Ramp Meters Evaluation: Using ITS Archived Data
Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 138, Issue 4
Abstract
In December 2009, ramp meters along US 95 in Las Vegas between Rancho Drive and Craig Road were activated. A study was performed to quantify the benefits of ramp meters on the freeway mainline by using archived ITS data. Traditional performance measures such as average travel speed, speed standard deviation, interquartile speed range, travel time index (TTI), and buffer index (BI) were employed to conduct the evaluation. In addition, two new performance measures—delay volume (DV) and average vehicle delay (AVD)—developed by the Freeway and Arterial System of Transportation (FAST) Division of the Regional Transportation Commission (RTC) of Southern Nevada were used to enhance the evaluation. Specifically, DV quantifies the congestion with temporal, spatial, and congestion intensity values, and AVD measures the average delay per vehicle with traffic volume as a weighting factor. Comparing both the freeway and ramp performance with and without ramp meters clearly demonstrates that ramp meters are very effective in mitigating the recurring heavy congestion for southbound US 95 during weekday peak periods. The improvement is comparatively little on the more lightly congested northbound section of US 95. The evaluation results also demonstrate that the DV and AVD metrics are useful in evaluating operational strategies such as ramp metering. Finally, informative results are achieved regarding the influence of ramp meters on the bottleneck, and the comparative effects metering has on the general purpose and high occupancy vehicle (HOV) lanes.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank all the staff at the Freeway and Arterial System of Transportation (FAST), Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada (RTC) for their support. The contents of this paper reflect the views of the authors, who are responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the data. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of the Nevada Department of Transportation or RTC.
References
Arnold, E. D. Jr. (1998). Ramp metering: A review of the literature.” Virginia Transportation Research Council Charlottesville, VA.
Cambridge Systematics. (2001). “Twin cities ramp meter evaluation - Executive summary.” Minnesota Dept. of Transportation, Cambridge Systematics, Oakland, CA.
Drakopoulos, A., Patrabansh, M., and Vergou, G. (2004). “Evaluation of ramp meter effectiveness for WI freeways, a milwaukee case study: Part 2, ramp metering effect on traffic operations and crashes.” Final Report No. 0092-45-17, Wisconsin Dept. of Transportation, Milwaukee, WI.
Hourdakis, J., and Michalopoulos, P. G. (2002). “Evaluation of ramp control effectiveness in two Twin Cities freeways.” Transp. Res. Rec., 1811, 21–29.
Levinson, D. M., Zhang, L., Das, S., and Sheikh, A. (2002). “Evaluating ramp meters: Evidence from Twin Cities ramp meter shut-Off.” 81st Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
Lomax, T., Schrank, D., Turner, S., and Margiotta, R. (2010). “Selecting travel reliability measures.” Texas Transportation Institute, 〈tti.tamu.edu/documents/474360-1.pdf〉 (July 23, 2010).
National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP). “Cost-Effective Performance Measures for Travel Time Delay, Variation, and Reliability.” Rep. No. 618, Transportation Research Board of National Academies, Washington, DC.
National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP). “Guide to effective freeway performance measurement: Final report and guidebook.” Rep. 97,Transportation Research Board of National Academies, Washington, DC, 〈onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/nchrp/nchrp_w97.pdf〉 (July 23, 2010).
Neel, P., and Gibbens, J. (2001). “SR 520 eastbound morning ramp metering three month study.” Washington State Dept. of Transportation, Northwest Region, WA.
Piotrowicz, G., and Robinson, J. (1995). “Ramp metering status in North America.” DOT-T-95-17, US. Dept. of Transportation, Washington, DC.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 138 • Issue 4 • April 2012
Pages: 447 - 454
Copyright
© 2012. American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Nov 29, 2010
Accepted: Jul 20, 2011
Published online: Jul 22, 2011
Published in print: Apr 1, 2012
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.