Simulation-Based Assessment of Vehicle Safety Behavior under Hazardous Driving Conditions
Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 136, Issue 4
Abstract
Future sustained economic growth of the nation very much depends on the reliability and efficiency of its highway infrastructure system. Some vehicles, such as trucks, emergency vehicles, and sport utility vehicles, often experience increasing risks of single-vehicle accidents under hazardous driving conditions, such as inclement weather and/or complicated topographical conditions. An advanced simulation-based single-vehicle accident assessment model is developed considering the coupling effects between vehicles and hazardous driving conditions, including wind gust, snow-covered or icy road surface, and/or curving. Compared to existing simulation models, the new model focuses on characterizing the transient process of accidents, introducing new critical variables on assessing the accident risks under more comprehensive hazardous driving conditions and establishing more realistic accident criteria. As a holistic deterministic model, it can be used to provide useful assessment and prevention information for traffic and emergency management. For example, it can be used to define appropriate safe driving speed limits for vulnerable vehicles under normal and extreme conditions and predict potential crash and injury risk of vulnerable drivers. Moreover, the new deterministic vehicle safety behavior simulation model lays a critical basis for future reliability-based studies of single-vehicle accident risks of vulnerable vehicles under hazardous conditions. After the model is introduced, numerical analyses on a typical truck under several representative hazardous scenarios will be conducted for demonstration purposes.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
This publication was partially supported by the Colorado Department of Transportation and the CDC NIOSH Mountain and Plains Education and Research Center (Grant No. UNSPECIFIED1T42OH009229-01). Its contents are solely the responsibility of the writers and do not necessarily represent the official views of CDOT or CDC NIOSH and MAP ERC.
References
AASHTO. (2004). A policy on geometric design of highways and streets, AASHTO, Washington, D.C.
Baker, C. J. (1986). “Simplified analysis of various types of wind-induced road vehicle accidents.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., 22(1), 69–85.
Baker, C. J. (1987). “Measures to control vehicle movement at exposed sites during windy periods.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., 25(2), 151–161.
Baker, C. J. (1991). “Ground vehicles in high cross winds. 3: The interaction of aerodynamic forces and the vehicle system.” J. Fluids Struct., 5, 221–241.
Baker, C. J. (1994). “Quantification of accident risk for road vehicles in cross winds.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., 52(1–3), 93–107.
Cai, C. S., and Chen, S. R. (2004). “Framework of vehicle-bridge-wind dynamic analysis.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., 92(7–8), 579–607.
Chen, S. R., and Cai, C. S. (2004). “Accident assessment of vehicles on long-span bridges in windy environments.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., 92(12), 991–1024.
Chen, S. R., Cai, C. S., and Wolshon, B. (2009). “From normal operation to evacuation: Single-vehicle safety under adverse weather, topographic and operational conditions.” Nat. Hazards Rev., 10(2), 68–76.
Coleman, S. A., and Baker, C. J. (1994). “Experimental study of the aerodynamic behavior of high-sided lorries in cross winds.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., 53(3), 401–429.
Gaspar, P., Szaszi, I., and Bokor, J. (2004). “The design of a combined control structure to prevent the rollover of heavy vehicles.” Eur. J. Control, 10(2), 148–162.
Gaspar, P., Szaszi, I., and Bokor, J. (2005). “Reconfigurable control structure to prevent the rollover of heavy vehicles.” Control Eng. Pract., 13(6), 699–711.
Guo, W. H., and Xu, Y. L. (2006). “Safety analysis of moving road vehicles on a long bridge under crosswind.” J. Eng. Mech., 132(4), 438–446.
The National Academies. (2006). “Where the weather meets the road—A research agenda for improving road weather system.” The National Academies Press, Washington, D.C.
The Road Information Program. (2005). “Growing traffic in rural America: Safety, mobility and economic challenges in America’s heartland.” ⟨http://www.tripnet.org/RuralRoads2005Report.pdf⟩ (May 17, 2008).
Sampson, D. J. M. (2000). “Active roll control of articulated heavy vehicles.” Ph.D. thesis, Univ. of Cambridge, Cambridge, U.K.
Sigbjörnsson, R., and Snæbjörnsson, J. T. (1998). “Probabilistic assessment of wind related accidents of road vehicles: A reliability approach.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., 74–76, 1079–1090.
Snæbjörnsson, J. T., Baker, C. J., and Sigbjörnsson, R. (2007). “Probabilistic assessment of road vehicle safety in windy environments.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., 95, 1445–1462.
Thomas, D. G. (1992). Fundamentals of vehicle dynamics, SAE, Warrendale, Pa.
Transportation Research Board (TRB). (2007). “The domain of truck and bus safety research.” Transportation Research Circular No. E-C117, The National Academies, Washington, D.C.
USDOT. (2005). “Report to Congress on the large truck crash causation study.” Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, U.S. Dept. of Transportation, Washington, D.C.
Winkler, C. B., and Ervin, R. D. (1999). Rollover of heavy commercial vehicles, SAE, Warrendale, Pa.
Xu, Y. L., and Guo, W. H. (2003). “Dynamic analysis of coupled road vehicle and cable-stayed bridge system under turbulent wind.” Eng. Struct., 25, 473–486.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2010 ASCE.
History
Received: Oct 14, 2008
Accepted: Aug 13, 2009
Published online: Aug 15, 2009
Published in print: Apr 2010
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.