Abstract

Civil engineers plan, design, manage, and guide investments in surface transportation. Truck weight limits are inextricably linked to the consideration of pavements, bridges, safety, asset management, sustainability, jobs, and economic productivity. The U.S. 36.3 t cap for gross vehicle weight (GVW), and the Federal Bridge Formula B (FBF B) constrain truck movement of 32.5 t full ISO (International Organization for Standardization) containers. This study identifies the options—and associated implications—for trucks to transport full containers notwithstanding FBF B and the cap. We conducted a national investigation of truck weight regulations across 50 states to identify options, with 28 cases involving telephone interviews. Results show the options are complex, vary by state, result in a patchwork of routes, and include: (1) nondivisible permits, (2) special haul routes, (3) grandfather rights, (4) state roads, (5) tare reduction, and (6) operation outside formal regulations. Containerships, railroads, ports, and highways of U.S. trading partners each accommodate full containers. Conditions identified in this paper can result in underutilization of the productivity and efficiency benefits afforded by international standardization.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada for its financial support of this research and the Florida, Los Angeles, Long Beach, Idaho, Oregon, Washington, Montana, North Dakota, Minnesota, Wisconsin, Illinois, Missouri, Indiana, Michigan, Ohio, Pennsylvania, New York, Texas, and California DOTs for contributing data and information.

References

Alstadt, B., and Weisbrod, G. (2011). “The relationship of transportation access and connectivity to local economic outcomes.” Economic Development Research Group, Boston.
Ashar, A. (1990). “Overweight containers: Short and long-term perspectives.” World Wide Shipping : WWSWWSHE3, 790, 70–73.
Berwick, M., Bitzan, J., Chi, J., and Lofgren, M. (2002). “North dakota strategic freight analysis: The role of intermodal container transportation in North Dakota.” Upper Great Plains Transportation Institute, Fargo, ND.
Bittner, J., Kleinmeier, D. K., Schilling, M. S., and Adams, T. (2009). “Containerization policy: Considering increased load weight for certain circumstances of freight in Wisconsin.” Wisconsin Dot, Madison, WI.
Bryan, J. (2009). “Achieving intermodal interoperability for freight movements.” Innovations for tomorrow’s transportation, 〈http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/policy/otps/innovation/issue1/index.htm〉 (Nov. 4, 2011).
California DOT. (2007). “Container weight exemption in California.” California DOT—Truck Services, 〈http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/traffops/trucks/exemptions/containers.html〉 (Jul. 27, 2010).
Center for Freight and Infrastructure Research and Education. (2009). “Aligning oversize and overweight truck permit fees and policies with agency costs.” Univ. of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI.
City of Long Beach. (2003). “Long beach municipal code chapter 10.41.” Long Beach municipal code, 〈http://library.municode.com/index.aspx?clientId=16115&stateId=5&stateName=CA〉 (Jul. 27, 2010).
City of Long Beach Dept. of Public Works. (2006). “Overweight vehicle special permit rider.” Long Beach, CA.
City of Tacoma. (2009). “Tacoma municipal code: title 11—Traffic: Chapter 11.55.” Tacoma municipal code, Tacoma City Clerk’s Office, Tacoma, WA.
Dept. for Transport. (2011). “ENV0201 Greenhouse gas emissions by transport mode: United Kingdom, annual from 1990.” Dept. for Transport Statistics Tables, 〈http://www.dft.gov.uk/statistics/tables/env0201〉 (Oct. 19, 2011).
Fernando, E. G. (2006). “Investigation of the effects of routine overweight truck traffic on SH4/48.” Texas Transportation Institute, College Station, TX.
Florida Dept. of State. (2010). “Rule 14-26.01311: Permits to move sealed international containerized loads.” Florida Administrative Code Safety Regulations and Permit Fees for Overweight and Overdimensional Vehicles, 〈https://www.flrules.org/gateway/ruleno.asp?id=14-26.01311〉 (Jul. 25, 2011).
Florida DOT. (2000). “Influence of heavy trucks on highway bridges.” Talahasse, FL.
Florida Transportation Commission. (1993). “Truck weights and penalties in Florida.” Florida Transportation Commission, Tallahassee, FL.
Fu, G., et al. (2003). “NCHRP Report 495, effects of truck weight on bridge network costs.” Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
Fu, G., and Fu, C. (2006). “NCHRP Synthesis 359: Bridge rating practices and policies for overweight vehicles.” Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
Haider, S. W., and Harichandran, R. S. (2007). “Relating axle load spectra to truck gross vehicle weights and volumes.” J. Transp. Eng.JTPEDI, 133(12) 696–705.
Hayuth, Y. (1994). “The overweight container problem and international intermodal transportation.” Transp. J.TPEJAN, 34(2), 18–28.
Indiana Dept. of Revenue. (2011). “Motor carrier services notices—oversize/overweight.” Dept. of Revenue Motor Carrier Services, 〈http://www.in.gov/dor/4258.htm#osw〉 (Jul. 25, 2011).
International Organization for Standardization. (2006). “Freight containers.” Geneva.
Luskin, D. M., and Walton, C. M. (2001). “Effects of truck size and weights on highway infrastructure and operations.” The Univ. of Texas at Austin Center for Transportation Research, Austin, TX.
Line, Maersk (2007). “Maersk line North America inland haulage network advisory.” Maersk Line North America, 〈http://www.maerskline.com/localfile/?path=/north_america/unitedstates/inlandhaulage/Network_Advisory.pdf〉 (Jul. 8, 2010).
McKinnon, A. C. (2005). “The economic and environmental benefits of increasing maximum truck weight: The british experience.” Transp. Res. Part D, 10(1), 77–95.
Middendorf, D. P., and Bronzini, M. S. (1994). “The productivity effects of truck size and weight policies: Final report.” Oak Ridge National Laboratory Center for Transportation Analysis, Knoxville, TN.
Minnesota DOT. (2011). “Annual/seasonal permits & fees.” Minnesota DOT Commercial Vehicle Operations, 〈http://www.dot.state.mn.us/cvo/oversize/oversize.html〉 (Jul. 25, 2011).
New York State DOT. (2010). “Special hauling permit—Guidance and information packet.” New York State DOT Permits, 〈https://www.nysdot.gov/nypermits〉 (Jun., 2010).
Nix, F. P., Billing, J., and Clayton, A. (1992). “Truck weight and dimension regulations and container standards.” Heavy Vehicle and Roads: Technology, Safety, and Policy: Proc., 3rd Int. Symp. on Heavy Vehicle Weights and Dimensions, Thomas Telford, London.
Pennsylvania DOT. (2011). “The vehicle code (tile 75), chapter 49, section 4974.” Pennsylvania DOT Driver and Vehicle Services, 〈http://www.dmv.state.pa.us/vehicle_code/index.shtml〉 (Jul. 25, 2011).
Port of Los Angeles. (2009). “Rail workshop presentation.” 〈http://www.portoflosangeles.org/pdf/Rail_Workshop_Presentation.pdf〉 (Aug. 5, 2011).
Rodrigue, J. P., Comtois, C., and Slack, B. (2009). “The geography of transport systems, the repositioning of empty containers.” Hofstra Univ. Dept. of Global Studies and Geography, Hempstead, NY.
Shafran, I., and Strauss-Weider, A. (2003). “NCHRP Report 497: Financing and improving land access to U.S. intermodal cargo hubs.” Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
State of Michigan, DOT. (2011). “Maximum legal truck loadings and dimensions.” Michigan DOT Rules and Guidelines, http://www.michigan.gov/mdot/0,1607,7-151-9625_56949---,00.html〉 (Jul. 25, 2011).
State of Ohio. (2010). “5501:2-2-16 Special oversize and overweight permits for sealed containerized loads.” Ohio Administrative Code, 〈http://codes.ohio.gov/oac/5501%3A2-1-16〉 (Jun. 1, 2011).
Steele, C., and Hodge, D. (2011). “Background research material for freight facility location selection: A guide for public officials, NCFRP Report 13.” Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
The Journal of Commerce Online. (2011). “U.S. container trade 2008–2011.” The Journal of Commerce Maritime News, 〈http://www.joc.com/maritime/us-container-trade-2008-2010〉 (Jul. 22, 2011).
The Library of Congress. (2009). “Bill summary & status, 111th congress (2009–2010), H.R. 1799, CRS summary.” GovTrack.us Congress Legislation, 〈http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h111-1799&tab=summary〉 (Nov. 19, 2010).
The Tioga Group, Inc., Univ. of TX at Austin Center for Transportation Research, and Univ. of SC Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering. (2011). “NCFRP Report 11 truck drayage productivity guide.” Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
Transportation Research Board. (2002). “Special Report 267—Regulation of weights, lengths, and widths of commercial motor vehicles.” Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
Truck News. (2010). “Maine trucker tests merits of increased interstate weights.” Truck News Daily News May 20, 2010, 〈http://www.trucknews.com/news/maine-trucker-tests-merits-of-increased-interstate-weights/1000372180/〉 (Jul. 8, 2010).
U.S. DOT. (2000). “Comprehensive truck size and weight study.” Federeal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.
U.S. DOT. (2011). “Bridge formula weights.” Federal Highway Administration Office of Freight Management and Operations, 〈http://ops.fhwa.dot.gov/freight/publications/brdg_frm_wghts/index.htm〉 (Nov. 4, 2011).
U.S. EPA. (2002). “Green transport partnership—A glance at clean freight strategies: Weight reduction.” Washington, DC.
U.S. EPA. (2011). “SmartWay transport partnership—Weight reduction: A glance at clean freight strategies.” Washington, DC.
U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure. (2010). “Capacity of vessels to meet U.S. import and export requirements.” Washington, DC.
U.S. Maritime Administration. (2003). Industry survey series: Mainstream container services 2003, Washington, DC.
Washington State DOT. (2010). “Washington state commercial vehicle guide 2010–2011.” Olympia, WA.
Washington State Legislature. (1975). “Revised code of Washington 46.44.091 special permits—Gross weight limit.” Olympia, WA.
Washington State Legislature. (2008). “Revised code of Washington 46.44.0915 heavy haul industrial corridors—Overweight sealed containers and vehicles.” Olympia, WA.
Woodroofe, J., Belzowski, B. M., Reece, J., and Sweatman, P. (2009). “Analysis of the potential benefits of larger trucks for U.S. businesses operating private fleets.” Univ. of Michigan Transportation Research Institute, Ann Arbor, MI.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Transportation Engineering
Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 138Issue 6June 2012
Pages: 760 - 767

History

Received: Aug 22, 2011
Accepted: Dec 12, 2011
Published online: Dec 14, 2011
Published in print: Jun 1, 2012
Published ahead of production: Jun 15, 2012

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Garreth Rempel, Ph.D., P.Eng. [email protected]
Univ. of Manitoba, Dept. of Civil Engineering, 15 Gillson St, Winnipeg, MB R3T 5V6, Canada. E-mail: [email protected]
Maryam Moshiri, EIT, S.M.ASCE [email protected]
M.Sc. Student, Univ. of Manitoba, Dept of Civil Engineering, 15 Gillson St, Winnipeg, MB R3T 5V6, Canada. E-mail: [email protected]
Craig Milligan, EIT, S.M.ASCE [email protected]
Ph.D. Student, Univ. of Manitoba, Dept. of Civil Engineering, 15 Gillson St, Winnipeg, MB R3T 5V6, Canada (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Jason Bittner, M.P.A. [email protected]
Director, Center for Urban Transportation Research (CUTR), Univ. of South Florida, 4202 E. Fowler Ave. CUT100, Tampa, FL 33620. E-mail: [email protected]
Jeannette Montufar, Ph.D., P.Eng. [email protected]
Associate Professor, Univ. of Manitoba, Dept. of Civil Engineering, 15 Gillson St, Winnipeg, MB R3T 5V6, Canada. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share