Technical Papers
Apr 19, 2022

Influence of Weld Sequence on the Low-Cycle Fatigue Failure of WUF-B Connections

Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 148, Issue 7

Abstract

Experiments on post-Northridge welded unreinforced flange bolted web (WUF-B) connections demonstrated a new low-cycle fatigue (LCF) crack initiation mechanism with final rupture occurring either near the weld access hole or the weld regions. Post-Northridge connection research reports and related commentary indicated that the weld and heat-affected zone (HAZ) conditions might be contributing factors in LCF-initiated failures of the modified WUF-B connections. The experimental study reported herein investigated the influence of weld sequence on the fatigue failure of the WUF-B connections. Two exterior WUF-B connections were fabricated using different weld sequences in laying the complete joint penetration welding between the beam and column flanges. These connections were tested under a constant-amplitude displacement-controlled loading protocol until crack initiation. Both specimens failed by cracking at the weld access hole, one in a brittle manner and the other in a ductile manner. Analysis of the recorded data demonstrated the influence of weld sequence on strain responses at the weld toe and weld access hole regions. Accumulation of strain with cycles, which is a phenomenon known as strain ratcheting, was observed near these locations in both tests. Recorded strain responses near the crack locations indicated the cause of earlier failure of one specimen compared with the other. Finally, future research needs in mitigating the influence of welding sequence on fatigue failure of welded steel moment connections are discussed.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

Donation of the W shapes by the Steel Fab at Charlotte, North Carolina, and the welding services by Buckner Steel at Graham, North Carolina, and help of Don Sherrill of the Steel Fab, Jerry Atkinson, and Dr. Greg Lucier of the Constructed Facilities Laboratory at North Carolina State University is highly appreciated. The help of Drs. Samiuddin Syed and Emmett Sumner with testing of the specimens is greatly acknowledged.

References

ANSI/AISC (American Institute of Steel Construction). 2016a. Prequalified connections for special and intermediate steel moment frames for seismic applications. Chicago: AISC.
ANSI/AISC (American Institute of Steel Construction). 2016b. Seismic provisions for structural steel buildings. Chicago: AISC.
ANSI/AWS (American Welding Society). 2015. Structural welding code-steel. Miami, FL: AWS.
ANSI/AWS (American Welding Society). 2016. Structural welding code-seismic supplement. Miami, FL: AWS.
ATC (Applied Technology Council). 1992. Guidelines for cyclic seismic testing of components of steel structures. Redwood City, CA: ATC.
Ballio, G., and C. A. Castiglioni. 1994. “Seismic behavior of steel sections.” J. Constr. Steel Res. 29 (3): 21–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/0143-974X(94)90055-8.
Barsom, J. M., and J. V. Pellegrino. 2000. Failure analysis of welded beam to column connections. Washington, DC: FEMA.
Barsom, J. M., and J. V. Pellegrino. 2002. “Failure analysis of welded steel moment-resisting frame connections.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 14 (1): 24–34. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2002)14:1(24).
Castiglioni, C. A. 2005. “Effects of the loading history on the local buckling behavior and failure mode of welded beam-to-column joints in moment-resisting steel frames.” J. Eng. Mech. 131 (6): 568–585. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2005)131:6(568).
Chi, W. M., G. G. Deierlein, and A. R. Ingraffea. 1997. Finite element fracture mechanics investigation of welded beam-to-column connections. Washington, DC: FEMA.
Chung, Y. L., T. Nagae, T. Hitaka, and M. Nakashima. 2010. “Seismic resistance capacity of high-rise buildings subjected to long-period ground motions: E-defense shaking table test.” J. Struct. Eng. 136 (6): 637–644. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000161.
Clark, P., K. Frank, H. Krawinkler, and R. Shaw. 1997. Protocol for fabrication, inspection, testing and documentation of beam-column connection tests and other experimental specimens. Washington, DC: FEMA.
Dong, P., T. Kilinski, J. Zhang, and F. W. Brust. 1999. Effects of strength/toughness mismatch on structural and fracture behaviors in weldments. Washington, DC: FEMA.
Engelhardt, M. D., G. Fry, S. Jones, M. Venti, and S. Holliday. 2000. Behavior and design of radius-cut, reduced beam section connections. Washington, DC: FEMA.
Engelhardt, M. D., T. Winneberger, A. J. Zekany, and T. J. Potyraj. 1998. “Experimental investigation of dogbone moment connections.” Eng. J. 4 (Jan): 128–138.
Farajian, M., T. Nitschke-Pagel, and K. Dilger. 2012. “Relaxation of welding residual stresses—Part I: Under quasi-static loading.” Int. J. Microstruct. Mater. Prop. 7 (1): 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMMP.2012.045800.
FEMA. 2000a. Recommendation and seismic design criteria for new steel moment-frame buildings. Washington, DC: FEMA.
FEMA. 2000b. Recommended specifications and quality assurance guidelines for steel Moment—Frame construction for seismic applications. Washington, DC: FEMA.
FEMA. 2000c. State of the art report on base metals and fracture. Washington, DC: FEMA.
FEMA. 2000d. State of the art report on connection performance. Washington, DC: FEMA.
FEMA. 2000e. State of the art report on welding and inspection. Washington, DC: FEMA.
Genchev, G., N. Doynov, R. Ossenbrink, V. Michailov, G. Bokuchava, and P. Petrov. 2017. “Residual stresses formation in multi-pass weldment: A numerical and experimental study.” J. Constr. Steel Res. 138 (8): 633–641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2017.08.017.
Han, S. W., G. U. Kwon, and K. H. Moon. 2007. “Cyclic behavior of post-Northridge WUF-B connections.” J. Constr. Steel Res. 63 (3): 365–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2006.05.003.
Hassan, T., and S. Kyriakides. 1994. “Ratcheting of cyclically hardening and softening materials, Part I: Uniaxial behavior.” Int. J. Plast. 10 (94): 149–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-6419(94)90033-7.
Jones, S. L., G. T. Fry, and M. D. Engelhardt. 2002. “Experimental evaluation of cyclically loaded reduced beam section moment connections.” J. Struct. Eng. 128 (4): 441–451. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2002)128:4(441).
Kanvinde, A. 2017. “Predicting fracture in civil engineering steel structures: State of the art.” J. Struct. Eng. 143 (3): 03116001. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001704.
Kanvinde, A., and G. G. Deierlein. 2004. Micromechanical simulation of earthquake induced fractures in steel structures. Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ.
Kanvinde, A., and G. G. Deierlein. 2006. “Void growth model and stress modified critical strain model to predict ductile fracture in structural steels.” J. Struct. Eng. 132 (12): 1907–1918. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2006)132:12(1907).
Kaufman, E. J., and J. Fisher. 1995. A study of the effects of material and welding factors on moment frame weld joint performance using a small scale tension specimen, 95–98. Sacramento, CA: SAC Joint Venture.
Krawinkler, H., A. Gupta, R. Medina, and N. Luco. 2000. Loading histories for seismic performance testing of SMRF components and assemblies. Washington, DC: FEMA.
Krawinkler, H., and M. Zohrei. 1983. “Cumulative damage in steel structures subjected to earthquake ground motions.” Comput. Struct. 16 (83): 531–541. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7949(83)90193-1.
Krawinkler, H., M. Zohrei, B. Lashkari-Irvani, N. G. Cofie, and H. Hadidi-Tamjed. 1983. Recommendations for experimental studies on the seismic behavior of steel components and materials. Washington, DC: Dept. of Civil Engineering.
Lee, D., S. C. Cotton, J. F. Hajjar, and R. J. Dexter. 2005. “Cyclic behavior of steel moment-resisting connections reinforced by alternative column stiffener details, I. Connection performance and continuity plate detailing.” Eng. J. 4 (Jan): 189–213.
Mander, J. B., S. S. Chen, and G. Pekan. 1994a. “Low-cycle fatigue behavior of semi-rigid top-and-seat angle connections.” Eng. J. 31 (3): 111–122.
Mander, J. B., S. S. Chen, and G. Pekan. 1994b. “Low-cycle variable amplitude fatigue modeling of top-and-seat angle connections.” Eng. J. 32 (2): 54–62.
Mao, C., J. Ricles, L. W. Lu, and J. Fisher. 2001. “Effect of local details on ductility of welded moment connections.” J. Struct. Eng. 127 (9): 1036–1044. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2001)127:9(1036).
Matos, C. G., and R. H. Dodds. 2002. “Probabilistic modeling of weld fracture in steel frame connections Part II: Seismic loading.” Eng. Struct. 24 (6): 687–705. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(01)00133-X.
Mazzolani, F. M. 2000. Moment resistant connections of steel frames in seismic areas: Design and reliability. London: E & FN Spon.
Mele, E., L. Calado, and D. Luca. 2003. “Experimental investigation on European welded connections.” J. Struct. Eng. 129 (10): 1301–1311. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2003)129:10(1301).
Mohr, W. 2002. Weld acceptance criteria for seismically-loaded welded connection. Washington, DC: FEMA.
Morrison, M. L., D. Q. Schweizer, and T. Hassan. 2015. “An innovative seismic performance enhancement technique for steel building moment resisting connections.” J. Constr. Steel Res. 109 (Jun): 34–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2015.02.010.
Morrison, M. L., D. Q. Schweizer, and T. Hassan. 2016. “Seismic enhancement of welded unreinforced flange-bolted web steel moment connections.” J. Struct. Eng. 142 (11): 04016102. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001575.
Nakashima, M., K. Suita, K. Marisako, and Y. Maruoka. 1998. “Tests of welded beam-column subassemblies. I: Global behavior.” J. Struct. Eng. 124 (11): 1236–1244. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1998)124:11(1236).
Ozkula, G., R. Garai, P. Lee, and C.-M. Uang. 2019. “Cyclic behavior of electroslag welded joints in beam-to-built-up box column steel moment connections.” J. Struct. Eng. 145 (12): 04019146. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002409.
Pan, J., S. Chen, Z. Lai, Z. Wang, J. Wang, and H. Xie. 2017. “Analysis and fracture behavior of welded box beam-to-column connections considering residual stresses.” Constr. Build. Mater. 154 (6): 557–566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.07.228.
Partridge, J. E., S. R. Paterson, and R. M. Richard. 2003. “ATC-24 cumulative damage tests and fracture analyses of bolted-welded seismic moment frame connections.” Forensic Eng. 142–157. https://doi.org/10.1061/40692(241)17.
Qu, W., E. Zhao, and Q. Zhou. 2017. “Refined analysis of fatigue crack initiation life of beam-to-column welded connections of steel frame under strong earthquake.” Shock Vib. 2017 (Jan): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/7946286.
Richard, R. M., J. E. Partridge, and J. Allen. 2001. “Accumulated seismic connection damage based upon full scale low cycle fatigue connection tests.” In Proc., Structural Engineering Association of California 70th Annual Convention, 43–48. Sacramento, CA: Structural Engineering Association of California.
Richard, R. M., and R. E. Radau. 1998. “Force, stress and strain distribution in FR bolted welded connections.” In Proc., ’98 Structural Engineers World Congress Tech Paper T199-3. New York: Elsevier.
Ricles, J. M., J. W. Fisher, L. W. Lu, and E. J. Kaufmann. 2002a. “Development of improved welded moment connections for earthquake-resistant design.” J. Constr. Steel Res. 58 (3): 565–604. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0143-974X(01)00095-5.
Ricles, J. M., C. Mao, L. W. Lu, and J. W. Fisher. 2002b. “Inelastic cyclic testing of welded unreinforced moment connections.” J. Struct. Eng. 128 (4): 429–440. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2002)128:4(429).
SEAOC (Structural Engineers Association of California Seismology Committee). 2002. Commentary and recommendations on FEMA 350. Sacramento, CA: SEAOC.
Stojadinovic, B., S. C. Goel, K. H. Lee, A. G. Margarian, and J. H. Choi. 2000. “Parametric tests on unreinforced steel moment connections.” J. Struct. Eng. 126 (1): 40–49. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2000)126:1(40).
Suita, K., M. Nakashima, and K. Morisako. 1998. “Tests of welded beam-column subassemblies II: Detailed behavior.” J. Struct. Eng. 124 (11): 1245–1252. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1998)124:11(1245).
Tong, L., X. Huang, F. Zhou, and Y. Chen. 2016. “Experimental and numerical investigations on extremely-low-cycle fatigue fracture behavior of steel welded joints.” J. Constr. Steel Res. 119 (12): 98–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2015.12.015.
Tsai, C., D. Kim, J. Jaeger, Y. Shim, Z. Feng, and J. Papritan. 2001. “Design analysis for welding of heavy W shapes.” Weld J. 80 (2): 35–41.
Tsai, C.-Y., K.-C. Tsai, C.-H. Li, C.-C. Wu, K.-C. Lin, and S.-J. Jhuang. 2020. “Seismic fracture evaluation of diaphragm joints in welded beam-to-box column moment connections.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 49 (Jan): 1344–1362. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.3293.
Yu, S., C. Gilton, and C. M. Uang. 2000. Cyclic response of RBS moment connections: Loading sequence and lateral bracing effects. Washington, DC: FEMA.
Zhang, J., and P. Dong. 2000. “Residual stresses in welded moment frames and implications for structural performance.” J. Struct. Eng. 126 (3): 306–315. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2000)126:3(306).

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Structural Engineering
Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 148Issue 7July 2022

History

Received: Aug 25, 2021
Accepted: Jan 28, 2022
Published online: Apr 19, 2022
Published in print: Jul 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Sep 19, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Professor, Dept. of Civil, Construction, and Environmental Engineering, North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC 27607 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6204-0898. Email: [email protected]
Shahriar Quayyum, M.ASCE [email protected]
Visiting Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Manhattan College, Riverdale, NY 10471. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share