Technical Papers
Apr 18, 2020

Rotational Capacity of Bolted Double-Web-Angle Beam-Column Gravity Connections through Full-Scale Experimental Testing

Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 146, Issue 7

Abstract

Double-web-angle beam–column connections are used extensively for gravity framing in steel buildings. Although they are designed to resist shear and to allow rotation, they still possess moment capacity that may contribute to lateral resistance, particularly in extreme-load scenarios. To characterize the nonlinear hysteretic behavior of bolted angle connections subjected to simultaneous gravity shear and rotational demand from the moment frame action, a comprehensive test program was conducted. Eight full-scale beam–column subassemblages of two different geometries were tested to characterize their hysteretic behavior and failure modes in relationship to the following parameters: angle geometry, beam and column section properties, gravity shear load, and loading history. The backbone curve of each test was calibrated numerically to reproduce the connection behavior. Double-web-angle connections exhibited large rotational capacity and stable hysteretic behavior. Their stable hysteretic behavior may be of interest in terms of a reserve capacity because it can provide sufficient rotational capacity to the gravity frame and mitigate building collapse in low-ductility braced frames.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (Canada Research Chair Program, Grant No. 219924), the National Science Foundation (Grant No. CMMI-1207976), and the American Institute of Steel Construction. The first author received the Steel Structures Education Foundation G. J. Jackson Fellowship of the Canadian Institute of Steel Construction for this research. Ali Davaran, Jessalyn Nelson, Cameron Bradley, and Joshua Sizemore provided assistance in developing the testing program described in this paper. Jonathan Auger, Romain Siguier, and Patrice Bélanger of the Structures Laboratory of Polytechnique Montreal provided valued assistance to conduct the experimental tests. The opinions, findings, and conclusions in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of those acknowledged here.

References

Abolmaali, A., A. R. Kukreti, and H. Razavi. 2003. “Hysteresis behavior of semi-rigid double web angle steel connections.” J. Constr. Steel Res. 59 (8): 1057–1082. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0143-974X(03)00005-1.
AISC. 2010. Seismic provisions for structural steel buildings. AISC 341. Chicago: AISC.
ASCE. 2016. Minimum design loads and associated criteria for buildings and other structures. ASCE 7. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Astaneh, A., M. N. Nader, and L. Malik. 1989. “Cyclic behavior of double angle connections.” J. Struct. Eng. 115 (5): 1101–1118. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1989)115:5(1101).
Beland, T., C. R. Bradley, J. Nelson, J. G. Sizemore, A. Davaran, E. M. Hines, and L. A. Fahnestock. Forthcoming-a. “Experimental parametric characterization of bolted angle connection behavior.”J. Struct. Eng. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002662.
Beland, T., R. Tremblay, E. M. Hines, and L. A. Fahnestock. Forthcoming-b. “Full-scale cyclic testing with shear load of double web with top and seat angle beam-column connections.”J. Struct. Eng. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002685.
Braconi, A., W. Salvatore, R. Tremblay, and O. S. Bursi. 2007. “Behaviour and modelling of partial-strength beam-to-column composite joints for seismic applications.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 36 (1): 142–161. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.629.
Callister, J. T., and R. G. Pekelnicky. 2011. “Seismic Evaluation of an existing low ductility braced frame building in California.” In Proc., ASCE Structures Congress 2011, 2756–2767. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Citipitioglu, A. M., R. M. Haj-Ali, and D. W. White. 2002. “Refined 3D finite element modeling of partially restrained connections including slip.” J. Constr. Steel Res. 58 (5–8): 995–1013. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0143-974X(01)00087-6.
Danesh, F., A. Pirmoz, and A. S. Daryan. 2007. “Effect of shear force on the initial stiffness of top and seat angle connections with double web angles.” J. Constr. Steel Res. 63 (9): 1208–1218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2006.11.011.
De Stefano, M., A. De Luca, and A. Astaneh-Asl. 1994. “Modeling of cyclic moment-rotation response of double-angle connections.” J. Struct. Eng. 120 (1): 212–229. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1994)120:1(212).
Elkady, A., and D. G. Lignos. 2015. “Effect of gravity framing on the overstrength and collapse capacity of steel frame buildings with perimeter special moment frames.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 44 (8): 1289–1307. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2519.
Flores, F. X., F. A. Charney, and D. Lopez-Garcia. 2014. “Influence of the gravity framing system on the collapse performance of special steel moment frames.” J. Constr. Steel Res. 101 (Oct): 351–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2014.05.020.
Flores, F. X., F. A. Charney, and D. Lopez-Garcia. 2016. “The influence of gravity column continuity on the seismic performance of special steel moment frame structures.” J. Constr. Steel Res. 118 (Mar): 217–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2015.11.010.
Gong, Y. 2014. “Ultimate tensile deformation and strength capacities of bolted-angle connections.” J. Constr. Steel Res. 100 (Sep): 50–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2014.04.029.
Gupta, A., and H. Krawinkler. 2000. “Behavior of ductile SMRFs at various seismic hazard levels.” J. Struct. Eng. 126 (1): 98–107. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2000)126:1(98).
Guravich, S. J., and J. L. Dawe. 2006. “Simple beam connections in combined shear and tension.” Can. J. Civ. Eng. 33 (4): 357–372. https://doi.org/10.1139/l05-057.
Hines, E. M., M. E. Appel, and P. J. Cheever. 2009. “Collapse performance of low-ductility chevron braced steel frames in moderate seismic regions.” Eng. J. 46 (3): 149–180.
Hwang, S.-H., and D. G. Lignos. 2017. “Effect of modelling assumptions on the earthquake-induced losses and collapse risk of steel-frame buildings with special concentrically braced frames.” J. Struct. Eng. 143 (9): 04017116. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001851.
Jarrett, J. A., J. P. Judd, and F. A. Charney. 2015. “Comparative evaluation of innovative and traditional seismic-resisting systems using the FEMA P-58 procedure.” J. Constr. Steel Res. 105 (Feb): 107–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2014.10.001.
Ji, X., M. Kato, T. Wang, T. Hitaka, and M. Nakashima. 2009. “Effect of gravity columns on mitigation of drift concentration for braced frames.” J. Struct. Steel. Res. 65 (12): 2148–2156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2009.07.003.
Judd, J. P., F. A. Charney, and S. E. Pryor. 2015. “Retrofit of steel-frame buildings using enhanced gravity-frame connections.” In Proc., 2nd ATC & SEI Conf. on Improving the Seismic Performance of Existing Buildings and Other Structures, 132–143. Reston, VA: ASCE. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784479728.012.
Kishi, N., and W.-F. Chen. 1990. “Moment-rotation relations of semirigid connections with angles.” J. Struct. Eng. 116 (7): 1813–1834. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1990)116:7(1813).
Lee, K., and D. A. Foutch. 2002. “Performance evaluation of new steel frame buildings for seismic loads.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 31 (3): 653–670. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.147.
Liu, J., and A. Astaneh-Asl. 2000. “Cyclic testing of simple connections including effects of slab.” J. Struct. Eng. 126 (1): 32–39. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2000)126:1(32).
Liu, J., and A. Astaneh-Asl. 2004. “Moment-rotation parameters for composite shear tab connections.” J. Struct. Eng. 130 (9): 1371–1380. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2004)130:9(1371).
Liu, J., J. Main, and F. Sadek. 2012. “Modeling of double-angle shear connections for evaluation of structural robustness.” In Proc., Forensic Engineering 2012. 1081–1090. Reston, VA: ASCE. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784412640.115.
Matthews, J., and K. Arjomandi. 2017. “Improved ductility of bolted double-angle shear connections.” Pract. Period. Struct. Des. Constr. 22 (3): 06017001. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)SC.1943-5576.0000323.
Menegotto, M., and P. E. Pinto. 1973. “Method of analysis for cyclically loaded R.C. plane frames including changes in geometry and non-elastic behaviour of elements under combined normal force and bending.” In Symposium on the Resistance and Ultimate Deformability of Structures Acted on by Well Defined Repeated Loads. Zurich, Switzerland: International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering.
NBCC (National Building Code of Canada). 2015. National building code of Canada. Ottawa: National Research Council Canada.
Oosterhof, S. A., and R. G. Driver. 2012. “Performance of steel shear connections under combined moment, shear and tension.” In Proc. Structures Congress 2012, 146–157. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Pirmoz, A., A. S. Daryan, A. Mazaheri, and H. E. Darbandi. 2008. “Behavior of bolted angle connections subjected to combined shear force and moment.” J. Constr. Steel Res. 64 (4): 436–446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2007.09.006.
Shen, J., and A. Astaneh-Asl. 1999. “Hysteretic behavior of bolted-angle connections.” J. Constr. Steel Res. 51 (3): 201–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0143-974X(99)00030-9.
Shen, J., and A. Astaneh-Asl. 2000. “Hysteretic model of bolted-angle connections.” J. Constr. Steel Res. 54 (3): 317–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0143-974X(99)00070-X.
Sizemore, J. G., L. A. Fahnestock, E. M. Hines, and C. R. Bradley. 2017. “Parametric study of low-ductility concentrically braced frames under cyclic static loading.” J. Struct. Eng. 143 (6): 04017032. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001761.
Stoakes, C. D., and L. A. Fahnestock. 2011. “Cyclic flexural testing of concentrically braced frame beam-column connections.” J. Struct. Eng. 137 (7): 739–747. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000326.
Weigand, J. M., and J. W. Berman. 2016. “Integrity of bolted angle connections subjected to simulated column removal.” J. Struct. Eng. 142 (3): 04015165. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001429.
Yang, B., and K. H. Tan. 2013. “Robustness of bolted-angle connections against progressive collapse: Mechanical modelling of bolted-angle connection under tension.” Eng. Struct. 57 (12): 153–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.08.041.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Structural Engineering
Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 146Issue 7July 2020

History

Received: Apr 27, 2019
Accepted: Dec 5, 2019
Published online: Apr 18, 2020
Published in print: Jul 1, 2020
Discussion open until: Sep 18, 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Ph.D. Candidate, Dept. of Civil, Geological and Mining Engineering, Polytechnique Montreal, 2500, chemin de Polytechnique, Montreal, QC, Canada H3T 1J4 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7755-8569. Email: [email protected]
Robert Tremblay, Ph.D. [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil, Geological and Mining Engineering, Polytechnique Montreal, 2500, chemin de Polytechnique, Montreal, QC, Canada H3T 1J4. Email: [email protected]
Eric M. Hines, Ph.D., M.ASCE [email protected]
P.E.
Professor of the Practice, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Tufts Univ., 474 Boston Ave., Medford, MA 02155. Email: [email protected]
P.E.
Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 205 N. Mathews Ave., Urbana, IL 61801. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3172-2260. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share