Technical Papers
Sep 16, 2022

Adaptive Two-Stage Monte Carlo Algorithm for Accuracy Estimation of Total Least Squares

Publication: Journal of Surveying Engineering
Volume 149, Issue 1

Abstract

The existing theory of the total least squares (TLS) accuracy estimation contains the following problems: (1) the approximation function method based on the Taylor series expansion cannot avoid the derivative operation; (2) the selection of the number of simulations for the Monte Carlo method is subjective; and (3) the adaptive Monte Carlo algorithm is complex. Aiming at these problems, we introduce the adaptive two-stage Monte Carlo (ATMC) algorithm into the theory of accuracy estimation of the TLS. In order to consider the biases of estimation for parameters, residuals, and the estimation of the variance of unit weight, the computing process for accuracy estimation of the TLS contains bias estimation and accuracy estimation, and the algorithm is provided. In addition, based on the quasi-Monte Carlo method, an adaptive two-stage quasi-Monte Carlo (ATQMC) algorithm is proposed for the calculation of the expected bias in parameter estimates, and the algorithm flow is given. The experimental results verified the effectiveness of the ATMC and ATQMC algorithms. Compared with the ATMC algorithm, the ATQMC algorithm proposed in this paper is more efficient in the calculation of the expected bias in parameter estimates.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some data, models, or code generated or used during the study are available from the corresponding author by reasonable request. The data (e.g., simulation data for the part of numerical experiments) can be provided by the .mat file.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to all of the anonymous reviewers and editors for their careful review and valuable suggestions, which improved the quality of this paper. This research is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 42174011 and 41874001).

References

Amiri-Simkooei, A. R., and S. Jazaeri. 2012. “Weighted total least squares formulated by standard least squares theory.” J. Geodetic Sci. 2 (2): 113–124. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10156-011-0036-5.
Amiri-Simkooei, A. R., F. Zangeneh-Nejad, and J. Asgari. 2016. “On the covariance matrix of weighted total least-squares estimates.” J. Surv. Eng. 142 (3): 04015014. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)SU.1943-5428.0000153.
Box, G., and M. E. Muller. 1958. “A note on the generation of random normal deviates.” Ann. Math. Stat. 29 (2): 610–611. https://doi.org/10.1214/aoms/1177706645.
Box, M. J. 1971. “Bias in nonlinear estimation.” J. R. Stat. Soc. 33 (2): 171–201. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1971.tb00871.x.
Boyle, P., M. Broadie, and P. Glasserman. 1997. “Monte Carlo methods for security pricing.” J. Econ. Dyn. Control 21 (8–9): 1267–1321. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-1889(97)00028-6.
Bratley, P., and B. L. Fox. 1988. “Algorithm 659: Implementing Sobol’s quasirandom sequence generator.” ACM Trans. Math. Software 14 (1): 88–100. https://doi.org/10.1145/42288.214372.
Charles, S. 1945. “A two-sample test for a linear hypothesis whose power is independent of the variance.” Ann. Math. Stat. 16 (3): 243–258.
Duchnowski, R., and Z. Wiśniewski. 2017. “Accuracy of the Hodges–Lehmann estimates computed by applying Monte Carlo simulations.” Acta Geod. Geophys. 52 (4): 511–525. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40328-016-0186-0.
Fang, X. 2011. Weighted total least squares solution for application in geodesy. Hanover, Germany: Leibniz Univ. of Hanover.
Gerhold, G. A. 1969. “Least squares adjustment of weighted data to a general linear equation.” Am. J. Phys. 37 (2): 156–161. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1975432.
JCGM (Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology). 2008. Evaluation of measurement data-supplement 1 to the ‘Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement.’—Propagation of distributions using a Monte Carlo method. JCGM 101:2008. France: JCGM.
Koch, K. R. 2017. “Monte Carlo methods.” Int. J. Geomath. 9 (1): 117–143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13137-017-0101-z.
Koch, K. R., H. Kuhlmann, and W. D. Schuh. 2010. “Approximating covariance matrices estimated in multivariate models by estimated auto-and cross-covariances.” J. Geod. 84 (6): 383–397. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-010-0375-5.
Malengo, A., and F. Pennecchi. 2013. “A weighted total least-squares algorithm for any fitting model with correlated variables.” Metrologia 50 (6): 654–662. https://doi.org/10.1088/0026-1394/50/6/654.
Matoušek, J. 1998. “On the L2-discrepancy for anchored boxes.” J. Complexity 14 (4): 527–556. https://doi.org/10.1006/jcom.1998.0489.
Michael, L., L. Rüdiger, N. Frank, and C. Eschelbach. 2021. “Bias in least-squares adjustment of implicit functional models.” Surv. Rev. 53 (378): 223–234. https://doi.org/10.1080/00396265.2020.1715680.
Niemeier, W., and D. Tengen. 2017. “Uncertainty assessment in geodetic network adjustment by combining GUM and Monte-Carlo-simulations.” J. Appl. Geod. 11 (2): 67–76. https://doi.org/10.1515/jag-2016-0017.
Qu, G., Z. Sun, X. Su, and C. Du. 2019. “Adaptive relaxation regularization algorithm for nonlinear parameter estimation.” [In Chinese.] Geomatics Inf. Sci. Wuhan Univ. 44 (10): 1491–1497. https://doi.org/10.13203/j.whugis20170425.
Ratkowsky, D. 1983. Nonlinear regression modeling: A unified practical approach. New York: Marcel Dekker.
Rofatto, V. F., M. T. Matsuoka, and I. Klein. 2017. “An attempt to analyse Baarda’s iterative data snooping procedure based on Monte Carlo simulation.” South Afr. J. Geomatics 6 (3): 416–435. https://doi.org/10.4314/sajg.v6i3.11.
Rofatto, V. F., M. T. Matsuoka, and I. Klein. 2018. “Design of geodetic networks based on outlier identification criteria: An example applied to the leveling network.” Bol. Ciênc. Geodésicas 24 (2): 152–170. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1982-21702018000200011.
Schaffrin, B., and Y. A. Felus. 2005. On total least squares adjustment with constraints: A window on the future of geodesy, 417–421. Berlin: Springer.
Schaffrin, B., and K. Snow. 2010. “Total least-squares regularization of Tykhonov type and an ancient racetrack in Corinth.” Linear Algebra Appl. 432 (8): 2061–2076. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.laa.2009.09.014.
Seelbinder, B. M. 1953. “On Stein’s two-stage sampling scheme.” Ann. Math. Stat. 24 (4): 640–649. https://doi.org/10.1214/aoms/1177728919.
Serré, L. 2010. A Matlab program for testing quasi-Monte Carlo constructions. Waterloo, Canada: Univ. of Waterloo.
Shen, Y., B. Li, and Y. Chen. 2011. “An iterative solution of weighted total least-squares adjustment.” J. Geod. 85 (4): 229–238. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-010-0431-1.
Sneeuw, N., F. Krumm, and M. Roth. 2015. Adjustment theory. Stuttgart, Germany: Univ. of Stuttgart.
Tellinghuisen, J. 2000. “A Monte Carlo study of precision, bias, inconsistency, and non-Gaussian distributions in nonlinear least squares.” J. Phys. Chem. A 104 (12): 2834–2844. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp993279i.
Van Huffel, S., and J. Vandewalle. 1991. The total least squares problem: Computational aspects and analysis. Philadelphia: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics.
Wang, L., and F. Yu. 2021. “Jackknife resample method for precision estimation of weighted total least squares.” Commun. Stat. Simul. Comput. 50 (5): 1272–1289. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610918.2019.1580727.
Wang, L., and Y. Zhao. 2017. “Unscented transformation with scaled symmetric sampling strategy for precision estimation of total least squares.” Stud. Geophys. Geod. 61 (3): 385–411. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11200-016-1113-0.
Wang, L., and Y. Zhao. 2018. “Scaled unscented transformation of nonlinear error propagation: Accuracy, sensitivity, and applications.” J. Surv. Eng. 144 (1): 04017022.1. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)SU.1943-5428.0000243.
Wang, L., and Y. Zhao. 2019a. “Adaptive Monte carlo method for precision estimation of nonlinear adjustment.” [In Chinese.] Geomatics Inf. Sci. Wuhan Univ. 44 (2): 206–213. https://doi.org/10.13203/j.whugis20170064.
Wang, L., and Y. Zhao. 2019b. “Second order approximating function method for precision estimation of total least-squares.” J. Surv. Eng. 145 (1): 04018011. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)SU.1943-5428.0000266.
Wang, L., and C. Zou. 2019. “Accuracy analysis and applications of the Sterling interpolation method for nonlinear function error propagation.” Measurement 146 (Nov): 55–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2019.06.017.
Wübbeler, G., P. M. Harris, M. G. Cox, and C. Elster. 2010. “A two-stage procedure for determining the number of trials in the application of a Monte Carlo method for uncertainty evaluation.” Metrologia 47 (3): 317. https://doi.org/10.1088/0026-1394/47/3/023.
Wyszkowska, P. 2017. “Propagation of uncertainty by Monte Carlo simulations in case of basic geodetic computations.” Geod. Cartography 66 (2): 333–346. https://doi.org/10.1515/geocart-2017-0022.
Xu, P., and J. Liu. 2014. “Variance components in errors-in-variables models: Estimability, stability and bias analysis.” J. Geod. 88 (8): 719–734. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-014-0717-9.
Xu, P., J. Liu, and C. Shi. 2012. “Total least squares adjustment in partial errors-in-variables models: Algorithm and statistical analysis.” J. Geod. 86 (8): 661–675. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-012-0552-9.
Xue, S. 2018. Research on geodetic observation optimization theory and methods. [In Chinese.] Xi’an, China: Chang’an Univ.
Yang, W., and W. Liou. 1996. “Combining antithetic variates and control variates in simulation experiments.” ACM Trans. Model. Comput. Simul. 6 (4): 243–260. https://doi.org/10.1145/240896.240899.
Yang, X. 2007. Pricing Asian options with Quasi-Monte Carlo simulation. [In Chinese.] Wuhan, China: Wuhan Univ. of Technology.
Yang, Y., and L. Zhang. 2009. “Progress of geodetic data processing for 60 years in China part 1: Progress of functional and stochastic model.” [In Chinese.] Geospatial Inf. 7 (6): 1–5.
York, D., N. M. Evensen, M. L. Martınez, and J. De Basabe Delgado. 2004. “Unified equations for the slope, intercept, and standard errors of the best straight line.” Am. J. Phys. 72 (3): 367–375. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1632486.
Yuan, R., J. Ma, P. Su, Y. Dong, and J. Cheng. 2019. “An importance sampling method for Monte-Carlo integration model for ultraviolet communication.” In Proc., 2019 Int. Conf. on Advanced Communication Technologies and Networking (CommNet), 1–6. New York: IEEE.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Surveying Engineering
Journal of Surveying Engineering
Volume 149Issue 1February 2023

History

Received: Nov 9, 2021
Accepted: Jun 9, 2022
Published online: Sep 16, 2022
Published in print: Feb 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Feb 16, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Professor, Faculty of Geomatics, East China Univ. of Technology, Nanchang 330013, People’s Republic of China; Professor, Key Laboratory of Mine Environmental Monitoring and Improving around Poyang Lake, Ministry of Natural Resources, Nanchang 330013, People’s Republic of China (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7919-2030. Email: [email protected]
Master’s Candidate, Faculty of Geomatics, East China Univ. of Technology, Nanchang 330013, People’s Republic of China. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Comparison of Posterior Precision Estimation Methods of Weighted Total Least-Squares Solution for Errors-in-Variables Model, Journal of Surveying Engineering, 10.1061/JSUED2.SUENG-1480, 150, 4, (2024).
  • Multivariate Weighted Total Least Squares Based on the Standard Least-Squares Theory, Journal of Surveying Engineering, 10.1061/JSUED2.SUENG-1424, 149, 4, (2023).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share