Laser Scanner and Terrestrial Surveying Applied to Gravitational Deformation Monitoring of Large VLBI Telescopes’ Primary Reflector
Publication: Journal of Surveying Engineering
Volume 135, Issue 4
Abstract
Laser scanning surveys were performed on the primary mirror of the very long baseline interferometry (VLBI) telescopes situated at Medicina and Noto observatories, with the specific purpose of investigating (1) gravity deformation patterns of the radio telescopes’ primary reflector and (2) the magnitude and relative variations of focal length as the antennas are steered in elevation. Both instruments have Azimuth-Elevation mounts and have 32 m parabolic mirrors which were surveyed in steps of 15° spanning the 90–15° elevation range. The scanning sessions were performed from two standpoints using a GS200 Trimble-Mensi; the sampling interval was set to 2 cm at a distance of 15 m. The complete surface of the main reflector at every elevation position was obtained by merging the two separate point clouds acquired from the two standpoints; each elevation is represented by at least 1.3 millions points. The merged clouds were compared for determining relative deformation patterns and magnitude. As the elevation decreases from 90−15°, the edges of the primary mirror of both telescopes fold in by a couple of cm. A least-squares adjustment was applied to point clouds corresponding to different elevations aimed at estimating the parameters of the rotational paraboloids that better fit the experimental data. This led to estimate the focal length variations induced by the structure deformative behavior. The focal lengths of the best-fit surfaces were compared. Their largest variation is found to be 2.5 cm at Medicina, between the 90° and the 15° positions. The clouds were also used to attempt a direct computation of the incoming radio signal’s path length variation due to primary reflectors’ deformations. Finally, two Leica total stations, a TDA5005 and a TC2003, were used to perform a survey of the local ground control network and of some selected targets placed on the edge of the dish. The comparison of the distances determined with the two terrestrial surveying methods (laser scanner versus triangulation and trilateration) highlights a statistically significant scale factor of about , being the laser estimates smaller than those obtained with total stations. This study proves that laser scanners can be efficiently used to determine gravitational influences on large VLBI telescopes’ primary reflectors: deformation patterns are clearly and reliably depicted, focal length and incoming radio signal path variations are precisely quantified.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
The writers thank M. Negusini for the precious help in performing the surveys and acquiring the data and G. Zacchiroli and A. Orfei for the useful conversations on the technical issues related to antennas performances. This paper is based on observations with the Medicina and Noto telescopes operated by INAF—Istituto di Radioastronomia.
References
Altamimi, Z., Collilieux, X., Legrand, J., Garayt, B., and Boucher, C. (2007). “ITRF2005: A new release of the international terrestrial reference frame based on time series of station positions and earth orientation parameters.” J. Geophys. Res., 112, B09401.
Besl, P. J., and McKay, N. D. (1992). “A method for registration of 3-d shapes.” IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., 14(2), 239–256.
Carter, W. E., Rogers, A. E. E., Counselman, C. C., III, and Shapiro, I. (1980). “Comparison of geodetic and radio interferometric measurements of the Haystack-Westford base line vector.” J. Geophys. Res., 85, 2685–2687.
Clark, T. A., and Thomsen, P. (1988). “Deformations in VLBI antennas.” NASA Technical Memorandum 100696, NASA, Greenbelt, Md.
Fröhlich, C., and Mettenleiter, M. (2004). “Terrestrial laser scanning-new perspective in 3D survey.” Proc., ISPRS Working Group VIII/2, Institute for Forest, Albert Ludwigs Univ., Freiburg, Germany.
Gendt, G., Nothnagel, A., Pavlis, E., Lemoine, F., Van Dam, T., and Appleby, G. (2007). “Technique-specific biases and effects at co-location sites/satellites.” Unified analysis workshop 2007, ⟨http://www.iers.org/documents/workshop2007/presentations/UAW_PosPap_Session_2_Dec02.pdf⟩ (Sept. 4, 2009).
Johnston, G., and Dawson, J. (2004). “The 2002 Mount Pleasant (Hobart) radio telescope local tie survey.” Geoscience Australia record 2004/21, 21, ⟨http://www.ga.gov.au/geodesy/reports/localties/⟩ (Sept. 4, 2009).
Johnston, G., Dawson, J., and Naebkhil, S. (2004). “The 2003 Mount Stromlo local tie survey.” Geoscience Australia record 2004/20, 26, ⟨http://www.ga.gov.au/geodesy/reports/localties/⟩ (Sept. 4, 2009).
Krügel, M., Thaller, D., Tesmer, V., Rothacher, M., Angermann, D., and Schmid, R. (2007). “Tropospheric parameters: Combination studies based on homogeneous VLBI and GPS data.” J. Geodesy, Berlin, 81(6–8), 515–527.
Leinen, S., Becker, M., Dow, J., Feltens, J., and Sauermann, K. (2007). “Geodetic determination of radio telescope antenna reference point and rotation axis parameters.” J. Surv. Eng., 133(2), 41–51.
Nothnagel, A., Pilhatsch, M. and Haas, R. (1995). “Investigations of thermal height changes of geodetic VLBI radio telescopes.” Proc., 10th Working Meeting on European VLBI for geodesy and astrometry, Agenzia Spaziale Italiana, Matera, Italy, 121–133.
Olmi, L. and Grueff, G., and (2006). “SRT: Design and technical specifications.” Mem. S.A.It. Suppl., Vol. 10, J. Brand, K. -H. Mack, and I. Prandoni, eds., Istituto Nazionale di Astrofisica, Trieste, Italy, ⟨http://sait.oat.ts.astro.it/MSAIS/10/index.html⟩ (Sept. 4, 2009).
Orfei, A, Morsiani, M., Zacchiroli, G., Maccaferri, G., Roda, J. and Fiocchi, F. (2004). “An active surface for large reflector antennas.” IEEE Antennas Wireless Propag. Lett., 46(4), 11–19.
Pieraccini, M., Guidi, G., and Atzeni, C. (2001). “3D digitizing of cultural heritage.” J. Cultural Heritage, 2, 63–70.
Ray, J., and Altamimi, Z. (2005). “Evaluation of co-location ties relating the VLBI and GPS reference frames.” J. Geodesy, Berlin, 79(4–5), 189–195.
Rochblatt, J. D., and Seidel, L. B. (1992). “Microwave antenna holography.” IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Tech., 40(6), 1294–1300.
Ruze, J. (1966). “Antenna tolerance theory—A review.” Proc. IEEE, 54(4), 633–640.
Sarti, P., and Angermann, D. (2005). “Terrestrial data analysis and SINEX generation.” Proc., IERS Workshop on Site Co-Location, Verlag des Bundesamts für Kartographie und Geodäsie, Frankfurt am Main, 118–127.
Sarti, P., Sillard, P., and Vittuari, L. (2004). “Surveying co-located space-geodetic instruments for ITRF computation.” J. Geodesy, Berlin, 78(3), 210–222.
Sawyer, R. (2001). “STAR*NET-PRO V6 least-squares survey network adjustment.” Program reference manual, Starplus Software, Inc., Oakland, Calif.
Schlüter, W., and Behrend, D. (2007). “The International VLBI service for geodesy and astrometry (IVS): Current capabilities and future prospects.” J. Geodesy, Berlin, 81(6–8), 379–387.
Setti, G. (2006). “Synthetic history of the SRT project.” Mem. S.A.It. Suppl., Vol. 10, J. Brand, K. -H. Mack, and I. Prandoni, eds., Istituto Nazionale di Astrofisica, Trieste, Italy, ⟨http://sait.oat.ts.astro.it/MSAIS/10/index.html⟩ (Sept. 4, 2009).
Subrahmanyan, R. (2005). “Photogrammetric measurement of the gravity deformation in a Cassegrain antenna.” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., 53(8), 2590–2596.
Thaller, D., Krügel, M., Rothacher, M., Tesmer, V., Schmid, R., and Angermann, D. (2007). “Combined Earth orientation parameters based on homogeneous and continuous VLBI and GPS data.” J. Geodesy, Berlin, 81(6–8), 529–541.
Tomasi, P. (1993). “Noto station status report.” Proc., IX Working Meeting European VLBI for Geodesy and Astrometry, Geodaetischen Instituten der Rheinischen, Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universitaet, Bonn, Germany, 11–12.
Tomasi, P., et al. (1988). “The first geodetic VLBI experiment with the Bologna radio telescope.” Il Nuovo Cimento, 11(2), 205–208.
Yang, C. -S., Kao, S. -P., Lee, F. -B., and Hung, P. -S. (2004). “Twelve different interpolation methods: A case study of Surfer 8.0.” Proc., XX ISPRS Congress, IAPRS, Istanbul, Turkey, 778–786.
Yemez, Y., and Wetherilt, C. J. (2007). “A volumetric fusion technique for surface reconstruction from silhouettes and range data.” Comput. Vis. Image Underst., 105, 30–41.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2009 ASCE.
History
Received: Oct 1, 2008
Accepted: Mar 16, 2009
Published online: Mar 27, 2009
Published in print: Nov 2009
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.