Efficient Simulation Techniques for Reliability Analysis of Flexible Pavements Using the Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide
Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 137, Issue 11
Abstract
Many sources of uncertainty are inherent in pavement design. These uncertainties must be incorporated systematically in a reliability analysis to compute their combined effects on the probability of failure of a given pavement structure. Monte Carlo simulation has been the technique of choice in the past to simulate the effects of uncertainties in input parameters on pavement distress and the resultant reliability analyses. The impractical computational time associated with a Monte Carlo scheme, however, has prompted the deferral of the implementation of similar techniques in the current Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide (MEPDG). Instead, the reliability analysis implemented in the current MEPDG is performed on the basis of a simple assessment of the overall standard error of the predicted distress compared to the observed distress of the long-term pavement performance (LTPP) sections. It relies on a set of predetermined variability values obtained from a performance database instead of the site-specific input parameters that induce such uncertainty in distress predictions. Past efforts found that techniques (such as the Latin hypercube method) that require a substantially reduced number of simulations compared with Monte Carlo accuracy still suffered from the need for repeated execution of the MEDPG calculations. This study proposes to combine an efficient numerical scheme to conduct statistical simulations with the MEPDG calculations. It makes use of the concept of the representative linear elastic (LE) structure to minimize the number of repeated executions involved in simulations. The numerical scheme can be combined with any simulation technique of random variables to perform a reliability analysis of flexible pavements. The relative merits of Monte Carlo simulation, Latin hypercube simulation, and Rosenblueth’s point-estimate method are compared. The simulations show that the Latin hypercube method is an efficient alternative to the computationally intensive Monte Carlo technique. On the other hand, although Rosenblueth’s point-estimate method is much simpler, it is not capable of capturing the important attributes of the distribution of either input or output variables.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
This study was conducted as part of Eisenhower Grants for Research Fellowship provided by the Federal Highway Administration to the first writer at Turner-Fairbank Highway Research Center. This support is gratefully acknowledged. The contents of this paper reflect the views of the writers, who are responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the data presented herein. The content does not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of the Federal Highway Administration.
References
Alsherri, A., and George, K. P. (1988). “Reliability model for pavement performance.” J. Transp. Eng., 114(3), 294–306.
Anderson, T. W., and Darling, D. A. (1952). “Asymptotic theory of certain “goodness-of-fit” criteria based on stochastic processes.” Ann. Math. Stat., 23(2), 193–212.
Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). (2001). “Assessment of selected LTPP material data tables and development of representative test tables.” FHWA-RD-02-001, U.S. Dept. of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, McLean, VA.
Khazanovich, L., Wojtkiewicz, S. F., and Velasquez, R. (2008). “MEPDG-RED: A framework for reliability analysis with the mechanistic-empirical pavement design procedure.” Proc., Transportation Research Board 87th Annual Meeting, Washington, DC.
Mechanistic Empirical Pavement Design Guide (MEPDG). (2007). “Mechanistic empirical pavement design guide, Version 1.003 (Evaluation Copy).” NCHRP 1-37A and NCHPR 1-40D, Applied Research Associates-Transportation and Arizona State University, Champaign, IL.
National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP). (2004). “National cooperative highway research program guide for mechanistic-empirical design of new and rehabilitated pavement structures.” NCHRP Project 1-37A Final Rep., Washington, DC.
Nowak, A. S., and Collins, K. (2000). Reliability of structures, McGraw-Hill, Boston.
Oracle Crystal Ball. (2010). “Version: 11.1.2.00.” 〈http://www.oracle.com/us/products/middleware/bus-int/crystalball/index-066566.html〉 (Aug. 1, 2010).
Rosenblueth, E. (1975). “Point estimates for probability moments.”Proc., National. Academy of Sciences, 72(10), 3812–3814.
Thyagarajan, S. (2009). “Improvements to strain computation and reliability analysis of flexible pavements in the mechanistic-empirical pavement design guide.” Ph.D. thesis, Washington State Univ., Pullman, WA.
Thyagarajan, S., Sivaneswaran, N., Muhunthan, B., and Petros, K. (2009). “An evaluation of the effects of nonlinear load-strain behavior on mepdg analysis of flexible pavements.” J. Assoc. Asphalt Paving Technol., 78, 681–706.
Thyagarajan, S., Sivaneswaran, N., Muhunthan, B., and Petros, K. (2010). “Statistical analysis and decision making of critical inputs in mechanistic empirical pavement design guide.” J. Assoc. Asphalt Paving Technol., 79, 635–662.
Timm, D. H., Newcomb, D. E., and Galambos, T. V. (2000). “Incorporation of reliability into mechanistic-empirical pavement design.” Transportation Research Record 1730, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 73–80.
Uzan, J. (1976). “JULEA (Jacob Uzan Layered Elastic Analysis).” Technion University, Haifa, Israel.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2011 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Mar 5, 2010
Accepted: Mar 10, 2011
Published online: Mar 12, 2011
Published in print: Nov 1, 2011
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.