Multiobjective Optimization Model for Prioritizing Transit Stops for ADA Improvements
Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 137, Issue 8
Abstract
Inaccessible transit stops prevent people with disabilities from using fixed-route transit services, thereby limiting their mobility. The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) prescribes the minimum accessibility requirements for transit stops for riders with disabilities. In addition, transit agencies may also choose to implement the “universal-design” paradigm, which involves higher design standards than current ADA requirements and includes amenities that are useful for all riders, such as shelters and lighting. Because of budget limitations, however, transit agencies can select only a limited number of transit stops for ADA improvements each year. To increase the impact of these improvements, it is desirable that transit stops be selected such that they will maximize the overall benefits to patrons with disabilities. This paper describes a multiobjective binary nonlinear programming model for selecting, within a limited annual budget, a priority set of transit stops for improvements. The model aims to achieve two objectives, namely, meeting the minimum ADA standards and the universal-design standards. Compared with the traditional approach of selecting stops for improvements, which are often based on either staff experience or requests from elected officials, the optimization approach described in this paper provides a more objective platform to identify better candidate stops for ADA improvements.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Mr. Roberto Galvez and Ms. Adriana Toro with BCT for their advice and assistance in providing ridership and construction cost data and Ms. Charlene Wilder of the FTA for her project guidance and review comments. The authors would also like to acknowledge the financial support provided for this research by the FTA, funded as part of the Center for Transportation Needs of Special Populations (TRANSPO) Program of the Lehman Center for Transportation Research (LCTR) at Florida International University (FIU).
References
Broward County Transit (BCT). (2005). “Broward County Transit development plan.” 〈http://www.broward.org/transportationplanning/tpi02601.pdf〉 (Apr. 15, 2007).
Collia, D. V., Sharp, J., and Giesbrecht, L. (2003). “The 2001 national household travel survey: A look into the travel patterns of older Americans.” J. Saf. Res., 34, 461–470.
Church, R. L., and Marston, J. R. (2003). “Measuring accessibility for people with a disability.” Geogr. Anal., 35(1), 83–96.
Dept. of Justice (DOJ). (1992). ADA regulation for Title II, Washington, DC.
Dept. of Justice (DOJ). (1994). Code of federal regulations: ADA standards for accessible design, Washington, DC.
DOT. (2003). Freedom to Travel, Washington, DC.
Easter Seals Project ACTION. (2005). Toolkit for transit stop accessibility and safety assessment, Washington, DC.
Federal Transit Administration (FTA). (1992). Accessibility handbook for transit facilities, Malvern, PA.
Florida Geographic Data Library (FGDL). (2008). “Florida Geographic Data Library.” 〈http://www.fgdl.org/〉 (Oct. 23, 2008).
GAMS Development Corporation. (2007). “GAMS-A user's guide.” 〈http://www.gams.com/dd/docs/bigdocs/GAMSUsersGuide.pdf〉 (Aug. 2, 2007).
General Services Administration, Dept. of Housing and Urban Development, Dept. of Defense, and U.S. Postal Service. (1984). Uniform federal accessibility standards, Washington, DC.
Kimpel, T. J., Dueker, K. J., and El-Geneidy, M. (2007). “Using GIS to measure the effect of overlapping service areas on passenger boardings at transit stops.” URISA J., 19(1), 5–11.
Malczewski, J. (1999). GIS and multicriteria decision analysis, Wiley, New York.
Moldovanyi, A. (2004). “GIS and multi-criteria decision making to determine marketability of pay pond businesses in West Virginia.” Aquaculture Forum in West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV.
National Council on Disability. (2004). The current state of transportation for people with disabilities in the United States, Washington, DC.
Scottish Executive Social Research. (2006). “Improved public transport for disabled people.” 〈http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Publications/2006/05/16145134/10〉 (Sep. 13, 2007).
Thill, J. (1999). Spatial multicriteria decision making and analysis: A geographic information sciences approach, Ashgate, Brookfield, VT.
Toregas, C., Swain, R., ReVelle, C., and Bergmen, L. (1971). “The location of emergency service facilities.” Oper. Res., 19, 1363–1373.
U.S. Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board. (2002). ADA accessibility guidelines, Washington, DC.
U.S. Census Bureau. (2006). Americans with Disabilities: 2002 Household Economic Studies, Washington, DC.
Zhu, X., Liu, S., and Yeow, M. C. (2005). “A GIS-based Multi-criteria analysis approach to accessibility analysis for housing development in Singapore.” Proc., The National Biennial Conf. of the Spatial Sciences Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 137 • Issue 8 • August 2011
Pages: 580 - 588
Copyright
© 2011 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Sep 27, 2009
Accepted: Oct 27, 2010
Published online: Nov 22, 2010
Published in print: Aug 1, 2011
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.