Evaluation of Masonry Beams with Openings and Validation Using a Strut-and-Tie Model
Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 147, Issue 12
Abstract
Strut-and-tie modeling (STM) has been proven to conservatively predict the strength of specialty concrete structures such as corbels, dapped ends, and deep beams with openings. The objectives of this study were to predict the strength of masonry beams with openings using STM and evaluate the effect of transverse reinforcement in masonry beams. To this end, a suite of 23 tests was conducted on masonry beams with openings of various sizes and locations. When experimental data are compared to various strut-and-tie models, results confirm that STM provides conservative predictions for the strengths of masonry beams with openings. Furthermore, beams with transverse reinforcement at the openings did not perform significantly better than beams without transversely reinforced openings.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Acknowledgments
The views expressed in this article are those of the authors alone. Eduardo Ramirez and Md Tarik Hossain supported the testing efforts. Partial funding was provided by a faculty-in-aid grant by the University of Wyoming and in-kind material donations.
References
Ashour, A. F., and G. Rishi. 2000. “Tests of reinforced concrete continuous deep beams with web opening.” ACI Struct. J. 97 (3): 418–426. https://doi.org/10.14359/4636.
ASTM. 2016a. Standard specification for grout for masonry. ASTM C476. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2016b. Standard specification for loadbearing concrete masonry units. ASTM C90. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2016c. Standard specification for mortar for unit masonry. ASTM C270. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2018. Standard test method of compressive strength of masonry prisms. ASTM C1314. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2020. Standard test method for compressive strength of hydraulic cement mortars. ASTM C109. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Darwin, D., C. Dolan, and A. Nilson. 2016. Design of concrete structures. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Foraboschi, P., and A. Vanin. 2013. “Non-linear static analysis of masonry buildings based on a strut-and-tie modeling.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 55 (Dec): 44–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2013.08.005.
Ghaisas, K. V., D. Basu, S. Brzev, P. Gavilán, and J. José. 2017. “Strut-and-tie model for seismic design of confined masonry buildings.” Constr. Build. Mater. 147 (Aug): 677–700. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.04.200.
Haach, V. G., G. Vasconcelos, and P. B. Lourenço. 2011. “Numerical analysis of concrete block masonry beams under three point bending.” Eng. Struct. 33 (12): 3226–3237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.08.015.
Hwang, S.-J., R.-J. Tsai, W.-K. Lam, and J. P. Moehle. 2017. “Simplification of softened strut-and-tie model for strength prediction of discontinuity regions.” ACI Struct. J. 114 (5): 1239. https://doi.org/10.14359/51689787.
NZS (Standards Association of New Zealand). 1999. Concrete masonry structures not requiring specific engineering design. Wellington, New Zealand: NZS.
Parra-Montesinos, G. J. 2008. “Strut-and-tie models for deep beam design.” Concr. Int. 30 (12): 41–46.
Perera, R., and J. Vique. 2009. “Strut-and-tie modelling of reinforced concrete beams using genetic algorithms optimization.” Constr. Build. Mater. 23 (8): 2914–2925. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2009.02.016.
Ring, J. 2020. Predicted strength of masonry beams with openings and varying vertical reinforcement using strut-and-tie modeling. Worland, WY: Univ. of Wyoming.
Ring, J., and J. Tanner. 2020. “Predicted strength of masonry beams with openings using strut-and-tie modeling.” In Proc., 13th North American Masonry Conf. Salt Lake City, UT: Masonry Society.
Roca, P. 2006. “Assessment of masonry shear-walls by simple equilibrium models.” Constr. Build. Mater. 20 (4): 229–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2005.08.023.
Schlaich, M., and G. Anagnostou. 1990. “Stress fields for nodes of strut-and-tie models.” J. Struct. Eng. 116 (1): 13–23. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1990)116:1(13).
Singhal, V., and D. C. Rai. 2017. “Strut-and-tie model for predicting the shear capacity of confined masonry with and without openings.” In Proc., 16th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering. Tokyo: International Association for Earthquake Engineering.
TMS (The Masonry Society). 2016. Building code requirements and specifications for masonry structures. TMS 402/602. Longmont, CO: TMS.
Tripathy, D., and V. Singhal. 2019. “Estimation of in-plane shear capacity of confined masonry walls with and without openings using strut-and-tie analysis.” Eng. Struct. 188 (Jun): 290–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.03.002.
Tuchscherer, R. 2016. “Strut-and-tie capacity of partially-grouted CMU shear walls.” In Proc., Geotechnical and Structural Engineering Congress. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Vanin, A., and P. Foraboschi. 2012. “In-plane behavior of perforated brick masonry walls.” Mater. Struct. 45 (7): 1019–1034. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-011-9814-x.
Voon, K. C., and J. M. Ingham. 2008. “Experimental in-plane strength investigation of reinforced concrete masonry walls with openings.” J. Struct. Eng. 134 (5): 758–768. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2006)132:3(400).
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2021 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jun 19, 2020
Accepted: May 21, 2021
Published online: Sep 16, 2021
Published in print: Dec 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Feb 16, 2022
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.