Technical Notes
Oct 25, 2017

Arctic High-Resolution Elevation Models: Accuracy in Sloped and Vegetated Terrain

Publication: Journal of Surveying Engineering
Volume 144, Issue 1

Abstract

New high-resolution elevation models for Alaska have recently been released; they were created using interferometric synthetic aperture radar (IFSAR) and automated matching of high-resolution optical satellite stereo imagery (OSSI). These products promise to fill a void in available digital elevation models (DEMs) for the Arctic. However, the effective use of these models requires knowledge of their expected accuracy, and to date, a detailed analysis of these models in remote Arctic locations has not been undertaken. Expected accuracy is necessary to gauge the uncertainty of any scientific conclusions based upon analysis of these DEM sources. To that end, both aforementioned DEM techniques were compared to airborne LiDAR (light detection and ranging) in the area surrounding Sitka, Alaska. It was found that both the IFSAR and OSSI DEMs provide vertical accuracy at the 2–4-m level (1 σ) in flat and open terrain but perform significantly worse in areas of vegetation cover with standard deviations increasing to ∼7–12 m. The DEM errors were found to have a strong positive correlation with vegetation height, and the overall error pattern suggests that neither OSSI nor IFSAR accurately model either the ground or top of the tree canopy, instead representing a surface between the canopy and topographic elevation.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This work was partially supported by the U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center Cold Regions Research and the Engineering Laboratory Remote Sensing/GIS Center of Expertise. The author would also like to thank the two anonymous reviewers whose constructive comments and criticisms helped to improve the final manuscript.

References

Atwood, D. K., Guritz, R. M., Muskett, R. R., Lingle, C. S., Sauber, J. M., and Freymueller, J. T. (2007). “DEM control in Arctic Alaska with ICESat laser altimetry.” IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 45(11), 3710–3720.
Besl, P. J., and McKay, N. D. (1992). “A method for registration of 3-D shapes.” IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., 14(2), 239–256.
Bolkas, D., Fotopoulos, G., Braun, A., and Tziavos, I. N. (2016). “Assessing digital elevation model uncertainty using GPS survey data.” J. Surv. Eng., 04016001.
Brown, J., and Romanovsky, V. E. (2008). “Report from the International Permafrost Association: State of permafrost in the first decade of the 21st century.” Permafrost Periglacial Processes, 19(2), 255–260.
Chen, Y., and Medioni, G. (1992). “Object modelling by registration of multiple range images.” Image Vision Comput., 10(3), 145–155.
Deems, J. S., Painter, T. H., and Finnegan, D. C. (2013). “LiDAR measurement of snow depth: A review.” J. Glaciol., 59(215), 467–479.
Glennie, C. L., Carter, W. E., Shrestha, R. L., and Dietrich, W. E. (2013). “Geodetic imaging with airborne LiDAR: The Earth's surface revealed.” Rep. Prog. Phys., 76(8), 086801.
Hinzman, L. D., et al. (2005). “Evidence and implications of recent climate change in northern Alaska and other Arctic regions.” Clim. Change, 72(3), 251–298.
IPCC. (2014). Climate change 2014: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Part B, regional aspects, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, U.K.
Jones, B. M., Arp, C. D., Jorgenson, M. T., Hinkel, K. M., Schmutz, J. A., and Flint, P. L. (2009). “Increase in the rate and uniformity of coastline erosion in Arctic Alaska.” Geophys. Res. Lett., 36(3).
Kampes, B., Blaskovich, M., Reis, J. J., Sanford, M., and Morgan, K. (2011). “Fugro GEOSar airborne dual-band IFSAR DTM processing.” Proc., ASPRS Annual Conf., ASPRS, Bethesda, MD.
Martone, M., Rizzoli, P., Bräutigam, B., and Krieger, G. (2013). “First 2 years of TanDEM-X mission: Interferometric performance overview.” Radio Sci., 48(5), 617–627.
Medeiros, S., Hagen, S., Weishampel, J., and Angelo, J. (2015). “Adjusting lidar-derived digital terrain models in coastal marshes based on estimated aboveground biomass density.” Remote Sens., 7(4), 3507–3525.
Nelson, A., Reuter, H. I., and Gessler, P. (2009). “Chapter 3 DEM production methods and sources.” Developments in soil science, T. Hengl and H. I. Reuter, eds., Elsevier, Vol. 33, 65–85.
Ni, W., Zhang, Z., Sun, G., Guo, Z., and He, Y. (2014). “The penetration depth derived from the synthesis of ALOS/PALSAR InSAR data and ASTER GDEM for the mapping of forest biomass.” Remote Sens., 6(8), 7303–7319.
Noh, M.-J., and Howat, I. M. (2015). “Automated stereo-photogrammetric DEM generation at high latitudes: Surface extraction with TIN-based search-space minimization (SETSM) validation and demonstration over glaciated regions.” GIScience Remote Sens., 52(2), 198–217.
Poli, D., Remondino, F., Angiuli, E., and Agugiaro, G. (2015). “Radiometric and geometric evaluation of GeoEye-1, WorldView-2 and Pléiades-1A stereo images for 3D information extraction.” ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens., 100, 35–47.
Sexton, J. O., Bax, T., Siqueira, P., Swenson, J. J., and Hensley, S. (2009). “A comparison of lidar, radar, and field measurements of canopy height in pine and hardwood forests of southeastern North America.” For. Ecol. Manage., 257(3), 1136–1147.
Shi, W. Z., Li, Q. Q., and Zhu, C. Q. (2005). “Estimating the propagation error of DEM from higher‐order interpolation algorithms.” Int. J. Remote Sens., 26(14), 3069–3084.
Slater, J. A., et al. (2011). “Global assessment of the New ASTER global digital elevation model.” Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens., 77(4), 335–349.
Steele, M., Ermold, W., and Zhang, J. (2008). “Arctic Ocean surface warming trends over the past 100 years.” Geophys. Res. Lett., 35(2).
Telling, J., Glennie, C., Fountain, A., and Finnegan, D. (2017). “Analyzing glacier surface motion using LiDAR data.” Remote Sens., 9(3), 283.
Williams, M. L., et al. (2010). “Analysis of geosar dual-band InSAR data for Peruvian forest.” Proc., 2010 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symp., IEEE, Piscataway, NJ,1398–1401.
Zhang, X., Glennie, C., and Kusari, A. (2015). “Change detection from differential airborne LiDAR using a weighted anisotropic iterative closest point algorithm.” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl. Earth Obs. Remote Sens., 8(7), 3338–3346.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Surveying Engineering
Journal of Surveying Engineering
Volume 144Issue 1February 2018

History

Received: Jun 7, 2017
Accepted: Sep 7, 2017
Published online: Oct 25, 2017
Published in print: Feb 1, 2018
Discussion open until: Mar 25, 2018

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Houston, Houston, TX 77204. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1570-0889. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share