Technical Papers
Aug 19, 2020

Ground Motion-Dependent Rapid Damage Assessment of Structures Based on Wavelet Transform and Image Analysis Techniques

Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 146, Issue 11

Abstract

Rapid and accurate evaluation of the damage state of structures after a seismic event is critical for postevent emergency response and recovery. The existing rapid damage evaluation methodology is typically based on fragility curves incorporated into earthquake alerting platforms. However, the extent of damage predicted solely based on the fragility curves can vary significantly depending on ground motion characteristics. This paper presents a methodology for damage assessment of structures while accounting for temporal and spectral nonstationarity of ground motions using continuous wavelet transform and image-analysis techniques. The methodology involves the establishment of a prediction model for wavelet transform of ground motions and damage state of a structure using convolutional neural networks. The methodology is demonstrated in this paper through two case studies: (1) a low-rise nonductile concrete building frame in California and (2) a four-span concrete box-girder bridge in California. The proposed methodology identified damage states with an accuracy greater than 75% in both cases.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIT) (No. 2019R1C1C1007780).

References

ATC (Applied Technology Council). 1996. Seismic evaluation and retrofit of concrete buildings. ATC-40. Redwood City, CA: ATC.
Baker, J. W., T. Lin, S. K. Shahi, and N. Jayaram. 2011. New ground motion selection procedures and selected motions for the PEER transportation research program. Berkeley, CA: Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Univ. of California.
Berry, M. P., D. E. Lehman, and L. N. Lowes. 2008. “Lumped-plasticity models for performance simulation of bridge columns.” ACI Struct. J. 105 (3): 270–279.
Caltrans. 2013a. “Guidelines on foundation loading and deformation due to liquefaction induced lateral spreading.” In Caltrans internal design guideline. Sacramento, CA: California DOT.
Caltrans. 2013b. Seismic design criteria (SDC) version 1.7. Sacramento, CA: Office of Structures Design, California DOT.
Chui, C. 1992. Vol. 1 of Wavelet analysis and applications: An introduction to wavelets. San Diego: Academic Press.
Daubechies, I. 1990. “The wavelet transform, time-frequency localization and signal analysis.” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 36 (5): 961–1005. https://doi.org/10.1109/18.57199.
Dutta, A. 1999. “On energy based seismic analysis and design of highway bridges.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil, Structural and Environmental Engineering, State Univ. of New York at Buffalo.
Friedman, J., T. Hastie, and R. Tibshirani. 2001. The elements of statistical learning. Berlin: Springer.
Gao, Y., and K. M. Mosalam. 2018. “Deep transfer learning for image-based structural damage recognition.” Comput.-Aided Civ. Infrastruct. Eng. 33 (9): 748–768. https://doi.org/10.1111/mice.12363.
He, K., X. Zhang, S. Ren, and J. Sun. 2016. “Deep residual learning for image recognition.” In Proc., IEEE Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 770–778. New York: IEEE.
Hou, Z., M. Noori, and R. S. Amand. 2000. “Wavelet-based approach for structural damage detection.” J. Eng. Mech. 126 (7): 677–683. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2000)126:7(677).
Huang, G., Z. Liu, L. Van Der Maaten, and K. Q. Weinberger. 2017. “Densely connected convolutional networks.” In Proc., IEEE Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 4700–4708. New York: IEEE.
ICBO (International Conference of Building Officials). 1967. Uniform building code. Whittier, CA: ICBO.
Iyama, J., and H. Kuwamura. 1999. “Application of wavelets to analysis and simulation of earthquake motions.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 28 (3): 255–272. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199903)28:3%3C255:AID-EQE815%3E3.0.CO;2-C.
Jeon, J.-S., R. DesRoches, T. Kim, and E. Choi. 2016. “Geometric parameters affecting seismic fragilities of curved multi-frame concrete box-girder bridges with integral abutments.” Eng. Struct. 122 (Sep): 121–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.04.037.
Jeon, J.-S., R. DesRoches, L. N. Lowes, and I. Brilakis. 2015a. “Framework for aftershock fragility assessment—Case studies: Older California reinforced concrete building frames.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 44 (15): 2617–2636. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2599.
Jeon, J.-S., L. N. Lowes, and R. DesRoches. 2014. “Numerical models for beam-column joints in reinforced concrete building frames.” ACI Spec. Publ. 297: 1–26.
Jeon, J.-S., L. N. Lowes, R. DesRoches, and I. Brilakis. 2015b. “Fragility curves for non-ductile reinforced concrete frames that exhibit different component response mechanisms.” Eng. Struct. 85 (Feb): 127–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.12.009.
Ji, C., D. J. Wald, and D. V. Helmberger. 2002. “Source description of the 1999 Hector Mine, California, earthquake. I: Wavelet domain inversion theory and resolution analysis.” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 92 (4): 1192–1207. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120000916.
Jordan, J. 2018. “Common architectures in convolutional neural networks.” Accessed December 1, 2018. https://www.jeremyjordan.me/convnet-architectures/.
Krizhevsky, A., I. Sutskever, and G. E. Hinton. 2012. “ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks.” In Proc., Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 1097–1105. San Diego, CA: Neural Information Processing Systems Foundation, Inc.
Li, H., T. Yi, M. Gu, and L. Huo. 2009. “Evaluation of earthquake-induced structural damages by wavelet transform.” Prog. Nat. Sci. 19 (4): 461–470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnsc.2008.09.002.
Liel, A. B. 2008. “Assessing the collapse risk of California’s existing reinforced concrete frame structures: Metrics for seismic safety decisions.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford Univ.
Mangalathu, S. 2017. “Performance based grouping and fragility analysis of box girder bridges in California.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology.
Mangalathu, S., G. Heo, and J.-S. Jeon. 2018a. “Artificial neural network based multi-dimensional fragility development of skewed concrete bridge classes.” Eng. Struct. 162 (May): 166–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.01.053.
Mangalathu, S., S.-H. Hwang, E. Choi, and J.-S. Jeon. 2019a. “Rapid seismic damage evaluation of bridge portfolios using machine learning techniques.” Eng. Struct. 201 (Dec): 109785. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109785.
Mangalathu, S., J.-S. Jeon, and R. DesRoches. 2018b. “Critical uncertainty parameters influencing seismic performance of bridges using Lasso regression.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 47 (3): 784–801. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2991.
Mangalathu, S., J.-S. Jeon, and J. Jiang. 2019b. “Skew adjustment factors for fragilities of California box-girder bridges subjected to near-fault and far-field ground motions.” J. Bridge Eng. 24 (1): 04018109. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001338.
Mangalathu, S., H. Sun, C. C. Nweke, Z. Yi, and H. V. Burton. 2020. “Classifying earthquake damage to buildings using machine learning.” Earthquake Spectra 36 (1): 183–208. https://doi.org/10.1177/8755293019878137.
Mazzoni, S., F. McKenna, M. H. Scott, G. L. Fenves. 2006. The open system for earthquake engineering simulation (OpenSees) command language manual. Berkeley, CA: Univ. of California.
Mitrani-Resier, J., S. Wu, and J. L. Beck. 2016. “Virtual Inspector and its application to immediate pre-event and post-event earthquake loss and safety assessment of buildings.” Nat. Hazard. 81 (3): 1861–1878. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2159-6.
Muthukumar, S., and R. DesRoches. 2006. “A Hertz contact model with non-linear damping for pounding simulation.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 35 (7): 811–828. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.557.
Noh, H. Y., D. G. Lignos, K. K. Nair, and A. S. Kiremidjian. 2012. “Development of fragility functions as a damage classification/prediction method for steel moment-resisting frames using a wavelet-based damage sensitive feature.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 41 (4): 681–696. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.1151.
Noura, H., A. Mebarki, and M. Abed. 2019. “Post-quake structural damage evaluation by neural networks: Theory and calibration.” Eur. J. Environ. Civ. Eng. 23 (6): 710–727. https://doi.org/10.1080/19648189.2017.1304277.
Olhede, S. C., and A. T. Walden. 2002. “Generalized Morse wavelets.” IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 50 (11): 2661–2670. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSP.2002.804066.
Pagni, C. A., and L. N. Lowes. 2006. “Fragility functions for older reinforced concrete beam-column joints.” Earthquake Spectra 22 (1): 215–238. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.2163365.
Pan, S. J., and Q. Yang. 2010. “A survey on transfer learning.” IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 22 (10): 1345–1359. https://doi.org/10.1109/TKDE.2009.191.
Ramanathan, K. N. 2012. “Next generation seismic fragility curves for California bridges incorporating the evolution in seismic design philosophy.” Ph.D. thesis, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology.
Ramanathan, K. N., J.-S. Jeon, B. Zakeri, R. DesRoches, and J. E. Padgett. 2015. “Seismic response prediction and modeling considerations for curved and skewed concrete box-girder bridges.” Earthquakes Struct. 9 (6): 1153–1179. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2015.9.6.1153.
Reuland, Y., P. Lestuzzi, and I. F. C. Smith. 2019. “Measurement-based support for post-earthquake assessment of buildings.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 15 (5): 647–662. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2019.1569071.
Seo, J., and D. G. Linzell. 2013. “Use of response surface metamodels to generate system level fragilities for existing curved steel bridges.” Eng. Struct. 52 (Jul): 642–653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.03.023.
Shamsabadi, A., P. Khalili-Tehrani, J. P. Stewart, and E. Taciroglu. 2010. “Validated simulation models for lateral response of bridge abutments with typical backfills.” J. Bridge Eng. 15 (3): 302–311. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000058.
Silva, P. F., S. Megally, and F. Seible. 2009. “Seismic performance of sacrificial exterior shear keys in bridge abutments.” Earthquake Spectra 25 (3): 643–664. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.3155405.
Simard, P. Y., D. Steinkraus, and J. C. Platt. 2003. “Best practices for convolutional neural networks applied to visual document analysis.” In Proc., 7th Int. Conf. on Document Analysis and Recognition. New York: IEEE.
Simonyan, K., and A. Zisserman. 2014. “Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition.” Preprint, submitted September 4, 2014. https://arxiv.org/abs/1409.1556.
Spanos, P., A. Giaralis, and N. Politis. 2007. “Time–frequency representation of earthquake accelerograms and inelastic structural response records using the adaptive chirplet decomposition and empirical mode decomposition.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 27 (7): 675–689. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2006.11.007.
Szegedy, C., W. Liu, Y. Jia, P. Sermanet, S. Reed, D. Anguelov, D. Erhan, V. Vanhoucke, and A. Rabinovich. 2015. “Going deeper with convolutions.” In Proc., IEEE Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 1–9. New York: IEEE.
Vassiliou, M. F., and N. Makris. 2011. “Estimating time scales and length scales in pulselike earthquake acceleration records with wavelet analysis.” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 101 (2): 596–618. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120090387.
Vidakovic, B. 2009. Statistical modeling by wavelets. New York: Wiley.
Wald, D., K.-W. Lin, K. Porter, and L. Turner. 2008. “ShakeCast: Automating and improving the use of shakemap for post-earthquake decision-making and response.” Earthquake Spectra 24 (2): 533–553. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.2923924.
Wald, D. J., V. Quitoriano, T. H. Heaton, H. Kanamori, C. W. Scrivner, and C. B. Worden. 1999. “TriNet ‘ShakeMaps’: Rapid generation of peak ground motion and intensity maps for earthquakes in Southern California.” Earthquake Spectra 15 (3): 537–555. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1586057.
Wald, D. J., B. C. Worden, V. Quitoriano, and K. L. Pankow. 2005. “ShakeMap manual: Technical manual, user’s guide, and software guide.” Accessed December 1, 2018. https://pubs.usgs.gov/tm/2005/12A01/.
Yamamoto, Y., and J. W. Baker. 2013. “Stochastic model for earthquake ground motion using wavelet packets.” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 103 (6): 3044–3056. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120120312.
Yeum, C. M., S. J. Dyke, and J. Ramirez. 2018. “Visual data classification in post-event building reconnaissance.” Eng. Struct. 155 (Jan): 16–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.10.057.
Zhang, Y., H. V. Burton, H. Sun, and M. Shokrabadi. 2018. “A machine learning framework for assessing post-earthquake structural safety.” Struct. Saf. 72 (May): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2017.12.001.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Structural Engineering
Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 146Issue 11November 2020

History

Received: Apr 19, 2019
Accepted: May 6, 2020
Published online: Aug 19, 2020
Published in print: Nov 1, 2020
Discussion open until: Jan 19, 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Sujith Mangalathu, Ph.D., A.M.ASCE [email protected]
Research Data Scientist, Equifax Inc., 1505 Windward Concourse, Alpharetta, GA 30005. Email: [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Hanyang Univ., Seoul 04763, Republic of Korea (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6657-7265. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share