Full-Range Behavior of Top-and-Seat Angle Connections
Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 147, Issue 1
Abstract
This paper presents recent research carried out at the University of Sydney on the full-range behavior of top-and-seat angle connections. A total of 18 tests were conducted, covering two connection configurations and three loading conditions, including bending, combined bending and compression, and combined bending and tension. The highlights of the experimental program include the following: (1) all connections were tested to their complete failure, thereby investigating the full-range behavior of the connections, including initial stiffness, ultimate bending strength, ductility, and failure mode, and the detailed behavior of the top flange cleat component; and (2) multiple tests were carried out on nominally identical connections to examine the variability of joint behavior, providing valuable information for estimating the uncertainties in joint properties due to the random variation in geometrical and material properties, including imperfections introduced during fabrication. Conclusions were drawn from the experimental results on the applicability and accuracy of the Eurocode 3 Part 1-8 provisions for calculating the initial stiffness and ultimate strength of top-and-seat angle connections. The results indicated that the Eurocode 3 model significantly underestimates the connection strength by more than 80% because of the conservative strength prediction of the top flange cleat component. To overcome this limitation, a new mechanical model was developed for the top flange cleat component to more accurately predict its full-range behavior, from initial linearity to complete failure. The model reflects the real deformation pattern of a flange cleat by capturing the development of four plastic hinges in the cleat while remaining simple and applicable to hand calculation. The model was applied to the tested connections and indicated a conservative and reasonably accurate strength prediction with substantial improvement from the current Eurocode 3 model.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
All of the data, models, and code generated or used during the study appear in the published article.
Acknowledgments
The work presented in this paper was funded by the Australian Research Council via Discovery Project DP150104873.
References
Altman, W. G., Jr., A. Azizinamini, J. H. Bradburn, and J. B. Radziminski. 1982. Moment-rotation characteristics of semi-rigid steel beam-column connections. Charleston, SC: Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of South Carolina.
Beg, D., E. Zupančič, and I. Vayas. 2004. “On the rotation capacity of moment connections.” J. Struct. Eng. 60 (3–5): 601–620. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0143-974X(03)00132-9.
CEN (European Committee for Standardization). 2010. Design of steel structures. Part 1-8: Design of joints. EN 1993-1-8. Eurocode 3. Brussels, Belgium: CEN.
de Lima, L. R. O., L. S. da Silva, P. D. S. Vellasco, and S. A. L. de Andrade. 2004. “Experimental evaluation of extended endplate beam-to-column joints subjected to bending and axial force.” Eng. Struct. 26 (10): 1333–1347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2004.04.003.
Fleischman, R. B., X. Li, Y. Pan, and A. Sumer. 2007. “Cast modular panel zone node for steel special moment frames. I: Analytical development.” J. Struct. Eng. 133 (10): 1393–1403. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2007)133:10(1393).
Fleischman, R. B., and A. Sumer. 2006. “Optimum arm geometry for ductile modular connectors.” J. Struct. Eng. 132 (5): 705–716. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2006)132:5(705).
Francavilla, A. B., M. Latour, V. Piluso, and G. Rizzano. 2015. “Simplified finite element analysis of bolted T-stub connection components.” Eng. Struct. 100 (Oct): 656–664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.06.029.
Huang, Y., and B. Young. 2014. “The art of coupon tests.” J. Constr. Steel Res. 96 (May): 159–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2014.01.010.
Lee, S. S., and T. S. Moon. 2002. “Moment-rotation model of semi-rigid connections with angles.” Eng. Struct. 24 (2): 227–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(01)00066-9.
Liu, W., H. Zhang, K. J. R. Rasmussen, and S. Yan. 2019. “System-based limit state design criterion for 3D steel frames under wind loads.” J. Constr. Steel Res. 157 (Jun): 440–449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2019.02.015.
Malaga-Chuquitaype, C., and A. Y. Elghazouli. 2010. “Component-based mechanical models for blind-bolted angle connections.” Eng. Struct. 32 (10): 3048–3067. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.05.024.
Pirmoz, A., F. Danesh, and V. Farajkhah. 2011. “The effect of axial beam force on moment-rotation curve of top and seat angels connections.” Struct. Design Tall Special Build. 20 (7): 767–783. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.551.
Pirmoz, A., A. S. Khoei, E. Mohammadrezapour, and A. S. Daryan. 2009. “Moment-rotation behavior of bolted top-seat angle connections.” J. Constr. Steel Res. 65 (4): 973–984. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2008.08.011.
Pucinotti, R. 2001. “Top-and-seat and web angle connections: Prediction via mechanical model.” J. Constr. Steel Res. 57 (6): 663–696. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0143-974X(01)00007-4.
Sakurai, S., B. R. Ellingwood, and S. Kushiyama. 2001. “Probabilistic study of the behavior of steel frames with partially restrained connections.” Eng. Struct. 23 (11): 1410–1417. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(01)00052-9.
Sellier, A., A. Mebarki, A. Colson, and R. Bjorhovde. 1996. “Reliability of steel structures with semi-rigid connections.” In Proc., 3rd Int. Workshop on Connections in Steel Structures III, edited by R. Bjorhovde, A. Colson, and R. Zandonini, 331–348. Trento, Italy: Elsevier.
Sena Cardoso, F., H. Zhang, K. J. R. Rasmussen, and S. Yan. 2019. “Reliability calibrations for the design of cold-formed steel portal frames by advanced analysis.” Eng. Struct. 182 (Mar): 164–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.12.054.
Standards Australia. 2010. Hot-rolled bars and sections. AS/NZS 3679.1. Sydney, Australia: Standards Australia.
Stelmack, T. W., M. J. Marley, and K. H. Gerstle. 1986. “Analysis and tests of flexibly connected steel frames.” J. Struct. Eng. 112 (7): 1573–1588. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1986)112:7(1573).
Wang, Z., Y. Wang, Y. Zhang, L. Gardner, and Y. Ouyang. 2019. “Experimental investigation and design of extruded aluminium alloy T-stubs connected by swage-locking pins.” Eng. Struct. 200 (Dec): 109675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109675.
Yan, S., X. Zhao, and A. Wu. 2018. “Ductile fracture simulation of constructional steels based on yield-to-fracture stress-strain relationship and micro-mechanism based fracture criterion.” J. Struct. Eng. 144 (3): 04018004. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001970.
Yang, B., and K. H. Tan. 2013. “Experimental tests of different types of bolted steel beam–column joints under a central-column-removal scenario.” Eng. Struct. 54 (Sep): 112–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.03.037.
Zhang, H., S. Shayan, K. J. R. Rasmussen, and B. R. Ellingwood. 2016. “System-based design of planar steel frames. I: Reliability framework.” J. Constr. Steel Res. 123 (Aug): 135–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2016.05.004.
Zhu, C., K. J. R. Rasmussen, S. Yan, and H. Zhang. 2019. “Experimental full-range behavior assessment of bolted moment end-plate connections.” J. Struct. Eng. 145 (8): 04019079. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002368.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2020 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Oct 21, 2019
Accepted: Aug 24, 2020
Published online: Oct 26, 2020
Published in print: Jan 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Mar 26, 2021
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.