Technical Papers
Apr 29, 2020

Experimental Study of Novel Self-Centering Seismic Base Isolators Incorporating Superelastic Shape Memory Alloys

Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 146, Issue 7

Abstract

This paper proposes novel self-centering (SC) seismic base isolators by utilizing shape memory alloy U-shaped dampers (SMA-UDs) with favorable superelastic behavior. Two different designs, which incorporate the SMA-UDs into a conventional laminated rubber bearing with a lead core or that with steel-UDs, are investigated. In both designs, four groups of superelastic SMA-UDs are arranged symmetrically around the rubber bearings. In the SC seismic base isolators, the laminated rubber bearings withstand the high vertical loads from superstructures, and the lead cores or the steel-UDs provide the majority of energy dissipation through hysteresis behavior under cyclic loading. Moreover, the superelastic SMA-UDs spontaneously offer excellent SC force, which can effectively minimize residual deformations and reduce downtime after earthquakes. This study first illustrates the working mechanism and performance of the SMA-UDs in the base isolators through a series of component tests under loadings with different directions (i.e., in-plane and out-of-plane directions), protocols, and frequencies. Subsequently, the principles and performances of the SC base isolators are examined systematically through the quasistatic cyclic loading tests of the conventional and proposed base isolators. Test results demonstrate that these SC base isolators can exhibit satisfactory SC capability and stable energy dissipation. Moreover, the hysteresis characteristics of the SC base isolators are nearly isotropic, thereby enabling the SC base isolators to resist seismic actions in any horizontal direction. In comparison with conventional seismic base isolators, the proposed SC base isolators will provide a promising type of high-performance seismic-resilient devices required by modern civil infrastructure.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models, and code generated or used during the study appear in the published article.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful for the financial support from the Research Grants Council of Hong Kong through the GRF Project (No. PolyU 152246/18E) and NSFC/RGC Joint Research Scheme (N_PolyU533/17, 51761165022). The first author also acknowledges the partial support from the Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (JSPS KAKENHI No. JP19F19077). The findings and opinions expressed in this paper are solely those of the authors and do not represent the view of the sponsors.

References

AASHTO. 2014. Guide specifications for seismic isolation design. 4th ed. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
ASCE. 2017. Minimum design loads and associated criteria for buildings and other structures. Reston, VA: ASCE.
ATC (Applied Technology Council). 1992. Guidelines for cyclic seismic testing of components of steel structures. Redwood City, CA: ATC.
Attanasi, G., and F. Auricchio. 2011. “Innovative superelastic isolation device.” J. Earthquake Eng. 15 (1): 72–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2011.562406.
Buckle, I. G., and R. L. Mayes. 1990. “Seismic isolation: History, application, and performance—A world view.” Earthquake Spectra. 6 (2): 161–201. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1585564.
Cardone, D. 2012. “Re-centring capability of flag-shaped seismic isolation systems.” B. Earthquake Eng. 10 (4): 1267–1284. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-012-9343-1.
Casciati, F., L. Faravelli, and R. Al Saleh. 2009. “An SMA passive device proposed within the highway bridge benchmark.” Struct. Control Health 16 (6): 657–667. https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.332.
Casciati, S., L. Faravelli, and M. Vece. 2017. “Investigation on the fatigue performance of Ni-Ti thin wires.” Struct. Control Health 24 (1): e1855. https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.1855.
CEN (European Committee for Standardization). 2005. Design of structures for earthquake resistance—Part 2: Bridges. Brussels, Belgium: CEN.
CEN (European Committee for Standardization). 2009. Anti-seismic devices. Brussels, Belgium: CEN.
Chen, X., T. Y. Yang, and W. X. Shi. 2015. “Influence of isolation hysteresis on the seismic performance of isolated buildings.” Struct. Control Health 22 (4): 631–647. https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.1709.
Choi, E., T. H. Nam, and B. S. Cho. 2005. “A new concept of isolation bearings for highway steel bridges using shape memory alloys.” Can. J. Civ. Eng. 32 (5): 957–967. https://doi.org/10.1139/l05-049.
Deng, K. L., P. Pan, and C. Y. Wang. 2013. “Development of crawler steel damper for bridges.” J. Constr. Steel Res. 85 (Jun): 140–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2013.03.009.
DesRoches, R., J. McCormick, and M. Delemont. 2004. “Cyclic properties of superelastic shape memory alloy wires and bars.” J. Struct. Eng. 130 (1): 38–46. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2004)130:1(38).
Dezfuli, F. H., and M. S. Alam. 2013. “Shape memory alloy wire-based smart natural rubber bearing.” Smart Mater. Struct. 22 (4): 045013. https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/22/4/045013.
Dolce, M., and D. Cardone. 2001. “Mechanical behaviour of shape memory alloys for seismic applications 2. Austenite NiTi wires subjected to tension.” Int. J. Mech. Sci. 43 (11): 2657–2677. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7403(01)00050-9.
Dolce, M., D. Cardone, and R. Marnetto. 2000. “Implementation and testing of passive control devices based on shape memory alloys.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 29 (7): 945–968. https://doi.org/10.1002/1096-9845(200007)29:7%3C945::AID-EQE958%3E3.0.CO;2-%23.
Ene, D., S. Kishiki, S. Yamada, Y. Jiao, Y. Konishi, M. Terashima, and N. Kawamura. 2016. “Experimental study on the bidirectional inelastic deformation capacity of U-shaped steel dampers for seismic isolated buildings.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 45 (2): 173–192. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2621.
Fang, C., M. C. Yam, T. M. Chan, W. Wang, X. Yang, and X. M. Lin. 2018. “A study of hybrid self-centring connections equipped with shape memory alloy washers and bolts.” Eng. Struct. 164 (Jun): 155–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.03.006.
FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency). 2007. Interim testing protocols for determining the seismic performance characteristics of structural and nonstructural components. Washington, DC: FEMA.
Ito, K., and Sonobe, A. 2019 “Restoration work of Oginosaka bridge on Kumamoto-Takamori line.” [In Japanese.] Technical report of Komaihaltec Inc 8: 71–80.
Jangid, R. S., and J. M. Kelly. 2001. “Base isolation for near-fault motions.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 30 (5): 691–707. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.31.
Johnson, R., J. E. Padgett, M. E. Maragakis, R. DesRoches, and M. S. Saiidi. 2008. “Large scale testing of nitinol shape memory alloy devices for retrofitting of bridges.” Smart Mater. Struct. 17 (3): 035018. https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/17/3/035018.
Kalkan, E., and S. K. Kunnath. 2006. “Effects of fling step and forward directivity on seismic response of buildings.” Earthquake Spectra 22 (2): 367–390. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.2192560.
Katsaras, C. P., T. B. Panagiotakos, and B. Kolias. 2008. “Restoring capability of bilinear hysteretic seismic isolation systems.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 37 (4): 557–575. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.772.
Kitayama, S., and M. C. Constantinou. 2016. Development and evaluation of procedures for analysis and design of buildings with fluidic self-centering systems. Buffalo, NY: Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research.
Krawinkler, H., A. Gupta, R. Medina, and N. Luco. 2000. Loading histories for seismic performance testing of SMRF components and assemblies. Richmond, CA: SAC Joint Venture.
Kumar, M., A. S. Whittaker, and M. C. Constantinou. 2015. “Experimental investigation of cavitation in elastomeric seismic isolation bearings.” Eng. Struct. 101 (Oct): 290–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.07.014.
Lee, G. C., Y. C. Ou, T. C. Niu, J. W. Song, and Z. Liang. 2010. “Characterization of a roller seismic isolation bearing with supplemental energy dissipation for highway bridges.” J. Struct. Eng. 136 (5): 502–510. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000136.
Li, H., C. X. Mao, and J. P. Ou. 2008. “Experimental and theoretical study on two types of shape memory alloy devices.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 37 (3): 407–426. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.761.
Li, Y. L., Z. H. Zong, X. Y. Huang, J. Xia, and L. Liu. 2017. “Experimental study on mechanical properties of high damping rubber bearing model.” Iop. C. Ser. Earth Environ. 61 (1): 012105. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/61/1/012105.
Lu, X. L., D. Wang, and S. S. Wang. 2016. “Investigation of the seismic response of high-rise buildings supported on tension-resistant elastomeric isolation bearings.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 45 (13): 2207–2228. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2755.
Makris, N. 2019. “Seismic isolation: Early history.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 48 (2): 269–283. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.3124.
Medeot R. 2012. “Re-centring capability of seismic isolation systems: A controversial matter moving scarcely towards its settlement.” In Proc., 15th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering. Lisbon, Portugal. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Re-centring-Capability-of-Seismic-Isolation-Systems-Medeot/3eec97715db1ed90f88e131729723032c9ec5575#citing-papers.
Miller, D. J., L. A. Fahnestock, and M. R. Eatherton. 2012. “Development and experimental validation of a nickel-titanium shape memory alloy self-centering buckling-restrained brace.” Eng. Struct. 40 (Jul): 288–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.02.037.
MOHURD (Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People’s Republic of China). 2018. Rubber isolation bearings for buildings. [In Chinese.]. Beijing: MOHURD.
Naeim, F., and J. M. Kelly. 1999. Design of seismic isolated structures: From theory to practice. New York: Wiley.
Oh, S. H., S. H. Song, S. H. Lee, and H. J. Kim. 2013. “Experimental study of seismic performance of base-isolated frames with U-shaped hysteretic energy-dissipating devices.” Eng. Struct. 56 (Nov): 2014–2027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.08.011.
Ozbulut, O. E., and B. Silwal. 2016. “Performance assessment of buildings isolated with S-FBI system under near-fault earthquakes.” Smart Struct. Syst. 17 (5): 709–724. https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2016.17.5.709.
Pan, P., D. Zamfirescu, M. Nakashima, N. Nakayasu, and H. Kashiwa. 2005. “Base-isolation design practice in Japan: Introduction to the post-Kobe approach.” J. Earthquake Eng. 9 (1): 147–171. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632460509350537.
Pinochet, J., J. C. De la Llera, and C. Luders. 2006. “Analysis of a kinematic self-centering seismic isolator.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 35 (12): 1533–1561. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.601.
Ponzo, F. C., A. Di Cesare, G. Leccese, and D. Nigro. 2017. “Shake table testing on restoring capability of double concave friction pendulum seismic isolation systems.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 46 (14): 2337–2353. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2907.
Qiu, C. X., and L. Tian. 2018. “Feasibility analysis of SMA-based damping devices for use in seismic isolation of low-rise frame buildings.” Int. J. Struct. Stab. Dyn. 18 (6): 1850087. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219455418500876.
Qiu, C. X., and S. Zhu. 2017a. “Shake table test and numerical study of self-centering steel frame with SMA braces.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 46 (1): 117–137. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2777.
Qiu, C. X., and S. Zhu. 2017b. “Performance-based seismic design of self-centering steel frames with SMA-based braces.” Eng. Struct. 130 (Jan): 67–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.09.051.
Saiidi, M. S., and H. Y. Wang. 2006. “Exploratory study of seismic response of concrete columns with shape memory alloys reinforcement.” ACI Struct. J. 103 (3): 436–443. https://doi.org/10.14359/15322.
Sarrafzadeh, M., K. J. Elwood, H. Ferner, R. P. Dhakal, H. Ferner, D. Pettinga, M. Stannard, M. Maeda, Y. Nakano, T. Mukai, and T. Koike. 2017. “Performance of reinforced concrete buildings in the 2016 Kumamoto earthquakes and seismic design in Japan.” Bull. N. Z. Soc. Earthquake Eng. 50 (3): 394–435. https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.50.3.394-435.
Shen, J., M. H. Tsai, K. C. Chang, and G. C. Lee. 2004. “Performance of a seismically isolated bridge under near-fault earthquake ground motions.” J. Struct. Eng. 130 (6): 861–868. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2004)130:6(861).
Shinozuka, M., S. R. Chaudhuri, and S. K. Mishra. 2015. “Shape-memory-alloy supplemented lead rubber bearing (SMA-LRB) for seismic isolation.” Probab. Eng. Mech. 41 (Jul): 34–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.probengmech.2015.04.004.
Shrestha, B., L. X. He, H. Hao, K. M. Bi, and W. X. Ren. 2018. “Experimental study on relative displacement responses of bridge frames subjected to spatially varying ground motion and its mitigation using superelastic SMA restrainers.” Soil. Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 109 (Jun): 76–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.03.005.
Speicher, M. S., R. DesRoches, and R. T. Leon. 2011. “Experimental results of a NiTi shape memory alloy (SMA)-based recentering beam-column connection.” Eng. Struct. 33 (9): 2448–2457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.04.018.
Tsopelas, P., and M. C. Constantinou. 1994. NCEER-Taisei Research program on sliding seismic isolation systems for bridges: Experimental and analytical study of a system consisting of sliding bearings and fluid restoring force/damping devices. New York: Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research.
Tsopelas, P., and M. C. Constantinou. 1997. “Study of elastoplastic bridge seismic isolation system.” J. Struct. Eng. 123 (4): 489–498. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1997)123:4(489).
Wang, B., and S. Zhu. 2018a. “Cyclic tension-compression behavior of superelastic shape memory alloy bars with buckling-restrained devices.” Constr. Build. Mater. 186 (Oct): 103–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.07.047.
Wang, B., and S. Zhu. 2018b. “Seismic behavior of self-centering reinforced concrete wall enabled by superelastic shape memory alloy bars.” B. Earthquake Eng. 16 (1): 479–502. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-017-0213-8.
Wang, B., and S. Zhu. 2018c. “Superelastic SMA U-shaped dampers with self-centering functions.” Smart Mater. Struct. 27 (5): 055003. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-665X/aab52d.
Wang, B., S. Zhu, C. X. Qiu, and H. Jin. 2019a. “High-performance self-centering steel columns with shape memory alloy bolts: Design procedure and experimental evaluation.” Eng. Struct. 182 (Mar): 446–458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.12.077.
Wang, B., S. Zhu, J. X. Zhao, and H. J. Jiang. 2019b. “Earthquake resilient RC walls using shape memory alloy bars and replaceable energy dissipating devices.” Smart Mater. Struct. 28 (6): 065021. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-665X/ab1974.
Wang, W., C. Fang, and J. Liu. 2017. “Self-centering beam-to-column connections with combined superelastic SMA bolts and steel angles.” J. Struct. Eng. 143 (2): 04016175. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001675.
Watanabe, G., K. Iiyama, and N. Kawano. 2007. Niigata Chuetsu-oki Earthquake, field reconnaissance report. Tokyo: Tokyo Institute of Technology.
Zhang, Y., X. B. Hu, and S. Zhu. 2009. “Seismic performance of benchmark base-isolated bridges with superelastic Cu-Al-Be restraining damping device.” Struct. Control Health 16 (6): 668–685. https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.327.
Zhang, Y., and S. Zhu. 2007. “A shape memory alloy-based reusable hysteretic damper for seismic hazard mitigation.” Smart Mater. Struct. 16 (5): 1603–1613. https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/16/5/014.
Zhang, Y., and S. Zhu. 2008. “Seismic response control of building structures with superelastic shape memory alloy wire dampers.” J. Eng. Mech. 134 (3): 240–251. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2008)134:3(240).
Zhou, F. L., and P. Tan. 2018. “Recent progress and application on seismic isolation energy dissipation and control for structures in China.” Earthquake Eng. Eng. Vib. 17 (1): 19–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-018-0422-4.
Zhu, S., and Y. Zhang. 2007a. “A thermomechanical constitutive model for superelastic SMA wire with strain-rate dependence.” Smart Mater. Struct. 16 (5): 1696–1707. https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/16/5/023.
Zhu, S., and Y. Zhang. 2007b. “Seismic behaviour of self-centring braced frame buildings with reusable hysteretic damping brace.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 36 (10): 1329–1346. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.683.
Zhu, S., and Y. Zhang. 2008. “Seismic analysis of concentrically braced frame systems with self-centering friction damping braces.” J. Struct. Eng. 134 (1): 121–131. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2008)134:1(121).
Zhu, S., and Y. Zhang. 2013. “Loading rate effect on superelastic SMA-based seismic response modification devices.” Earthquake Struct. 4 (6): 607–627. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2013.4.6.607.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Structural Engineering
Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 146Issue 7July 2020

History

Received: Jul 11, 2019
Accepted: Jan 28, 2020
Published online: Apr 29, 2020
Published in print: Jul 1, 2020
Discussion open until: Sep 29, 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Postdoctoral Fellow, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Hong Kong Polytechnic Univ., Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China; JSPS Research Fellow, Dept. of Architecture and Architectural Engineering, Kyoto Univ., Kyoto 615 8540, Japan. Email: [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Hong Kong Polytechnic Univ., Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2617-3378. Email: [email protected]
Fabio Casciati [email protected]
Formerly, Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Univ. of Pavia, Pavia 27100, Italy; Professor, College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Zhejiang Univ., Hangzhou 310058, China. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share