Technical Papers
Jan 22, 2020

Effect of Ductile Shear Wall Ratio and Cross-Section Configuration on Seismic Behavior of Reinforced Concrete Masonry Shear Wall Buildings

Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 146, Issue 4

Abstract

Reinforced masonry buildings typically have a load-bearing wall structural system. Thus, the reinforced masonry shear walls must be capable of resisting both vertical forces from gravity loads and lateral forces from seismic and wind loads. Typically, because the walls are subjected to high axial loads, ensuring the ductile response becomes challenging. A possible solution at the component level would be the utilization of walls with confined ends (i.e., walls with boundary elements) to reduce the compression zone and increase the compression strain. Another solution, which is at the system level, is the introduction of a hybrid structural system composed of two types of walls: (1) ductile walls with or without boundary elements to resist the lateral forces and part of vertical forces, and (2) gravity walls that resist only axial loads. This paper proposes a combination of both solutions (i.e., at component and system levels). Additionally, it utilizes a series of linear and nonlinear static and dynamic analyses to evaluate and quantify the effect of cross-section configuration and ductile shear wall area to total floor area (i.e., ductile shear wall ratio) on the seismic response of masonry buildings. The numerical analyses are performed by a macro model detailed to simulate the nonlinear response. The primary objective is to recommend a range of ductile shear wall ratios that optimize the design and overall performance. The study targets mid-rise and high-rise masonry buildings located in regions with moderate seismic hazard. The findings emphasize that utilizing the ductile walls with boundary elements in the proposed hybrid structural system resulted in major favorable enhancements in the structural response and optimization of the design. In addition, the results demonstrate the possibility of vertically reducing and terminating the specially detailed boundary elements, thus promoting ductile reinforced concrete masonry shear wall buildings as a competitive building system.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the support from the Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC), l’Association des Entrepreneurs en Maçonnerie du Québec (AEMQ), the Canadian Concrete Masonry Producers Association (CCMPA), and Canada Masonry Design Centre (CMDC).

References

Aly, N., and K. Galal. 2019. “Seismic performance and height limits of ductile reinforced masonry shear wall buildings with boundary elements.” Eng. Struct. 190 (Jul): 171–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.03.090.
ASCE/SEI (Structural Engineering Institute). 2016. Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures. ASCE 7. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Ashour, A., W. El-Dakhakhni, and M. Shedid. 2016. “Influence of floor diaphragm–wall coupling on the system-level seismic performance of an asymmetrical reinforced concrete block building.” J. Struct. Eng. 142 (10): 04016071. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001540.
Assatourians, K., and G. Atkinson. 2010. “Database of processed time series and response spectra data for Canada: An example application to study of 2005 MN 5.4 Riviere du Loup, Quebec, earthquake.” Seismol. Res. Lett. 81 (6): 1013–1031. https://doi.org/10.1785/gssrl.81.6.1013.
Banting, B., and W. El-Dakhakhni. 2012. “Force-and displacement-based seismic performance parameters for reinforced masonry structural walls with boundary elements.” J. Struct. Eng. 138 (12): 1477–1491. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000572.
Banting, B., and W. El-Dakhakhni. 2014. “Seismic performance quantification of reinforced masonry structural walls with boundary elements.” J. Struct. Eng. 140 (5): 04014001. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000895.
Bohl, A., and P. Adebar. 2011. “Plastic hinge length in high-rise concrete shear walls.” ACI Struct. J. 108 (2): 148–157.
Bruneau, M., and K. Yoshimura. 1996. “Damage to masonry buildings caused by the 1995 Kobe earthquake.” Can. J. Civ. Eng. 23 (3): 797–807. https://doi.org/10.1139/l96-889.
Burak, B., and H. G. Comlekoglu. 2013. “Effect of shear wall area to floor area ratio on the seismic behavior of reinforced concrete buildings.” J. Struct. Eng. 139 (11): 1928–1937. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000785.
Calabrese, A., J. P. Almeida, and R. Pinho. 2010. “Numerical issues in distributed inelasticity modeling of RC frame elements for seismic analysis.” Supplement, J. Earthquake Eng. 14 (S1): 38–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632461003651869.
Chang, G. A., and J. B. Mander. 1994. Seismic energy based fatigue damage analysis of bridge columns: Part I—Evaluation of seismic capacity. Buffalo, NY: State Univ. of New York.
Correa, M. R. S. 2016. “A 20-storey high masonry building in Brazil—Design problems and adopted strategies.” In Proc., 16th Int. Brick and Block Masonry Conf., 623–628. Padova, Italy: Università degli Studi di Padova.
CSA (Canadian Standards Association). 2014. Design of masonry structures. CSA S304. Rexdale, ON, Canada: CSA.
CSI (Computers and Structures, Inc.). 2015. ETABS. Berkeley, CA: CSI.
Drysdale, R. G., and A. A. Hamid. 1979. “Behavior of concrete block masonry under axial compression.” ACI J. 76 (6): 707–722.
Drysdale, R. G., and A. A. Hamid. 2005. Masonry structures behaviour and design (Canadian e). Mississauga, ON, Canada: Canada Masonry Design Centre.
Ezzeldin, M., W. El-Dakhakhni, and L. Weibe. 2017. “Experimental assessment of the system-level seismic performance of an asymmetrical reinforced concrete block—wall building with boundary elements.” J. Struct. Eng. 143 (8): 04017063. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001790.
Ezzeldin, M., L. Wiebe, and W. El-Dakhakhni. 2016. “Seismic collapse risk assessment of reinforced masonry walls with boundary elements using the FEMA P695 methodology.” J. Struct. Eng. 142 (11): 04016108. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001579.
FEMA. 2012. Seismic performance assessment of buildings—Methodology. FEMA P58. Washington, DC: FEMA.
Fortes, E. S., G. A. Parsekian, and F. S. Fonseca. 2015. “Relationship between the compressive strength of concrete masonry and the compressive strength of concrete masonry units.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 27 (9): 04014238. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001204.
Khalaf, F. M. 1996. “Factors influencing compressive strength of concrete masonry prisms.” Mag. Concr. Res. 48 (175): 95–101. https://doi.org/10.1680/macr.1996.48.175.95.
Kolozvari, K., T. A. Tran, K. Orakcal, and J. W. Wallace. 2015a. “Modeling of cyclic shear-flexure interaction in reinforced concrete structural walls. I: Theory.” J. Struct. Eng. 141 (5): 04014135. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001059.
Kolozvari, K., T. A. Tran, K. Orakcal, and J. W. Wallace. 2015b. “Modeling of cyclic shear-flexure interaction in reinforced concrete structural walls. II: Experimental validation.” J. Struct. Eng. 141 (5): 04014136. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001083.
McKenna, F., G. Fenves, and M. Scott. 2000. Open system for earthquake engineering simulation. Berkeley, CA: Univ. of California.
Menegotto, M., and P. E. Pinto. 1973. “Method of analysis for cyclically loaded RC plane frames including changes in geometry and non-elastic behavior of elements under combined normal force and bending.” In Proc., IABSE Symp. on Resistance and Ultimate Deformability of Structures Acted on by Well Defined Loads, 15–22. Zurich, Switzerland: International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering.
MSJC (Masonry Standard Joint Committee). 2013. Building code requirements for masonry structures. TMS 402/ASCE 5/ACI 530. Reston, VA: MSJC.
NBCC (National Building Code of Canada). 2015. Institute for Research in Construction, National Research Council of Canada. Ottawa: National Research Council of Canada.
NZS (New Zealand Standard). 2004. Design of reinforced concrete masonry structures. NZS 4230. Wellington, New Zealand: NZS.
Orakcal, K., D. Ulugtekin, and L. M. Massone. 2012. “Constitutive modeling of reinforced concrete panel behavior under cyclic loading.” In Proc., 15th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering. Lisboa, Portugal: Sociedade Portuguesa de Engenharia Sismica.
Orakcal, K., and J. W. Wallace. 2006. “Flexural modeling of reinforced concrete walls-experimental verification.” ACI Struct. J. 103 (2): 196–206.
Priestley, M. J. N., and Y. H. Chai. 1984. “Prediction of masonry compression strength: Part 1.” N. Z. Concr. Constr. 28 (Mar): 11–14.
Priestley, M. J. N., and D. M. Elder. 1982. “Cyclic loading tests of slender concrete masonry shear walls.” Bull. N. Z. Natl. Soc. Earthquake Eng. 15 (1): 3–21.
Sarhat, S. R., and E. G. Sherwood. 2013. “The prediction of compressive strength of grouted hollow concrete block masonry based on the contribution of its individual components.” In Proc., 12th Canadian Masonry Symp. Vancouver, BC, Canada: British Columbia Institute of Technology.
Shedid, M., W. El-Dakhakhni, and R. Drysdale. 2010. “Alternative strategies to enhance the seismic performance of reinforced concrete-block shear wall systems.” J. Struct. Eng. 136 (6): 676–689. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000164.
Shing, P., E. Carter, and J. Noland. 1993. “Influence of confining steel on flexural response of reinforced masonry shear walls.” Masonry Soc. J. 11 (2): 72–85.
Snook, M., D. McLean, C. McDaniel, and D. Pollock. 2005. “Effects of confinement reinforcement on the performance of masonry shear walls.” In Proc., 10th Canadian Masonry Symp. Mississauga, ON, Canada: Canada Masonry Design Centre.
Vulcano, A., V. V. Bertero, and V. Colotti. 1988. “Analytical modeling of R/C structural walls.” In Proc., 9th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, 41–44. Tokyo: Japan Association for Earthquake Disaster Prevention.
Zhao, J., and S. Sritharan. 2007. “Modeling of strain penetration effects in fiber-based analysis of reinforced concrete structures.” ACI Struct. J. 104 (2): 133–141.
Zhao, Y., and F. Wang. 2015. “Experimental studies on behavior of fully grouted reinforced-concrete masonry shear walls.” Earthquake Eng. Eng. Vib. 14 (4): 743–757. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-015-0030-5.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Structural Engineering
Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 146Issue 4April 2020

History

Received: Jun 11, 2018
Accepted: Aug 2, 2019
Published online: Jan 22, 2020
Published in print: Apr 1, 2020
Discussion open until: Jun 22, 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Ph.D. Candidate, Dept. of Building, Civil, and Environmental Engineering, Concordia Univ., Montréal, QC, Canada H3G2W1. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8156-5799. Email: [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Building, Civil, and Environmental Engineering, Concordia Univ., Montréal, QC, Canada H3G2W1 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9562-0461. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share