TECHNICAL NOTES
May 1, 2009

Potential Freeway Congestion Severity Measure: Impact of Continuous Congestion Patterns

Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 135, Issue 5

Abstract

To better understand the characteristics of traffic congestion and efficiently employ congestion measures for interstate highway systems, this study examined the limitations of the congestion measures currently in use such as the percent of congestion and the duration of continuous congestion. Based on this study, these congestion measures provided different results of the congestion severity for even the same interstate highway segment, which means that the use of a single measure might not give a reliable evaluation result. In order to minimize the potential bias and enhance the advantage of each congestion measure, this study proposed a composite congestion severity measure by combining congestion information of both percent of congestion and duration of continuous congestion measures. The writers found that the proposed composite congestion severity measure efficiently identified the levels of the congestion severity of interstate highway segments and that it could be instantly accomplished with the existing loop detector count systems in most states. This proposed measure may be a potential candidate for describing levels of congestion severity and can provide a proper guideline for transportation engineers or decision makers to efficiently allocate available budget and resources to correct applicable interstate segments.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The writers thank Ralph Jones, Michael Nichols, Michael Clements, Larry Caldwell, and Tien Simmons of Traffic Engineering Division in the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) for their oversight and discussion over the course of this study. The writers also thank VDOT’s traffic monitoring section, managed by Tom Schinkel, who made the data used in this study available. The contents of this paper reflect the views of the writers, who are responsible for the facts and accuracy of the data presented herein, and do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of the Virginia Department of Transportation.

References

Borden, J. (1993). “Statewide highway congestion monitoring program.” HICOMP Rep., California Dept. of Transportation, Sacramento, Calif.
California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). (2003). Information memorandum: Year 2002 Bay Area freeway congestion data, Oakland, Calif.
Colman, S. B. (2007). “Predicting the duration of congestion on Bay Area freeway.” Dowling Associates, Inc., ⟨http://www.dowlinginc.com/publications.php⟩ (June 2007).
Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT). (2004). Congestion relief program guidelines, Division of Transportation Development, Colo., ⟨http://www.cotrip.org/its/whitepapers/architecture/Final_Congestion_Relief_Guidelines_August_25_2004.pdf⟩ (Oct. 2007).
Cottrell, W. D. (1991). “Measurement of the extent and duration of freeway congestion in urbanized areas.” Proc., ITE 61st Annual Meeting, ITE, Washington, D.C.
Federal Highway Administration (FHwA). (2007). Freeway management and operation handbook, Chap. 4, Performance monitoring and evaluation, ⟨http://ops.fhwa.dot.gov/freewaymgmt/publications/frwy_mgmt_handbook/chapter4_02.htm⟩ (Oct. 2007).
Flannery, A., McLeod, D., and Pedersen, N. J. (2006). “Customer-based measures of level of service.” ITE J., 76(5), 17–21.
Georgia Department of Transportation (GDOT). (2007). Defining and locating congestion area. Georgia’s congestion relief program, ⟨http://www.dot.state.ga.us/SpecialSubjects/fastforward/define.shtml⟩ (Oct. 2007).
Gunawardena, N. R., Sinha, K. C., and Fricker, J. D. (1996). “Development of peak-hour and peak directional factors for congestion management systems.” Transportation Research Record. 1552, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 8–18.
Lindley, J. A. (1986). “Quantification of urban freeway congestion and analysis of remedial measures.” Rep. No. FHWA/RD-87/052, FHwA, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C.
Lisco, T. E. (1983). “A procedure for predicting queues and delays on expressways in urban core areas.” CTPS Technical Rep. No. 36, Central Transportation Planning Staff, Boston.
Lomax, T., et al. (1997). NCHRP Rep. 398: Quantifying Congestion, Volume 2: User’s Guide, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C.
National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP). (2003). Performance measure of operational effectiveness for highway segments and systems: A synthesis of highway practice, Synthesis 313, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C.
Northern Virginia Transportation Coordinating Council (TCC). (2007). “Northern Virginia 2020 transportation plan.” Summary Rep., ⟨http://www.virginiadot.org/projects/resources/NOVA-20_20Plan_summ_rpt.pdf⟩ (Oct. 2007).
Ozbay, K., Yasar, I., and Kachroo, P. (2004). “Comprehensive evaluation of feedback-based freeway ramp-metering strategy by using microscopic simulation: Taking ramp queues into account.” Transportation Research Record. 1867, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 89–96.
Schrank, D., and Lomax, T. (2003). The 2003 Annual Urban Mobility Rep. No., Texas Transportation Institute, Texas A&M Univ. System, College Station, Tex.
Schrank, D. L., Turner, S. M., and Lomax, T. J. (1994). “Trends in urban roadway congestion-1982 to 1991: Vol. 1.” Annual Rep. Research Rep. No. 1131-6, Texas Transportation Institute, College Station, Tex.
Skabardonis, A., Varaiya, P., and Petty, K. (2003). “Measuring recurrent and non-recurrent traffic congestion.” Proc., Transportation Research Board (CD-ROM), TRB, Washington, D.C.
Stathopoulos, A., and Karlaftis, M. G. (2002). “Modeling duration of urban traffic congestion.” J. Transp. Eng., 128(6), 587–590.
Thurgood, G. S., and Taylor, T. J. (1994). “Strategies to reduce recurring interstate congestion: A freeway congestion index (FCI).” Rep. No. UT-94.06, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Brigham Young Univ., Provo, Utah.
Vaziri, M. (2002). “Development of highway congestion index with fuzzy set models.” Transportation Research Record. 1802, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 16–22.
Transportation Research Board (TRB). (2000), Highway capacity manual, National Research Council, Washington, D.C.
Washington Dept. of Transportation (WDOT). (2007). Puget Sound Freeway and HOV performance statistics, ⟨http://depts.washington.edu/hov/Readme/FwyPerformance⟩ (June 2007).

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Transportation Engineering
Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 135Issue 5May 2009
Pages: 316 - 321

History

Received: May 27, 2008
Accepted: Oct 5, 2008
Published online: May 1, 2009
Published in print: May 2009

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Jungwook Jun [email protected]
Ph.D.
Highway Performance Engineer, Traffic Engineering Division, Virginia Department of Transportation, 1401 East Broad St., Richmond, VA 23219 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Ph.D.
Senior Highway Safety Engineer, Traffic Engineering Division, Virginia Department of Transportation. 1401 East Broad St., Richmond, VA 23219. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share