Abstract

Although long-span suspension bridges play a vital role in the transportation infrastructure, their resistance to disproportionate collapse resulting from locally induced damage has not yet been adequately investigated. In this study, computational simulation is used to shed light on how a prototype long-span suspension bridge responds to sudden loss of suspenders. Several scenarios were considered, with a focus on the total number of suspenders lost, their locations, and mode of removal. An increasing number of suspenders were removed either sequentially (i.e., one at a time) or simultaneously (i.e., multiple suspenders removed at the same time) until progressive collapse of the bridge was triggered. The simulation results showed that the bridge exhibited increasing levels of damage as the number of removed suspenders increased, and that the most critical location for suspender removal was near the middle of the bridge. It is shown that the sequential loss of a group of suspenders led to bridge responses that are almost identical with the simultaneous loss of the same group of suspenders. It is also argued that suspension bridges like the prototype system under consideration are highly robust.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data shown in the paper are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

This material is based upon work supported by Federal Highway Administration under Contract No. DTFH61-14-D-00010/693JJ318F000170. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Federal Highway Administration. The US Government does not endorse products, manufacturers, or outside entities. Such names are included here for informational purposes only and are not intended to reflect a preference, approval, or endorsement of any product or entity.

References

AASHO. 1961. Standard specifications for highway bridges. Washington, DC: AASHO.
Agrawal, A. K., S. El-Tawil, Q. Chen, and H. Wang. 2021. Redundancy in long span bridges for risk mitigation in a multi-hazard environment. Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration.
Alashker, Y., H. Li, and S. El-Tawil. 2011. “Approximations in progressive collapse modeling.” J. Struct. Eng. 137 (9): 914–924. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000452.
Aoki, Y., H. Valipour, B. Samali, and A. Saleh. 2013. “A study on potential progressive collapse responses of cable-stayed bridges.” Adv. Struct. Eng. 16 (4): 689–706. https://doi.org/10.1260/1369-4332.16.4.689.
Calvi, G. M., M. Moratti, G. J. O’Reilly, N. Scattarreggia, R. Monteiro, D. Malomo, P. M. Calvi, and R. Pinho. 2019. “Once upon a time in Italy: The tale of the Morandi bridge.” Struct. Eng. Int. 29 (2): 198–217. https://doi.org/10.1080/10168664.2018.1558033.
Cao, R., A. K. Agrawal, S. El-Tawil, and W. Wong. 2021. “Overheight impact on bridges: A computational case study of the Skagit River bridge collapse.” Eng. Struct. 237 (Jun): 112215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112215.
Cao, R., S. El-Tawil, and A. K. Agrawal. 2020. “Miami pedestrian bridge collapse: Computational forensic analysis.” J. Bridge Eng. 25 (1): 04019134. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001532.
CEN (European Committee for Standardization). 2006. Design of steel structures, Part 1-11: Design of structures with tension components. Brussels, Belgium: CEN.
Connor, R. J., F. J. Bonachera Martín, A. Varma, Z. Lai, and C. Korkmaz. 2018. Fracture-critical system analysis for steel bridges. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Das, R., A. D. Pandey, M. J. Mahesh, P. Saini, and S. Anvesh. 2016. “Progressive collapse of a cable stayed bridge.” Procedia Eng. 144 (2): 132–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.05.016.
DOD (Department of Defense). 2009. Unified facilities criteria: Design of buildings to resist progressive collapse. Washington, DC: DOD.
GSA (General Services Administration). 2003. Progressive collapse analysis and design guidelines for new federal office buildings and major modernization projects. Washington, DC: GSA.
Hoang, V., O. Kiyomiya, and T. An. 2016. “Experimental and dynamic response analysis of cable-stayed bridge due to sudden cable loss.” J. Struct. Eng. 62 (1): 50–60. https://doi.org/10.11532/structcivil.62A.50.
Hoang, V., O. Kiyomiya, and T. An. 2018. “Experimental and numerical study of lateral cable rupture in cable-stayed bridges: Case study.” J. Bridge Eng. 23 (6): 05018004. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001227.
Jin, J., and S. El-Tawil. 2003. “Inelastic cyclic model for steel braces.” J. Eng. Mech. 129 (6): 548–557. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2003)129:5(548).
Kawai, Y., D. Siringoringo, and Y. Fujino. 2014. “Failure analysis of the hanger clamps of the Kutai-Kartanegara Bridge from the fracture mechanics viewpoint.” J. JSCE 2 (1): 1–6. https://doi.org/10.2208/journalofjsce.2.1_1.
Khandelwal, K., S. El-Tawil, and F. Sadek. 2008. “Progressive collapse analysis of seismically designed steel braced frames.” J. Constr. Steel Res. 65 (3): 699–708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2008.02.007.
Kim, S., and Y. J. Kang. 2016. “Structural behavior of cable-stayed bridges after cable failure.” Struct. Eng. Mech. 59 (6): 1095–1120. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2016.59.6.1095.
Lonetti, P., and A. Pascuzzo. 2014. “Vulnerability and failure analysis of hybrid cable-stayed suspension bridges subjected to damage mechanisms.” Eng. Fail. Anal. 45 (Sep): 470–495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2014.07.002.
LSTC (Livermore Software Technology Corporation). 2020. “LS-DYNA® keywords user manual Volume II-Material models.” Accessed September 9, 2020. https://www.dynasupport.com/manuals/ls-dyna-manuals/ls-dyna_manual_volume_i_r12.pdf.
Mayrbaurl, R. M., and S. Camo. 2004. Guidelines for inspection and strength evaluation of suspension bridge parallel-wire cables. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Mozos, C. M., and A. C. Aparicio. 2010a. “Parametric study on the dynamic response of cable stayed bridges to the sudden failure of a stay, Part I: Bending moment acting on the deck.” Eng. Struct. 32 (10): 3288–3300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.07.003.
Mozos, C. M., and A. C. Aparicio. 2010b. “Parametric study on the dynamic response of cable stayed bridges to the sudden failure of a stay, Part II: Bending moment acting on the pylons and stress on the stays.” Eng. Struct. 32 (10): 3301–3312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.07.002.
PTI (Post-Tensioning Institute). 2012. Recommendations for stay-cable design, testing and installation. Phoenix, AZ: Cable-Stayed Bridges Committee.
Qiu, W., M. Jiang, and C. Huang. 2014a. “Parametric study on responses of a self-anchored suspension bridge to sudden breakage of a hanger.” Sci. World J. 2014 (Jan): 11. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/512120.
Qiu, W., M. Jiang, and Z. Zhang. 2014b. “Responses of self-anchored suspension bridge to sudden breakage of hangers.” Struct. Eng. Mech. 50 (2): 241–255. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2014.50.2.241.
Ruiz-Teran, A. M., and A. C. Aparicio. 2009. “Response of under-deck cable-stayed bridges to the accidental breakage of stay cables.” Eng. Struct. 31 (7): 1425–1434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.02.027.
Shoghijavan, M., and U. Starossek. 2018a. “An analytical study on the bending moment acting on the girder of a long-span cable-supported bridge suffering from cable failure.” Eng. Struct. 167 (Mar): 166–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.04.017.
Shoghijavan, M., and U. Starossek. 2018b. “Structural robustness of long-span cable-supported bridges in a cable-loss scenario.” J. Bridge Eng. 23 (2): 04017133. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001186.
Starossek, U. 2007. “Typology of progressive collapse.” Eng. Struct. 29 (9): 2302–2307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2006.11.025.
Takena, K., M. Sasaki, K. Hata, and K. Hasegawa. 1992. “Slip behavior of cable against saddle in suspension bridges.” J. Struct. Eng. 118 (2): 377–391. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1992)118:2(377).
TTSB (Taiwan Transportation Safety Board). 2020. Final report on nanfangao sea-crossing bridge collapse. Taipei, Taiwan: TTSB.
Wolff, M., and U. Starossek. 2009. “Cable loss and progressive collapse in cable-stayed bridges.” Bridge Struct. 5 (1): 17–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732480902775615.
Wu, G., and W. Qiu. 2020. “Effect of load cases and hanger-loss scenarios on dynamic responses of the self-anchored suspension bridge to abrupt rupture of hangers.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 34 (5): 04020081. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001482.
Wu, G., W. Qiu, and T. Wu. 2019. “Nonlinear dynamic analysis of the self-anchored suspension bridge subjected to sudden breakage of a hanger.” Eng. Fail. Anal. 97 (Mar): 701–717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2019.01.028.
Zhang, Y., Z. Fang, R. Jiang, Y. Xiang, H. Long, and J. Lu. 2020. “Static performance of a long-span concrete cable-stayed bridge subjected to multiple-cable loss during construction.” J. Bridge Eng. 25 (3): 04020002. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001529.
Zhou, Y., and S. Chen. 2014. “Time-progressive dynamic assessment of abrupt cable-breakage events on cable-stayed bridges.” J. Bridge Eng. 19 (2): 159–171. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000517.
Zhou, Y., and S. Chen. 2015. “Numerical investigation of cable breakage events on long-span cable-stayed bridges under stochastic traffic and wind.” Eng. Struct. 105 (Dec): 299–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.07.009.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Structural Engineering
Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 148Issue 6June 2022

History

Received: Oct 18, 2021
Accepted: Feb 15, 2022
Published online: Apr 6, 2022
Published in print: Jun 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Sep 6, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Postdoctoral Researcher, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, City College of New York, New York, NY 10031 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6854-511X. Email: [email protected]
Graduate Student, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, City College of New York, New York, NY 10031. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8651-5210. Email: [email protected]
Anil K. Agrawal, M.ASCE [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, City College of New York, New York, NY 10031. Email: [email protected]
Sherif El-Tawil, F.ASCE [email protected]
Antoine E. Naaman Collegiate Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109. Email: [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, Kharagpur, West Bengal 721302, India. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8758-7486. Email: [email protected]
Waider Wong [email protected]
Senior Structural Engineer, Federal Highway Administration, 31 Hopkins Plaza, Suite 1520, Baltimore, MD 21201. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Twenty Years of Advances in Disproportionate Collapse Research and Best Practices since 9/11/2001, Journal of Structural Engineering, 10.1061/JSENDH.STENG-12056, 149, 2, (2023).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share