Technical Papers
May 29, 2019

TestGrids: Evaluating and Optimizing Map Projections

Publication: Journal of Surveying Engineering
Volume 145, Issue 3

Abstract

In the study of map projections, it is relatively simple to obtain meaningful estimators of distortion for a small area. The definition and especially the evaluation of global distortion measures (i.e., estimators representing the distortion worldwide or in a continent-like area) are undoubtedly more troublesome. Therefore, it is relatively common to find that recommendations for the parameters to use in a particular map projection, be it devised for a continent or a country, are based on simple rules (like the one-sixth rule of thumb for conic projections), with no possibility of further improvement in terms of resulting distortions and sometimes even with no knowledge at all of the sizes of these distortions. Although the choice of map defining parameters is normally made for reasons other than distortion minimization, such as ease of use (e.g., integer or half-integer numbers may be preferable), preservation of conventional or traditional definitions, and uniformity of parameters between neighboring regions, it is always worthwhile to know the optimal set of parameters in terms of minimal distortion. Then, the cartographer may mindfully deviate from this optimal set, documenting the differences in defining parameters and in the resulting distortions. The present research provides a means to do this by extending a related work presented in a previous contribution, where the evaluation and optimization of distortions were studied for a single map projection and only two areas of interest. To this end, a new tool has been developed and presented in this paper. This tool allows users to evaluate several measures of distortion for the most common conformal and equal-area projections within user-defined geographic boundaries of interest. Also embedded in the tool and transparent to users are global optimization techniques operating on Fibonacci grids, which permit the optimization of parameters for the particular map projection and area of interest under two possible criteria: minimization of typical distortion or minimization of extreme distortions. This tool and the associated techniques are applied to several official projections to analyze their original performance and to propose new parameters that significantly improve the resulting distortions while leaving room for users to easily evaluate and optimize the tool for the lowest distortions of these projections within their regions of interest.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The author is grateful to the editor and the anonymous reviewers for their valuable suggestions, corrections, and comments that helped improve the original manuscript.

References

Agüera-Vega, F., F. Carvajal-Ramírez, and P. Martínez-Carricondo. 2017. “Accuracy of digital surface models and orthophotos derived from unmanned aerial vehicle photogrammetry.” J. Surv. Eng. 143 (2): 04016025. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)SU.1943-5428.0000206.
Airy, G. B. 1861. “LIII. Explanation of a projection by balance of errors for maps applying to a very large extent of the earth's surface; and comparison of this projection with other projections.” Lond. Edinb. Dub. Phil. Mag. 22 (149): 409–421. https://doi.org/10.1080/14786446108643179.
Annoni, A., C. Luzet, E. Gubler, and J. Ihde. 2003. “Map projections for Europe, Vol. EUR20120EN.” Brussels, Belgium: European Commission, Joint Research Centre. Accessed June 12, 2018. http://mapref.org/LinkedDocuments/MapProjectionsForEurope-EUR-20120.pdf.
Baselga, S. 2007. “Global optimization solution of robust estimation.” J. Surv. Eng. 133 (3): 123–128. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9453(2007)133:3(123).
Baselga, S. 2011. “Second order design of geodetic networks by the simulated annealing method.” J. Surv. Eng. 137 (4): 167–173. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)SU.1943-5428.0000053.
Baselga, S. 2014. Fundamentos de cartografía matemática. 2nd ed. València, Spain: Univ. Politècnica de València.
Baselga, S. 2018. “Fibonacci lattices for the evaluation and optimization of map projections.” Comput. Geosci. 117: 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2018.04.012.
Canters, F. 2002. Small-scale map projection design. London: Taylor & Francis.
El-Mowafy, A., and E. Bilbas. 2016. “Quality control in using GNSS CORS network for monitoring plate tectonics: A Western Australia case study.” J. Surv. Eng. 142 (2): 05015003. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)SU.1943-5428.0000157.
EPSG (European Petroleum Survey Group). 2018. “EPSG Geodetic Parameter Registry.” International Association of Oil 8 Gas Producers. Accessed June 22, 2018. https://www.epsg-registry.org.
ESRI (Environmental Systems Research Institute). 2013. “Spatial reference database, projection: 1002004.” Accessed June 22, 2018. http://spatialreference.org/ref/esri/102004/html/.
Fenna, D. 2007. Cartographic science: A compendium of map projections, with derivations. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Gilbert, E. N. 1974. “Distortion in maps.” SIAM Rev. 16 (1): 47–62. https://doi.org/10.1137/1016004.
González, Á. 2010. “Measurement of areas on a sphere using Fibonacci and latitude–longitude lattices.” Math. Geosci. 42 (1): 49–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-009-9257-x.
INSPIRE (Infrastructure for Spatial Information in Europe). 2014. “D2.8.I.1 Data specification on coordinate reference systems—Technical guidelines.” Vol. 2. Brussels, Belgium: European Commission. Accessed June 12, 2018. http://inspire.ec.europa.eu/documents/Data_Specifications/INSPIRE_DataSpecification_RS_v3.2.pdf.
ISO. 2019. Geographic information—Referencing by coordinates. ISO 19111. Geneva: ISO.
Jordan, W. 1896. “Der mittlere Verzerrungsfehler.” Z. Vermessungswesen 25: 249–252.
Keinert, B., M. Innmann, M. Sänger, and M. Stamminger. 2015. “Spherical Fibonacci mapping.” ACM Trans. Graphics 34 (6): 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1145/2816795.2818131.
Konečný, J., Z. Qu, and P. Richtárik. 2017. “Semi-stochastic coordinate descent.” Optim. Methods Softw. 32 (5): 993–1005. https://doi.org/10.1080/10556788.2017.1298596.
Kopp, S., and M. Kennedy. 2000. Understanding map projections: GIS by ESRI. Redlands, CA: ESRI.
Koshy, T. 2001. Fibonacci and Lucas numbers with applications. New York: Wiley.
Meyer, T. H. 2010. Introduction to geometrical and physical geodesy: Foundations of geomatics. Redlands, CA: ESRI.
Mozas-Calvache, A. T., and J. L. Pérez-García. 2017. “Analysis and comparison of lines obtained from GNSS and UAV for large-scale maps.” J. Surv. Eng. 143 (3): 04016028. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)SU.1943-5428.0000215.
Onursal, G., and Z. Kızılsu. 1999. “Simple approximation of area determination on Mercator chart of sphere.” J. Surv. Eng. 125 (4): 203–210. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9453(1999)125:4(203).
Pardalos, P. M., and H. E. Romeijn, eds. 2002. Handbook of global optimization. Vols. 1 and 2. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
Peters, A. B. 1975. “Wie man unsere Weltkarten der Erde ähnlicher machen kann.” Kartographische Nachr. 25 (5): 173–183.
Singh, V., R. Dwivedi, O. Dikshit, and A. K. Singh. 2016. “First-order design of GPS networks using particle swarm optimization.” J. Surv. Eng. 142 (3): 04016002. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)SU.1943-5428.0000176.
Snyder, J. P. 1987. Map projections: A working manual. Washington, DC: USGS.
Soler, T., and G. Wang. 2016. “Interpreting OPUS-static results accurately.” J. Surv. Eng. 142 (4): 05016003. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)SU.1943-5428.0000191.
Stem, J. E. 1989. State plane coordinate systems of 1983. NOAA Manual NOS NGS 5. Rockville, MD: Charting and Geodetic Services, US Dept. of Commerce.
Swinbank, R., and R. J. Purser. 2006. “Fibonacci grids: A novel approach to global modelling.” Q. J. R. Meteorolog. Soc. 132 (619): 1769–1793. https://doi.org/10.1256/qj.05.227.
US Dept. of Energy. 2013. “The national hydropower map.” Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. Accessed June 22, 2018. https://www.energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2014/03/f9/national_hydropower_map.pdf.
Yetkin, M., and M. Berber. 2013. “Application of the sign-constrained robust least-squares method to surveying networks.” J. Surv. Eng. 139 (1): 59–65. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)SU.1943-5428.0000088.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Surveying Engineering
Journal of Surveying Engineering
Volume 145Issue 3August 2019

History

Received: Jun 23, 2018
Accepted: Nov 5, 2018
Published online: May 29, 2019
Published in print: Aug 1, 2019
Discussion open until: Oct 29, 2019

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Sergio Baselga, M.ASCE [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Cartographic Engineering, Geodesy and Photogrammetry, Univ. Politècnica de València, 46022 València, Spain. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share