Technical Papers
Mar 30, 2017

Analysis of the Multipass Approach for Collection and Processing of Mobile Laser Scan Data

Publication: Journal of Surveying Engineering
Volume 143, Issue 3

Abstract

The standard method in surveying practice for adjusting mobile terrestrial laser scan (MTLS) data to correct for global navigation satellite system (GNSS) positioning errors consists of placing a detailed network of surveyed control targets along the corridor being scanned. Although this approach is easy to understand and implement, it is suboptimal with regard to accuracy, efficiency, and safety. Fortunately, the rapid data acquisition that characterizes MTLS enables the user to quickly obtain repeated independent measurements, providing a simple method to examine potential errors that may be present in an individual pass. These multiple passes can be statistically combined and input with GNSS and inertial measurement unit (IMU) data to allow adjustment of the vehicle trajectory. This paper investigates this new multipass approach (MPA) of collecting and processing MTLS data, which reduces control requirements, resulting in significant improvements in accuracy and economic and safety benefits. In this paper, two case studies using MPA are discussed, and the obtained data are analyzed to demonstrate the effectiveness of the MPA. In one of the case studies, GNSS conditions were poor; in the other case study, GNSS conditions were ideal. From these cases studies, the appropriate intervals for control targets were determined based on the desired level of accuracy. In both cases, the multipass approach was shown to be effective in significantly improving accuracy and reducing the need for dense control target networks.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The University of California authors acknowledge the Office of Land Surveys within Caltrans for support of this work. McMullen Nolan Group would also like to thank Wayne Carnell, Greg Myers, and staff at the Department of Main Roads, Western Australia, and Neville Janssen, Tony Kirchner, John E. Allsop, and others at Transport and Main Roads, Queensland, for their support and assistance. Coauthor Olsen acknowledges partial funding support through National Science Foundation Grant CMMI-1351487. Finally, we thank the organizers of the 2015 Mobile Mapping Technology Conference in Sydney, Australia.

References

Abdallah, A. (2016). “Precise point positioning for kinematic applications to improve hydrographic survey.” Ph.D. dissertation, Univ. of Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany.
Barber, D., Mills, J., and Smith-Voysey, S. (2008). “Geometric validation of a ground-based mobile laser scanning system.” ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens., 63(1), 128–141.
Brown, N. J., Featherstone, W. E., Hu, G., and Johnston, G. M. (2011). “AUSGeoid09: A more direct and more accurate model for converting ellipsoidal heights to AHD heights.” J. Spatial Sci., 56(1), 27–37.
Caltrans. (2011). “Terrestrial laser scanning specifications.” Surveys manual, Sacramento, CA.
Clancy, S. (2011). “The importance of applied control.” LiDAR Mag., 1(2), 26–30.
Csanyi, N., and Toth, C. K. (2007). “Improvement of LiDAR data accuracy using LiDAR-specific ground targets.” Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens., 4, 385–396.
Featherstone, W. E. (2008). “GNSS-based heighting in Australia: Current, emerging and future issues.” J. Spatial Sci., 53(2), 115–133.
Featherstone, W. E., and Guo, W. (2001). “Evaluations of the precision of AUSGeoid98 versus AUSgeoid93 using GPS and Australian Height Datum data.” Geomatics Res. Australasia, 74, 75–102.
Featherstone, W. E., and Kuhn, M. (2006). “Height systems and vertical datums: A review in the Australian context.” J. Spatial Sci., 51(1), 21–41.
Featherstone, W. E., et al. (2001). “The AUSGeoid98 geoid model of Australia: Data treatment, computations and comparisons with GPS-levelling data.” J. Geod., 75(5), 313–330.
Featherstone, W. E., et al. (2011). “The AUSGeoid09 model of the Australian Height Datum.” J. Geod., 85(3), 133–150.
Fowler, A., and Kadatskiy, V. (2011). “Accuracy and error assessment of terrestrial, mobile and airborne LiDAR.” Proc. American Society of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing Conf., American Society of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Bethesda, MD.
Ghilani, C. D. (2010). Adjustment computations: Spatial data analysis, 5th Ed., Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ.
Glennie, C. (2007). “Rigorous 3D error analysis of kinematic scanning LiDAR systems.” J. Appl. Geod., 1(3), 147–157.
Glennie, C. (2009). “Kinematic terrestrial light-detection and ranging system for scanning.” Transp. Res. Rec., 2105, 135–141.
Graham, L. (2010). “Mobile mapping systems overview.” Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens., 76, 222–228.
Haala, N., Peter, M., Kremer, J., and Hunter, G. (2008). “Mobile LiDAR mapping for 3D point cloud collection in urban areas—A performance test.” Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial. Inf. Sci., 37, 1119–1124.
Habib, A., Bang, K. I., Kersting, A. P., and Lee, D. C. (2009). “Error budget of LiDAR systems and quality control of the derived data.” Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens., 75(9), 1093–1108.
Hauser, D., Glennie, C., and Brooks, B. (2016). “Calibration and accuracy analysis of a low-cost mapping-grade mobile laser scanning system.” J. Surv. Eng., 04016011.
ICSM (Intergovernmental Committee on Surveying and Mapping). (2014). “Guideline for control surveys by differential levelling.” Special Publication 1, version 2.1, ICSM Permanent Committee on Geodesy, Canberra, Australia.
Mao, Q., et al. (2015). “A least squares collocation method for accuracy improvement of mobile LiDAR systems.” Remote Sens., 7(6), 7402–7424.
Nolan, J., Eckels, R., Evers, M., Singh, R., and Olsen, M. J. (2015). “Multi-pass approach for mobile terrestrial laser scanning.” Proc., ISPRS Geospatial/Laser Scanning Workshop, International Society of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Hanover, Germany.
Olsen, M. J., et al. (2013). “Guidelines for the use of mobile LiDAR in transportation applications.” Rep. 748, National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Washington, DC.
Puente, I., González-Jorge, H., Martinez-Sanchez, J., and Arias, P. (2013a). “Review of mobile mapping and surveying technologies.” Measurement, 46(7), 2127–2145.
Puente, I., González-Jorge, H., Riveiro, B., and Arias, P. (2013b). “Accuracy verification of the Lynx Mobile Mapper system.” Opt. Laser Technol., 45, 578–586.
Soininen, A. (2012). “Mobile accuracy and control: How much control do we need?” ⟨https://www.terrasolid.com/download/presentations/2012/mobile_accuracy_and_control.pdf〉.
Toth, C., Paska, E., and Brzezinska, D. (2008). “Quality assessment of LiDAR data by using pavement markings.” Proc., ASPRS Annual Conf., American Society of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Bethesda, MD.
Williams, K., Olsen, M. J., Roe, G. V., and Glennie, C. (2013). “Synthesis of transportation applications of mobile LIDAR.” Remote Sens., 5(9), 4652–4692.
Wu, C. T., Hasiao, C. Y., and Chen, C. S. (2013). “Improvement of LiDAR data accuracy using 12-parameter affine transformation.” J. Chin. Soil Water Conserv., 44(4), 293–301.
Ye, Z., Yang, Y., Zhao, W., and Yanfang, H. (2011). “Dynamic calibration of exterior orientations for vehicle GPS/IMU/LS laser imaging system.” Acta Geod. Cartogr. Sin., 40, 345–350.
Yen, K. S., Ravani, B., and Lasky, T. A. (2011). “LiDAR for data efficiency.” Rep. No. WA-RD 778.1, AHMCT Research Center, Univ. of California, Davis, CA.
Yousif, H., Li, J., Chapman, M., and Shu, Y. (2010). “Accuracy enhancement of terrestrial mobile LiDAR data using theory of assimilation.” Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci., 38, 639–645.
Zhang, L., Mao, Q., Li, Q., and Zhang, P. (2014). “An accuracy-improvement method for GPS/INS kinematic levelling for use in linear engineering surveying projects.” Measurement, 54, 22–30.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Surveying Engineering
Journal of Surveying Engineering
Volume 143Issue 3August 2017

History

Received: Mar 31, 2016
Accepted: Jan 12, 2017
Published online: Mar 30, 2017
Published in print: Aug 1, 2017
Discussion open until: Aug 30, 2017

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

General Manager, Geospatial, McMullen Nolan Group, Level 1, 2 Sabre Crescent, Jandakot 6164, Australia. E-mail: [email protected]
Business Development, McMullen Nolan Group, Level 1, 2 Sabre Crescent, Jandakot 6164, Australia. E-mail: [email protected]
Michael J. Olsen, Ph.D., A.M.ASCE [email protected]
Associate Professor, School of Civil and Construction Engineering, Oregon State Univ., Corvallis, OR 97331 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Senior Development Engineer, Dept. of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Univ. of California, Davis, CA 95616. E-mail: [email protected]
Ty A. Lasky, Ph.D. [email protected]
Research Professor, Dept. of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Univ. of California, Davis, CA 95616. E-mail: [email protected]
Bahram Ravani, Ph.D. [email protected]
Distinguished Professor, Dept. of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Univ. of California, Davis, CA 95616. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share