Technical Papers
Aug 1, 2022

Experimental Study on Composite Beam with Various Connections under Midspan Impact Scenarios

Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 148, Issue 10

Abstract

The performance of an immediate frame span subjected to a falling-debris-impact scenario is of great importance to investigate the spread of initial damage during a progressive collapse event. If the frame span was not able to resist the impact load from possible falling debris, it would become new debris and impact the lower floor with previous debris. After that, progressive collapse might probably happen. However, the impact mechanism considering the contribution of composite slabs of an immediate span remained unclear currently. Therefore, experimental studies on a series of three half-scale composite beam subassemblies were conducted under impact scenarios. The impact loads were applied via a high-performance drop-weight test machine. Various beam–column connections, including welded unreinforced flange-bolted web, fin plate, and reverse channel connections, which represented rigid connection, hinge connection, and semirigid connection, respectively, were investigated. The structural resistances of the specimens were provided by flexural action, compression arch action, and catenary action. Among them, the contribution of compressive arch action was limited and can be ignored. Flexural action always provided the most structural resistance contribution in the whole impact process, and catenary action provided structural resistance under large deformation. The specimen structural resistance increased with increasing deformation before the failure of connections. Good flexural resistance and deformation capacity were the key factors for structures to resist impact load. The reversed channel specimen had the best impact resistance.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to gratefully acknowledge the financial support provided by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51778086) and the Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing (cstc2020jcyj-jqX0026 and cstc2020jcyj-bshX0077), China.

References

BSCA and SCI (The British Constructional Steelwork Association Limited and Steel Construction Institute). 2013. Joints in steel construction: Moment-resisting joints to Eurocode 3. London: BSCA and SCI.
BSI (British Standards Institution). 2005. Design of steel structures—Part 1-8: Design of joints. Eurocode 3. BS EN 1993-1-8. London: BSI.
Chen, C., H. Qiao, J. Wang, and Y. Chen. 2020a. “Progressive collapse behavior of joints in steel moment frames involving reduced beam section.” Eng. Struct. 225 (Dec): 111297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.111297.
Chen, K., and K. H. Tan. 2019. “Composite joints with fin plate connections under a middle column removal scenario.” J. Constr. Steel Res. 161 (Oct): 258–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2019.06.018.
Chen, K., and K. H. Tan. 2020. “Structural behavior of composite moment-resisting joints under column-removal scenario.” J. Struct. Eng. 146 (3): 04019226. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002518.
Chen, K., Y. Zhang, and K. H. Tan. 2021. “Behaviour of steel beam-column joints subjected to quasi-static and impact loads.” J. Constr. Steel Res. 183 (Aug): 106721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2021.106721.
Chen, Y., J. Huo, W. Chen, H. Hao, and A. Y. Elghazouli. 2020b. “Experimental and numerical assessment of welded steel beam-column connections under impact loading.” J. Constr. Steel Res. 175 (Dec): 106368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2020.106368.
Daneshvar, H., and R. G. Driver. 2017. “Behaviour of shear tab connections in column removal scenario.” J. Constr. Steel Res. 138 (Nov): 580–593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2017.08.010.
Ding, J., and Y. C. Wang. 2007. “Experimental study of structural fire behaviour of steel beam to concrete filled tubular column assemblies with different types of joints.” Eng. Struct. 29 (12): 3485–3502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2007.08.018.
DOD (Department of Defense). 2016. Design of buildings to resist progressive collapse. UFC 4-023-03. Washington, DC: DOD.
Elsanadedy, H., M. Alrubaidi, H. Abbas, T. Almusallam, and Y. Al-Salloum. 2021. “Progressive collapse risk of 2D and 3D steel-frame assemblies having shear connections.” J. Constr. Steel Res. 179 (Apr): 106533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2021.106533.
Gong, Y. 2017. “Test, modeling and design of bolted-angle connections subjected to column removal.” J. Constr. Steel Res. 139 (Dec): 315–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2017.10.004.
Grimsmo, E. L., A. H. Clausen, M. Langseth, and A. Aalberg. 2015. “An experimental study of static and dynamic behaviour of bolted end-plate joints of steel.” Int. J. Impact Eng. 85 (Nov): 132–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2015.07.001.
GSA (General Serviced Administration). 2016. Alternate path analysis and design guidelines for progressive collapse resistance. GSA 2016. Washington, DC: GSA.
Guo, L., S. Gao, F. Fu, and Y. Wang. 2013. “Experimental study and numerical analysis of progressive collapse resistance of composite frames.” J. Constr. Steel Res. 89 (Oct): 236–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2013.07.006.
Kaewkulchai, G., and E. Williamson. 2006. “Modeling the impact of failed members for progressive collapse analysis of frame structures.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 20 (4): 375–383. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(2006)20:4(375).
Kim, T., U. Kim, and J. Kim. 2012. “Collapse resistance of unreinforced steel moment connections.” Struct. Des. Tall Special Build. 21 (10): 724–735. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.636.
Kong, D.-Y., B. Yang, M. Elchalakani, K. Chen, and L.-M. Ren. 2020. “Progressive collapse resistance of 3D composite floor system subjected to internal column removal: Experiment and numerical simulation.” J. Constr. Steel Res. 172 (Sep): 106208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2020.106208.
Kukla, D., and A. Kozlowski. 2021. “Parametric study of steel flush and extended end-plate joints under column loss scenario.” Eng. Struct. 237 (Jun): 112204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112204.
Lew, H., J. Main, S. Robert, F. Sadek, and V. Chiarito. 2013. “Performance of steel moment connections under a column removal scenario. I: Experiments.” J. Struct. Eng. 139 (1): 98–107. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000618.
Li, L., W. Wang, L. H. Teh, and Y. Chen. 2017. “Effects of span-to-depth ratios on moment connection damage evolution under catenary action.” J. Constr. Steel Res. 139 (Dec): 18–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2017.09.011.
Lin, S., J. Wang, H. Qiao, Y. Chen, and Y. Zhou. 2021. “Performance of steel frames with different web bolt number and arrangements in a column-loss scenario.” J. Struct. Eng. 147 (10): 04021150. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0003119.
Liu, C., T. C. Fung, and K. H. Tan. 2016. “Dynamic performance of flush end-plate beam-column connections and design applications in progressive collapse.” J. Struct. Eng. 142 (1): 04015074. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001329.
MOHURD (Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development). 2016. Code for design of composite structures. JGJ 138-2016. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press.
MOHURD (Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development). 2017. Standard for design of steel structures. GB 50017-2017. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press.
MOHURD (Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development). 2019. Standard for test methods of concrete physical and mechanical properties. GB/T 50081-2019. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press.
Oosterhof, S., and R. Driver. 2015. “Behavior of steel shear connections under column-removal demands.” J. Struct. Eng. 141 (4): 04014126. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001073.
Qiao, H., Y. Chen, J. Wang, and C. Chen. 2020. “Experimental study on beam-to-column connections with reduced beam section against progressive collapse.” J. Constr. Steel Res. 175 (Dec): 106358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2020.106358.
SA (Standardization Administration of the People’s Republic of China). 2010. Metallic materials—Tensile testing—Part 1: Method of test at room temperature. GB/T 228.1-2010. Beijing: SA.
Stoddart, E., M. Byfield, and A. Tyas. 2014. “Blast modeling of steel frames with simple connections.” J. Struct. Eng. 140 (1): 04013027. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000778.
Tang, H., X. Deng, Y. Jia, J. Xiong, and C. Peng. 2019. “Study on the progressive collapse behavior of fully bolted RCS beam-to-column connections.” Eng. Struct. 199 (Nov): 109618. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109618.
Thompson, S. L. 2009. “Axial, shear and moment interaction of single plate shear tab connections.” M.S. thesis, Dept. of Civil and Architectural Engineering and Construction Management, Milwaukee School of Engineering.
Wang, H., J. Huo, Y. Liu, M. Elchalakani, and Z. Zhu. 2021. “Dynamic performance of composite beam-column connections subjected to impact loadings.” J. Constr. Steel Res. 178 (Mar): 106498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2020.106498.
Wang, H., K. H. Tan, and B. Yang. 2020. “Experimental tests of steel frames with different beam-column connections under falling debris impact.” J. Struct. Eng. 146 (1): 04019183. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002469.
Wang, W., C. Fang, X. Qin, Y. Chen, and L. Li. 2016. “Performance of practical beam-to-SHS column connections against progressive collapse.” Eng. Struct. 106 (Jan): 332–347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.10.040.
Weigand, J., and J. Berman. 2014. “Integrity of steel single plate shear connections subjected to simulated column removal.” J. Struct. Eng. 140 (5): 04013114. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000935.
Weigand, J. M., and J. W. Berman. 2015. “Integrity of bolted angle connections subjected to simulated column removal.” J. Struct. Eng. 142 (3): 04015165. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001429.
Yang, B., and K. H. Tan. 2013. “Robustness of bolted-angle connections against progressive collapse: Experimental tests of beam-column joints and development of component-based models.” J. Struct. Eng. 139 (9): 1498–1514. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000749.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Structural Engineering
Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 148Issue 10October 2022

History

Received: Dec 9, 2021
Accepted: May 26, 2022
Published online: Aug 1, 2022
Published in print: Oct 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Jan 1, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Professor, School of Civil Engineering, Chongqing Univ., Chongqing 400045, China. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5374-9208. Email: [email protected]
Hongshen Lecturer, School of Civil Engineering, Chongqing Univ., Chongqing 400045, China (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5811-2043. Email: [email protected]
Da-Ming Wang [email protected]
Postgraduate Student, School of Civil Engineering, Chongqing Univ., Chongqing 400045, China. Email: [email protected]
Mohamed Elchalakani [email protected]
Senior Lecturer, School of Civil, Environmental, and Mining Engineering, Univ. of Western Australia, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Axial-Shear-Flexural Interaction Behavior of a Double-Span Steel Beam Under a Column-Loss State Using the Pushdown Method, International Journal of Steel Structures, 10.1007/s13296-023-00721-7, (2023).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share