TECHNICAL PAPERS
Sep 23, 2010

Event-Based Modeling of Driver Yielding Behavior at Unsignalized Crosswalks

Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 137, Issue 7

Abstract

This research explores factors associated with driver yielding behavior at unsignalized pedestrian crossings and develops predictive models for yielding by using logistic regression. It considers the effect of variables describing driver attributes, pedestrian characteristics, and concurrent conditions at the crosswalk on yield response. Special consideration is given to “vehicle dynamics constraints” that form a threshold for the potential to yield. Similarities to driver reaction in response to the amber indication at a signalized intersection are identified. The logit models were developed from data collected at two unsignalized midblock crosswalks in North Carolina. The data include before and after observations of two pedestrian safety treatments, an in-street pedestrian crossing sign and pedestrian-actuated in-roadway warning lights. The analysis suggests that drivers are more likely to yield to assertive pedestrians who walk briskly in their approach to the crosswalk. In turn, the yield probability is reduced with higher speeds, with deceleration rates, and if vehicles are traveling in platoons. The treatment effects proved to be significant and increased the propensity of drivers to yield, but their effectiveness may be dependent on whether the pedestrian activates the treatment. The results of this research provide new insights into the complex interaction of pedestrians and vehicles at unsignalized intersections and have implications for future work toward predictive models for driver yielding behavior. The developed logit models can provide the basis for representing driver yielding behavior in a microsimulation modeling environment.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The research leading up to this document was partially sponsored by the NCHRPNCHRP 3-78 project, Crossing Solutions at Roundabouts and Channelized Turn Lanes for Pedestrians with Visual Disabilities and NIH Bioengineering Research Partnership Grant UNSPECIFIEDR01 EY12894-03, Pedestrian Access to Complex Intersections. The authors would like to acknowledge the National Academies for their support and the members of the project team, who have provided continuous feedback to the research efforts. The authors would also like to thank the City of Charlotte, North Carolina, for facilitating the data collection efforts and the Federal Highway Administration Dwight D. Eisenhower Transportation Fellowship Program for graduate student financial support. This research was part of the doctoral dissertation by Dr. Bastian Schroeder that is available through North Carolina State University.
The project described was partially supported by Grant No. UNSPECIFIEDR01EY12894 from the National Eye Institute. This content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Eye Institute or the National Institutes of Health.

References

Agresti, A. (2007). An introduction to categorical data analysis, 2nd Ed., Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.
Ashmead, D. H., Guth, D., Wall, R. S., Long, R. G., and Ponchilla, P. E. (2005). “Street crossing by sighted and blind pedestrians at a modern roundabout.” J. Transp. Eng., 131(11), 812–821.
Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). (1999). Injuries to pedestrians and bicyclists: An analysis based on hospital emergency department data, FHWA-RD-99-078, Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), McLean, VA.
Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). (2003). Manual on uniform traffic control devices for streets and highways (MUTCD), U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC, http://mutcd.fhwa.dot.gov, (Jan. 2009).
Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). (2004). “NGSIM Task, E.1: Core algorithm assessment.” Publication No. #FHWA-HOP-06-0009, Dept. of Transportation., Washington, DC.
Fitzpatrick, et al. (2007). “Improving Pedestrian Safety at Unsignalized Intersections.” TCRP Rep. 112/NCHRP Rep. 562, Transportation Research Board. Washington, DC.
Gates, T. J., Schrock, S. D., and Bonneson, J. A. (2004). “Comparison of portable speed measurement devices.” Transp. Res. Rec., 1870, 139–146.
Geruschat, D. R., and Shirin, H. (2005). “Driver behavior in yielding to sighted and blind pedestrians at roundabouts.” J. Visual Impairment Blindness, 99(5).
Harkey, D. L., and Zegeer, C. V. (2004). “PEDSAFE: Pedestrian safety guide and countermeasure selection system.” FHWA-SA-04-003, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.
Harrel, W. A. (1993). “The impact of pedestrian visibility and assertiveness on motorist yielding.” J. Social Psych., 133(3), 353–360.
Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE). (1982). Transportation and traffic engineering handbook, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE). (2010). Manual of transportation studies, 2nd Ed., Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
NHTSA. (2006). Traffic SAFETY Facts: 2006 data, Publication No. DOT HS 810 818, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC.
Rodegerdts, et al. (2007). “Roundabouts in the United States.” NCHRP Rep. 572, Transportation Research Board, http://onlinepubs.trb.org., Washington, D.C.
SAS Institute Inc. (2007). The SAS system for Windows, release 9.02., Cary, NC.
Schroeder, B. J. (2008). “A behavior-based methodology for evaluating pedestrian-vehicle interaction at crosswalk.” Ph.D. Dissertation, North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC.
Schroeder, B. J., and Rouphail, N. M. (2007). “A framework for evaluating pedestrian-vehicle interactions at unsignalized crossing facilities in a microscopic modeling environment.” Proc., 86th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
Schroeder, B. J., Bastian, Rouphail, N. M., and Lehan, B. A. (2009). “Observational study of pedestrian behavior along a signalized urban corridor.” 88th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
Sun, D., Ukkusuri, S. V. S. K., Benekohal, R. F., and Waller, S. T. (2003). “Modeling of motorist-pedestrian interaction at uncontrolled mid-block crosswalks.” 82nd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Record, Washington, DC.
Transportation Research Board. (2000). Highway capacity manual, Washington, DC.
Washington, S. P., Karlaftis, M. G., and Mannering, F. L. (2003). Statistical and econometric methods for transportation data analysis, Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, FL.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Transportation Engineering
Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 137Issue 7July 2011
Pages: 455 - 465

History

Received: Apr 9, 2010
Accepted: Sep 21, 2010
Published online: Sep 23, 2010
Published in print: Jul 1, 2011

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Bastian J. Schroeder, Ph.D. [email protected]
Senior Research Associate, Institute for Transportation Research and Education (ITRE), North Carolina State Univ., Centennial Campus, Box 8601, Raleigh, NC 27695-8601 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Nagui M. Rouphail, Ph.D. [email protected]
Director, Institute for Transportation Research and Education (ITRE), North Carolina State Univ., Centennial Campus, Box 8601, Raleigh, NC 27695-8601. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share