Experimental Study of Continuous-Beam Lateral Torsional–Buckling Resistance with a Noncomposite Concrete Deck
Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 148, Issue 4
Abstract
Some of Louisiana’s bridges built in the 1950s and 1960s used two-girder or truss systems, in which transverse floor beams are carried by main longitudinal members and continuous (spliced) beams supporting the deck are supported by the floor beams. The main longitudinal members are either two edge (fascia) girders or trusses. Continuous-beam bottom flanges are in compression in the negative moment region, which could result in lateral torsional buckling. When the continuous beams are load rated, is calculated in accordance with a standard specification that does not account for potentially beneficial bracing effects from a noncomposite concrete deck and could therefore underestimate actual flexural strength. As a result, the rating may require a restrictive bridge posting or closure. This issue affects bridges that are key parts of Louisiana’s highway system, i.e., longer, multispan crossings with high average daily traffic (ADT) counts. The calculated load rating could require expensive, and possibly unnecessary, bridge rehabilitation or replacement with significant traffic disruption. This research reassessed the methodology behind load rating these continuous beams, with efforts focusing on deriving more realistic values for . Its main objective was to evaluate the capacity of bridges built with continuous beams and noncomposite decks and to develop a new approach for rating those beams by more accurately representing the moment gradients using . An experimental study was conducted to evaluate lateral torsional–buckling resistance of a reduced-scale, two-span grillage system that included three lines of continuous beams supporting a noncomposite concrete deck. A significantly higher moment gradient factor as compared to the existing codes and standards was recommended by accounting for the bracing effect provided by a noncomposite deck.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank the Louisiana Transportation Research Center (LTRC) and the Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development (LADOTD) for funding this project. The investigators are grateful to the Project Review Committee members for their guidance and support. Special thanks go to Dr. Walid R. Alaywan, senior structures research engineer, for his leadership and efforts. The authors are also grateful to Mr. Peter Hilsabeck at the University of Nebraska–Lincoln for assisting in lab testing.
Disclaimer
Any statements expressed in the paper are those of the individual authors and do not necessarily represent the view of ASCE, which takes no responsibility for any statement made herein.
References
AASHTO. 2016. Manual for bridge evaluation. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
AASHTO. 2020. LRFD bridge design specifications. 9th ed. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
AISC. 2016. Specification for structural steel buildings. ANSI/AISC 360-16. Chicago: AISC.
BSI (British Standards Institution). 2000. Structural use of steelwork in buildings—Part 1, code of practice for design rolled and welded sections. BS 5950-1. London: BSI.
CSA (Canadian Standards Association). 2019. Canadian highway bridge design code. CSA S6-19. Mississauga, ON, Canada: CSA.
JSCE (Japan Society of Civil Engineers). 2007. Standard specifications for steel and composite structures. Tokyo: JSCE.
Kirby, P. A., and D. A. Nethercot. 1979. Design for structural stability. New York: Wiley.
Kissane, R. J. 1985. Lateral restraint of non-composite beams. Albany, NY: New York State DOT.
LADOTD (Louisiana DOT and Development). 2019. Bridge design and evaluation manual. Baton Rouge, LA: LADOTD.
Ravindra, M. K., and T. V. Galambos. 1978. “Load and resistance factor design for steel.” J. Struct. Div. 104 (9): 1337–1353. https://doi.org/10.1061/JSDEAG.0004981.
Salvadori, M. G. 1955. “Lateral buckling of I-beams.” Trans. Am. Soc. Civ. Eng. 120 (1): 1165–1177.
Standards Australia. 2020. Steel structures. AS 4100. Sydney, Australia: Standards Australia.
Sun, C., D. Linzell, J. O. Puckett, A. Rageh, D. Kuruppuarachchi, and O. Babarinde. 2021. “Experimental study of stringer lateral torsional resistance using a grillage system.” In Proc., Annual Stability Conf. Chicago: Structural Stability Research Council.
Yura, J. A., and T. A. Helwig. 2010. “Buckling of beams with inflection points.” In Proc., Annual Stability Conf. Chicago: Structural Stability Research Council.
Yura, J. A., B. Phillips, S. Raju, and S. Webb. 1992. Bracing of steel beams in bridges. Austin, TX: Univ. of Texas at Austin.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2022 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: May 30, 2021
Accepted: Nov 18, 2021
Published online: Feb 10, 2022
Published in print: Apr 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Jul 10, 2022
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.
Cited by
- Rafał Piotrowski, Andrzej Szychowski, Josef Vičan, Elastic Critical Resistance of the Simple Beam Grillage Resulting from the Lateral Torsional Buckling Condition: FEM Modelling and Analytical Considerations, Materials, 10.3390/ma16041346, 16, 4, (1346), (2023).
- Chuanbing “Shawn” Sun, Oluwatobi Babarinde, Dinesha Kuruppuarachchi, Daniel G. Linzell, Jay A. Puckett, Ahmed Rageh, Experimental and Analytical Studies of Continuous Steel-Stringer Lateral-Torsional Buckling Resistance, Journal of Bridge Engineering, 10.1061/JBENF2.BEENG-5974, 28, 6, (2023).
- Ahmed Rageh, C. Shawn Sun, Daniel G. Linzell, Jay A. Puckett, Dataset for large-scale, lateral-torsional buckling tests of continuous beams in a grillage system, Data in Brief, 10.1016/j.dib.2022.108532, 44, (108532), (2022).