Technical Papers
Feb 18, 2020

Buckling Restrained Sizing and Shape Optimization of Truss Structures

Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 146, Issue 5

Abstract

An integrated strategy for sizing and shape optimization of truss structures, taking buckling constraints implicitly into truss design, is demonstrated here. Because the associated objective functional is not convex, a derivative-free directionality-based global optimization scheme is adopted. As required by the problem, the change of measure–based evolutionary optimization (COMBEO) optimization scheme is appropriately enhanced in this work to incorporate complex inequality constraints without affording any violation. The applied scheme arrests buckling through a forward model via capturing geometric nonlinear responses of the structure. For this purpose, each truss element is modeled using two corotational beam elements with moment releases at hinged ends. Local and global imperfections are introduced to induce buckling of a single member and global buckling of the structure, respectively. These imperfections are randomly generated using Gaussian distribution to arrive at a resilient structure. While past research used large numbers of buckling constraints explicitly to optimize truss weight, the proposed scheme eliminates the same by adding buckling implicitly in the forward model. Present formalism also includes capturing nonlinear responses of the structure to eliminate structural failure due to geometric nonlinearity. Robustness of the proposed scheme is demonstrated extensively using four different types of trusses. The proposed formalism can be used to solve many other structural optimization problems involving geometric nonlinearity and imperfections.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments, which have helped us improve the quality of the manuscript.

References

Adeli, H., and S. Kumar. 1995. “Distributed genetic algorithm for structural optimization.” J. Aerosp. Eng. 8 (3): 156–163. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0893-1321(1995)8:3(156).
Aslani, M., P. Ghasemi, and A. H. Gandomi. 2018. “Constrained mean-variance mapping optimization for truss optimization problems.” Struct. Des. Tall Spec. Build. 27 (6): e1449. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.1449.
Augenti, N., and F. Parisi. 2011. “Buckling analysis of a long-span roof structure collapsed during construction.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 27 (1): 77–88. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000302.
Bekdaş, G., S. M. Nigdeli, and X.-S. Yang. 2015. “Sizing optimization of truss structures using flower pollination algorithm.” Appl. Soft Comput. 37 (Dec): 322–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2015.08.037.
Belytschko, T., and L. W. Glaum. 1979. “Applications of higher order corotational stretch theories to nonlinear finite element analysis.” Comput. Struct. 10 (1–2): 175–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7949(79)90085-3.
Belytschko, T., and B. Hsieh. 1973. “Non-linear transient finite element analysis with convected co-ordinates.” Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng. 7 (3): 255–271. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.1620070304.
Carrillo, E. S. 2006. “The cantilevered beam: An analytical solution for general deflections of linear-elastic materials.” Eur. J. Phys. 27 (6): 1437. https://doi.org/10.1088/0143-0807/27/6/017.
Chladnỳ, E., and M. Stujberová. 2013. “Frames with unique global and local imperfection in the shape of the elastic buckling mode (part 1).” Stahlbau 82 (8): 609–617. https://doi.org/10.1002/stab.201310080.
Crisfield, M. A. 1991. Non-linear finite element analysis of solids and structures. New York: Wiley.
Degée, H., A. Detzel, and U. Kuhlmann. 2008. “Interaction of global and local buckling in welded rhs compression members.” J. Constr. Steel Res. 64 (7–8): 755–765. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2008.01.032.
Degertekin, S., and M. Hayalioglu. 2013. “Sizing truss structures using teaching-learning-based optimization.” Comput. Struct. 119 (Apr): 177–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2012.12.011.
Degertekin, S., L. Lamberti, and I. Ugur. 2018. “Sizing, layout and topology design optimization of truss structures using the Jaya algorithm.” Appl. Soft Comput. 70 (Sep): 903–928. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2017.10.001.
Farshchin, M., C. Camp, and M. Maniat. 2016. “Multi-class teaching–learning-based optimization for truss design with frequency constraints.” Eng. Struct. 106 (Jan): 355–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.10.039.
Gomes, H. M. 2011. “Truss optimization with dynamic constraints using a particle swarm algorithm.” Expert Syst. Appl. 38 (1): 957–968. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2010.07.086.
Gutkowski, W., and J. Latalski. 2005. “Structural optimization with member dimensional imperfections.” Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 30 (1): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-004-0383-2.
Imai, K., and L. A. Schmit. 1981. “Configuration optimization of trusses.” J. Struct. Div. 107 (5): 745–756.
Kanarachos, S., J. Griffin, and M. E. Fitzpatrick. 2017. “Efficient truss optimization using the contrast-based fruit fly optimization algorithm.” Comput. Struct. 182 (Apr): 137–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2016.11.005.
Kaveh, A., and S. Talatahari. 2009. “Size optimization of space trusses using big bang–big crunch algorithm.” Comput. Struct. 87 (17–18): 1129–1140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2009.04.011.
Lee, K. S., and Z. W. Geem. 2004. “A new structural optimization method based on the harmony search algorithm.” Comput. Struct. 82 (9–10): 781–798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2004.01.002.
Madah, H., and O. Amir. 2017. “Truss optimization with buckling considerations using geometrically nonlinear beam modeling.” Comput. Struct. 192 (Nov): 233–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2017.07.023.
Madah, H., and O. Amir. 2019. “Concurrent structural optimization of buckling-resistant trusses and their initial imperfections.” Int. J. Solids Struct. 162 (May): 244–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2018.12.007.
Martin, R., and N. J. Delatte. 2001. “Another look at hartford civic center coliseum collapse.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 15 (1): 31–36. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(2001)15:1(31).
Mitjana, F., S. Cafieri, F. Bugarin, C. Gogu, and F. Castanie. 2018. “Optimization of structures under buckling constraints using frame elements.” Eng. Optim. 51 (1): 140–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305215X.2018.1444162.
Mortazavi, A., V. Toğan, and A. Nuhoğlu. 2017. “Weight minimization of truss structures with sizing and layout variables using integrated particle swarm optimizer.” J. Civ. Eng. Manage. 23 (8): 985–1001. https://doi.org/10.3846/13923730.2017.1348982.
Palassopoulos, G. 1997. “Buckling analysis and design of imperfection-sensitive structures.” In Uncertainty modeling in finite element, fatigue and stability of systems, 311–355. Singapore: World Scientific.
Rajan, S. 1995. “Sizing, shape, and topology design optimization of trusses using genetic algorithm.” J. Struct. Eng. 121 (10): 1480–1487. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1995)121:10(1480).
Rosen, A., and L. A. Schmit Jr. 1979. “Design-oriented analysis of imperfect truss structures. Part I: Accurate analysis.” Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 14 (9): 1309–1321. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.1620140905.
Sarkar, S., D. Roy, and R. M. Vasu. 2015. “A global optimization paradigm based on change of measures.” R. Soc. Open Sci. 2 (7): 150123. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.150123.
Schenk, C., and G. Schuëller. 2003. “Buckling analysis of cylindrical shells with random geometric imperfections.” Int. J. Non-Linear Mech. 38 (7): 1119–1132. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7462(02)00057-4.
Sonmez, M. 2011. “Artificial bee colony algorithm for optimization of truss structures.” Appl. Soft Comput. 11 (2): 2406–2418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2010.09.003.
Torii, A. J., R. H. Lopez, and L. F. Miguel. 2015. “Modeling of global and local stability in optimization of truss-like structures using frame elements.” Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 51 (6): 1187–1198. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-014-1203-y.
Turco, E. 2017. “Tools for the numerical solution of inverse problems in structural mechanics: Review and research perspectives.” Eur. J. Environ. Civ. Eng. 21 (5): 509–554. https://doi.org/10.1080/19648189.2015.1134673.
Weaver, W., and J. M. Gere. 2012. Matrix analysis framed structures. Berlin: Springer.
Zhang, Y., Y. Hou, and S. Liu. 2014. “A new method of discrete optimization for cross-section selection of truss structures.” Eng. Optim. 46 (8): 1052–1073. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305215X.2013.827671.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Structural Engineering
Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 146Issue 5May 2020

History

Received: Dec 14, 2018
Accepted: Oct 1, 2019
Published online: Feb 18, 2020
Published in print: May 1, 2020
Discussion open until: Jul 18, 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

T. Venkatesh Varma [email protected]
Master’s Student, School of Infrastructure, Indian Institute of Technology, Bhubaneswar 752050, India. Email: [email protected]
Saikat Sarkar [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Discipline of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Indore 453552, India (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Goutam Mondal [email protected]
Assistant Professor, School of Infrastructure, Indian Institute of Technology, Bhubaneswar 752050, India. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share