Technical Papers
Oct 19, 2022

Wind Load Evaluation of Low-Rise Residential Buildings for Coastal Communities Using Database-Assisted Design Method

Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 149, Issue 1

Abstract

Low-rise wood buildings occupy over 95% of all residential structures in the US. However, low-rise buildings usually perform poorly during extreme wind events, such as hurricanes and tornadoes. To ensure the resilience of low-rise buildings to various loads, codes, specifications, and design manuals are usually adopted. However, wind loading in these design codes is typically represented by simplified wind pressure coefficients. Both the directional and envelope methods provided in the current standard consider explicitly the wind directions normal and parallel to the ridge of buildings, with the other directions enveloped for generalization purposes. In comparison, the database-assisted design (DAD) method, which has received increased attention from researchers, is characterized by the direct use of pressure time series from a large number of pressure taps measured in wind tunnel tests for various wind directions. Based on the several previous versions of the current standard, many researchers compared the wind pressures and peak responses from the DAD method and the directional and envelope methods in the current standard. Both methods were found to provide underestimated results. Currently, in addition to the absence of comparisons for the current standard, comparisons of the DAD method with the time-history analysis using the directional and envelope methods for a full-size building considering the material nonlinearity have not been performed. Moreover, the effects of wind speed and wind direction on the wind pressures and peak responses of structures have been ignored. In this paper, the results from both directional and envelope methods with time history analysis for low-rise residential buildings are assessed and compared with those from the DAD method. Synthetic hurricane tracks were incorporated based on the real wind speeds and directions in the community. Transient analysis with the time histories of wind pressures were applied to a realistic full-scale building model under different wind speeds and wind directions. The results suggest that the directional and envelope methods lead to an underestimated displacement, especially at high wind speeds. With wind directions parallel and normal to the ridge of buildings explicitly considered in the current standard, critical wind directions other than the two directions could not be detected, which could underestimate wind-induced responses.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

Funding for this work was partially provided by the Connecticut Sea Grant, the University of Connecticut through Award No. NA14OAR4170086, Project Number R/CH-1 and Connecticut Institute for Resilience & Climate Adaptation (CIRCA). The support is greatly appreciated. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the sponsors.

References

Anagnostou, E., and W. Zhang. 2017. Resiliency analysis of storm surge for Interstate 95 right-of-way at Long Wharf/New Haven, CT. Storrs, CT: Univ. of Connecticut.
ANSYS. 2018. ANSYS mechanical APDL theory reference. Canonsburg, PA: ANSYS.
APA (American Psychological Association). 1998. The engineered wood association. Plywood design specification. Washington, DC: APA.
ASCE. 2016. Minimum design loads and associated criteria for buildings and other structures. ASCE 7-16. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Coffman, B. F., J. A. Main, D. Duthinh, and E. Simiu. 2010. “Wind effects on low-rise metal buildings: Database-assisted design versus ASCE 7-05 standard estimates.” J. Struct. Eng. 136 (6): 744–748. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000140.
Dean, J. A., W. G. Stewart, and A. J. Carr. 1986. “The seismic behaviour of plywood sheathed shearwalls.” Bull. N. Z. Nat. Soc. Earthquake Eng. 19 (1): 48–63. https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.19.1.48-63.
Ding, Z., W. Zhang, W. Hughes, and D. Zhu. 2021. “A modified sub-assembly approach for hurricane induced wind-surge-wave vulnerability assessment of low-rise wood buildings in coastal communities.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 218 (Nov): 104755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2021.104755.
Doudak, G. 2005. “Field determination and modeling of load paths in wood light-frame structures.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil Engineering and Applied Mechanics, McGill Univ.
Fischer, C., and B. Kasal. 2009. “Analysis of light-frame, low-rise buildings under simulated lateral wind loads.” Wind Struct. 12 (2): 89–101. https://doi.org/10.12989/was.2009.12.2.089.
Gupta, R., and P. Limkatanyoo. 2008. “Practical approach to designing wood roof truss assemblies.” Pract. Period. Struct. Des. Constr. 13 (Aug): 135–146. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0680(2008)13:3(135).
Hagos, A., F. Habte, A. G. Chowdhury, and D. Yeo. 2014. “Comparisons of two wind tunnel pressure databases and partial validation against full-scale measurements.” J. Struct. Eng. 140 (10): 04014065. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001001.
He, J., F. Pan, and C. S. Cai. 2017. “A review of wood-frame low-rise building performance study under hurricane winds.” Eng. Struct. 141 (Mar): 512–529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.03.036.
He, J., F. Pan, and C. S. Cai. 2018a. “Assessment of ASCE 7-10 for wind effects on low-rise wood frame buildings with database-assisted design methodology.” Wind Struct. 27 (3): 163–173. https://doi.org/10.12989/was.2018.27.3.163.
He, J., F. Pan, C. S. Cai, A. Chowdhury, and F. Habte. 2018b. “Progressive failure analysis of low-rise timber buildings under extreme wind events using a DAD approach.” J. Wind Eng. Indus. Aerodyn. 182 (Nov): 101–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2018.09.018.
He, J., F. Pan, C. S. Cai, F. Habte, and A. Chowdhury. 2018c. “Finite-element modeling framework for predicting realistic responses of light-frame low-rise buildings under wind loads.” Eng. Struct. 164 (Jun): 53–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.01.034.
Herzog, B., and B. Yeh. 1999. “Nail withdrawal and pull-through strength of structural-use panels nail withdrawal strength of plywood and OSB.” In Proc., 9th World Conf. on Timber Engineering, 6–10. Corvallis, OR: Oregon State Univ.
Ho, T. C. E., D. Surry, and D. Morrish. 2003a. “NIST/TTU cooperative agreement—Windstorm mitigation initiative: Wind tunnel experiments on generic low buildings.” In The boundary layer wind tunnel laboratory. London: Univ. of Western Ontario.
Ho, T. C. E., D. Surry, and M. Nywening. 2003b. “NIST/TTU cooperative agreement—Windstorm mitigation initiative: Future experiments on generic low buildings.” In The boundary layer wind tunnel laboratory. London: Univ. of Western Ontario.
Ho, T. C. E. Ã., D. Surry, D. Morrish, and G. A. Kopp. 2005. “The UWO contribution to the NIST aerodynamic database for wind loads on low buildings: Part 1. Archiving format and basic aerodynamic data.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 93 (14): 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2004.07.006.
IBC (International Building Code). 2018. International building code. Washington, DC: IBC.
Knapp, K. R., M. C. Kruk, D. H. Levinson, H. J. Diamond, and C. J. Neumann. 2010. “The international best track archive for climate stewardship (IBTrACS) unifying tropical cyclone data.” Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 91 (3): 363–376.
Kwon, D., A. Kareem, D. Kumar, and Y. Tamura. 2016. “A prototype online database-enabled design framework for wind analysis/design of low-rise buildings.” Front. Struct. Civ. Eng. 10 (1): 121–130. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-015-0329-3.
Li, Y., and B. R. Ellingwood. 2006. “Hurricane damage to residential construction in the US: Importance of uncertainty modeling in risk assessment.” Eng. Struct. 28 (7): 1009–1018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.11.005.
Main, J. A., and W. P. Fritz. 2006. Database–assisted design for wind: Concepts, software, and examples for rigid and flexible buildings. Gaithersburg, MD: NIST.
Malone, B. P., T. H. Miller, and R. Gupta. 2014. “Gravity and wind load path analysis of a light-frame and a traditional timber frame building.” J. Archit. Eng. 20 (4): B4013001. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)AE.1943-5568.0000136.
Martin, K. G., R. Gupta, D. O. Prevatt, P. L. Datin, and J. W. Lindt. 2011. “Modeling system effects and structural load paths in a wood-framed structure.” J. Archit. Eng. 17 (4): 134–143. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)AE.1943-5568.0000045.
Masoomi, H., M. R. Ameri, and J. W. Van De Lindt. 2018. “Wind performance enhancement strategies for residential wood-frame buildings.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 32 (3): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001172.
Mensah, A. F., P. L. Datin, D. O. Prevatt, R. Gupta, and J. W. Lindt. 2011. “Database-assisted design methodology to predict wind-induced structural behavior of a light-framed wood building.” Eng. Struct. 33 (2): 674–684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.11.028.
National Hurricane Center. 2020. “Historical hurricane.” Accessed April 7, 2020. https://coast.noaa.gov/hurricanes/.
Pan, F., C. S. Cai, W. Zhang, and B. Kong. 2014. “Refined damage prediction of low-rise building envelope under high wind load.” Wind Struct. 18 (6): 669–691. https://doi.org/10.12989/was.2014.18.6.669.
Pfretzschner, K. S., R. Gupta, and T. H. Miller. 2014. “Practical modeling for wind load paths in a realistic light-frame wood house.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 28 (Jun): 430–439. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000448.
Pierre, L. M. S., G. A. Ã. Kopp, D. Surry, and T. C. E. Ho. 2005. “The UWO contribution to the NIST aerodynamic database for wind loads on low buildings: Part 2. Comparison of data with wind load provisions.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 93 (1): 31–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2004.07.007.
Roueche, D. B., D. O. Prevatt, F. L. Haan, and P. L. Datin. 2015. “An estimate of tornado loads on a wood-frame building using database-assisted design methodology.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 138 (Mar): 27–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2014.11.011.
Simiu, E., C. Letchford, N. Isyumov, A. G. Chowdhury, and D. Yeo. 2013. “Assessment of ASCE 7-10 standard methods for determining wind loads.” J. Struct. Eng. 139 (11): 2044–2047. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000771.
Trautner, C. A., and R. P. Ojdrovic. 2014. “Comparison of directional and envelope wind load provisions of ASCE 7.” J. Struct. Eng. 140 (4): 04013100. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000868.
Van De Lindt, J. W., and T. N. Dao. 2009. “Performance-based wind engineering for wood-frame buildings.” J. Struct. Eng. 135 (2): 169–177. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2009)135:2(169).
Vickery, P. J., P. F. Skerlj, and L. A. Twisdale. 2000. “Simulation of hurricane risk in the US using empirical track model.” J. Struct. Eng. 126 (10): 1222–1237. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2000)126:10(1222).
Weston, J., F. Pan, and W. Zhang. 2017. “Resilience study of elevated coastal residential buildings subject to strong winds.” In Proc., 13th Americas Conf. on Wind Engineering. Fort Collins, CO: American Association for Wind Engineering.
Weston, J., and W. Zhang. 2017. “Equivalent parameterized beam model for nailed connections in low-rise residential buildings.” Eng. Struct. 145 (Aug): 12–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.05.002.
Whalen, T. M., F. Sadek, and E. Simiu. 2002. “Database-assisted design for wind: Basic concepts and software development.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 90 (4): 1349–1368. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6105(02)00353-7.
Wu, D. 2018. Coastal community resilience assessment for residential building structures subjected to multi-hazards. Storrs, CT: Univ. of Connecticut.
Zareian, F., and R. A. Medina. 2010. “A practical method for proper modeling of structural damping in inelastic plane structural systems.” Comput. Struct. 88 (1–2): 45–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2009.08.001.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Structural Engineering
Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 149Issue 1January 2023

History

Received: Oct 14, 2021
Accepted: Jul 21, 2022
Published online: Oct 19, 2022
Published in print: Jan 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Mar 19, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Zhixia Ding, S.M.ASCE [email protected]
Graduate Student, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269. Email: [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8364-9953. Email: [email protected]
Graduate Student, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9957-137X. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share