SPECIAL ISSUE EDITOR: Matthew Karlaftis
Aug 26, 2009

Real-Time Crash Risk Reduction on Freeways Using Coordinated and Uncoordinated Ramp Metering Approaches

Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 136, Issue 5

Abstract

This study was conducted to examine the ability of two ramp metering strategies at reducing the real-time crash risk along a typical urban freeway. The strategies were tested using a simulated freeway network of Interstate-4 in Orlando, Fla. created in PARAMICS microsimulation. Measurements of the crash risk along the freeway were estimated using models created by the first writer which calculate rear-end and lane-change risks along the freeway using offline geometric characteristics and real-time loop detector data. The ramp metering strategies tested were the uncoordinated ALINEA algorithm and the coordinated Zone ramp metering algorithm. Additionally, two implementation methods of these algorithms were examined: the traffic-cycle realization which allows vehicles to enter the network in platoons and the one-car-per-cycle (OCPC) realization which allows a single vehicle to enter the freeway per traffic cycle. This study shows that the ALINEA and Zone algorithms both successfully reduce the real-time crash risk along the freeway. Comparing the two implementation methods, the traffic-cycle realization provides better safety and operational benefits than the OCPC realization. However, the OCPC realization provides better safety benefits when applied with the ALINEA algorithm. In general, the ALINEA algorithm performs better using shorter cycle lengths while the Zone algorithm performs best using longer cycle lengths. Comparing the two metering algorithms, the ALINEA algorithm proves to be superior to the Zone algorithm in providing the best overall safety benefits since it is more restrictive and generally allows fewer vehicles onto the network. However, at the 90% loading scenario, evidence of crash risk migration (the lowering of crash risk at one location combined with the increase at another) appears when the ALINEA algorithm is applied. This crash risk migration is a function of the specific geometry and demand patterns of the network used and is reduced by applying the Zone algorithm. This shows that while the ALINEA algorithm provides better overall results, there are cases where a less restrictive algorithm would perform better from a safety perspective.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Abdel-Aty, M., and Dhindsa, A. (2007). “Coordinated use of variable speed limits and ramp metering for improving traffic safety on congested freeways.” Preprint No. TRB 07–0008, 86th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.
Abdel-Aty, M., Dilmore, J., and Dhindsa, A. (2006). “Evaluation of variable speed limits for real-time freeway safety improvement.” Accident analysis and prevention, Elsevier, New York, 38(2), 335–345.
Abdel-Aty, M., Uddin, N., and Pande, A. (2005). “Split models for predicting multi-vehicle crashes during high-speed and low-speed operating conditions on freeways.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1908, 51–58.
Ben-Akiva, M., Cuneo, D., Hasan, M., Jha, M., and Yang, Q. (2003). “Evaluation of freeway control using a microscopic simulation laboratory.” Transp. Res., Part C: Emerg. Technol., 11(1), 29–50.
Bohenberger, K., and May, A. (1999). “Advanced coordinated traffic responsive ramp metering strategies.” PATH Rep. No. UCB-ITS-PWP-99-19, Univ. of Calif., Berkeley.
Cambridge Systematics. (2001). “Twin cities ramp meter evaluation.” Final Report Prepared for Minnesota DOT, Cambridge Systematics, Cambridge, Mass.
Chu, L., and Yang, X. (2003). “Optimization of the ALINEA ramp metering control using genetic algorithm with micro-simulation.” Transportation Research Board 82nd Annual Meeting, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.
Dhindsa, A. (2006). “Evaluating ramp metering and variable speed limits to reduce crash potential on congested freeways using micro-simulation.” MS thesis, Univ. of Central Fla., Orlando.
Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT). (2003). “Florida traffic information (FTI) CD.”
Gettman, D., and Head, L. (2003). “Surrogate safety measures from traffic simulation models.” Transportation Research Board 83rd Annual Meeting, Transportation Research Board, Washington D.C.
Hasan, M., Jha, M., and Ben-Akiva, M. (2002). “Evaluation of ramp control algorithms using microscopic traffic simulation.” Transp. Res., Part C: Emerg. Technol., 10(3), 229–256.
Hourdakis, J., and Michalopoulos, P. (2002). “Evaluating ramp metering with AIMSUN.” Transportation Research Board 81st Annual Meeting, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.
Kwon, E., Nanduri, S., Lau, R., and Aswegan, J. (2001). “Comparative analysis of operational algorithms for coordinated ramp metering.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1748, 144–152.
Lee, C., Hellinga, B., and Ozbay, K. (2006). “Quantifying the effects of ramp metering on freeway safety.” Accid. Anal. Prev., 38, 279–288.
Levinson, D., Zhang, L., Das, S., and Sheikh, A. (2002). “Evaluating ramp meters: Evidence from the twin cities ramp meter shut-off.” Transportation Research Board 81st Annual Meeting, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.
Oketch, T., and Carrick, M. (2005). “Calibration and validation of a micro-simulation model in network analysis.” Transportation Research Board 84th Annual Meeting, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.
Pande, A., and Abdel-Aty, M. (2006a). “A comprehensive analysis of the relationship between real-time traffic surveillance data and rear-end crashes on freeways.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1953, 31–40.
Pande, A., and Abdel-Aty, M. (2006b). “Assessment of freeway traffic parameters leading to lane-change related collisions.” Accid. Anal Prev., 38, 936–948.
Papageorgiou, M., Hadj Salem, H., and Blosseville, J. (1991). “ALINEA: A local feedback control law for on-ramp metering.” Transp. Res. Rec., 1320, 58–64.
Papageorgiou, M., Hadj Salem, H., and Middleham, F. (1997). “ALINEA local ramp metering: Summary of field results.” Transp. Res. Rec., 1603, 90–98.
Park, B., and Yadlapati, S. (2003). “Development and testing of variable speed limit logics at work zones using simulation,” Transportation Research Board 82nd Annual Meeting, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.
Stephanedes, Y. (1994).“Implementation of on-line zone control strategies for optimal ramp metering in the Minneapolis ring road.” Proc., 7th Int'l. Conf. on Road Traffic and Control, IEEE, Piscataway, N.J.
Transportation Research Board. (2000). Highway capacity manual, National Academies, Washington D.C.
Zhang, M., Kim, T., Nie, X., Jin, W., Chu, L., and Recker, W. (2001). “Evaluation of on-ramp control algorithms.” California PATH Research Rep. No. UCB ITS PRR 2001 36, California PATH, Richmond, Calif.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Transportation Engineering
Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 136Issue 5May 2010
Pages: 410 - 423

History

Received: Jan 17, 2009
Accepted: Aug 24, 2009
Published online: Aug 26, 2009
Published in print: May 2010

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Mohamed Abdel-Aty [email protected]
Dept. of Civil, Environmental, and Construction Engineering, Univ. of Central Florida, Orlando, FL 32816-2450 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Vikash Gayah [email protected]
Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of California, Berkeley, CA 94720. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share