Technical Papers
May 18, 2020

Wind Resistance and Fragility Functions for Wood-Framed Wall Sheathing Panels in Low-Rise Residential Construction

Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 146, Issue 8

Abstract

The wind uplift resistance of wood roof sheathing panels has been the subject of many engineering studies due to the high probability that roofs are subjected to large uplift loads during intense wind events. However, few studies have focused on determining the out-of-plane wind resistance of wall sheathing for light-framed wood structures, which are integral to the construction of external walls in single-family residential housing. The objective of this research is to experimentally determine the out-of-plane wind resistance of wood framed walls as used in light-framed wood structural systems. Tests were conducted at the University of Florida on 1.22×2.44  m (4×8  ft) wood wall panels consisting of oriented strand board (OSB) and/or plywood sheathing nailed to wood studs. The panels were fabricated in accordance with the minimum requirements of the Florida Building Code. Each panel was subjected to a monotonic-increasing static pressure using a step-and-hold pressure test sequence until the panel failed. The mean out-of-plane structural resistance capacity of wood panels attained was 4.21 kPa (88.0 psf), and there was no statistical difference in performance between plywood and OSB sheathing panels. As expected, when results were compared with previous results from tests on wood roofs panels (conducted by the third author), the mean failure pressure of the wall panels was higher than the failure pressure of the roof panels. The ultimate nail-withdrawal load failure of the fasteners (by far the most common failure mechanism) in the wall sheathing was actually 21% lower than for the roof panels. Finally, the research has for the first time contributed experimentally determined fragility functions for wood wall panel systems and compared these to previously available fragilities for roof panels. Roof panels in the corners and along roof edges are more likely to fail in high wind events than are wall panels. The study shows that the failure probabilities for wall corner panels (in Zone 5) can exceed that of roof sheathing panels located in the field (Zone 1) of the roof. These results are important contributions for probabilistic modeling of wood framed building and for use in component-based wind-damage prediction models in hurricanes and in tornadoes.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code generated or used during the study are available in a repository or online in accordance with funder data retention policies (https://doi.org/10.17603/ds2-fpg9-1w85).

Acknowledgments

The research was conducted under the National Science Foundation (NSF) Award 1150975 CAREER: Tornado-Resilient Structural Retrofits for Sustainable Housing Communities. The authors are grateful to the Ronald E. McNair Post-Baccalaureate Achievement Program at the University of Florida (UF), the University Scholars Program at UF, and the UF University Scholars Program administrators for supporting Mr. Lopez in performing this research.

References

APA-Engineered Wood Association. 2016. Engineered wood construction guide. Tacoma, WA: APA-Engineered Wood Association.
ASCE. 2010. Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures. ASCE 7-10. Reston, VA: ASCE.
ASTM. 2014. Standard test methods for density and specific gravity (relative density) of wood and wood-based materials. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
AWC (American Wood Council). 2017. National design specifications (NDS) supplement: Design values for wood construction. Leesburg, VA: AWC.
Datin, P. L., D. O. Prevatt, and W. Pang. 2011. “Wind-uplift capacity of residential wood roof-sheathing panels retrofitted with insulating foam adhesive.” J. Archit. Eng. 17 (4): 144–154. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)AE.1943-5568.0000034.
Forest Products Laboratory. 1931. Nail holding power of American woods. Washington, DC: US Dept. of Agriculture, Forest Service.
He, W. X., and H. P. Hong. 2012. “Probabilistic characterization of roof panel uplift capacity under wind loading.” Can. J. Civ. Eng. 39 (12): 1285–1296. https://doi.org/10.1139/l2012-114.
Henderson, D., C. Williams, E. Gavanski, and G. Kopp. 2013. “Failure mechanisms of roof sheathing under fluctuating wind loads.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 114 (Mar): 27–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2013.01.002.
Hill, K. M. 2009. “Development of time-varying wind uplift test protocols for residential wood roof sheathing panels.” Master’s thesis, Dept. of Civil and Coastal Engineering, Univ. of Florida.
ICC (International Code Council). 2017. 2017 Florida building code: Residential. 6th ed. Country Club Hills, IL: ICC.
Kasal, B., R. J. Leichti, and R. Y. Itani. 1994. “Nonlinear finite-element model of complete light-frame wood structures.” J. Struct. Eng. 120 (1): 100–119. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1994)120:1(100).
Kemp, G. 2008. “New hurricane test facility allows repeatable full-scale building testing.” Test Eng. Manage. 70 (4): 10–13.
Kopp, G. A., and E. Gavanski. 2012. “Effects of pressure equalization on the performance of residential wall systems under extreme wind loads.” J. Struct. Eng. 138 (4): 526–538. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000476.
Kopp, G. A., M. J. Morrison, and D. J. Henderson. 2012. “Full-scale testing of low-rise, residential buildings with realistic wind loads.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 104 (May): 25–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2012.01.004.
Kuligowski, E. D., F. T. Lombardo, L. T. Phan, M. L. Levitan, and D. P. Jorgensen. 2014. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) technical investigation of the May 22, 2011, tornado in Joplin, Missouri. Gaithersburg, MD: NIST.
Lee, K. H., and D. V. Rosowsky. 2005. “Fragility assessment for roof sheathing failure in high wind regions.” Eng. Struct. 27 (6): 857–868. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2004.12.017.
Li, Y., and B. R. Ellingwood. 2009. “Framework for multihazard risk assessment and mitigation for wood-frame residential construction.” J. Struct. Eng. 135 (2): 159–168. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2009)135:2(159).
Lopez, J., D. Roueche, and D. Prevatt. 2019. “Testing the wind resistance of wall sheathing panels used in wood-framed low-rise residential construction.” In CAREER Tornado resilience structural retrofit for sustainable housing communities. DesignSafe-CI. https://doi.org/10.17603/ds2-fpg9-1w85.
Martin, K. G., R. Gupta, D. O. Prevatt, P. L. Datin, and J. W. van de Lindt. 2011. “Modeling system effects and structural load paths in a wood-framed structure.” J. Archit. Eng. 17 (4): 134–143. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)AE.1943-5568.0000045.
Morse-Fortier, L. J. 1995. “Structural implications of increased panel use in wood-frame buildings.” J. Struct. Eng. 121 (6): 995–1003. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1995)121:6(995).
Peng, X., D. B. Roueche, D. O. Prevatt, and K. R. Gurley. 2016. “An engineering-based approach to predict tornado-induced damage.” In Multi-hazard approaches to civil infrastructure engineering, edited by P. Gardoni and M. J. LaFave, 311–335. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Phillips, T. L., R. Y. Itani, and D. I. McLean. 1993. “Lateral load sharing by diaphragms in wood-framed buildings.” J. Struct. Eng. 119 (5): 1556–1571. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1993)119:5(1556).
Prevatt, D. O., A. A. Bhusar, and D. B. Roueche. 2016. “A predictive tool for estimation Tornado-induced damage to residential structures-application to the 2015  Garland/Rowlett, TX Tornado.” In Proc., 1st Int. Conf. on Natural Hazards and Infrastructure. Athens, Greece: National Technical Univ. of Athens.
Prevatt, D. O., K. R. Gurley, D. B. Roueche, and G. Wong-Parodi. 2018. Survey and investigation of buildings damaged by category II, III, IV and V hurricanes in FY 2017-18 – Hurricane Irma 2017. Gainesville, FL: Univ. of Florida.
Prevatt, D. O., S. Shreyans, A. Kerr, and K. R. Gurley. 2014. “In situ nail withdrawal strengths in wood roof structures.” J. Struct. Eng. 140 (5): 04014008. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000990.
Roueche, D. B., and D. O. Prevatt. 2013. “Residential damage patterns following the 2011 Tuscaloosa, AL and Joplin, MO tornadoes.” J. Disaster Res. 8 (6): 1061–1067. https://doi.org/10.20965/jdr.2013.p1061.
Sakamoto, Y., M. Ishiguro, and G. Kitagawa. 1986. Akaike information criterion statistics, 81. Dordrecht, Netherlands: D. Reidel.
Scoville, E. 2005. “Investigation of the response of low-rise wood-frame roof-wall systems under combined uplift and in-plane shear loads.” Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Clemson Univ.
Standohar-Alfano, C. D., J. W. van de Lindt, and B. R. Ellingwood. 2017. “Vertical load path failure risk analysis of residential wood-frame construction in tornadoes.” J. Struct. Eng. 143 (7): 04017045. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001775.
Thampi, H., V. Dayal, and P. P. Sarkar. 2011. “Finite element analysis of interaction of tornados with a low-rise timber building.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 99 (4): 369–377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2011.01.004.
van de Lindt, J. W., and T. N. Dao. 2009. “Performance-based wind engineering for wood-frame buildings.” J. Struct. Eng. 135 (2): 169–177. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2009)135:2(169).
Yeh, B., and E. Keith. 2010. “Using wood structural panels for shear and wind uplift applications.” In Vol. 3 of Proc., 11th World Conf. on Timber Engineering 2010, WCTE 2010, 2688–2697. Sesto Fiorentino, Italy: Trees and Timber Institute, National Research Council.
Yeh, B., T. Williamson, and E. Keith. 2009. “Combined shear and wind uplift resistance of wood structural panel shearwalls.” In Proc., 2009 Structures Congress–Don’t Mess with Structural Engineers: Expanding Our Role, 1662–1672. Reston, VA: ASCE.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Structural Engineering
Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 146Issue 8August 2020

History

Received: Dec 20, 2018
Accepted: Nov 18, 2019
Published online: May 18, 2020
Published in print: Aug 1, 2020
Discussion open until: Oct 18, 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Formerly, Undergraduate Student, Dept. of Civil and Coastal Engineering, Univ. of Florida, 365 Weil Hall, Gainesville, FL 32611. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6775-1939. Email: [email protected]
David B. Roueche, Ph.D., M.ASCE [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Auburn Univ., Auburn, AL 36849. Email: [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil and Coastal Engineering, Univ. of Florida, 365 Weil Hall, Gainesville, FL 32611 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9365-9776. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share