Buckling of Shallow Spherical Concrete Domes under Gravity and Earthquake Loads
Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 146, Issue 5
Abstract
Buckling analysis of spherical concrete domes constructed over prestressed concrete tanks subjected to gravity and earthquake load combinations is complex due to the sensitivity of spherical dome buckling to geometric imperfection, the effect of creep and shrinkage on amplifying the deflection of the dome (increasing the radius of curvature of the deformed dome and reducing the buckling resistance), and the geometric and material nonlinearity of the concrete dome. Study of imperfections has shown that imperfections that increase the average radius of curvature in an area the size of an elastic buckle have the highest impact in reducing buckling strength; thus, the problem of buckling of the concrete dome is reducible to the snap-through buckling of a shallow cap equal in size to an elastic buckle of the dome. In this paper, the buckling of a shallow cap subjected to gravity and seismic load combinations is determined using nonlinear geometry, material nonlinearity of concrete (accounting for softening and cracking in tension and microcracking and crushing in compression), and time-dependent creep and shrinkage of concrete. The analysis is performed in three steps: in the first step, the cap is analyzed for gravity loads; in the second step, the cap is analyzed for the effects of creep and shrinkage strains; and in the third step, the earthquake load is applied until the snap-through buckling occurs. The analysis was carried out on a set of domes designed for gravity load combinations alone. These domes cover the extremes of size and rise of the domes that are currently constructed over prestressed concrete tanks. The results show that the majority of existing domes that are not in high-seismicity zones and are designed for gravity load combinations have capacity for earthquake loading. The results are also of value in the design of new domes for load combinations that include earthquake loading.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
Special thanks are extended to Atis Liepins for many useful discussions and to Sean Hsieh and Duncan McGeehan of Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc. for assisting in performing the finite-element analyses reported in this paper.
References
ACI (American Concrete Institute). 1992. Prediction of creep, shrinkage, and temperature effects in concrete structures (reapproved 2008). ACI 209R. Farmington Hills, MI: ACI.
ACI (American Concrete Institute). 2006. Code requirements for environmental engineering concrete structures and commentary. ACI 350. Farmington Hills, MI: ACI.
ACI (American Concrete Institute). 2013. Guide to design and construction of circular wire- and strand-wrapped prestressed concrete structures. ACI 372R. Farmington Hills, MI: ACI.
ACI (American Concrete Institute). 2014. Building code and commentary on requirements for structural concrete. ACI 318. Farmington Hills, MI: ACI.
ASCE. 2016. Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures. ASCE/SEI 7. Reston, VA: ASCE.
AWWA (American Water Works Association). 2013. AWWA standard for wire- and strand-wound circular, prestressed concrete water tanks. AWWA D110. Denver: AWWA.
Darwin, D., and D. A. W. Pecknold. 1974. Inelastic model for cyclic biaxial loading of reinforced concrete. Urbana, IL: Univ. of Illinois.
Hamed, E., M. A. Bradford, R. I. Gilbert, and Z.-T. Chang. 2011a. “Analytical model and experimental study of failure behavior of thin-walled shallow concrete domes.” J. Struct. Eng. 137 (1): 88–99. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000274.
Hamed, E., M. A. Bradford, R. I. Gilbert, and Z.-T. Chang. 2011b. “Creep testing and analysis of shallow concrete domes.” In Incorporating sustainable practice in mechanics of structures and materials, edited by F. Fragomemi, S. Venkatesan, N. T. K. Lam, and S. Setunge, 203–215. London: Taylor & Francis.
Huang, N. 1964. “Unsymmetrical buckling of thin shallow spherical shells.” J. Appl. Mech. 31 (3): 447–457. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3629662.
Hutchinson, J. W., and W. T. Koiter. 1970. “Postbuckling theory.” Appl. Mech. Rev. 23 (12): 1353–1356.
Zarghamee, M. S., and F. J. Heger. 1983. “Buckling of thin concrete domes.” J. Am. Concr. Inst. 80: 487–500.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
©2020 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Oct 24, 2018
Accepted: Oct 7, 2019
Published online: Feb 22, 2020
Published in print: May 1, 2020
Discussion open until: Jul 22, 2020
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.