Case Studies
Oct 31, 2019

Improving Data Acquisition Efficiency: Systematic Accuracy Evaluation of GNSS-Assisted Aerial Triangulation in UAS Operations

Publication: Journal of Surveying Engineering
Volume 146, Issue 1

Abstract

The number of unmanned aerial system (UAS) mapping applications that require high-accuracy data sets have grown significantly in recent years. Indirect georeferencing (IG) requires the establishment of multiple, well distributed ground control points (GCPs) throughout a project site. UAS mapping operations can now use precise navigation trajectories with position and/or orientation observations to replace or augment GCPs. Assisted aerial triangulation (AAT), which uses only airborne camera perspective center (CPC) observations to augment GCPs, is the primary method investigated herein. The objective of this study is to rigorously analyze the impact that each additional GCP in UAS structure from motion (SfM) photogrammetric processing has on the spatial accuracy of UAS-derived orthophotos and digital surface models (DSMs) when comparing AAT to IG. Three separate flights with two different cameras were flown over a project site that had a network of nine GCPs and 70 additional checkpoints (CPs). The authors carried out 29 unique processing trials for each flight, varying the georeferencing method and the quantity of GCPs used. American Society of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing’s (ASPRS’s) Positional Accuracy Standards for Digital Geospatial Data provided reporting metrics to evaluate the derived orthophoto and DSM from each processing trial. UAS SfM processing using AAT with minimal to no augmenting GCPs provided high spatial accuracy products that met or exceeded more traditional workflows reliant on IG. When using AAT, the inclusion of at least one GCP improved vertical spatial accuracy relative to processing trials by using airborne positioning alone. To ensure the focal length was resolved during camera self-calibration, the inclusion of at least two high-accuracy GCPs in the simultaneous bundle block adjustment (SBBA) is recommended.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code generated or used during the study are available from the corresponding author by request, including aerial images, coordinates for GCPs/CPCs, orthophoto mosaics, DSMs, and spatial accuracy assessment code.

Acknowledgments

This research is a collaborative effort between the University of Florida’s Geomatics program and Micro Aerial Projects L.L.C. Thank you to Oliver Volkmann and Nicholas DiGruttolo for UAS operations and field data collection. Thank you to Levente Juhasz and Ahmed Ahmouda for assistance with automating data extraction. Thank you to the anonymous reviewers who provided detailed feedback that guided the improvement of this manuscript during the review process.

References

Agisoft. 2016. Agisoft Photoscan version 1.2 user manual: Professional edition. St. Petersburg, Russia: Agisoft LLC.
Agüera-Vega, F., F. Carvajal-Ramírez, and P. Martínez-Carricondo. 2017a. “Accuracy of digital surface models and orthophotos derived from unmanned aerial vehicle photogrammetry.” J. Surv. Eng. 143 (2): 04016025. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)SU.1943-5428.0000206.
Agüera-Vega, F., F. Carvajal-Ramírez, and P. Martínez-Carricondo. 2017b. “Assessment of photogrammetric mapping accuracy based on variation ground control points number using unmanned aerial vehicle.” Measurement 98 (Feb): 221–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2016.12.002.
ASPRS (American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing). 1990. ASPRS positional accuracy standards for digital geospatial data. Bethesda, MD: ASPRS.
ASPRS (American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing). 2015. “ASPRS positional accuracy standards for digital geospatial data.” Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 81 (3): 53. https://doi.org/10.14358/PERS.81.3.A1-A26.
Benassi, F., E. Dall’Asta, F. Diotri, G. Forlani, U. Morra di Cella, R. Roncella, and M. Santise. 2017. “Testing accuracy and repeatability of UAV blocks oriented with GNSS-supported aerial triangulation.” Remote Sens. 9 (2): 172. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs9020172.
Benjamin, A., D. O’Brien, G. Barnes, B. Wilkinson, and W. Volkmann. 2017. “Assessment of Structure from Motion (SfM) processing parameters on processing time, spatial accuracy, and geometric quality of unmanned aerial system derived mapping products.” J. Unmanned Aerial Syst. 3 (1): 27.
Carbonneau, P. E., and J. T. Dietrich. 2017. “Cost-effective non-metric photogrammetry from consumer-grade sUAS: Implications for direct georeferencing of structure from motion photogrammetry.” Earth Surf. Process. Landforms 42 (3): 473–486. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.4012.
Casella, E., A. Rovere, A. Pedroncini, C. P. Stark, M. Casella, M. Ferrari, and M. Firpo. 2016. “Drones as tools for monitoring beach topography changes in the Ligurian Sea (NW Mediterranean).” Geo-Mar. Lett. 36 (2): 151–163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00367-016-0435-9.
Clapuyt, F., V. Vanacker, and K. Van Oost. 2016. “Reproducibility of UAV-based earth topography reconstructions based on structure-from-motion algorithms.” Geomorphology 260 (May): 4–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2015.05.011.
Colomina, I., and P. Molina. 2014. “Unmanned aerial systems for photogrammetry and remote sensing: A review.” ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 92 (Jun): 79–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2014.02.013.
Cramer, M., D. Stallmann, and N. Haala. 2000. “Direct georeferencing using GPS/inertial exterior orientations for photogrammetric applications.” Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 33 (B3/1; PART 3): 198–205.
Dandois, J. P., and E. C. Ellis. 2013. “High spatial resolution three-dimensional mapping of vegetation spectral dynamics using computer vision.” Remote Sens. Environ. 136 (Sep): 259–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2013.04.005.
Eltner, A., A. Kaiser, C. Castillo, G. Rock, F. Neugirg, and A. Abellán. 2016. “Image-based surface reconstruction in geomorphometry–Merits, limits and developments.” Earth Surf. Dyn. 4 (2): 359–389. https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-4-359-2016.
FGDC (Federal Geographic Data Committee). 1998. Geospatial positioning accuracy standards. Part 3: National standard for spatial data accuracy (NSSDA), 28. Reston, VA: FGDC.
Finn, R. L., and D. Wright. 2012. “Unmanned aircraft systems: Surveillance, ethics and privacy in civil applications.” Comput. Law Secur. Rev. 28 (2): 184–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2012.01.005.
Flood, M. 2004. Vertical accuracy reporting for LiDAR data. Bethesda, MD: American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing LiDAR Committee.
Forlani, G., E. Dall’Asta, F. Diotri, U. M. D. Cella, R. Roncella, and M. Santise. 2018. “Quality assessment of DSMs produced from UAV flights georeferenced with on-board RTK positioning.” Remote Sens. 10 (2): 311. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10020311.
Gabrlik, P., A. L. Cour-Harbo, P. Kalvodova, L. Zalud, and P. Janata. 2018. “Calibration and accuracy assessment in a direct georeferencing system for UAS photogrammetry.” Int. J. Remote Sens. 39 (15–16): 4931–4959. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2018.1434331.
Geocue. 2018. “Loki: Direct geopositioning for drones.” Accessed October 2, 2018. https://geocue.com/products/loki/.
Gerke, M., and H.-J. Przybilla. 2016. “Accuracy analysis of photogrammetric UAV image blocks: Influence of onboard RTK-GNSS and cross flight patterns.” Photogramm. Fernerkundung Geoinf. 2016 (1): 17–30. https://doi.org/10.1127/pfg/2016/0284.
Ghilani, C. D., and P. R. Wolf. 2014. Elementary surveying: An introduction to geomatics. 14th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
Gonçalves, J. A., and R. Henriques. 2015. “UAV photogrammetry for topographic monitoring of coastal areas.” ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 104 (Jun): 101–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2015.02.009.
Harwin, S., and A. Lucieer. 2012. “Assessing the accuracy of georeferenced point clouds produced via multi-view stereopsis from unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) imagery.” Remote Sens. 4 (6): 1573–1599. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs4061573.
Hodgson, M. E., and P. Bresnahan. 2004. “Accuracy of airborne lidar-derived elevation.” Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 70 (3): 331–339. https://doi.org/10.14358/PERS.70.3.331.
Hugenholtz, C., O. Brown, J. Walker, T. Barchyn, P. Nesbit, M. Kucharczyk, and S. Myshak. 2016. “Spatial accuracy of UAV-derived orthoimagery and topography: Comparing photogrammetric models processed with direct geo-referencing and ground control points.” Geomatica 70 (1): 21–30. https://doi.org/10.5623/cig2016-102.
James, M. R., and S. Robson. 2014. “Mitigating systematic error in topographic models derived from UAV and ground-based image networks.” Earth Surf. Process. Landforms 39 (10): 1413–1420. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.3609.
James, M. R., S. Robson, S. d’Oleire-Oltmanns, and U. Niethammer. 2017. “Optimising UAV topographic surveys processed with structure-from-motion: Ground control quality, quantity and bundle adjustment.” Geomorphology 280 (Mar): 51–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2016.11.021.
Klemas, V. V. 2015. “Coastal and environmental remote sensing from unmanned aerial vehicles: An overview.” J. Coastal Res. 315 (5): 1260–1267. https://doi.org/10.2112/JCOASTRES-D-15-00005.1.
Klingbeil, L., C. Eling, E. Heinz, M. Wieland, and H. Kuhlmann. 2017. “Direct georeferencing for portable mapping systems: In the air and on the ground.” J. Surv. Eng. 143 (4): 04017010. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)SU.1943-5428.0000229.
Messinger, M., G. Asner, and M. Silman. 2016. “Rapid assessments of Amazon forest structure and biomass using small unmanned aerial systems.” Remote Sens. 8 (8): 615. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs8080615.
Pajares, G. 2015. “Overview and current status of remote sensing applications based on unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs).” Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 81 (4): 281–330. https://doi.org/10.14358/PERS.81.4.281.
Paneque-Gálvez, J., M. McCall, B. Napoletano, S. Wich, and L. Koh. 2014. “Small drones for community-based forest monitoring: An assessment of their feasibility and potential in tropical areas.” Forests 5 (6): 1481–1507. https://doi.org/10.3390/f5061481.
Puliti, S., H. Olerka, T. Gobakken, and E. Næsset. 2015. “Inventory of small forest areas using an unmanned aerial system.” Remote Sens. 7 (8): 9632–9654. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs70809632.
Roze, A., J.-C. Zufferey, A. Beyeler, and A. McClellan. 2017. eBee RTK accuracy assessment. Lausanne, Switzerland: SenseFly.
Sankaran, S., et al. 2015. “Low-altitude, high-resolution aerial imaging systems for row and field crop phenotyping: A review.” Eur. J. Agron. 70 (Oct): 112–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2015.07.004.
Sanz-Ablanedo, E., J. Chandler, J. Rodríguez-Pérez, and C. Ordóñez. 2018. “Accuracy of unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) and SfM photogrammetry survey as a function of the number and location of ground control points used.” Remote Sens. 10 (10): 1606. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10101606.
Sauerbier, M., E. Siegrist, H. Eisenbeiss, and N. Demir. 2011. “The practical application of UAV-based photogrammetry under economic aspects.” In Vol. 38 of Proc., Int. Conf. on Unmanned Aerial Vehicle in Geomatics (UAV-g). Hannover, Germany: International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing.
Tong, X., et al. 2015. “Integration of UAV-based photogrammetry and terrestrial laser scanning for the three-dimensional mapping and monitoring of open-pit mine areas.” Remote Sens. 7 (6): 6635–6662. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs70606635.
Tonkin, T. N., and N. G. Midgley. 2016. “Ground-control networks for image based surface reconstruction: An investigation of optimum survey designs using UAV derived imagery and structure-from-motion photogrammetry.” Remote Sens. 8 (9): 786. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs8090786.
Turner, D., A. Lucieer, and L. Wallace. 2014. “Direct georeferencing of ultrahigh-resolution UAV imagery.” IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 52 (5): 2738–2745. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2013.2265295.
Vander Jagt, B., A. Lucieer, L. Wallace, D. Turner, and M. Durand. 2015. “Snow depth retrieval with UAS using photogrammetric techniques.” Geosciences 5 (3): 264–285. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences5030264.
Van Sickle, J. 2015. GPS for land surveyors. Boca Raton, FL: CRC.
Verhoeven, G. 2011. “Taking computer vision aloft—Archaeological three-dimensional reconstructions from aerial photographs with Photoscan.” Archaeol. Prospection 18 (1): 67–73. https://doi.org/10.1002/arp.399.
Wallace, L., A. Lucieer, Z. Malenovský, D. Turner, and P. Vopěnka. 2016. “Assessment of forest structure using two UAV techniques: A comparison of airborne laser scanning and structure from motion (SfM) point clouds.” Forests 7 (12): 62. https://doi.org/10.3390/f7030062.
Wallace, L., R. Musk, and A. Lucieer. 2014. “An assessment of the repeatability of automatic forest inventory metrics derived from UAV-Borne laser scanning data.” IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 52 (11): 7160–7169. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2014.2308208.
Westoby, M. J., J. Brasington, N. F. Glasser, M. J. Hambrey, and J. M. Reynolds. 2012. “‘Structure-from-motion’ photogrammetry: A low-cost, effective tool for geoscience applications.” Geomorphology 179 (Dec): 300–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2012.08.021.
Whitehead, K., and C. H. Hugenholtz. 2015. “Applying ASPRS accuracy standards to surveys from small unmanned aircraft systems (UAS).” Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 81 (10): 787–793. https://doi.org/10.14358/PERS.81.10.787.
Wolf, P. R., B. A. Dewitt, and B. E. Wilkinson. 2014. Elements of photogrammetry with applications in GIS. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Zhang, C., and J. M. Kovacs. 2012. “The application of small unmanned aerial systems for precision agriculture: A review.” Precis. Agric. 13 (6): 693–712. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-012-9274-5.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Surveying Engineering
Journal of Surveying Engineering
Volume 146Issue 1February 2020

History

Received: Oct 16, 2018
Accepted: Jul 15, 2019
Published online: Oct 31, 2019
Published in print: Feb 1, 2020
Discussion open until: Mar 31, 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Geomatics Specialist, School of Forest Resources and Conservation, Univ. of Florida Geomatics Program, Fort Lauderdale R.E.C., 3205 College Ave., Fort Lauderdale, FL 33314 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3080-8188. Email: [email protected]
Dennis O’Brien [email protected]
Manager, Asset Information Data, Metropolitan Transportation Authority-Long Island Rail Road, 1234 Pacific St., Apt E6, Brooklyn, NY 11216. Email: [email protected]
Grenville Barnes, Ph.D. [email protected]
Professor, School of Forest Resources and Conservation, Univ. of Florida Geomatics Program, P.O. Box 110565, Gainesville, FL 32611. Email: [email protected]
Benjamin E. Wilkinson, Ph.D. [email protected]
Assistant Professor, School of Forest Resources and Conservation, Univ. of Florida Geomatics Program, P.O. Box 110565, Gainesville, FL 32611. Email: [email protected]
Walter Volkmann [email protected]
President, Micro Aerial Projects L.L.C., 1625 NW 89th Terrace, Gainesville, FL 32606. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share