To Level or Not to Level: Laser Scanner Inclination Sensor Stability and Application
Publication: Journal of Surveying Engineering
Volume 138, Issue 3
Abstract
Many modern terrestrial laser scanners (TLSs) are equipped with inclination/tilt sensors—also referred to as level compensators—that can correct out-of-level imperfections in an instrument setup. Some users elect to disable the inclination sensor when their scanner is equipped with one. Those who use an inclination sensor may override its leveling data by linking to external control that defines the level plane. Our case study shows that inclination sensor data can be a valuable quality check for the control data and overall point cloud alignment. Quality inclination sensor data requires careful scan planning. Specifically, laboratory tests indicate that scanner rotation speed influences the reliability of inclination sensor readings recorded during rotation. These inertial effects can be canceled to a limited extent by measuring during both clockwise and counterclockwise rotations. A scan duration within a “stability threshold” can also minimize the inertial effects and variability in inclination sensor readings for scanners continuously measuring inclination data during rotation. Finally, inclination sensor readings from a full 360° rotation are recommended to reduce systematic bias.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
Partial funding for this research was provided through OTREC under Project 2011-398. The writers would like to thank Leica Geosystems and David Evans & Associates for their generous provision of training, equipment, and software to Oregon State University. Maptek Pty donated licenses and support for Maptek I-Site Studio. Riegl Laser Measurement Systems provided their RiVLib API and technical support for the Riegl VZ-400. Shawn Butcher (OSU CCE doctoral student) and Tim Maddux (HWRL) assisted with data collection and background information. We appreciate the time and comments of the anonymous reviewers. Finally, we appreciate the efforts of Gene Roe of lidarnews.com and administrators of laserscanning.uk to distribute an inclination sensor survey. We appreciate those who participated in the survey and shared their unique insights.
References
Besl, P. J., and McKay, N. D. (1992). “A method for registration of 3D shapes.” IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., 14(2), 239–256.ITPIDJ
Boehler, W., Vicent, M. B., and Marbs, A. (2004). “Investigating laser scanner accuracy.” i3mainz, 〈http://scanning.fh-mainz.de/scannertest/results200404.pdf〉 (Nov. 15, 2010).
Cuartero, A., Armesto, J., Rodriguez, P. G., and Arias, P. (2010). “Error analysis of terrestrial laser scanning data by means of spherical statistics and 3D graphs.” Sensors, 10(11), 10128–10145.SNSRES
FARO Technologies. (2009). “FARO LS 880 techsheet (English).” 〈http://www.faro.com〉 (Nov. 30, 2010).
JADA Productions. (2010). “Laser scanner hardware survey.” Point of beginning, 〈http://laser.jadaproductions.net/hardware/default.php〉 (Nov. 15, 2010).
Leica Geosystems. (2009). “Leica TPS1200+ Series technical data (English US).” 〈http://www.leica-geosystems.us/en/Leica-TPS1200_4547.htm〉 (Aug. 22, 2011).
Leica Geosystems. (2011). “Leica ScanStation C10 technical datasheet (English US).” 〈http://hds.leica-geosystems.com/en/Leica-ScanStation-C10_79411.htm〉 (Feb. 24, 2011).
Lichti, D. D. (2007). “Error modelling, calibration and analysis of an AM-CW terrestrial laser scanner system.” ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens., 61(5), 307–324.IRSEE9
Lichti, D. D., Gordon, S. J., and Tipdecho, T. (2005). “Error models and propagation in directly georeferenced terrestrial laser scanner networks.” J. Surv. Eng., 131(4), 135–142.JSUED2
Lichti, D. D., and Licht, M. G. (2006). “Experiences with terrestrial laser scanner modelling and accuracy assessment.” Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens., 36(5/W3), 155–160.
Mechelke, K., Kersten, T. P., and Lindstaedt, M. (2007). “Comparative investigations into the accuracy behaviour of the new generation of terrestrial laser scanning systems.” Proc., Optical 3-D Meas. Techniques VIII, Zurich, Switzerland, 319–327.
Olsen, M. J., Johnstone, E., Driscoll, N., Ashford, S. A., and Kuester, F. (2009). “Terrestrial laser scanning of extended cliff sections in dynamic environments: Parameter analysis.” J. Surv. Eng., 135(4), 161–169.JSUED2
Olsen, M. J., Johnstone, E., Kuester, F., Driscoll, N., and Ashford, S. A. (2011). “New automated point-cloud alignment for ground-based light detection and ranging data of long coastal sections.” J. Surv. Eng., 137(1), 14–25.JSUED2
Ravani, B., Hiremagalur, J., Yen, K. S., Akin, K., Bui, T., and Lasky, T. A. (2007). “Creating standards and specifications for the use of laser scanning in Caltrans projects.” Rep. No. UCD-ARR-07-06-30-01, California AHMCT Program, Univ. of California, Davis, CA.
Salvi, J., Matabosch, C., Fofi, D., and Forest, J. (2007). “A review of recent range image registration methods.” Image Vis. Comput., 25(5), 578–596.
Silvia, E. P. (2011). “Survey of TLS professionals.” LiDAR News, 〈http://www.lidarnews.com/content/view/8535/〉 (Aug. 30, 2011).
Vosselman, G., and Maas, H.-G. (2010). Airborne and terrestrial laser scanning, North American Ed., Whittles Publishing, Caithness, Scotland.
Wehr, A., and Lohr, U. (1999). “Airborne laser scanning—an introduction and overview.” ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens., 54(2-3), 68–82.IRSEE9
Wynne, R. H. (2006). “Lidar remote sensing of forest resources at the scale of management.” Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sensing, 72(12), 1310–1314.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2012. American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Apr 7, 2011
Accepted: Nov 17, 2011
Published online: Nov 19, 2011
Published in print: Aug 1, 2012
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.