Technical Papers
Aug 29, 2022

Deaggregation of Wind Speeds for Hurricane Scenarios Used in Risk-Informed Resilience Assessment of Coastal Communities

Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 148, Issue 11

Abstract

Coastal cities in the east and southeast regions of the US have seen significant population growth and economic development in the last 2 decades. As a result, urban infrastructure, populations, and economies are becoming increasingly vulnerable to hurricane-driven hazards. Criteria for wind design in national standards are intended specifically for the design and performance assessment of individual buildings and other facilities for life safety. They are not adequate for assessing community resilience because hurricane winds are spatially nonuniform. Although scenario-based approaches to representing hurricane demands are more useful in community performance assessment because the distinct features of various hurricane scenarios and their impact on a community can be captured, they are not tied to a specific hazard level. This study introduces a new method for systematically identifying a set of hurricane scenarios corresponding to a stipulated return period (RP) for resilience assessment of coastal communities using a deaggregation approach, which establishes a connection that has not existed previously between hurricane scenarios and the building regulatory process. A community patterned after Miami, Florida, was used to demonstrate the proposed hazard deaggregation and damage analysis. Hurricane scenario events that are dominant contributors to the stipulated RP events, coupled with fragility models of engineered buildings, were used to identify building damage patterns and form an improved basis for risk-informed decision making.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The research herein was funded, in part, by the Center for Risk-Based Community Resilience Planning, a Center of Excellence funded through a cooperative agreement between the US National Institute of Standards and Technology and Colorado State University (NIST Financial Assistance Award No. 70NANB20H008). This support is gratefully acknowledged. The views expressed herein are those of the authors and may not represent the official position of the National Institute of Standards and Technology.

References

Adhikari, P., M. Abdelhafez, Y. Dong, Y. Guo, H. Mahmoud, and B. Ellinwood. 2021. “Achieving residential coastal communities resilient to tropical cyclones and climate change.” Front. Built Environ. 6 (Feb): 576403. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2020.576403.
Aerts, J. C. J. H., P. L. Barnard, W. Botzen, P. Grifman, J. F. Hart, H. De Moel, A. N. Mann, L. T. de Ruig, and N. Sadrpour. 2018. “Pathways to resilience: Adapting to sea level rise in Los Angeles.” Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1427 (1): 1–90. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.13917.
ASCE. 2016. Minimum design loads and associated criteria for buildings and other structures. ASCE 7-16. Reston, VA: ASCE.
ASTM. 2021. Standard test method for water penetration of exterior windows, doors, and curtain walls by uniform static air pressure difference. ASTM E330-02. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Burby, R. J., and S. P. French. 1981. “Coping with floods: The land use management paradox.” J. Am. Plann. Assoc. 47 (3): 289–300. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944368108976511.
CityMiamiFL. 2019. “Miami neighborhoods shapefile.” City of Miami GIS open data. Accessed December 29, 2021. https://datahub-miamigis.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/MiamiGIS::miami-neighborhoods-shapefile.
Darling, R. W. R. 1991. “Estimating probabilities of hurricane wind speeds using a large-scale empirical model.” J. Clim. 4 (10): 1035–1046. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(1991)004%3C1035:EPOHWS%3E2.0.CO;2.
Ellingwood, B. 1990. “Validation studies of seismic PRAs.” Nuclear Eng. Des. 123 (2): 189–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/0029-5493(90)90237-R.
Emmanuel, K. A. 1988. “The maximum intensity of hurricanes.” J. Atmos. Sci. 45 (7): 1143–1155. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1988)045%3C1143:TMIOH%3E2.0.CO;2.
European Commission. 2003. Guidelines for successful public-private partnerships. Brussels, Belgium: European Commission.
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration). 2005. Manual for using public-private partnerships on highway projects. Washington, DC: FHWA.
Georgiou, P. N. 1985. “Design windspeeds in tropical cyclone-prone regions.” Ph.D. thesis, Faculty of Engineering Science, Univ. of Western Ontario.
Harmsen, S., and A. Frankel. 2001. “Geographic de-aggregation of seismic hazard in the United States.” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 91 (1): 13–26. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120000007.
Harper, B. A., J. D. Kepert, and J. D. Ginger. 2010. Guidelines for converting between various wind averaging periods in tropical cyclone conditions. Geneva, Switzerland: WMO.
Hassan, E., and H. Mahmoud. 2019. “Full functionality and recovery assessment framework for a hospital subjected to a scenario earthquake event.” Eng. Struct. 188 (Jun): 165–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.03.008.
Hassan, E., and H. Mahmoud. 2020. “An integrated socio-technical approach for post-earthquake recovery of interdependent healthcare system.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 201 (Sep): 106953. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2020.106953.
Holland, G. J. 1980. “An analytic model of the wind and pressure profiles in hurricanes.” Mon. Weather Rev. 108 (8): 1212–1218. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1980)108%3C1212:AAMOTW%3E2.0.CO;2.
Kalnay, E., et al. 1996. “The NCEP/NCAR 40-year reanalysis project.” Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 77 (3): 437–471. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(1996)077%3C0437:TNYRP%3E2.0.CO;2.
Kang, D., K. Ko, and J. Huh. 2015. “Determination of extreme wind values using the Gumbel distribution.” Energy 86 (Jun): 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2015.03.126.
Koliou, M., J. W. van de Lindt, T. P. McAllister, B. R. Ellingwood, M. Dillard, and H. Cutler. 2018. “State of the research in community resilience: Progress and challenges.” Sustainable Resilient Infrastruct. 5 (3): 131–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/23789689.2017.1418547.
Kossin, J. P. 2018. “A global slowdown of tropical-cyclone translation speed.” Nature 558 (7708): 104–107. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0158-3.
Kousky, C., E. F. P. Luttmer, and R. J. Zeckhauser. 2006. “Private investment and government protection.” J. Risk Uncertainty 33 (1): 73–100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11166-006-0172-y.
Landsea, C. W., S. Feuer, A. Hagen, D. A. Glenn, J. Sims, R. Perez, and M. Chenowethm, and N. Anderson. 2012. “A reanalysis of the 1921–30 Atlantic hurricane database.” J. Clim. 25 (3): 865–885. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00026.1.
Li, Y., and B. R. Ellingwood. 2006. “Hurricane damage to residential construction in the US: Importance of uncertainty modelling in risk assessment.” Eng. Struct. 28 (7): 1009–1018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.11.005.
Li, Y., and B. R. Ellingwood. 2009. “Framework for multi-hazard risk assessment and mitigation for wood-frame residential construction.” J. Struct. Eng. 135 (2): 159–168. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2009)135:2(159).
Manning, B. R., and G. G. Nichols. 1991. “Hugo-lessons learned.” In Proc., Hurricane Hugo One Year Later, 186–194. Reston, VA: ASCE.
McAllister, T. P. 2016. “Research needs for developing a risk-Informed methodology for community resilience.” J. Struct. Eng. 142 (8): C4015008. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001379.
Mei, W., C. Pasquero, and F. Primeau. 2012. “The effect of translation speed upon the intensity of tropical cyclones over the tropical ocean.” Geophys. Res. Lett. 39 (7): L07801. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL050765.
Porter, K., K. Farokhnia, D. Vamvatksikos, and I. Cho. 2015. “Guidelines for component-based analytical vulnerability assessment of buildings and nonstructural elements.” Accessed December 29, 2021. https://www.sparisk.com/pubs/Porter-2015-GEM-Analytical-Vulnerability.pdf.
Powell, M. D., et al. 2010. “Reconstruction of Hurricane Katrina’s wind fields for storm surge and wave hindcasting.” Ocean Eng. 37 (1): 26–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2009.08.014.
Powell, M. D., S. H. Houston, L. R. Amat, and N. Morisseau-Leroy. 1998. “The HRD real-time hurricane wind analysis system.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 77–78 (Sep): 53–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6105(98)00131-7.
Rosowsky, D. V., and B. R. Ellingwood. 2002. “Performance-based engineering of wood frame housing: A fragility analysis methodology.” J. Struct. Eng. 128 (1): 32–38. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2002)128:1(32).
Shinozuka, M., M. Q. Feng, J. Lee, and T. Naganuma. 2000. “Statistical analysis of fragility curves.” J. Eng. Mech. 126 (12): 1224–1231. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2000)126:12(1224).
Simiu, E., P. Vickery, and A. Kareem. 2007. “Relation between Saffir–Simpson hurricane scale wind speeds and peak 3-s gust speeds over open terrain.” J. Struct. Eng. 133 (7): 1043–1045. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2007)133:7(1043).
Simiu, E., and D. Yeo. 2019. Wind effects on structures: Modern structural design for wind. 4th ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Singhal, A., and A. S. Kiremidjian. 1996. “Methods for probabilistic evaluation of seismic structural damage.” J. Struct. Eng. 122 (12): 1459–1467. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1996)122:12(1459).
Sparks, P. R., S. D. Schiff, and T. A. Reinhold. 1994. “Wind damage to envelopes of houses and consequence insurance losses.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 53 (1–2): 145–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6105(94)90023-X.
USGS. 2014. “U.S.G.S. unified hazard tool.” Accessed December 29, 2021. https://earthquake.usgs.gov/hazards/interactive/.
Vickery, P. J., F. J. Masters, M. D. Powell, and D. Wadhera. 2009a. “Hurricane hazard modeling: The past, present, and future.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 97 (7–8): 392–405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2009.05.005.
Vickery, P. J., P. F. Skerlj, A. C. Steckley, and L. A. Twisdale. 2000a. “Hurricane wind field model for use in hurricane simulations.” J. Struct. Eng. 126 (10): 1203–1221. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2000)126:10(1203).
Vickery, P. J., P. F. Skerlj, and L. A. Twisdale. 2000b. “Simulation of hurricane risk in the US using empirical track model.” J. Struct. Eng. 126 (10): 1222–1237. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2000)126:10(1222).
Vickery, P. J., and L. A. Twisdale. 1995. “Wind-field and filling models for hurricane wind-speed predictions.” J. Struct. Eng. 121 (11): 1700–1709. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1995)121:11(1700).
Vickery, P. J., and D. Wadhera. 2008. “Statistical models of Holland pressure profile parameter and radius to maximum winds of hurricanes from flight level pressure and H* wind data.” J. Appl. Meteorol. Climatol. 47 (10): 2497–2517. https://doi.org/10.1175/2008JAMC1837.1.
Vickery, P. J., D. Wadhera, M. D. Powell, and Y. Chen. 2009b. “A hurricane boundary layer and wind field model for use in engineering applications.” J. Appl. Meteorol. Climatol. 48 (2): 381–405. https://doi.org/10.1175/2008JAMC1841.1.
Vickery, P. J., D. Wadhera, L. A. Twisdale Jr., and F. M. Lavelle. 2009c. “U.S. hurricane wind speed risk and uncertainty.” J. Struct. Eng. 135 (3): 301–320. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2009)135:3(301).

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Structural Engineering
Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 148Issue 11November 2022

History

Received: Jan 2, 2022
Accepted: Mar 28, 2022
Published online: Aug 29, 2022
Published in print: Nov 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Jan 29, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Graduate Student, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins, CO 80523 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3119-5627. Email: [email protected]
Yanlin Guo, A.M.ASCE [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins, CO 80523. Email: [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins, CO 80523. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7400-3656. Email: [email protected]
Hussam N. Mahmoud, M.ASCE [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins, CO 80523. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Advances in Data-Driven Risk-Based Performance Assessment of Structures and Infrastructure Systems, Journal of Structural Engineering, 10.1061/JSENDH.STENG-12434, 149, 5, (2023).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share