Technical Papers
Mar 9, 2020

Simulation-Based Assessment of Postearthquake Functionality of Buildings with Disruptions to Cross-Dependent Utility Networks

Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 146, Issue 5

Abstract

Buildings are central to the vitality of any community, and assessing their time-dependent functionality following a hazard event is central to resilience quantification. Such an assessment requires consideration of the physical damage to buildings and their dependence on interconnected lifeline systems. In this study, a methodology is formulated to quantify postearthquake functionality by considering both the physical damage to buildings caused by ground shaking and the disruptions to the cross-dependent utilities that support the community. The methodology is illustrated by modeling the interconnected networks of the city of Napa, California, and simulating the recovery process of the electric power network, water network, and building cluster for a specified earthquake scenario. The proposed methodology can be implemented in resilience-based risk-informed decision-making tools to provide a wealth of information to community leaders, stakeholders, and policymakers.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code generated or used during the study are available from the corresponding author by request.

Acknowledgments

The work presented in this paper was supported by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) under Grant No. NRC-HQ-60-17-G-0028. This support is gratefully acknowledged. All views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NRC.

References

Abrahamson, N. A., and R. R. Youngs. 1992. “A stable algorithm for regression analyses using the random effects model.” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 82 (1): 505–510.
ALA (American Lifelines Alliance). 2001. Seismic fragility formulation for water systems. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Alipour, A., and B. Shafei. 2016. “Seismic resilience of transportation networks with deteriorating components.” J. Struct. Eng. 142 (8): C4015015. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001399.
Almufti, I., and M. Willford. 2013. REDiTM rating system: Resilience-based earthquake design initiative for the next generation of buildings. London: Arup Co.
Ameri, M. R., and J. W. van de Lindt. 2019. “Seismic performance and recovery modeling of natural gas networks at the community level using building demand.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 33 (4): 04019043. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001315.
Argyroudis, S., J. Selva, P. Gehl, and K. Pitilakis. 2015. “Systemic seismic risk assessment of road networks considering interactions with the built environment.” Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastruct. Eng. 30 (7): 524–540. https://doi.org/10.1111/mice.12136.
Bernardini, G., M. D’Orazio, and E. Quagliarini. 2016. “Towards a ‘behavioural design’ approach for seismic risk reduction strategies of buildings and their environment.” Saf. Sci. 86 (Jul): 273–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2016.03.010.
Bernardini, G., S. Santarelli, E. Quagliarini, and M. D’Orazio. 2017. “Dynamic guidance tool for a safer earthquake pedestrian evacuation in urban systems.” Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 65 (Sep): 150–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2017.07.001.
Burton, H. V., G. Deierlein, D. Lallemant, and T. Lin. 2016. “Framework for incorporating probabilistic building performance in the assessment of community seismic resilience.” J. Struct. Eng. 142 (8): C4015007. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001321.
Burton, H. V., G. Deierlein, D. Lallemant, and Y. Singh. 2017. “Measuring the impact of enhanced building performance on the seismic resilience of a residential community.” Earthquake Spectra 33 (4): 1347–1367. https://doi.org/10.1193/040916EQS057M.
Çagnan, Z., and R. Davidson. 2004. “Post-earthquake restoration modeling of electric power systems.” In Proc., 13th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering. Tokyo: International Association of Earthquake Engineering.
Campbell, K. W., and Y. Bozorgnia. 2014. “NGA-West2 ground motion model for the average horizontal components of PGA, PGV, and 5% damped linear acceleration response spectra.” Earthquake Spectra 30 (3): 1087–1115. https://doi.org/10.1193/062913EQS175M.
CEC (California Energy Commission). 2018. “GIS open data.” Accessed June 1, 2018. https://cecgis-caenergy.opendata.arcgis.com.
Chang, S. E., W. D. Svekla, and M. Shinozuka. 2002. “Linking infrastructure and urban economy: Simulation of water-disruption impacts in earthquakes.” Environ. Plann. B: Plann Des. 29 (2): 281–301. https://doi.org/10.1068/b2789.
Cimellaro, G. P., A. De Stefano, and O. Villa. 2013. “Serviceability of natural gas distribution networks after earthquakes.” J. Earthquake Tsunami 7 (2): 1350005. https://doi.org/10.1142/S179343111350005X.
Cimellaro, G. P., O. Villa, and M. Bruneau. 2015. “Resilience-based design of natural gas distribution networks.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 21 (1): 05014005. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000204.
County of Napa. 2018. “GIS data catalog.” Accessed June 1, 2018. http://gis.napa.ca.gov/giscatalog/.
FEMA. 2003. Multi-hazard loss estimation methodology—Earthquake model. Washington, DC: Dept. of Homeland Security.
Field, E. H., et al. 2013. Uniform California earthquake rupture forecast, version 3 (UCERF3)—The time-independent model, 97. Reston, VA: USGS.
Field, E. H., T. H. Jordan, and C. A. Cornell. 2003. “OpenSHA: A developing community-modeling environment for seismic hazard analysis.” Seismol. Res. Lett. 74 (4): 406–419. https://doi.org/10.1785/gssrl.74.4.406.
Fishman, G. S. 2001. Discrete-event simulation: Modeling, programming, and applications. New York: Springer.
Gay Alanis, L. F. 2013. “Development of a resilience assessment methodology for networked infrastructure systems using stochastic simulation, with application to water distribution systems.” Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Virginia Tech.
Goretti, A., and V. Sarli. 2006. “Road network and damaged buildings in urban areas: Short and long-term interaction.” Bull. Earthquake Eng. 4 (2): 159–175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-006-9004-3.
Guidotti, R., H. Chmielewski, V. Unnikrishnan, P. Gardoni, T. McAllister, and J. van de Lindt. 2016. “Modeling the resilience of critical infrastructure: The role of network dependencies.” Sustainable Resilient Infrastruct. 1 (3–4): 153–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/23789689.2016.1254999.
Ip, W. H., and D. Wang. 2011. “Resilience and friability of transportation networks: Evaluation, analysis and optimization.” IEEE Syst. J. 5 (2): 189–198. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSYST.2010.2096670.
Jayaram, N., and J. W. Baker. 2009. “Correlation model for spatially distributed ground-motion intensities.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 38 (15): 1687–1708. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.922.
Kang, H., H. V. Burton, and H. Miao. 2018. “Re-enacting the recovery following the 2014 South Napa Earthquake using stochastic process models.” Earthquake Spectra 34 (3): 1247–1266. https://doi.org/10.1193/012917EQS020M.
Karimi Askarani, K., E. B. Stockwell, K. R. Piontek, and T. C. Sale. 2018. “Thermal monitoring of natural source zone depletion.” Groundwater Monit. Rem. 38 (3): 43–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwmr.12286.
Liao, T. Y., T. Y. Hu, and Y. N. Ko. 2018. “A resilience optimization model for transportation networks under disasters.” Nat. Hazard. 93 (1): 469–489. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-018-3310-3.
Lin, P., and N. Wang. 2016. “Building portfolio fragility functions to support scalable community resilience assessment.” Sustainable Resilient Infrastruct. 1 (3–4): 108–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/23789689.2016.1254997.
Lin, P., and N. Wang. 2017. “Stochastic post-disaster functionality recovery of community building portfolios. I: Modeling.” Struct. Saf. 69 (Nov): 96–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2017.05.002.
Luna, R., N. Balakrishnan, and C. H. Dagli. 2011. “Postearthquake recovery of a water distribution system: Discrete event simulation using colored petri nets.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 17 (1): 25–34. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000039.
Masoomi, H. 2018. “A resilience-based decision framework to determine performance targets for the built environment.” Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Colorado State Univ.
Masoomi, H., and J. W. van de Lindt. 2018. “Restoration and functionality assessment of a community subjected to tornado hazard.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 14 (3): 275–291. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2017.1354030.
Masoomi, H., and J. W. van de Lindt. 2019. “Community-resilience-based design (CRBD) of the built environment.” ASCE-ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Eng. Syst. Part A: Civ. Eng. 5 (1): 04018044. https://doi.org/10.1061/AJRUA6.0000998.
Masoomi, H., J. W. van de Lindt, and L. Peek. 2018. “Quantifying socioeconomic impact of a tornado by estimating population outmigration as a resilience metric at the community level.” J. Struct. Eng. 144 (5): 04018034. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002019.
Mieler, M. W., and J. Mitrani-Reiser. 2018. “Review of the state of the art in assessing earthquake-induced loss of functionality in buildings.” J. Struct. Eng. 144 (3): 04017218. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001959.
Nozhati, S., B. R. Ellingwood, and E. K. Chong. 2020. “Stochastic optimal control methodologies in risk-informed community resilience planning.” Struct. Saf. 84 (May): 101920. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2019.101920.
Nozhati, S., B. R. Ellingwood, and H. Mahmoud. 2019a. “Understanding community resilience from a PRA perspective using binary decision diagrams.” Risk Anal. 39 (10): 2127–2142. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13321.
Nozhati, S., N. Rosenheim, B. R. Ellingwood, H. Mahmoud, and M. Perez. 2019b. “Probabilistic framework for evaluating food security of households in the aftermath of a disaster.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 15 (8): 1060–1074. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2019.1584824.
Nozhati, S., Y. Sarkale, B. R. Ellingwood, E. K. Chong, and H. Mahmoud. 2019c. “Near-optimal planning using approximate dynamic programming to enhance post-hazard community resilience management.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 181 (Jan): 116–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2018.09.011.
NWD (Napa Water Division). 2017. Urban water management plan: 2015 update. Napa, CA: NWD.
Ouyang, M., and L. Dueñas-Osorio. 2014. “Multi-dimensional hurricane resilience assessment of electric power systems.” Struct. Saf. 48 (May): 15–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2014.01.001.
Ouyang, M., L. Dueñas-Osorio, and X. Min. 2012. “A three-stage resilience analysis framework for urban infrastructure systems.” Struct. Saf. 36 (May): 23–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2011.12.004.
Pitilakis, K., H. Crowley, and A. M. Kaynia. 2014. Vol. 27 of SYNER-G: Typology definition and fragility functions for physical elements at seismic risk: Buildings, lifelines, transportation networks and critical facilities. New York: Springer.
Poljanšek, K., F. Bono, and E. Gutiérrez. 2012. “Seismic risk assessment of interdependent critical infrastructure systems: The case of European gas and electricity networks.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 41 (1): 61–79. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.1118.
Porter, K. A. 2009. CAPSS soft-story loss study: Scenario losses to large soft-story woodframe buildings in San Francisco for ATC 52-2, community action plan for seismic safety (CAPSS), 28. Denver: SPA Risk.
Psyrras, N. K., and A. G. Sextos. 2018. “Safety of buried steel natural gas pipelines under earthquake-induced ground shaking: A review.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 106 (Mar): 254–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.12.020.
Tabucchi, T., R. Davidson, and S. Brink. 2010. “Simulation of post-earthquake water supply system restoration.” Civ. Eng. Environ. Syst. 27 (4): 263–279. https://doi.org/10.1080/10286600902862615.
Tomar, A., H. Burton, A. Mosleh, and J. Y. Lee. Forthcoming. “Hindcasting the functional loss and restoration of the Napa water system following the 2014 earthquake using discrete event simulation.” J. Infrastruct. Syst.
Xie, L., J. Tang, H. Tang, Q. Xie, and S. Xue. 2012. “Seismic fragility assessment of transmission towers via performance-based analysis.” In Proc., 15th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering. Tokyo: International Association of Earthquake Engineering.
Zaker Esteghamati, M., M. Banazadeh, and Q. Huang. 2018. “The effect of design drift limit on the seismic performance of RC dual high-rise buildings.” Struct. Des. Tall Special Build. 27 (8): e1464. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.1464.
Zanini, M. A., F. Faleschini, P. Zampieri, C. Pellegrino, G. Gecchele, M. Gastaldi, and R. Rossi. 2017. “Post-quake urban road network functionality assessment for seismic emergency management in historical centres.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 13 (9): 1117–1129. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2016.1244211.
Zanini, M. A., C. Vianello, F. Faleschini, L. Hofer, and G. Maschio. 2016. “A framework for probabilistic seismic risk assessment of NG distribution networks.” Chem. Eng. Trans. 53 (Sep): 163–168. https://doi.org/10.3303/CET1653028.
Zhang, W., P. Lin, N. Wang, C. Nicholson, and X. Xue. 2018. “Probabilistic prediction of postdisaster functionality loss of community building portfolios considering utility disruptions.” J. Struct. Eng. 144 (4): 04018015. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001984.
Zhang, W., N. Wang, and C. Nicholson. 2017. “Resilience-based post-disaster recovery strategies for road-bridge networks.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 13 (11): 1404–1413. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2016.1271813.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Structural Engineering
Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 146Issue 5May 2020

History

Received: Dec 3, 2018
Accepted: Aug 13, 2019
Published online: Mar 9, 2020
Published in print: May 1, 2020
Discussion open until: Aug 9, 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Postdoctoral Scholar, B. John Garrick Institute for the Risk Sciences, Univ. of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2920-187X. Email: [email protected]
Henry Burton, A.M.ASCE [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095. Email: [email protected]
Ph.D. Candidate, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9661-6744. Email: [email protected]
Professor and Director, B. John Garrick Institute for the Risk Sciences, Univ. of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share