Technical Papers
Jun 18, 2021

Indoor Map Boundary Correction Based on Normalized Total Least Squares of Condition Equation

Publication: Journal of Surveying Engineering
Volume 147, Issue 4

Abstract

Indoor high-precision maps are necessary for many applications, including robot navigation and location-based services. Raw indoor map boundaries are too irregular and coarse to be used in practical applications directly; thus, correction for indoor map boundaries is necessarily carried out. Considering that least-square (LS) methods cannot process the errors in a coefficient matrix, we proposed a normalized total least-squares of condition (NTLSC) equation method to solve for polylines. The proposed NTLSC is more robust than LS with respect to the ill-posed problem in iteration, and linearization need not be employed, which simplifies the complexity of the formula. Aiming at the curves in the map, an iterative LS (ILS) strategy was designed to rectify it for high precision. However, due to the use of different correction models, there will be some tiny gaps between the curve and polylines. Therefore, a junction processing method was put forward, which is an indispensable step to preserve the integrality of the indoor map boundary. Finally, the indoor map boundaries of two scenes were refined by the proposed method, and the results of two perspectives of qualitative and quantitative evaluations indicate that the proposed method can effectively correct irregular and coarse map boundaries.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request, including original data of Scenes 1 and 2, corresponding coordinates of broken points extracted from the original data, and application source code (MATLAB code).

Acknowledgments

We would like to express our appreciation to Mr. Shoujun Jia for the help in data collection of Scene 1. This work is supported by the National Major Science and Technology Projects of China (Nos. 2016YFB0502104 and 2018YFB1305000), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 41671451), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China (No. 22120190195), and Shanghai Municipal Natural Science Foundation (No. 19ZR1459700).

References

Alharthy, A., and J. Bethel. 2002. “Heuristic filtering and 3d feature extraction from LIDAR data.” In Proc., ISPRS Commission III. Graz, Austria: International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing.
Ambrus, R. S., S. Claici, and A. Wendt. 2017. “Automatic room segmentation from unstructured 3-d data of indoor environments.” IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett. 2 (2): 749–756. https://doi.org/10.1109/LRA.2017.2651939.
Amiri-Simkooei, A., and S. Jazaeri. 2012. “Weighted total least squares formulated by standard least squares theory.” J. Geodetic Sci. 2 (2): 113–124. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10156-011-0036-5.
Amiri-Simkooei, A. R., S. Mortazavi, and J. Asgari. 2016. “Weighted total least squares applied to mixed observation model.” Surv. Rev. 48 (349): 278–286. https://doi.org/10.1179/1752270615Y.0000000031.
Budroni, A., and J. Boehm. 2010. “Automated 3D reconstruction of interiors from point clouds.” Int. J. Archit. Comput. 8 (1): 55–73. https://doi.org/10.1260/1478-0771.8.1.55.
Cui, Y., Q. Li, B. Yang, W. Xiao, and Z. Dong. 2019. “Automatic 3-d reconstruction of indoor environment with mobile laser scanning point clouds.” IEEE J. Select. Top. Appl. Earth Observ. Remote Sens. 12 (8): 3117–3130. https://doi.org/10.1109/ JSTARS.2019.2918937.
Dodge, S., J. Xu, and B. Stenger. 2017. “Parsing floor plan images.” In Proc., 15th IAPR Int. Conf. on Machine Vision Applications, 358–361. New York: IEEE.
Fang, X. 2013. “Weighted total least squares: Necessary and sufficient conditions, fixed and random parameters.” J. Geod. 87 (8): 733–749. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-013-0643-2.
Golub, G. H., and C. F. van Loan. 1980. “An analysis of the total least squares problem.” SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 17 (6): 883–893. https://doi.org/10.1137/0717073.
Han, J., S. Zhang, Y. Li, Z. Dong, and X. Zhang. 2018a. “An improved weighted total least-squares for condition equation and corresponding bias-corrected method.” In Proc., 26th Int. Conf. on Geoinformatics, 1–8. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
Han, J., S. Zhang, Y. Li, and X. Zhang. 2018b. “A general partial errors-in-variables model and a corresponding weighted total least-squares algorithm.” J. Surv. Rev. 2018 (Oct): 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/00396265.2018.1530332.
Hong, S., J. Jung, S. Kim, H. Cho, J. Lee, and J. Heo. 2015. “Semi-automated approach to indoor mapping for 3D as-built building information modeling.” Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 51 (May): 34–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2015.01.005.
Jin, Y., X. Tong, L. Li, S. Zhang, and S. Liu. 2018. “Partial total-least-squares adjustment of condition equations with application to a rectangular building adjustment in a GIS.” J. Surv. Eng. 144 (1): 4017021. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)SU.1943-5428.0000246.
Jung, J., S. Hong, S. Yoon, J. Kim, and J. Heo. 2016. “Automated 3D wireframe modeling of indoor structures from point clouds using constrained least-squares adjustment for as-built BIM.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 30 (4): 04015074. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000556.
Jung, J., C. Stachniss, and C. Kim. 2017. “Automatic room segmentation of 3D laser data using morphological processing.” ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 6 (7): 206. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi6070206.
Khoshelham, K. L., N. V. Díaz, M. Peter, Z. Kang, and D. Acharya. 2017. “The isprs benchmark on indoor modelling.” Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inform. Sci. XLII-2 (W7): 367–372. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives- XLII-2-W7-367-2017.
Koch, K. 1999. Parameter estimation and hypothesis testing in linear models. 2nd ed. Berlin: Springer.
Koch, K.-R. 2014. “Robust estimations for the nonlinear Gauss Helmert model by the expectation maximization algorithm.” J. Geod. 88 (3): 263–271. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-013-0681-9.
Neitzel, F. 2010. “Generalization of total least-squares on example of unweighted and weighted 2D similarity transformation.” J. Geod. 84 (12): 751–762. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-010-0408-0.
Oesau, S., F. Lafarge, and P. Alliez. 2019. “Indoor scene reconstruction using feature sensitive primitive extraction and graph-cut.” ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 90 (1): 68–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2014.02.004.
Previtali, M., L. V. Díaz, and M. Scaioni. 2018. “Indoor building reconstruction from occluded point clouds using graph-cut and ray-tracing.” Appl. Sci. 8 (9): 1529. https://doi.org/10.3390/app8091529.
Sampath, A., and J. Shan. 2007. “Building boundary tracing and regularization from airborne LiDAR point clouds.” Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 73 (7): 805–812. https://doi.org/805-812.10.14358/pers.73.7.805.
Schaffrin, B., and A. Wieser. 2008. “On weighted total least-squares adjustment for linear regression.” J. Geod. 82 (7): 415–421. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-007-0190-9.
Schaffrin, B., and A. Wieser. 2011. “Total least-squares adjustment of condition equations.” Stud. Geophys. Geod. 55 (3): 529–536. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11200-011-0032-3.
Shen, Y., P. Xu, and B. Li. 2012. “Bias-corrected regularized solution to inverse ill-posed models.” J. Geodesy 86 (8): 597–608. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-012-0542-y.
Tikhonov, A. N., and V. Y. Arsenin. 1977. Solutions of ill-posed problems. New York: Wiley.
Tong, X., Y. Jin, and L. Li. 2011. “An improved weighted total least squares method with applications in linear fitting and coordinate transformation.” J. Surv. Eng. 137 (4): 120–128. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)SU.1943-5428.0000055.
Tong, X., Y. Jin, L. Li, and T. Ai. 2015a. “Area-preservation simplification of polygonal boundaries by the use of the structured total least squares method with constraints.” Trans. GIS 19 (5): 780–799. https://doi.org/10.1111/tgis.12130.
Tong, X., Y. Jin, S. Zhang, L. Li, and S. Liu. 2015b. “Bias-corrected weighted total least-squares adjustment of condition equations.” J. Surv. Eng. 141 (2): 04014013. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)SU.1943-5428.0000140.
Wang, C., S. Hou, C. Wen, Z. Gong, Q. Li, X. Sun, and J. Li. 2018. “Semantic line framework-based indoor building modeling using backpacked laser scanning point cloud.” ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 143 (Sep): 150–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2018.03.025.
Wen, C., C. You, H. Wu, C. Wang, X. Fan, and J. Li. 2019. “Recovery of urban 3D road boundary via multi-source data.” ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 156 (Oct): 184–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2019.08.010.
Wu, H., H. Yue, Z. Xu, H. Yang, C. Liu, and L. Chen. 2021. “Automatic structural mapping and semantic optimization from indoor point clouds.” Autom. Constr. 124 (Apr): 103460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103460.
Xia, S., D. Chen, R. Wang, J. Li, and X. Zhang. 2020. “Geometric primitives in lidar point clouds: A review.” IEEE J. Select. Top. Appl. Earth Observ. Remote Sens. 13 (1): 685–707. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2020.2969119.
Xu, P. 2009. “Iterative generalized cross-validation for fusing heteroscedastic data of inverse ill-posed problems.” Geophys. J. Int. 179 (1): 182–200. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2009.04280.x.
Xu, P., J. Liu, and C. Shi. 2012. “Total least squares adjustment in partial errors-in-variables models: Algorithm and statistical analysis.” J. Geod. 86 (8): 661–675. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-012-0552-9.
Xu, P., Y. Shen, Y. Fukuda, and Y. Liu. 2006. “Variance components estimation in linear inverse ill-posed models.” J. Geod. 80 (2): 69–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-006-0032-1.
Yang, F., L. Li, F. Su, D. Li, H. Zhu, S. Ying, X. Zuo, and L. Tang. 2019. “Semantic decomposition and recognition of indoor spaces with structural constraints for 3D indoor modelling.” Autom. Constr. 106 (1): 102913. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2019.102913.
Zhang, K., J. Yan, and S. C. Chen. 2006. “Automatic construction of building footprints from airborne LiDAR data.” IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 44 (9): 2523–2533. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2006.874137.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Surveying Engineering
Journal of Surveying Engineering
Volume 147Issue 4November 2021

History

Received: Sep 22, 2020
Accepted: Mar 22, 2021
Published online: Jun 18, 2021
Published in print: Nov 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Nov 18, 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Associate Professor, College of Surveying and Geo-informatics, Tongji Univ., Shanghai 20092, China. Email: [email protected]
Ph.D. Student, College of Surveying and Geo-informatics, Tongji Univ., Shanghai 20092, China. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6200-9065. Email: [email protected]
Ph.D. Student, College of Surveying and Geo-informatics, Tongji Univ., Shanghai 20092, China (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Songlin Zhang [email protected]
Professor, College of Surveying and Geo-informatics, Tongji Univ., Shanghai 20092, China. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Automated Semantic Segmentation of Indoor Point Clouds from Close-Range Images with Three-Dimensional Deep Learning, Buildings, 10.3390/buildings13020468, 13, 2, (468), (2023).
  • Topologically Consistent Reconstruction for Complex Indoor Structures from Point Clouds, Remote Sensing, 10.3390/rs13193844, 13, 19, (3844), (2021).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share