Technical Papers
Dec 17, 2021

Rational Robustness Design of Multistory Building Structures

Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 148, Issue 3

Abstract

This paper presents concepts and methods developed over the past two decades for the rational and practical robustness design of multistory building structures. The consideration of sudden column loss as an event-independent scenario is examined with reference to typical extreme dynamic events, and a simplified multilevel framework for alternate load path analysis, providing a rational measure of robustness that combines ductility, redundancy, and dynamic effects, is reviewed. Finally, the conceptual basis of a new rational tying force method, recently developed and proposed by the author for the next generation of the Eurocodes, is presented, highlighting its practical application and limitations.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

BSI (British Standards Institution). 1970. Large-panel structures and structural connections in precast concrete. Addendum No. 1 to CP 116:1965 and CP 116-2:1969. London: BSI.
CEN (European Committee for Standardization). 2004. Design of concrete structures—Part 1-1: General rules and rules for buildings. Eurocode 2. EN 1992. Brussels, Belgium: CEN.
CEN (European Committee for Standardization). 2006. Actions on structures—Part 1-7: General actions—Accidental actions. Eurocode 1. EN 1991-1-7. Brussels, Belgium: CEN.
Ding, L., R. Van Coile, W. Botte, and R. Caspeele. 2021. “Quantification of model uncertainties of the energy-based method for dynamic column removal scenarios.” Eng. Struct. 237 (Jun): 112057. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112057.
DoD (Department of Defense). 2009. Unified facilities criteria, design of buildings to resist progressive collapse. UFC 4-023-03, change 3, November 2016. Washington, DC: DoD.
Ellingwood, B., and E. V. Leyendecker. 1978. “Approaches for design against progressive collapse.” J. Struct. Div. 104 (3): 413–423. https://doi.org/10.1061/JSDEAG.0004876.
Farazman, S., B. A. Izzuddin, and D. Cormie. 2013. “Influence of unreinforced masonry infill panels on the robustness of multistory buildings.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 27 (6): 673–682. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000392.
Fu, Q., and K. H. Tan. 2019. “numerical study on steel-concrete composite floor systems under corner column removal scenario.” Structures 21 (Oct): 33–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2019.06.003.
GSA (General Services Administration). 2013. Alternate path analysis & design guidelines for progressive collapse resistance, revision 1, January 2016. Washington, DC: GSA.
Gudmundsson, G. V., and B. A. Izzuddin. 2010. “The ‘sudden column loss’ idealisation for disproportionate collapse assessment.” Struct. Eng. 88 (6): 22–26.
Izzuddin, B. A. 2010. “Robustness by design—Simplified progressive collapse assessment of building structures.” Stahlbau 79 (8): 556–564. https://doi.org/10.1002/stab.201001350.
Izzuddin, B. A., and J. Sio. Forthcoming. “Rational horizontal tying force method for practical robustness design of building structures.” Eng. Struct. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.113676.
Izzuddin, B. A., A. G. Vlassis, A. Y. Elghazouli, and D. A. Nethercot. 2007. “Assessment of progressive collapse in multi-storey buildings.” Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Struct. Build. 160 (4): 197–205. https://doi.org/10.1680/stbu.2007.160.4.197.
Izzuddin, B. A., A. G. Vlassis, A. Y. Elghazouli, and D. A. Nethercot. 2008. “Progressive collapse of multi-storey buildings due to sudden column loss—Part I: Simplified assessment framework.” Eng. Struct. 30 (5): 1308–1318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2007.07.011.
Marchand, K., D. Stevens, and A. E. McKay. 2008. “SEI pre-standard and commentary on disproportionate collapse: Part II—Prescriptive approaches to provide robustness.” In Proc., 17th Congress of IABSE: Creating and renewing urban structures, tall buildings, bridges and infrastructure. Zurich, Switzerland: International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering.
ODPM (Office of the Deputy Prime Minister). 2004. The building regulations 2000, part A, schedule 1: A3, disproportionate collapse. London: Office of the Deputy Prime Minister.
Pham, A. T., and K. H. Tan. 2019. “Static and dynamic responses of reinforced concrete structures under sudden column removal scenario subjected to distributed loading.” J. Struct. Eng. 145 (1): 04018235. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002214.
Russell, J. M., J. Sagaseta, D. Cormie, and A. E. K. Jones. 2019. “Historical review of prescriptive design rules for robustness after the collapse of Ronan point.” Structures 20 (Aug): 365–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2019.04.011.
Stylianidis, P. M., D. A. Nethercot, B. A. Izzuddin, and A. Y. Elghazouli. 2015. “Modelling of beam response for progressive collapse analysis.” Structures 3 (2015): 137–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2015.04.001.
Vlassis, A. G., B. A. Izzuddin, A. Y. Elghazouli, and D. A. Nethercot. 2008. “Progressive collapse of multi-storey buildings due to sudden column loss—Part II: Application.” Eng. Struct. 30 (5): 1424–1438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2007.08.011.
Vrouwenvelder, T., B. J. Leira, and M. Sykora. 2012. “Modelling of hazards.” Struct. Eng. Int. 22 (1): 73–78. https://doi.org/10.2749/101686612X13216060213356.
Xu, G., and B. R. Ellingwood. 2011. “Disproportionate collapse performance of partially restrained steel frames with bolted T-stub connections.” Eng. Struct. 33 (1): 32–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.09.015.
Zolghadr Jahromi, H., B. A. Izzuddin, D. A. Nethercot, S. Donahue, M. Hadjioannou, E. B. Williamson, M. Engelhardt, D. Stevens, K. Marchand, and M. Waggoner. 2012. “Robustness assessment of building structures under explosion.” Buildings 2 (4): 497–518. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings2040497.
Zolghadr Jahromi, H., A. G. Vlassis, and B. A. Izzuddin. 2013. “Modelling approaches for robustness assessment of multi-storey steel-composite buildings.” Eng. Struct. 51 (Jun): 278–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.01.028.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Structural Engineering
Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 148Issue 3March 2022

History

Received: Apr 20, 2021
Accepted: Oct 6, 2021
Published online: Dec 17, 2021
Published in print: Mar 1, 2022
Discussion open until: May 17, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Professor of Computational Structural Mechanics, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5746-463X. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Twenty Years of Advances in Disproportionate Collapse Research and Best Practices since 9/11/2001, Journal of Structural Engineering, 10.1061/JSENDH.STENG-12056, 149, 2, (2023).
  • Analyses of Structural Robustness of Prefabricated Modular Buildings: A Case Study on Mid-Rise Building Configurations, Buildings, 10.3390/buildings12081289, 12, 8, (1289), (2022).
  • Validation and application of rational tying method for robustness design of post-and-beam timber buildings, Wood Material Science & Engineering, 10.1080/17480272.2022.2035433, (1-16), (2022).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share