Technical Papers
May 22, 2020

Effect of Charge Shape and Initiation Configuration of Explosive Cylinders Detonating in Free Air on Blast-Resistant Design

Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 146, Issue 8

Abstract

This paper investigates the influence of the cylindrical charge characteristics, i.e., the length-to-diameter ratio, orientation, and initiation configuration, on the blast loads (peak overpressure and maximum impulse). Three different initiation configurations were considered, i.e., at the center, at one end, and at both ends. Numerical models were developed for the spherical and cylindrical charges. The numerical results were analyzed along the gauge lines at different azimuth angles around the cylindrical charges. Some important observations were made. Neglecting the charge shape effect, the peak overpressure (maximum impulse) in the near field generated from centrally initiated cylindrical charges can be underestimated by a factor as high as 3.0 (1.9). Therefore, the cylindrical charge shape should be explicitly modeled in the numerical simulations for the blast-resistant design of protective structures subjected to near-field detonations. It is confirmed that the shock front heals into a spherical one in the far field. Hence, the blast loads generated from the spherical charge of the same mass can be used. In addition, the influence range, beyond which the charge shape effect can be neglected, is 5.7  m/kg1/3 for the impulse, which is about twice that for the overpressure (3.2  m/kg1/3). In general, the maximum values of blast loads resulted by the three considered initiation configurations can be sorted in descending order, i.e., atoneend>atthecenter>atbothends. The initiation configuration at one end (at the center) has the largest influence range of 3.9  m/kg1/3 (5.7  m/kg1/3) for the overpressure (impulse) among the three considered initiation configurations.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models, or code generated or used during the study are available from the corresponding author by request.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the Federal Office of Civil Protection and Disaster Assistance, Department II.5—Structural Protection, Emergency Preparedness (Water) in Germany, and the Bundeswehr Technical Center for Protective and Special Technologies (WTD52) in Germany for their financial support to carry out this research work.

References

Anastacio, A. C., and C. Knock. 2016. “Radial blast prediction for high explosive cylinders initiated at both ends.” Propellants Explos. Pyrotech. 41 (4): 682–687. https://doi.org/10.1002/prep.201500302.
Chen, L., Y. Hu, H. Ren, H. Xiang, C. Zhai, and Q. Fang. 2019. “Performances of the RC column under close-in explosion induced by the double-end-initiation explosive cylinder.” Int. J. Impact Eng. 132 (Oct): 103326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2019.103326.
Courant, R., K. Friedrichs, and H. Lewy. 1928. “Über die partiellen Differenzengleichungen der mathematischen Physik.” Math. Ann. 100 (1): 32–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01448839.
Dobratz, B. M., and P. C. Crawford. 1985. LLNL explosives handbook: Properties of chemical explosives and explosive simulants. Berkeley, CA: Univ. of California.
Esparza, E. D. 1986. “Blast measurements and equivalency for spherical charges at small scaled distances.” Int. J. Impact Eng. 4 (1): 23–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/0734-743X(86)90025-4.
Guerke, G. H., and G. Scheklinski-Glueck. 1982. Blast parameters from cylindrical charges detonated on the surface of the ground. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center.
Held, M. 1999. “Impulse method for the blast contour of cylindrical high explosive charges.” Propellants Explos. Pyrotech. 24 (1): 17–26. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1521-4087(199902)24:1%3C17::AID-PREP17%3E3.0.CO;2-D.
Held, M. 2002. “Comparison of rectangular and round momentum gauges for blast impulse measurements.” Propellants Explos. Pyrotech. 27 (5): 279–283. https://doi.org/10.1002/1521-4087(200211)27:5%3C279::AID-PREP279%3E3.0.CO;2-D.
Hryciów, Z., W. Borkowski, P. Rybak, and J. Wysocki. 2014. “Influence of the shape of the explosive charge on blast profile.” J. KONES 21 (4): 169–176. https://doi.org/10.5604/12314005.1130466.
Hu, Y., L. Chen, Q. Fang, and H. Xiang. 2018. “Blast loading model of the RC column under close-in explosion induced by the double-end-initiation explosive cylinder.” Eng. Struct. 175 (Nov): 304–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.08.013.
Ismail, M. M., and S. G. Murray. 1993. “Study of the blast waves from the explosion of nonspherical charges.” Propellants Explos. Pyrotech. 18 (3): 132–138. https://doi.org/10.1002/prep.19930180304.
Johnson, C., P. Mulligan, K. Williams, M. Langenderfer, and J. Heniff. 2018. “Effect of explosive charge geometry on shock wave propagation.” In Proc., Conf. of the American Physical Society, Topical Group on Shock Compression of Condensed Matter, 150021. Melville, NY: AIP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5044977.
Kingery, C. N., and G. Bulmash. 1984. Air blast parameters from TNT spherical air burst and hemispherical surface burst. Aberdeen, MD: Ballistic Research Laboratories.
Knock, C., and N. Davies. 2011a. “Predicting the impulse from the curved surface of detonating cylindrical charges.” Propellants Explos. Pyrotech. 36 (2): 105–109. https://doi.org/10.1002/prep.201000002.
Knock, C., and N. Davies. 2011b. “Predicting the peak pressure from the curved surface of detonating cylindrical charges.” Propellants Explos. Pyrotech. 36 (3): 203–209. https://doi.org/10.1002/prep.201000001.
Knock, C., and N. Davies. 2013. “Blast waves from cylindrical charges.” Shock Waves 23 (4): 337–343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00193-013-0438-7.
Knock, C., N. Davies, and T. Reeves. 2015. “predicting blast waves from the axial direction of a cylindrical charge.” Propellants Explos. Pyrotech. 40 (2): 169–179. https://doi.org/10.1002/prep.201300188.
Maranda, A., P. Koślik, J. Hadzik, and Z. Wilk. 2014. “Research of ANFO cylindrical explosive charge detonation in air using modern numerical modeling methods.” [in Polish.] Chemik 68 (1): 9–16.
Omang, M., S. O. Christensen, S. Borve, and J. Trulsen. 2009. “Height of burst explosions: A comparative study of numerical and experimental results.” Shock Waves 19 (2): 135–143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00193-009-0196-8.
Petes, J. 1986. Handbook of HE explosion effects. Santa Barbara, CA: Dept. of Defense Nuclear Information and Analysis Center.
Plooster, M. N. 1982. Blast effect from cylindrical explosive charges: Experimental measurements. China Lake, CA: Naval Weapons Center.
Plooster, M. N., and J. D. Yatteau. 1979. Estimation of positive impulse from peak pressure data for cylindrical explosive charges: Preliminary investigation. China Lake, CA: Naval Weapons Center.
Rigby, S. E. 2014. “Blast wave clearing effects on finite-sized targets subjected to explosive loads.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil and Structural Engineering, Univ. of Sheffield.
Schrami, S., R. Summers, and R. Mudd. 2002. “The influence of initiator configuration on blast environments from cylindrical charges.” In Proc., 40th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit. Reston, VA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2002-1094.
Schwer, L. 2016. “Some observations on artificial bulk viscosity in LS-DYNA: What Noh knew in 1978.” In Proc., 14th LS-DYNA Forum 2016. Bamberg, Germany: DYNAmore GmbH.
Schwer, L., and S. Rigby. 2018. “Secondary and height of burst shock reflections: Application of afterburning.” In Proc., 25th Military Aspects of Blast and Shock. Zürich, Switzerland: Spiez Laboratory.
Sherkar, P., J. Shin, A. Whittaker, and A. Aref. 2016. “Influence of charge shape and point of detonation on blast-resistant design.” J. Struct. Eng. 142 (2): 04015109. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001371.
Shin, J., A. S. Whittaker, and D. Cormie. 2015. “Incident and normally reflected overpressure and impulse for detonations of spherical high explosives in free air.” J. Struct. Eng. 141 (12): 04015057. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001305.
Shin, J., A. S. Whittaker, D. Cormie, and W. Wilkinson. 2014. “Numerical modeling of close-in detonations of high explosives.” Eng. Struct. 81 (Dec): 88–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.09.022.
Simoens, B., and M. Lefebvre. 2015. “Influence of the shape of an explosive charge: Quantification of the modification of the pressure field.” Cent. Eur. J. Energetic Mater. 12 (2): 195–213.
Simoens, B., M. H. Lefebvre, M. Arrigoni, and S. Kerampran. 2012. “Effect of charge shape: Pressure field around a cylindrical explosive charge.” In Proc., 22nd Military Aspects of Blast and Shock. Zurich, Switzerland: Spiez Laboratory.
Stoner, R. G., and W. Bleakney. 1948. “The attenuation of spherical shock waves in air.” J. Appl. Phys. 19 (7): 670–678. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1698189.
Swisdak, M. M. 1975. Explosion effects and properties. Part I. Explosion effects in air. White OAK, TX: White OAK Laboratory, Naval Surface Weapons Center.
Tham, C. Y. 2009. “Numerical simulation on the interaction of blast waves with a series of aluminum cylinders at near-field.” Int. J. Impact Eng. 36 (1): 122–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2007.12.011.
USACE. 2002. Design and analysis of hardened structures for conventional weapons effects. UFC 3-340-01. Washington, DC: USACE.
USACE. 2014. Structures to resist the effects of accidental explosions. UFC 3-340-02. Washington, DC: USACE.
USDOD (US Dept. of Defense). 1989. The joint munitions effectiveness manual. Washington, DC: USDOD.
Wisotski, J., and W. H. Snyer. 1965. Characteristics of blast waves obtained from cylindrical high explosive charges. Denver: Univ. of Denver.
Wu, C., G. Fattori, A. Whittaker, and D. J. Oehlers. 2010. “Investigation of air-blast effects from spherical-and cylindrical-shaped charges.” Int. J. Protective Struct. 1 (3): 345–362. https://doi.org/10.1260/2041-4196.1.3.345.
Xiao, W., M. Andrae, and N. Gebbeken. 2018. “Experimental and numerical investigations of shock wave attenuation effects using protective barriers made of steel posts.” J. Struct. Eng. 144 (11): 04018204. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002194.
Xiao, W., M. Andrae, and N. Gebbeken. 2019. “Air blast TNT equivalence factors of high explosive material PETN for bare charges.” J. Hazard. Mater. 377 (Sep): 152–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.05.078.
Zimmerman, H. D., C. T. Nguyen, and P. A. Hookham. 1999. “Investigation of spherical vs cylindrical charge shape effects on peak free-air overpressure and impulse.” In Proc., 9th Int. Symp. on Interaction of the Effects of Munitions with Structures. Berlin: Armed Forces Office of the German Federal Ministry of Defence.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Structural Engineering
Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 146Issue 8August 2020

History

Received: Sep 3, 2019
Accepted: Feb 6, 2020
Published online: May 22, 2020
Published in print: Aug 1, 2020
Discussion open until: Oct 22, 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Research Fellow, Risk, Infrastructure, Security and Conflict Research Center, Univ. of Bundeswehr Munich, Werner-Heisenberg-Weg 39, Neubiberg 85577, Germany (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5324-3028. Email: [email protected]
Research Fellow, Risk, Infrastructure, Security and Conflict Research Center, Univ. of Bundeswehr Munich, Werner-Heisenberg-Weg 39, Neubiberg 85577, Germany. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9433-9133. Email: [email protected]
Norbert Gebbeken, M.ASCE [email protected]
Professor of Structural Engineering, Risk, Infrastructure, Security and Conflict Research Center, Univ. of Bundeswehr Munich, Werner-Heisenberg-Weg 39, Neubiberg 85577, Germany. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share