Conventional, Flexible, and Variable-Type Bus Services
Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 138, Issue 3
Abstract
To provide efficient public transportation services in areas with high demand variability over time, it may be desirable to switch vehicles between conventional services (with fixed routes and schedules) during peak periods and flexible route services during low-demand periods. This option is called variable-type services. Conventional, flexible, and variable-type service alternatives optimized for various conditions are compared to explore when variable-type bus services might be preferable to purely conventional or flexible service. The optimization models used for purely conventional or flexible service are adapted from previous studies. These models are integrated into a new model for optimizing variable-type bus service. The results of sensitivity analyses show how demand variability over time and other factors affect the relative effectiveness of conventional, flexible, and variable-type bus services.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
The authors gratefully acknowledge the funding received from the Mid-Atlantic Universities Transportation Consortium (MAUTC) for this work.
References
Baumgartner, D. S., and Schofer, J. L. (2011). “Forecasting Call-n-Ride productivity in low-density areas.” Transportation Research Board 90th Annual Meeting, online compendium, Jan. 23–27 2011.
Becker, A. J., and Teal, R. F. (2011). “Next generation general public demand responsive transportation.” Transportation Research Board 90th Annual Meeting, online compendium, Jan. 23–27, 2011.
Chang, S. K. (1990). “Analytic optimization of bus systems in heterogeneous environments.” Ph.D. Dissertation, Univ. of MD, College Park.
Chang, S. K., and Schonfeld, P. (1991a). “Optimization models for comparing conventional and subscription bus feeder services.” Transp. Sci., 25(4), 281–298.
Chang, S. K., and Schonfeld, P. (1991b). “Integration of fixed-and flexible-route bus systems.” Transportation Research Record 1308, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 51–57.
Daganzo, C. F. (1984). “The length of tour in zones of different shapes.” Transp. Res. Part B, 18(2), 135–145.
Diana, M., Quadrifoglio, L., and Pronello, C. (2009). “A methodology for comparing distances traveled by performance-equivalent fixed-route and demand responsive transit services.” Transp. Plann. Technol., 32(4), 377–399.
Fu, L., and Ishkhanov, G. (2004). “Fleet size and mix optimization for paratransit services.” Transportation Research Record 1884, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 39–46.
Horn, M. E. T. (2002). “Multi-modal and demand-responsive passenger transport systems: a modeling framework with embedded control systems.” Transp. Res. Part A, 36(2), 167–188.
Jansson, J. O. (1980). “A simple bus line model for optimisation of service frequency and bus size.” Journal of Transport Economic Policy, 14, 53–80.
Jung, J., and Jayakrishnan, R. (2011). “High coverage point-to-point transit: A study of multi-hub path-based vehicle routing.” Transportation Research Board 90th Annual Meeting, online compendium, Jan. 23–27, 2011.
Kim, T., and Haghani, A. (2011). “Model and algorithm for solving static multi depot dial-a-ride problem considering time varying travel times.” Transportation Research Board 90th Annual Meeting, online compendium, Jan. 23–27, 2011.
Lee, K. K. Lee, Kuo, S. H. F., and Schonfeld, P. M. (1995). “Optimal mixed bus fleet for urban operations.” Transportation Research Record 1503, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 39–48.
Luo, Y., and Schonfeld, P. (2011a). “Online rejected-reinsertion heuristics for the dynamic multi-vehicle dial-a-ride problem.” Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting, 11-1655, online compendium, Jan. 23–27 2011.
Luo, Y., and Schonfeld, P. (2011b). “Performance metamodels for dial-a-ride services with time constraints.” Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting, 11-3144, online compendium, Jan. 23–27 2011.
Nourbakhsh, S. M., and Ouyang, Y. (2011). “A Structured flexible transit system for low demand areas.” Transportation Research Board 90th Annual Meeting, online compendium, Jan. 23–27, 2011.
Oldfield, R. H., and, P. H. (1988). “An analytic investigation of optimal bus size.” Transp. Res., 22(B), 319–337.
Quadrifoglio, L., Dessouky, M. M., and Ordonez, F. (2008). “Mobility allowance shuttle transit (MAST) services: MIP formulation and strengthening with logic constraints.” Eur. J. Oper. Res., 185(2), 481–494.
Quadrifoglio, L., Hall, R. W., and Dessouky, M. M. (2006). “Performance and design of mobility allowance shuttle transit services: Bounds on the maximum longitudinal velocity.” Transp. Sci., 40(3), 351–363.
Quadrifoglio, L., and Li, X. (2009). “A methodology to derive the critical demand density for designing and operating feeder transit services.” Transp. Res. Part B, 43(10), 922–935.
Schonfeld, P., Kim, M., and Cheong, S. (2010). “Integration of fixed and flexible route public transportation systems.” TSC Report 2010-21, Univ. of MD, College Park.
Shen, C., and Quadrifoglio, L. (2011). “The coordinated decentralized paratransit system: Formulation and comparison with alternative strategies.” Transportation Research Board 90th Annual Meeting, online compendium, Jan. 23–27, 2011.
Stein, D. M. (1978). “An asymptotic probabilistic analysis of a routing problem.” Math. Oper. Res., 3(2), 89–101.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 138 • Issue 3 • March 2012
Pages: 263 - 273
Copyright
© 2012 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Mar 10, 2011
Accepted: Jul 18, 2011
Published online: Jul 20, 2011
Published in print: Mar 1, 2012
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.