How Lane Arrangements on Freeway Mainlines and Ramps Affect Safety of Freeways with Closely Spaced Entrance and Exit Ramps
Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 136, Issue 7
Abstract
The number and arrangement of lanes on freeways are important considerations in freeway geometric design. The objective of this study is to evaluate the safety impacts of lane arrangements on freeway segments with closely spaced entrance and exit ramps. Three different types of lane arrangements were considered. They were designated as Type A, Type B, and Type C arrangements. The research team compared crash frequency, crash rate, crash severity, and collision types for freeway segments with different types of lane arrangements. Crash prediction models were developed to relate crash counts to various explanatory variables such as traffic conditions and geometric characteristics. The crash data analysis results show that the Type C arrangement reported the lowest average crash frequency and crash rate. The Type C arrangement uses a continuous auxiliary lane to connect the entrance and exit ramps; and the auxiliary is dropped in a one-lane exit. Freeway segments with the Type B arrangement reported the highest average crash frequency, crash rate, and percentage of fatal plus severe injury crashes. Based on the crash prediction models, if other factors remain constant, a Type B arrangement results in 113% more total crashes and 102% more severe crashes than does a Type C arrangement. Crash data analysis results suggest that the Type B arrangement should be used cautiously when entrance and exit ramps are closely spaced.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
This research was co-sponsored by the National Science Foundation of China (Grant No. UNSPECIFIED507380001), National Key Basic Research Program (Grant No. UNSPECIFIED2006CB705501) and China's National Science and Technology Plan of Action for Traffic Safety (Grant No. UNSPECIFIED2009BAG13A07-5). Their assistance is greatly appreciated. The writers also would like to thank the graduate research assistants in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at the University of South Florida for their assistance in field data collection and data reduction.
References
AASHTO. (2001). A policy on geometric design of highways and streets, Washington, D.C.
Bared J., Giering L. G., and Warren L. D. (1999). “Safety of evaluation of acceleration and deceleration lane lengths.” ITE J., 69(5), 50–54.
Bared, J., Powell, A., Kaisar, E., and Jagannathan, R. (2005). “Crash comparison of single point and tight diamond interchanges sources.” J. Transp. Eng., 131(5), 379–381.
Batenhorst, R. A., and Gerken, J. G. (2000). “Operational analysis of terminating freeway auxiliary lanes with one-lane and two-lane exit ramps: A case study.” Proc., Mid-Continent Transportation Symp. 2000, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa.
Bauer K. M., and Harwood D. W. (1998). “Statistical models of accidents on interchange ramps and speed-change lanes.” FHWA-RD-97-106, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C.
Bonneson, A. (2005). “Calibration of predictive models for estimating the safety of ramp design configurations.” Transportation Research Record. 0912, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.
Chen, H., Liu, P., Lu, J., and Behzadi, B. (2009). “Evaluating the safety impacts of the number and arrangement of lanes on freeway exit ramps.” Accid. Anal Prev., 41, 543–551.
Cirillo, J. A., Dietz, S. K., and Beatty, R. L. (1969). Analysis and modeling of relationships between accidents and the geometric and traffic characteristics of the interstate system, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C.
Dobson, A. J. (1990). An introduction to generalized linear models, Chapman and Hall, London.
Garber, N., and Fontaine, M. (1999). “Guidelines for preliminary selection of the optimum interchange type for a specific location.” VTRC-99-r15, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C.
Janson, B. N., Awad, W., and Robles, J. (1998). “Truck accidents at freeway ramps: Data analysis and high-risk site identification.” J. Transp. Stat., 1(1), 75–92.
Khorashadi, A. (1998). “Effect of ramp type and geometry on accidents.” FHWA/CA/TE-98/13, California Dept. of Transportation, Sacramento, Calif.
Lord, D., and Bonneson, A. J. (2005). “Calibration of predictive models for estimating safety of ramp design configurations.” Transportation Research Record. 1908, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 88–95.
Maher, M. J., and Summersgill, I. (1996). “A comprehensive methodology for the fitting of predictive accident models.” Accid. Anal Prev., 28, 281–296.
McCartt, A. T., Northrup, V. S., and Retting, R. A. (2004). “Types and characteristics of ramp-related motor vehicle crashes on urban interstate roadways in northern Virginia.” J. Safety Res., 35, 107–114.
Transportation Research Board. (2000). Highway capacity manual, Washington D.C.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 136 • Issue 7 • July 2010
Pages: 614 - 622
Copyright
© 2010 ASCE.
History
Received: Nov 5, 2008
Accepted: Oct 15, 2009
Published online: Oct 22, 2009
Published in print: Jul 2010
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.