Technical Papers
Apr 30, 2019

Preliminary Design of Moment-Resisting Frame Buildings for Tolerable Financial Loss

Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 145, Issue 7

Abstract

This paper aims to transfer the current performance-based seismic assessment (PBSA) methodology to engineering practice by providing a preliminary design procedure denoted herein as the preliminary performance-based seismic design (PPBSD). PPBSD aims at guiding a conceptual design given the tolerable expected loss and target hazard level. The suggested preliminary design procedure implicitly incorporates the main sources of variability in the seismic performance assessment of building structures including the variability associated with seismic excitation. PPBSD can help stakeholders make informed decisions on how to handle potential seismic risk at the preliminary design level with minimal computational effort. The process for development of design tools required for implementation of PPBSD are described and such development is illustrated for a 4-story reinforced concrete special moment-resisting frame (RC-SMRF) building located in Los Angeles for a 475-year ground motion return period. A design example is offered to demonstrate how PPBSD can be implemented in practice.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

ACI (American Concrete Institute). 2002. Building code requirements for structural concrete (ACI 318-02) and commentary (ACI 318R-02). ACI 318. Farmington Hills, MI: ACI.
ACI (American Concrete Institute). 2011. Building code requirements for structural concrete (ACI 318-11) and commentary (ACI 318R-11). ACI 318. Farmington Hills, MI: ACI.
AISC. 2005. Seismic provisions for structural steel buildings. AISC 341. Chicago: AISC.
Ang, A. H., and J. C. Lee. 2001. “Cost optimal design of R/C buildings.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 73 (3): 233–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0951-8320(01)00058-8.
Arora, J. S. 1989. Introduction to optimum design. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Arora, J. S. 1997a. “Basic concepts of computational methods for optimum design.” In Guide to structural optimization, edited by J. S. Arora, 291–302. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Arora, J. S. 1997b. Guide to structural optimization—ASCE manuals and reports on engineering practice No. 90. Reston, VA: ASCE.
ASCE. 2002. Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures. ASCE 7. Reston, VA: ASCE.
ASCE. 2010. Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures. ASCE 7. Reston, VA: ASCE.
ASCE. 2013. Seismic evaluation and retrofit of existing buildings. ASCE/SEI 41. Reston, VA: ASCE.
ASCE. 2017. Minimum design loads and associated criteria for buildings and other structures. ASCE 7. Reston, VA: ASCE.
ATC (Applied Technology Council). 2010. Modeling and acceptance criteria for seismic design and analysis of tall buildings. (October 2010). PEER/ATC 72-1. Redwood City, CA: ATC.
Bachmann, H. 2002. Seismic conceptual design of buildings: Basic principles for engineers, architects, building owners, and authorities. Biel, Switzerland: BWG.
Baker, J. W., and C. A. Cornell. 2005. “A vector-valued ground motion intensity measure consisting of spectral acceleration and epsilon.” J. Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 34 (10): 1193–1217. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.474.
Beck, J. L., K. A. Porter, and R. V. Shaikhutdinov. 2003. “Simplified estimation of seismic life-cycle costs.” In Proc., 3rd IABMAS Workshop on Life-Cycle Cost Analysis and Design of Civil Infrastructure Systems and the JCSS Workshop on Probabilistic Modeling of Deterioration Processes in Concrete Structures International Association of Bridge Maintenance and Safety (IABMAS). Zurich, Switzerland: Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Swiss National Science Foundation.
Berry, M., M. Parrish, and M. Eberhard. 2004. PEER structural performance database user’s manual. Berkeley, CA: Pacific Engineering Research Center and Univ. of California.
Deierlein, G. G., A. B. Liel, C. B. Haselton, and C. A. Kircher. 2008. “ATC-63 methodology for evaluating seismic collapse safety of archetype buildings.” In Proc., ASCE-SEI Structures Congress, 10. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Esmaili, O. 2014. “Developing a rapid seismic performance based rating system in safety assessment of buildings.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of California.
Esmaili, O., L. G. Ludwig, and F. Zareian. 2016. “Improved performance-based seismic assessment of buildings by utilizing Bayesian statistics.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 45 (4): 581–597. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2672.
Esmaili, O., L. G. Ludwig, and F. Zareian. 2017. “An applied method for general regional seismic loss assessment—With a case study in Los Angeles County.” J. Earthquake Eng. 22 (9): 1569–1589. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2017.1284699.
FEMA. 1996. Performance-based seismic design of buildings. FEMA 283. Washington, DC: FEMA.
FEMA. 1997. Applied technology council, NEHRP guidelines for seismic rehabilitation of buildings. Washington, DC: FEMA.
FEMA. 2000. Action plan for performance-based seismic design. FEMA 349. Washington, DC: FEMA.
FEMA. 2002. American Society of Civil Engineers, Pre-standard and commentary for seismic rehabilitation of buildings. Washington, DC: FEMA.
FEMA. 2006. Next-generation performance-based seismic design guidelines. FEMA 445. Washington, DC: FEMA.
FEMA. 2009. Quantification of building seismic performance factors. FEMA P695. Washington, DC: FEMA.
FEMA. 2012. Guidelines for seismic performance assessment of buildings, Volume 1: Methodology. FEMA P-58-1. Washington, DC: FEMA.
Filiatrault, A., and B. Folz. 2002. “Performance-based seismic design of wood framed buildings.” J. Struct. Eng. 128 (1): 39–47. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2002)128:1(39).
Gokkaya, B. U., J. W. Baker, and G. G. Deierlein. 2016. “Quantifying the impacts of modeling uncertainties on the seismic drift demands and collapse risk of buildings with implications on seismic design checks.” J. Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 45 (10): 1661–1683. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2740.
Gokkaya, B. U., J. W. Baker, and G. G. Deierlein. 2017. “Estimation and impacts of model parameter correlation for seismic performance assessment of reinforced concrete structures.” J. Struct. Saf. 69: 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2017.07.005.
Goulet, C., C. B. Haselton, J. Mitrani-Reiser, J. L. Beck, G. G. Deierlein, K. A. Porter, and J. P. Stewart. 2007. “Evaluation of the seismic performance of a code-conforming reinforced-concrete frame building—From seismic hazard to collapse safety and economic losses.” J. Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 36 (13): 1973–1997. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.694.
Hamburger, R., C. Rojahn, J. Meohle, R. Bachman, C. Comartin, and A. Whittaker. 2004. “The ATC-58 project: Development of next-generation performance-based earthquake design criteria for buildings.” In Proc., 13th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Haselton, C. B. 2006. “Assessing seismic collapse safety of modern reinforced concrete moment frame buildings.” Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford Univ.
Haselton, C. B., A. B. Leil, B. S. Dean, J. H. Chou, and G. G. Deierlein. 2007. “Seismic collapse safety and behavior of modern reinforced concrete moment frame buildings.” In Proc., Research Frontiers at Structures Congress. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Haselton, C. B., A. B. Liel, and G. G. Deierlein. 2008. “Example evaluation of the ATC-63 methodology for reinforced concrete special moment frame buildings.” In Proc., 2008 ASCE-SEI Congress. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Haselton, C. B., A. B. Leil, G. G. Deierlein, B. S. Dean, and J. H. Chou. 2011. “Seismic collapse safety of reinforced concrete buildings. I: Assessment of ductile moment frames.” J. Struct. Eng. 137 (4): 481–491. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000318.
Haselton, C. B., A. B. Liel, L. S. Taylor, and G. G. Deierlein. 2006. Beam-column element model calibrated for predicting flexural response leading to global collapse of RC frame buildings. Berkeley, CA: Pacific Earthquake Research Center, Univ. of California at Berkeley.
Haug, E. J., and J. S. Arora. 1979. Applied optimal design. New York: Wiley.
Ibarra, L. F., and H. Krawinkle. 2005. Global collapse of frame structures under seismic excitations. Stanford, CA: John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Stanford Univ.
ICC (International Code Council). 2003. 2003 International building code. Falls Church, VA: International Code Council.
Jayaram, N., T. Lin, and J. W. Baker. 2011. “A computationally efficient ground-motion selection algorithm for matching a target response spectrum mean and variance.” Earthquake Spectra 27 (3): 797–815. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.3608002.
Krawinkler, H., F. Zareian, R. A. Medina, and L. F. Ibarra. 2006. “Decision support for conceptual performance-based design.” J. Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 35 (1): 115–133. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.536.
Leil, A. B., C. B. Haselton, and G. G. Deierlein. 2006. “The effectiveness of seismic building code provisions on collapse risk of reinforced concrete moment frame buildings.” In Proc., 4th Int. Conf. on Earthquake Engineering. Taipei, Taiwan.
Liao, W. C. 2010. “Performance-based plastic design of earthquake resistant reinforced concrete moment frames.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Michigan.
Lignos, D. G., and H. Krawinkler. 2009. Side sway collapse of deteriorating structural systems under seismic excitations. Stanford, CA: John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Stanford Univ.
Lignos, D. G., F. Zareian, and H. Krawinkler. 2008. “Reliability of a 4-story steel moment-resisting frame against collapse due to seismic excitations.” In Proc., ASCE Structures Congress. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Liu, M., Y. K. Wen, and S. A. Burns. 2004. “Life cycle cost oriented seismic design optimization of steel moment frame structures with risk-taking preference.” Eng. Struct. 26 (10): 1407–1421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2004.05.015.
Liu, S. C., and F. Neghabat. 1972. “A cost optimization model for seismic design of structures.” Bell Syst. Tech. J. 51 (10): 2209–2225. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1538-7305.1972.tb01921.x.
Miranda, E., and C. M. Ramirez. 2012. “Enhanced loss estimation for buildings with explicit incorporation of residual deformation demands.” In Proc., World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering (15WCEE). Lisbon, Portugal.
NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology). 2011. Selecting and scaling earthquake ground motions for performing response-history analyses. Gaithersburg, MD: NEHRP Consultants Joint Venture for the National Institute of Standards and Technology.
PACT (Performance Assessment Calculation Tool), FEMA, and ATC (Applied Technology Council). 2012. Guidelines for seismic performance assessment of buildings, volume 1—Methodology. FEMA P-58-1 (ATC-58). Redwood City, CA: PACT.
Pei, S. 2007. “Loss analysis and Loss-based design for Wood-frame structures.” Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Colorado State Univ.
Porter, K. A., J. L. Beck, and R. Shaikhutdinov. 2004. “Simplified estimation of economic seismic risk for buildings.” Earthquake Spectra 20 (4): 1239–1263. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1809129.
Porter, K. A., C. R. Scawthorn, and J. L. Beck. 2006. “Cost-effectiveness of stronger wood-frame buildings.” Earthquake Spectra 22 (1): 239–266. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.2162567.
Priestley, M. J. N. 2000. “Performance based seismic design.” In Proc., 12th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering. Auckland, New Zealand. CD-ROM.
Ramirez, C. M., and E. Miranda. 2009. Building-specific loss estimation methods and tools for simplified performance-based earthquake engineering. Stanford, CA: John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center.
Rojas, H. A., C. Foley, and S. Pezeshk. 2011. “Risk-based seismic design for optimal structural and nonstructural system performance.” Earthquake Spectra 27 (3): 857–880. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.3609877.
SEAOC (Structural Engineers Association of California). 1996. Structural engineers association of California, Vision 2000 a framework for performance-based earthquake engineering. Sacramento, CA: SEAOC.
Sinković, N. L., M. Brozovič, and M. Dolšek. 2016. “Risk-based seismic design for collapse safety.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 45 (9): 1451–1471. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2717.
USGS. 2008. Interactive deaggregation tools. Reston, VA: USGS.
Van de Lindt, J. W., S. Pei, and H. Liu. 2008. “Performance-based seismic design of wood frame buildings using a probabilistic system identification concept.” J. Struct. Eng. 134 (2): 240–247. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2008)134:2(240).
Xiang, Y., F. Naeim, and F. Zareian. 2016. “Identification and validation of natural periods and modal damping ratios for steel and reinforced concrete buildings in California.” In Proc., SMIP16. Irvine, CA.
Zareian, F., and H. Krawinkler. 2007a. “Sensitivity of collapse potential of buildings to variations in structural systems and structural parameters.” In Proc., ASCE-SEI Structures Congress. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Zareian, F., and H. Krawinkler. 2007b. “A simplified procedure for performance-based design.” J. Earthquake Eng. Soc. Korea 11 (4): 13–23. https://doi.org/10.5000/EESK.2007.11.4.013.
Zareian, F., and H. Krawinkler. 2009. Simplified performance based earthquake engineering. Stanford, CA: John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center.
Zareian, F., and H. Krawinkler. 2012. “Conceptual performance-based seismic design using building-level and story-level decision support system.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 41 (11): 1439–1453. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2218.
Zareian, F., D. G. Lignos, and H. Krawinkler. 2010. “Evaluation of seismic collapse performance of steel special moment resisting frames using FEMA P695 (ATC-63) methodology.” In Proc., 2010 Structures Congress. Reston, VA: ASCE.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Structural Engineering
Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 145Issue 7July 2019

History

Received: Apr 5, 2018
Accepted: Nov 14, 2018
Published online: Apr 30, 2019
Published in print: Jul 1, 2019
Discussion open until: Sep 30, 2019

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Omid Esmaili, M.ASCE
Graduate Student Researcher, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of California, Irvine, CA 92697-2175.
Farzin Zareian, M.ASCE [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of California, Irvine, CA 92697-2175 (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share