” Institute of Transportation (IOT), Ministry of Transportation and Communications, Publication No. IOT-95-58-1228, Taiwan.
Jong, J. C., Chang, E. F., and Huang, S. H. (2009). “A railway capacity model for estimating hourly throughputs with mixed traffic and complex track layouts.” Proc., 3rd Int. Seminar on Railway Operations Modelling and Analysis Engineering and Optimisation Approaches, International Association of Railway Operations Research, Delft, The Netherlands.
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. (2003). TCRP report 100: Transit capacity and quality of service manual, 2nd Ed., Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, DC.
Kon, Y. (2002). “The new train control system ATACS by using ADS technologies.” Proc., 2nd Int. Workshop on Autonomous Decentralized Systems, IEEE, New York.
Kraft, E. R. (1988). “Analytical models for rail line capacity analysis.” J. Transp. Res. Forum, 29(1), 153–162.
Lai, Y. C. (2008). “Increasing railway efficiency and capacity through improved operations, control and planning.” Ph.D. dissertation, Univ. of Illinois, Urbana, IL.
Lai, Y. C., Shih, M. C., and Jong, J. C. (2010). “Railway capacity model and decision support process for strategic capacity planning.” Transportation Research Record 2197, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 19–28.
Landex, A., Kaas, A. H., Schittenhelm, B., and Jan, S. T. (2006). “Evaluation of railway capacity.” Centre for traffic and transport, Technical Univ. of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark.
Landex, A. (2009). “Evaluation of railway networks with single track operation using the UIC 406 capacity method.” Network Spatial Econ., 9(1), 7–23.
Li, K. P., and Gao, Z. Y. (2007). “An improved equation model for the train movement.” Simul. Modell. Pract. Theory, 15(9), 1156–1162.
Matsumoto, M. (2005). “The revolution of train control system in JAPAN.” Proc., the 7th Int. Symp. on Autonomous Decentralized Systems, IEEE, New York.
Mattalia, A. (2007). “The effects on operation and capacity on railways deriving from the switching to continuous signals and tracing systems (ERTMS).” M.S. thesis, Royal Institute of Technology KTH, Stockholm, Sweden.
Midya, S., and Thottappillil, R. (2008). “An overview of electromagnetic compatibility challenges in European rail traffic management system.” J. Transp. Res. Part C: Emerging Technol., 16(5), 515–534.
Moore Ede, W. J., Polivka, A., Brosseau, J., Tse, Y., and Reinschmidt, A. (2009). “Improving enforcement algorithms for communications-based train control using adaptive methods.” Proc., 9th Int. Heavy Haul Conf.—Heavy Haul Innovation and Development, International Heavy Haul Association, Virginia Beach, VA.
Murphy, E. (2007). “The application of ERTMS/ETCS systems.” Proc., Institution of Railway Signal Engineers (IRSE) Australasia Technical Meeting, Institution of Railway Signal Engineers, London.
Oliver Wyman, Inc. (2010). Assessment of the commercial benefits of positive train control, New York.
Pachl, J. (2002). Railway operation and control, VTD Rail Publishing, Mountlake Terrace, WA.
Schwanhäusser, W. (1994). “Theoretical background of the program family SLS.” Proc., the 1st Erasmus-Network Conf. on Transportation and Traffic Engineering, Acco Press, Leuven, The Netherlands.
Strategic Rail Authority (SRA). (2005). National ERTMS programme team (progress report), London.
Transit Cooperative Research Program (TCRP). (1996). “Rail transit capacity.” TCRP Rep. 13, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
Transport Research Laboratory (TRL). (2010). “ERTMS level 3 risks and benefits to UK railways.” Wokingham, UK.
Vuchic, V. (1981). Urban public transportation, Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
Wilson, W. (2009). “Signalling change.” Rail Professional, 151, 34–36.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Transportation Engineering
Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 138Issue 7July 2012
Pages: 961 - 974

History

Received: Aug 26, 2011
Accepted: Dec 12, 2011
Published online: Jun 15, 2012
Published in print: Jul 1, 2012

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Yung-Cheng Lai [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, National Taiwan Univ., Rm. 313, Civil Engineering Bldg. No. 1, Roosevelt Rd., Sec. 4, Taipei, 10617, Taiwan (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Szu-Han Wang [email protected]
Graduate Research Assistant, Dept. of Civil Engineering, National Taiwan Univ., Rm. 313, Civil Engineering Bldg. No. 1, Roosevelt Rd., Sec. 4, Taipei, 10617, Taiwan. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share