Cyclic Loading Test for Two-Story RC Moment Frames Retrofitted with Internal Steel Frames
Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 147, Issue 2
Abstract
An internal steel frame–retrofitting method without diagonal braces was studied to strengthen existing reinforced-concrete (RC) moment frames with nonseismic details. For better constructability and structural capacity, a novel shear connection method was developed and verified by cyclic shear testing. To evaluate the seismic performance of retrofitted frames, three two-story moment frames with and without strengthening were tested under cyclic lateral loading. The test results showed that, despite partial composite action between RC and steel members, the proposed retrofit method significantly increased the stiffness and strength of the RC moment frame, achieving a satisfactory deformation capacity greater than 2% drift ratio. On the basis of the test results, the failure mechanism of the retrofitted frame was discussed, considering the shear connection behavior. The test strengths of the frame specimens were compared with the predictions based on a simple plastic mechanism. Further, the degree of partial composite action between the RC and steel members developed by shear connections was addressed to improve the strength predictions.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Acknowledgments
The research described in this paper was financially supported by CTS Engineering Ltd. as well as Institute of Engineering Research at Seoul National University. The authors are grateful to the authorities for their support.
References
ACI (American Concrete Institute). 2002. Recommendations for design of beam-column connections in monolithic reinforced concrete structures. Farmington Hills, MI: ACI.
ACI (American Concrete Institute). 2005. Acceptance criteria for moment frames based on structural testing and commentary. Farmington Hills, MI: ACI.
ACI (American Concrete Institute). 2019. Building code requirements for structural concrete. Farmington Hills, MI: ACI.
AIJ (Architectural Institute of Japan). 2010. Standard for structural calculation of reinforced concrete structures. [In Japanese.] Tokyo: AIJ.
AISC. 2016. Specification for structural steel buildings. Chicago: AISC.
Ishimura, M., K. Sadasue, T. Fujii, Y. Miyauchi, and K. Minami. 2009. “Experimental study on seismic retrofitting steel brace of existing RC school buildings with low-strength concrete.” [In Japanese.] J. Struct. Constr. Eng. 74 (644): 1813–1820. https://doi.org/10.3130/aijs.74.1813.
JBDPA (Japan Building Disaster Prevention Association). 2017. Seismic evaluation standards and retrofit design guidelines for existing reinforced concrete structures. [In Japanese.] Tokyo: JBDPA.
Katsumata, H., M. Seki, F. Kumazawa, and T. Okada. 1989. “Retrofit method of existing reinforced concrete structures by ductile steel braces.” [In Japanese.] Proc. Jpn. Concr. Inst. 11 (2): 263–268.
Kei, T., and Y. Miyauchi. 2001. “Study on retrofitting adhered steel brace.” [In Japanese.] J. Struct. Constr. Eng. 66 (539): 103–109. https://doi.org/10.3130/aijs.66.103_1.
Kikuta, S., A. Miwa, S. Nakahara, and K. Mukai. 2008. “A study on seismic strengthening method with steel tube as cotter.” [In Japanese.] Proc. Jpn. Concr. Inst. 30 (3): 1183–1188.
Lee, C. H., S. Y. Kim, J. H. Park, D. K. Kim, T. J. Kim, and K. H. Park. 2018. “Comparative analysis of structural damage potentials observed in the 9.12 Gyeongju and 11.15 Pohang earthquakes.” [In Korean.] J. Earthquake Eng. Soc. Korea 22 (3): 175–184. https://doi.org/10.5000/EESK.2018.22.3.175.
Masuo, K., and T. Komiya. 2000. “Strengthening effects of infilled steel braces using both adhesion joints and combination joints.” [In Japanese.] Proc. Jpn. Concr. Inst. 22 (3): 1651–1656.
Miyagawa, K., R. Kinoshita, Y. Ohtani, and I. Mitani. 2003. “Stress transfer and design of indirect connections for external steel brace-retrofitting method.” [In Japanese.] Proc. Jpn. Concr. Inst. 25 (2): 1495–1500.
Nakamura, T., K. Kanata, T. Fujimura, and Y. Suzuki. 2005. “Seismic retrofit systems for RC buildings without dowel anchors.” [In Japanese.] Concr. J. 43 (8): 25–33. https://doi.org/10.3151/coj1975.43.8_25.
Oh, S. H., H. S. Ryu, and T. S. Moon. 2005. “Study for fabricable and adhesive seismic retrofit method using the steel members.” [In Korean.] J. Archit. Inst. Korea 21 (11): 51–58.
Ohmura, T., S. Hayashi, K. Kanata, T. Nakamura, Y. Nishikawa, Y. Suzuki, and T. Fujimura. 2007. “Shear transfer mechanism of seismic strengthened frames by steel braces without dowel anchors.” [In Japanese.] J. Struct. Constr. Eng. 72 (616): 73–80. https://doi.org/10.3130/aijs.72.73_3.
Ozcelik, R., U. Akpınar, and B. Binici. 2011. “Seismic retrofit of deficient RC structures with internal steel frames.” Adv. Struct. Eng. 14 (6): 1205–1222. https://doi.org/10.1260/1369-4332.14.6.1205.
Shih, C. T., S. Y. Chu, Y. W. Liou, F. P. Hsiao, C. C. Huang, T. C. Chiou, and Y. C. Chiou. 2015. “In situ test of school buildings retrofitted with external steel-framing systems.” J. Struct. Eng. 141 (1): D4014002. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001063.
Ueki, R., K. Imai, H. Tomatsuri, and H. Kuramoto. 2010. “Influence of indirect joint on retrofitting effect by external steel frames.” [In Japanese.] J. Struct. Constr. Eng. 75 (654): 1501–1508. https://doi.org/10.3130/aijs.75.1501.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2020 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Mar 15, 2020
Accepted: Sep 18, 2020
Published online: Nov 30, 2020
Published in print: Feb 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Apr 30, 2021
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.